Page 111 of 274 FirstFirst ... 1161101109110111112113121161211 ... LastLast
Results 1,651 to 1,665 of 4099

Thread: Had enough yet

  1. #1651
    Member mark blazejewski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    5,352
    LIDA Member Rinow to Member Ruda: You were a sitting Trustee on the Board. Did you help support Mr. Sweeney getting a seat on the CDC Board?"

  2. #1652
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    8,954

    The truth at last


    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/ne...cid=spartandhp

    New cases this week drove the state’s total above 75,000, surpassing China’s Hubei province, where the virus emerged in December. The grim milestone was recorded as Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo acknowledged having underestimated how overwhelming the situation would become. “It’s more dangerous than we expected,” he said.

    Why is it okay for Gov. Cuomo to admit to underestimating how overwhelming the virus could be, but not Trump – who is openly being charged by the liberal media for delayed response and now having blood on his hands? Well. now they both said it!

    Dr. Fauci has become a public target for some right-wing commentators and bloggers, who exercise influence over parts of the president’s base. As they press for the president to ease restrictions to reinvigorate economic activity, some of these figures have assailed Fauci and questioned his expertise. Asinine!

    On the left, The Boston Globe's editorial board released a scathing op-ed on Monday in which it argued that the president's "colossal failure of leadership" on the coronavirus cost American lives. Journalists from other liberal media outlets have gone so far as to charge Trump with having blood on his hands. Asinine!

    The liberal media is attacking Trump’s coronavirus briefing s a train wreck, alleging it as propaganda and political pandering – requesting their outlets stop carrying it. Until the last few briefings, perhaps there was reason to make such assessment as there was a lot of spin and reason for the press to attack Trump. Not so as of the last few briefings where expert opinion and transparency brings focus to the nature of the beast and a strategy to reduce loss of life. That should be the focus, not the political BS discord of who knew what and when.

    After attacking Trump's coronavirus-related China travel ban as xenophobic, Dems and media have changed tune. So much else will change as a suffering but heroic public looks towards government leadership that acts to resolve the crisis and rightfully condemns the negative left / right and media who continue to sow seeds of mistrust and divisiveness, for whatever reason.

  3. #1653
    Member mark blazejewski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    5,352
    Quote Originally Posted by mark blazejewski View Post

    Lee,

    The recent visuals of Trump and Cuomo working together in the best American tradition, were indeed inspiring.

    That said, I wonder why the ult-Left in the House seems intent on blowing up this "Era of Good Feeling" with such unreasonable and entirely inappropriate attachments to a legislative proposal intended to confront a present crisis, save lives, preserve our financial system, and to defeat an enemy which appears to be just as dangerous as any human enemy or foreign foe.

    Ergo, I am beginning to become suspicious that such reckless Leftist conduct may be an indication of the furtherance of the Socialist/Globalist/Deep State resistance to the Trump Presidency.

    That partisan behavior in my opinion, may serve to support the early suspicion(s) previously resident in some minds, that the extraordinary government interventions were in part resultant of an unspoken motive or agenda.
    Reference: https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-cor...er-11585953005

    Now a word from whom I perceive to have once been the "Globalist-In-Chief:"



    The Wall Street Journal Opinion

    April 4, 2020

    OPINION COMMENTARY

    The Coronavirus Pandemic Will Forever Alter the World Order

    The U.S. must protect its citizens from disease while starting the urgent work of planning for a new epoch.

    By Henry A. Kissinger
    April 3, 2020 6:30 pm ET

    The surreal atmosphere of the Covid-19 pandemic calls to mind how I felt as a young man in the 84th Infantry Division during the Battle of the Bulge. Now, as in late 1944, there is a sense of inchoate danger, aimed not at any particular person, but striking randomly and with devastation. But there is an important difference between that faraway time and ours. American endurance then was fortified by an ultimate national purpose. Now, in a divided country, efficient and farsighted government is necessary to overcome obstacles unprecedented in magnitude and global scope. Sustaining the public trust is crucial to social solidarity, to the relation of societies with each other, and to international peace and stability.

    Nations cohere and flourish on the belief that their institutions can foresee calamity, arrest its impact and restore stability. When the Covid-19 pandemic is over, many countries’ institutions will be perceived as having failed. Whether this judgment is objectively fair is irrelevant. The reality is the world will never be the same after the coronavirus. To argue now about the past only makes it harder to do what has to be done.

    The coronavirus has struck with unprecedented scale and ferocity. Its spread is exponential: U.S. cases are doubling every fifth day. At this writing, there is no cure. Medical supplies are insufficient to cope with the widening waves of cases. Intensive-care units are on the verge, and beyond, of being overwhelmed. Testing is inadequate to the task of identifying the extent of infection, much less reversing its spread. A successful vaccine could be 12 to 18 months away.

    The U.S. administration has done a solid job in avoiding immediate catastrophe. The ultimate test will be whether the virus’s spread can be arrested and then reversed in a manner and at a scale that maintains public confidence in Americans’ ability to govern themselves. The crisis effort, however vast and necessary, must not crowd out the urgent task of launching a parallel enterprise for the transition to the post-coronavirus order.

    Leaders are dealing with the crisis on a largely national basis, but the virus’s society-dissolving effects do not recognize borders. While the assault on human health will—hopefully—be temporary, the political and economic upheaval it has unleashed could last for generations. No country, not even the U.S., can in a purely national effort overcome the virus. Addressing the necessities of the moment must ultimately be coupled with a global collaborative vision and program. If we cannot do both in tandem, we will face the worst of each.


