So let me get this straight. Using your logic Lee
IF another laborer appointment is presented for resolution at the next meetingPosted by Lee Chowaniec:
Ruffino and Gaczewski both voted to deny a job creation in the Supervisor’s office – payroll supervisor. A position that would have paid a higher hour salary rate than the newly appointed payroll supervisor.
Ruffino voted to approve the hiring of both Speyer and Wilczak as Parks laborers. Gaczewski voted to hire but one.
Who is the fiscally conservative one here?
and Gaczewski votes 'yes' and Ruffino votes 'no', that would make Ruffino fiscally conservative on that vote.
That makes no sense just as Gaczewski voting 'yes' to appoint the registered conservative, tea party supporter and voted 'no' to the other
and being described as fiscally conservative. Gaczewski never stated that her vote was cast to cut staff in the park's department.
So how does fiscally conservative come into play? Just my opinion.