    Drawing lessons from the development of the Marshall Plan and the Manhattan Project, the U.S. is obliged to undertake a major effort in three domains. First, shore up global resilience to infectious disease. Triumphs of medical science like the polio vaccine and the eradication of smallpox, or the emerging statistical-technical marvel of medical diagnosis through artificial intelligence, have lulled us into a dangerous complacency. We need to develop new techniques and technologies for infection control and commensurate vaccines across large populations. Cities, states and regions must consistently prepare to protect their people from pandemics through stockpiling, cooperative planning and exploration at the frontiers of science.

    Second, strive to heal the wounds to the world economy. Global leaders have learned important lessons from the 2008 financial crisis. The current economic crisis is more complex: The contraction unleashed by the coronavirus is, in its speed and global scale, unlike anything ever known in history. And necessary public-health measures such as social distancing and closing schools and businesses are contributing to the economic pain. Programs should also seek to ameliorate the effects of impending chaos on the world’s most vulnerable populations.

    Third, safeguard the principles of the liberal world order. The founding legend of modern government is a walled city protected by powerful rulers, sometimes despotic, other times benevolent, yet always strong enough to protect the people from an external enemy. Enlightenment thinkers reframed this concept, arguing that the purpose of the legitimate state is to provide for the fundamental needs of the people: security, order, economic well-being, and justice. Individuals cannot secure these things on their own. The pandemic has prompted an anachronism, a revival of the walled city in an age when prosperity depends on global trade and movement of people.

    The world’s democracies need to defend and sustain their Enlightenment values. A global retreat from balancing power with legitimacy will cause the social contract to disintegrate both domestically and internationally. Yet this millennial issue of legitimacy and power cannot be settled simultaneously with the effort to overcome the Covid-19 plague. Restraint is necessary on all sides—in both domestic politics and international diplomacy. Priorities must be established.

    We went on from the Battle of the Bulge into a world of growing prosperity and enhanced human dignity. Now, we live an epochal period. The historic challenge for leaders is to manage the crisis while building the future. Failure could set the world on fire.

    Mr. Kissinger served as secretary of state and national security adviser in the Nixon and Ford administrations.
    Just sayin'.
    Last edited by mark blazejewski; April 4th, 2020 at 04:20 AM.
    LIDA Member Rinow to Member Ruda: You were a sitting Trustee on the Board. Did you help support Mr. Sweeney getting a seat on the CDC Board?"

  4. #1654
    Member mark blazejewski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    5,352
    Speaking of the Globalist, I will throw this WSJ Opinion out here...


    OPINION

    World Health Coronavirus Disinformation
    WHO’s bows to Beijing have harmed the global response to the pandemic.


    By The Editorial Board
    April 5, 2020 5:28 pm ET



    The coronavirus pandemic will offer many lessons in what to do better to save more lives and do less economic harm the next time. But there’s already one way to ensure future pandemics are less deadly: Reform or defund the World Health Organization (WHO).

    Last week Florida Senator Rick Scott called for a Congressional investigation into the United Nations agency’s “role in helping Communist China cover up information regarding the threat of the Coronavirus.” The rot at WHO goes beyond canoodling with Beijing, but that’s a good place to start.

    The coronavirus outbreak began in Wuhan, China, sometime in the autumn, perhaps as early as November. It accelerated in December. Caixin Global reported that Chinese labs had sequenced the coronavirus genome by the end of December but were ordered by Chinese officials to destroy samples and not publish their findings. On Dec. 30 Dr. Li Wenliang warned Chinese doctors about the virus, and several days later local authorities accused him of lies that “severely disturbed the social order.”

    Taiwanese officials warned WHO on Dec. 31 that they had seen evidence that the virus could be transmitted human-to-human. But the agency, bowing to Beijing, doesn’t have a normal relationship with Taiwan. On Jan. 14 WHO tweeted, “Preliminary investigations conducted by the Chinese authorities have found no clear evidence of human-to-human transmission.” The agency took another week to reverse that misinformation.

    On Jan. 22-23 a WHO emergency committee debated whether to declare Covid-19 a “public health emergency of international concern.” The virus already had spread to several countries, and making such a declaration would have better prepared the world. It should have been an easy decision, despite Beijing’s objections. Yet director-general Tedros Ghebreyesus declined and instead traveled to China.

    He finally made the declaration on Jan. 30—losing a week of precious time—and his rhetoric suggests the trip to Beijing was more about politics than public health. “The Chinese government is to be congratulated for the extraordinary measures it has taken,” he said. “I left in absolutely no doubt about China’s commitment to transparency.”

    A University of Southampton study suggests the number of coronavirus cases could have been reduced by 95% had China moved to contain the virus three weeks sooner. Yet Dr. Tedros gushed that Beijing had set “a new standard for outbreak response.” He also praised the speed with which China “sequenced the genome and shared it with WHO and the world.” China didn’t do so until Jan. 12.

    On Jan. 30 Dr. Tedros also said that “WHO doesn’t recommend limiting trade and movement.” President Trump ignored the advice and announced travel restrictions on China the following day, slowing the spread of the virus. U.S. progressive elites echoed WHO and criticized Mr. Trump. WHO didn’t declare the coronavirus a pandemic until March 11.

    Not that any of this has prompted much soul-searching. Alluding to China, WHO official Michael Ryan said last week, “We need to be very careful also to not to be profiling certain parts of the world as being uncooperative.” Beijing touted the remarks, as it has other WHO statements.

    This record is tragic but not surprising. Much of the blame for WHO’s failures lies with Dr. Tedros, who is a politician, not a medical doctor. As a member of the left-wing Tigray People’s Liberation Front, he rose through Ethiopia’s autocratic government as health and foreign minister. After taking the director-general job in 2017, he tried to install Zimbabwe dictator Robert Mugabe as a WHO goodwill ambassador.

    China inevitably gains more international clout as its economy grows. But why does WHO seem so much more afraid of Beijing’s ire than Washington’s? Only 12% of WHO’s assessed member-state contributions come from China. The U.S. contributes 22%. Americans at WHO generally are loyal to the institution, while Chinese appointees put Chinese interests first or they will suffer Beijing’s wrath.

    China’s influence over WHO has been organized and consistent, whereas the U.S. response has been haphazard. Washington needs a quarterback to lead the fight against Chinese dominance at WHO and other international organizations. Yet the State Department’s Bureau of International Organization Affairs lacks a political appointee.

    The U.S. will have allies in an effort to reform WHO. A frustrated Japanese deputy prime minister called WHO the “Chinese Health Organization.” British Prime Minister Boris Johnson reportedly is rethinking U.K.-China ties over China’s lack of candor about the virus.

    Congress should investigate how WHO performed against the coronavirus and whether its judgments were corrupted by China’s political influence. Of all international institutions, WHO should be the least political. Its core mission is to coordinate international efforts against epidemics and provide honest public-health guidance.

    If WHO is merely a politicized Maginot Line against pandemics, then it is worse than useless and should receive no more U.S. funding. And if foreign-policy elites want to know why so many Americans mistrust international institutions, WHO is it.
    Last edited by mark blazejewski; April 6th, 2020 at 02:57 PM.
    LIDA Member Rinow to Member Ruda: You were a sitting Trustee on the Board. Did you help support Mr. Sweeney getting a seat on the CDC Board?"

  5. #1655
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    8,954
    Blame game alive and well

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/pr...cid=spartanntp

    Contrasting views of an ex-Republican Governor and a liberal, feminist, freelance writer.

    Personal opinion – they are all to blame in this who knew what and when Covid-19 pandemic and the delay in response. The finger-pointing serves no purpose, distracts from the good works now in progress, and fuels anger / fear and divisiveness.

    There should be a coordinated effort by all to address stopping the spread of the virus and restarting the economy.

  6. #1656
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    8,954
    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/elect...cid=spartandhp

    Now Mr. Biden and his allies are hoping to quickly bring the party’s divided factions together after spending much of the past two weeks quietly negotiating with Mr. Sanders’s team to find common ground on the senator’s policy priorities as he mulled an exit.

    What a kick in the ass to supporting centrist Democrats who carried the water for Biden should he abandon his agenda and ideology to a socialist platform to gain votes. The votes gained may very well be lost by defecting party supporters, but by independents and unaffiliated registered voters who abhor Sanders’ Marxist ideology.

    Biden may now be the presumptive candidate, but I still don't see him as winding up the Democratic convention nominee.

  7. #1657
    Member mark blazejewski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    5,352
    "Papers, please!"

    image (6).jpg


    Dr. Anthony Fauci: Americans could eventually carry certificates of immunity to coronavirus



    https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...sFE8kZnMGX-pwg
    Last edited by mark blazejewski; April 10th, 2020 at 01:17 PM.
    LIDA Member Rinow to Member Ruda: You were a sitting Trustee on the Board. Did you help support Mr. Sweeney getting a seat on the CDC Board?"

  8. #1658
    Member mark blazejewski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    5,352
    Quote Originally Posted by mark blazejewski View Post
    reference: https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-cor...er-11585953005

    Now a word from whom I perceive to have once been the "Globalist-In-Chief:"

    The Wall Street Journal Opinion

    April 4, 2020

    Opinion Commentary

    The Coronavirus Pandemic Will Forever Alter The World Order

    The U.S. Must Protect Its Citizens From Disease While Starting The Urgent Work Of Planning For A New Epoch.

    By Henry A. Kissinger
    April 3, 2020 6:30 pm et

    The surreal atmosphere of the Covid-19 pandemic calls to mind how i felt as a young man in the 84th infantry division during the Battle of the Bulge. Now, as in late 1944, there is a sense of inchoate danger, aimed not at any particular person, but striking randomly and with devastation. But there is an important difference between that faraway time and ours. American endurance then was fortified by an ultimate national purpose. Now, in a divided country, efficient and farsighted government is necessary to overcome obstacles unprecedented in magnitude and global scope. Sustaining the public trust is crucial to social solidarity, to the relation of societies with each other, and to international peace and stability.

    Nations cohere and flourish on the belief that their institutions can foresee calamity, arrest its impact and restore stability. When the covid-19 pandemic is over, many countries’ institutions will be perceived as having failed. Whether this judgment is objectively fair is irrelevant. the reality is the world will never be the same after the coronavirus. To argue now about the past only makes it harder to do what has to be done.

    The coronavirus has struck with unprecedented scale and ferocity. Its spread is exponential: U.s. Cases are doubling every fifth day. At this writing, there is no cure. Medical supplies are insufficient to cope with the widening waves of cases. Intensive-care units are on the verge, and beyond, of being overwhelmed. Testing is inadequate to the task of identifying the extent of infection, much less reversing its spread. A successful vaccine could be 12 to 18 months away.

    The U.S. Administration has done a solid job in avoiding immediate catastrophe. The ultimate test will be whether the virus’s spread can be arrested and then reversed in a manner and at a scale that maintains public confidence in americans’ ability to govern themselves. The crisis effort, however vast and necessary, must not crowd out the urgent task of launching a parallel enterprise for the transition to the post-coronavirus order.

    Leaders are dealing with the crisis on a largely national basis, but the virus’s society-dissolving effects do not recognize borders. While the assault on human health will—hopefully—be temporary, the political and economic upheaval it has unleashed could last for generations. No country, not even the U.S., can in a purely national effort overcome the virus. Addressing the necessities of the moment must ultimately be coupled with a global collaborative vision and program. If we cannot do both in tandem, we will face the worst of each.


    Drawing lessons from the development of the Marshall plan and the Manhattan project, the u.s. Is obliged to undertake a major effort in three domains. First, shore up global resilience to infectious disease. triumphs of medical science like the polio vaccine and the eradication of smallpox, or the emerging statistical-technical marvel of medical diagnosis through artificial intelligence, have lulled us into a dangerous complacency. We need to develop new techniques and technologies for infection control and commensurate vaccines across large populations. Cities, states and regions must consistently prepare to protect their people from pandemics through stockpiling, cooperative planning and exploration at the frontiers of science.

    Second, strive to heal the wounds to the world economy. global leaders have learned important lessons from the 2008 financial crisis. The current economic crisis is more complex: The contraction unleashed by the coronavirus is, in its speed and global scale, unlike anything ever known in history. And necessary public-health measures such as social distancing and closing schools and businesses are contributing to the economic pain. Programs should also seek to ameliorate the effects of impending chaos on the world’s most vulnerable populations.

    Third, safeguard the principles of the liberal world order. the founding legend of modern government is a walled city protected by powerful rulers, sometimes despotic, other times benevolent, yet always strong enough to protect the people from an external enemy. Enlightenment thinkers reframed this concept, arguing that the purpose of the legitimate state is to provide for the fundamental needs of the people: Security, order, economic well-being, and justice. Individuals cannot secure these things on their own. The pandemic has prompted an anachronism, a revival of the walled city in an age when prosperity depends on global trade and movement of people.

    The world’s democracies need to defend and sustain their enlightenment values. A global retreat from balancing power with legitimacy will cause the social contract to disintegrate both domestically and internationally. Yet this millennial issue of legitimacy and power cannot be settled simultaneously with the effort to overcome the covid-19 plague. Restraint is necessary on all sides—in both domestic politics and international diplomacy. Priorities must be established.

    We went on from the battle of the bulge into a world of growing prosperity and enhanced human dignity. Now, we live an epochal period. The historic challenge for leaders is to manage the crisis while building the future. Failure could set the world on fire.

    Mr. Kissinger served as secretary of state and national security adviser in the nixon and ford administrations.
    Just sayin'.
    Update:

    Kissinger’s Call For A New World Order

    April 7, 2020 by Patrick J. Buchanan



    Among the works that first brought Henry Kissinger to academic acclaim was “A World Restored,” his 1950s book about how the greatest diplomats of Europe met at the congress of Vienna to restore order to a continent shattered by the Napoleonic wars.

    The balance-of-power peace these men achieved lasted — with the significant exception of the Franco-Prussian war of 1870-1871 — for the full century, from 1815 to 1914.

    Writing in the wall street journal friday, kissinger declared that it is now an imperative that the world’s leaders, even as they deal with the raging pandemic, begin to make the “transition to the post-coronavirus order.”

    “Failure to do so could set the world on fire.”

    Yet, the ingredients Kissinger considers essential for establishing that new world order appear, like ventilators, to be in short supply.


    “Sustaining public trust,” asserts Kissinger, “is crucial … to international peace and stability.”

    but how do we trust again our adversary china, after its criminal cover-up of the menace and magnitude of the virus unleashed in Wuhan?

    How do we trust again this regime that was, until recently, blaming the coronavirus on U.S. Army troops visiting Wuhan?

    Observing governments thrashing about in the crisis, the phrase that comes to mind is not “public trust” as much as “every nation for itself.”

    On Monday, the wall street journal described Europe's recent behavior thus:

    “EU countries unilaterally shut borders and hoarded vital medical gear, leaving people stranded far from home, grocery stores struggling to stock shelves and hospitals desperate to save critically ill patients.

    “When Italy and Spain, reeling from some of the world’s most deadly outbreaks, urged their richer and healthier northern neighbors to help, dutch politicians brushed off the appeals as new signs of southerners’ mismanagement.”

    last week, the Eu's court of justice ruled that Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic broke EU law by refusing to relocate refugees during the migrant crisis in 2015. The three nations offered no apologies.

    Last month, Greece used force to stop Syrian refugees from entering its territory. According to human rights watch, Greek troops and armed men at the Greece-Turkey land border sexually assaulted, robbed and stripped asylum seekers and migrants, driving them back into turkey. The EU has stayed largely silent.

    When Donald trump’s issued his Jan. 31 travel ban on those who had recently been in china, candidate Joe Biden denounced trump for “hysterical xenophobia and fearmongering.”

    Biden now thinks trump did the right thing.

    Even lifetime liberals can put ideology on the shelf when the voice of the people is loud and clear enough.

    We must “struggle to heal the wounds to the world economy,” said Kissinger.

    Yet, the crisis has revealed that a prominent feature of this global economy is that china controls the production of medicines essential to keeping Americans alive. Do we want to continue that dependency?

    Says Kissinger: “the world’s democracies need to defend and sustain their enlightenment values… (and) safeguard the principles of the liberal world order.”

    but did not march 2020 prove the superior wisdom of Alexander Hamilton: “every nation ought to endeavor to possess within itself all the essentials of national supply.”

    today, borders are everywhere being strengthened as nations compete ferociously for n95 masks and ventilators. Authoritarian rulers are seizing broader powers. The claims of family, faith, tribe, nation and country seem ascendant over all.

    “The founding legend of modern government,” writes Kissinger, “is a walled city … strong enough to protect the people from an external enemy. … this pandemic has produced … a revival of the walled city in an age where prosperity depends on global trade and movement of people.”

    Kissinger calls the concept of the walled city an “anachronism,” a “legend.”

    But is the idea of the nation-state, whose principal duty is the defense of the health, safety and security of the unique people who created it, the “legend”?

    Or is the real legend, the myth, the idea of some new world order of countries traveling and trading happily with one another in a federation of the world?

    In this coronavirus crisis, we can see clearly now, no longer as through a glass darkly.

    As in most wars, it is to the men of action not the men of words to whom the people turn — to governors, not legislators or members of congress, who are taking action, as states outbid one another for critical medical equipment.

    As for Donald Trump, suddenly, the elites are berating him for being insufficiently dictatorial.

    Trump, they rail, did not move swiftly enough to invoke the defense production act. He failed to use its authority to dictate to U.S. companies what they must produce. He did not shut down the country quickly enough. He failed to issue orders soon enough to governors who delayed shutting down their states.

    People are dying, it is now said, because trump did not immediately become the autocrat that progressives were denouncing him for being during the impeachment hearings two months ago.



    https://buchanan.org/blog/kissingers...d-order-138395
    Last edited by mark blazejewski; April 10th, 2020 at 07:43 PM.
    LIDA Member Rinow to Member Ruda: You were a sitting Trustee on the Board. Did you help support Mr. Sweeney getting a seat on the CDC Board?"

  9. #1659
    Member mark blazejewski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    5,352
    A friend sent this to me, and it is worth reading...


    Bill O’Reilly: China's Bio weapon and Pelosi & Schiff



    My wife Angie will tell you that I study history and world events fluently every day. I have studied China for many years. To get answers I need to questions, I call many I know in Washington on Capitol Hill (from my tenure on two Presidential campaigns and Presidential talks) and I ask them for straight up answers to better understand what affects us as a nation. Well, in 2016 America elected a new Sheriff: Donald J Trump. For decades the Chinese walked all over America but the new President said "not anymore”. Trump literally strangled China's economy to the point their economy was in its worst free fall ever. Trump negotiated a new 50 billion trade agreement. He had Xi by the proverbial balls. America's economy was on fire and unstoppable. President Xi Jingping knew he could not beat the USA militarily and he knew any domesticated economic attack would fail as our economy was too strong. He had to act. But how?



    Enter the USA democrats led by Pelosi and Schiff. Impeachment. A hoax. A distraction for our people and President. Xi Jingping and his thugs see this. They aren't stupid. They have very intelligent intellectual thinkers in their government. Now you must understand , the Chinese regime are truly Barbarians. Notice I did not say ALL CHINESE. The Chinese people are a good people. I enjoy my interactions with them. The communist regime has millions of its own citizens slaving in gulags simply for speaking against the government or openly practicing Christianity. Knowing they could not attack us openly they needed to be coy, like a deceptive fox. In my opinion, I believe the regime released a biological weapon upon the world that doesn't kill everyone, but kills "enough," especially the elderly and in-firmed. Back in WW 2 Hitler thought the same way. He got rid of what he considered the useless and rejects of society.



    Trumps task force uses models to figure things. Xi used and uses “models" too. China's president figured that if he killed a few of his own (a few hundred thousand to them would be a few out of 1.4 billion people) and spread the virus to other nations (especially to the USA) they would “level the economic playing field" and not have fired a shot. Losses of his own people were acceptable costs of a new war. When China’s own doctors attempted to sound the warning, they were immediately silenced. In fact one died and another has simply disappeared. Trump and the other allied leaders indeed KNOW this is what happened. They have under reported their own deaths. Trump knows he cannot outrightly seek retribution. His news conference today showed me this when he balked publicly about no outright retribution over Xi's handling of this and he immediately brought up the "trade deal". However, Trump wasn't being weak, he too was now being coy. We know this was a biological weapon. The food market story is bull****. Xi knows we know it. Trump also today announced he sent two battle groups of destroyers and other ships to sea several days ago to fight drugs and rogue actors like Iran should they try anything.



    I say he did this to show Xi he knows what has transpired (we have the greatest intelligence assets) and that they (the Chinese) should rethink further action. Politics is premier. We cannot overtly attack China for what they have done as we would also suffer greatly. We all know this. But China has temporarily achieved its goal. America was literally consumed by Trumps phony impeachment brought by the ultra left democrats (supported by democrat rank and file and one Republican Mitt Romney) and Xi Jingping saw an opening. He took it. Xi did what Trump usually does...he walked onto the world stage and threw a grenade into the "room" and left. It exploded in the form of this worldwide pandemic. It brought the USA and the rest of the world to its knees and leveled the economic playing field. Our economy is now near depression. Xi didn't fire one bullet. Trump needed to up his game of chess and putting our Naval ships to sea was his next move. He said he is a "war" President. He is. But now on not one but two fronts. One front is the virus and the other front is the Chinese. While the Saudi's and Russians are screwing with oil prices they aren't overtly doing what this pandemic is doing. The drug smuggling story for dispatching the Naval Force is bull**** and the world knows it. I am of the opinion Trump can indeed bring us back from this catastrophe albeit with a changed playing field. But Trump is a genius in chess and financial matters. He's become a champ at international politics too. I am sure Trump can once again lead the economy to even stronger strength and greatness the it was . He can do it quickly I'm sure of it. He has proved it. Xi Jingping needs to be sent a message loud and clear. NEVER AGAIN. We need to bring all of our critical manufacturing back from China beginning with our medicines they were recently threatening to withhold. We can do it immediately. Again, another reason for Trump putting to sea such a sizable Naval Force. Sending a clear message.



    We all must ride out the next few weeks. Then we and the world pick up the pieces and move on. The democrats who have given Xi this opening wrapped in a bow must pay a heavy price in November as they (the democrats) truly have cost and continue to cost America precious lives by the phony scandals. Nancy Pelosi continues to help the Chinese by her daily shameless attacks upon the President and meddling in stimulus packages as she did this last weekend. Yesterday's statements she made were truly appalling and the lowest of low. I didn't think she could go any lower. What a disgrace she is to our nation. But, Pelosi aside, make no mistake, China must and will be taught a lesson the likes they have never seen before and Trump is the man to pull the trigger.



    We the people must teach the democrats the same lesson at the polls. They (the radical wing of the party) are the enemy of a free America. I am certain of it. The entire democrat party of our forefathers is dead. Remember people, Trump indeed tried to warn us all of the Conavirus in his State of the Union Speech. He spoke of it. He said he was on top of it. After he spoke , Nancy Pelosi ripped up the speech calling Trumps words “a manifesto of lies". She disgraced the country and all of our fellow honored citizens present in the House Chamber. Well she now has American blood on her hands. She is very majorly responsible for these needless deaths as well as the Chinese. Her and Adam Schiff.



    The left and democrats laughed as she tore up his speech. Well, as they laughed the disease he just spoke of in that speech came to our shores. Republicans and Democrats alike are now dying. Your family members and mine. Our grandparents and middle aged citizens alike. Bodies are being loaded in trucks with forklifts in Brooklyn outside of hospitals. No one is safe. Our liberty is for the most part suspended. As we bury our dead (without proper funerals) from this calamity let's drive the nails into the coffin of the Democrat party as well in November.



    It's time people. Stand up for your rights and your country! Our Liberty and survival is at stake! I am praying for God's blessing on our nation. But, God also gave us the ability to think for ourselves and it's time we placed blame for all this death where it belongs: on the doorsteps of Nancy Pelosi, Adam Schiff and Xi Jingping directly. Wake Up America. WAKE UP!



    Written by: Bill O’Reilly

    LIDA Member Rinow to Member Ruda: You were a sitting Trustee on the Board. Did you help support Mr. Sweeney getting a seat on the CDC Board?"

  10. #1660
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    8,954
    Yes, we are all being inundated with opposing and conflicting reports on the Covid-19 virus, its origin, and culpability for addressing the crisis. We read and hear reports every day from the liberal mainstream on what a douchebag, racist Trump is and that he should be blamed for killing thousands of Americans.

    MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” co-host Mika Brzezinski suggested that "people are asking" if Americans have died from coronavirus because President Trump hasn’t done his job.

    Brzezinski was criticizing the daily White House task force briefings during a segment on Friday. The MSNBC host declared the press conferences to be a waste of time for task force members, such as Dr. Anthony Fauci, who should be focused solely on defeating coronavirus.

    “He’s wasting their precious time, some would say, so he can bloviate and have little fights with reporters and make sure, you know, that’s noticed and talked about. It is, for me, that is the deepest insult to this entire process, that he is wasting his top scientists’ time. These people are tired,” Brzezinski said.


    What is not being reported, except through social media, is the following for offending China and the WHO. The following email (one of many) is interesting and should also be given consideration:

    SOMETHING IS FISHY!!

    Wuhan to Shanghai = 839 km
    Wuhan to Beijing = 1,152 km
    Wuhan to Milan = 8,684 km
    Wuhan to NY = 12,033 km

    The Coronavirus started in Wuhan yet there is no effect of Coronavirus in nearby Beijing or Shanghai but many deaths in Italy, Iran, European countries and USA.

    All business areas of China are now safe.

    Something is fishy

    America is not just blaming China without a reason. Even today, India is locked down but all the cities of China are open. China has also announced the opening of Wuhan from April 08. Not a single leader in China has tested positive for the deadly Coronavirus.

    Something is fishy

    The virus has ruined many economies around the world. Many have had to close their borders in an attempt to contain and control the spread of the Coronavirus.

    Thousands have lost their lives, millions have now got this disease, countless people have been locked in their homes and many countries have placed their citizens on lock down.

    Something is fishy

    The Coronavirus originated from the city of Wuhan in China and has now reached every corner of the world, but the virus did not reach China's capital Beijing and China's Economic Capital Shanghai, located in close proximity to Wuhan itself.

    Something is fishy

    Today Paris is closed, New York is closed, Berlin is closed, Delhi is closed, Mumbai is closed, Tokyo is closed, the world's major economic and political centers are closed, but Beijing and Shanghai are open. No Coronavirus effect is seen in either cities. There were only a few cases but the virus had no real effect on Beijing and Shanghai.

    Something is fishy

    Beijing is the city where all the leaders of China live, including their military leaders. There is no lock down in Beijing.

    Something is fishy

    Shanghai is the city that runs China's economy. It is the economic capital of China, where all the rich people of China live and run major industries. There is no lock down here, there is no effect of the Coronavirus there.

    Something is fishy

    Beijing and Shanghai are the areas adjoining Wuhan. The virus from Wuhan reached every corner of the world, but the virus did not affect Beijing and Shanghai.

    Something is fishy

    Another big thing is, that the worldwide share market has fallen by almost half. In India also the Nifty has gone from 12 thousand to 7 thousand, but the share market of China was at 3000 and just merely dropped to 2700.

    Something is fishy

    This leaves one to speculate that the Coronavirus is a bio-chemical weapon of China, which China used to carry out destruction in the world in order to gain economic supremacy. China has now put this virus under control, maybe they also have the antidote/ vaccine that they are not sharing with the world ever or will do when it is in their best interest to do so.

    Something is fishy

    Hollywood stars, Australia's Home Minister, Britain's Prime Minister and Health Minister, Spain's Prime Minister's wife, Canada's Prime Minister's wife, and Britain's Prince Charles, among others, have contracted the Coronavirus, but NOT A SINGLE POLITICAL LEADER IN CHINA, NOT A SINGLE MILITARY COMMANDER in China have tested positive for Coronavirus.

    SOMETHING IS FISHY!!!!

  11. #1661
    Member mark blazejewski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    5,352
    Thank you for posting this Lee.

    There is plenty of fishy evidence to suggest that the entire calamity is resultant from something other than "An Act of God." Consider this...


    JUST A COINCIDENCE-BASED HYPOTHETICAL:

    Cicero's words "Cui Bono" enter my mind when considering this alternative viewpoint surrounding the Covid-19 crisis.

    I have mused, but not embraced, the possibility that this entire mess may have been man-made; a concerted effort by the Globalists and the Communist Chinese to foster Constitutional America's decline in favor of a "New World Order."

    Consider these very serious proposals and applications, and ask yourself, "When, before now, would such restrictive intrusions have been accepted without serious challenge, and do they truly resemble the pre-Covid state of being in the free America that we have always known?"...

    https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...iWIsHUH4ualr1g

    https://www.businessinsider.com/coun...navirus-2020-3

    https://www.politico.com/news/2020/0...racking-162715

    Then consider this article by Henry Kissinger...

    https://www.wsj.com/…/the-coronaviru...forever…

    (Pat Bushannan Analysis: https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...iWIsHUH4ualr1g).

    ... along with the rather curious Chinese roots [/COLOR] of Coronavirus, suggest to me that the Covid- 19 crisis while real, MAY have stemmed from other than natural occurrences; perhaps an application of the holdings in "Unrestricted Warfare: China's master plan to destroy America"?

    The reference https://www.c4i.org/unrestricted.pdf

    (The reference https://www.c4i.org/unrestricted.pdf appears not to work on this post. However, you may download a copy of "Unrestricted..." through a direct Google search by title or by the link https://www.c4i.org/unrestricted.pdf .)

    Assuming that the Communist Chinese could develop the virus and an antidote, and that the rapid construction of Chinese hospitals may be an indication of pre-planned efficiency, consider this hypothetical Chinese template:

    (1) Start the spread of the virus inside a limited area of China.

    (2) Quickly control the virus inside China, while spreading it worldwide, starting with Europe.

    (3) The spread quickly brings to a halt the economy of dozens of countries, especially impacting production lines in factories in those countries, with a resultant stock market fall and bargain buying opportunities.

    (4) The price of commodities fall, including the price of oil, a commodity which the Chinese buy on a large scale.

    (5) The Chinese seize the moment by a rapid return to industrial production, while the rest of the planet is at a standstill. Equally, the Chinese buy items cheaply in the crisis, and perhaps at later date, sell them more expensively to wanting countries.

    (6) The United States responds to (3)-(5) in such ways as to contradict historic founding and capitalistic principles.

    (7) If (1)-(5) are applied and the United States military has been significantly weakened, the Chinese will have in part accomplished with germ and economic warfare what it was unable to realize on a battlefield.

    (8) In seeming support of the hypothetical Chinese plan, perhaps Globalists, such as Dr. Kissinger, Never Trumpers, and the Socialists in high-profile state and national government positions, may have actually begun to prepare the U.S. national psyche for a transformation from a strong, independent Constitutional Republic to a far lesser nation dedicated to a "New World Order."

    If you believe that (1)-(8) are entirely tin hat, than you must think the following are entirely innocent coincidences:

    (1) President Xi Jinping appeared wearing just a simple RM1 face mask to visit effected Chinese areas.

    Is it not reasonable to suggest that as the Chinese President he should have been covered from head to toe?

    Is it not reasonable to conclude that President Xi Jinping was already the recipient of a vaccine to resist any harm from the virus, and in that regard, if such a vaccine does exist, do you not agree that a cure has also been developed and resides in the custody of the Chinese government?

    (2) Consider that a couple of Chinese doctors who sounded the alarm on this virus were also silenced by the Chinese authorities: "Dead Men Tell No Tales," eh?

    (3) I understand that the Chinese appear to be buying up stocks from countries facing the brink of severe ECONOMIC COLLAPSE.

    (4) Why does it appear that Bejing China's capital, Russia and North Korea, Chinese allies have experienced little impact from the virus, yet South Korea has been severely ravaged?

    Perhaps at a future, critical time, China may announce that their medical researchers have found a cure to destroy the virus, eh?

    The curious Chinese aspects of this hypothetical, along with the holdings and advocacy of the Globalists and the American Left, and in light of the attendant reductions of the personal American freedoms specified above: Cui Bono, INDEED!

    But again, just a coincidence-based hypothetical.

    SMH.
    Last edited by mark blazejewski; April 12th, 2020 at 09:58 AM.
    LIDA Member Rinow to Member Ruda: You were a sitting Trustee on the Board. Did you help support Mr. Sweeney getting a seat on the CDC Board?"

  12. #1662
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    8,954
    How pathetic spending an Easter Sunday sitting home whiling away the time reading this conflicting, depressing BS:

    Trump Lashes Out at Fauci Amid Criticism of Slow Virus Response

    “Fauci was telling people on February 29th that there was nothing to worry about and it posed no threat to the US at large. Trump did block foreign nationals who had been in China in the past 14 days from coming into the United States starting on Feb. 2 and took heat from even Biden.

    Dr. Fauci said on Sunday that earlier imposition of such policies would have made a difference. “I mean, obviously, you could logically say that if you had a process that was ongoing and you started mitigation earlier, you could have saved lives,” he said on “State of the Union” on CNN. “Obviously, no one is going to deny that. But what goes into those kinds of decisions is complicated.

    The country has recorded at least 22,073 deaths (3,300 in nursing homes) and 556,044 cases.

    Democrats politicize coronavirus pandemic, want yet another baseless investigation of Trump.

    Without an effective therapy or a vaccine for the novel coronavirus, the U.S. economy could face 18 months of rolling shutdowns as the outbreak recedes and flares up again, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis President Neel Kashkari said.

    Country of coronavirus' origin blocks research on outbreak, deleted posts show. Chinese officials and state media have repeatedly stressed that there has been no conclusion on the exact origin of the virus. Last month, Zhao Lijian, a spokesperson of the Chinese Foreign Ministry, promoted a conspiracy on Twitter that the virus had originated in the US and was brought to China by the US military.

    CNN poll has Biden 11 points ahead of Trump; 53% to 42%. FOX poll has them tied at 42%. Despite Biden’s shift to the left, his sexual abuse charge and Hunter’s financial woes, the doddering, old fella is surging in popularity?

    Now we have a virus expert imploring surfers to stay out of ocean to avoid coronavirus.

  13. #1663
    Member mark blazejewski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    5,352
    Quote Originally Posted by Lee Chowaniec View Post

    Dr. Fauci said on Sunday that earlier imposition of such policies would have made a difference. “I mean, obviously, you could logically say that if you had a process that was ongoing and you started mitigation earlier, you could have saved lives,” he said on “State of the Union” on CNN. “Obviously, no one is going to deny that. But what goes into those kinds of decisions is complicated.
    If one looks at the extreme side of Fauci's comments, as I am sure the Left and the Main Stream Media will, one could say that Trump's hands are stained with blood.

    If that extremist viewpoint is accepted, then is it not reasonable to apply the same reasoning to Fauci that was attached to the Nuremberg criminals, which held that military commanders were not required to follow orders that stood in contradiction of the rules of war, and therefore, "I was just following orders" was of no value in their defense?

    In this Covid-19 controversay, are not Fauci's professional credentials and ethics somewhat analogous to the rules of war and the rank status of the German military and political leaders who were on trial in 1945 and 1946?

    In that connection, would not Fauci's professional credentials have required a prompt, contemporaneous resignation, an attendant public condemnation of the purported Trump policies, a bold proclamation of Fauci's concerns, and irrevocable resignation in protest?


    Hell, I know of doctors who have withdrawn services from patients when each and every professional command were not complied with.

    Did his silence save lives and advance the good for the public's welfare, or was that public good sacrificed on the alter of employment self-interests?

    BTW, I am not impressed, and frequently irritated by Dr. Birx and her seeming faithful affection for the WHO, just my two cents.
    Last edited by mark blazejewski; April 13th, 2020 at 02:20 AM.
    LIDA Member Rinow to Member Ruda: You were a sitting Trustee on the Board. Did you help support Mr. Sweeney getting a seat on the CDC Board?"

  14. #1664
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    8,954
    What has become irritating, Mark, is daily hearing / reading from the liberal mainstream media outlets what an a-hole Trump is, the lives he has cost this country, how he has now screwed up the economy and how reckless he is to want to open up parts of the country to commerce.

    While Trump is being portrayed as the sole monster in this crisis, his detractors’ solution is to shut down the country for whatever period of time, regardless of consequence to economy or individual wellbeing.

    I found a link you posted in another Lancaster thread to present another side of the crisis not being discussed noteworthy, insightful and credible. It bears repeating here.

    https://www.realclearpolitics.com/ar...5iX3ITMudQEzcY

  15. #1665
    Member mark blazejewski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    5,352
    Quote Originally Posted by Lee Chowaniec View Post
    What has become irritating, Mark, is daily hearing / reading from the liberal mainstream media outlets what an a-hole Trump is, the lives he has cost this country, how he has now screwed up the economy and how reckless he is to want to open up parts of the country to commerce.

    While Trump is being portrayed as the sole monster in this crisis, his detractors’ solution is to shut down the country for whatever period of time, regardless of consequence to economy or individual wellbeing.

    I found a link you posted in another Lancaster thread to present another side of the crisis not being discussed noteworthy, insightful and credible. It bears repeating here.

    https://www.realclearpolitics.com/ar...5iX3ITMudQEzcY


    This is all very troubling Lee.

    April, 2020: "That Was The Revealing Month That Was!"

    The Covid-19 is a truly dangerous threat, about that there is no question. I want to make clear that I believe government needs to take all reasonably appropriate steps to mitigate damage. Those appropriate steps, in my opinion, must necessarily be based on facts, not projected models reflective of ill-founded facts or exaggerated assumptions; not on fanciful interpretation of available data, but on tested scientific methodology; not by knee-jerk emotional reaction, but by serious, sober, unbiased, and dispassionate assessment.

    As such, this post is not a whimsical advocacy to reduce the need for necessary measures, but rather it is my submission of some readily observable facts, intended to bring to public attention, the rather curious chain of events, foreign and domestic, which may suggest the possibility that these collective circumstances may arise from more nefarious worlds.

    Concurrent with well-founded suspicions surrounding China's role in the Covid crisis, the reader needs to be sensitized and open to, the possibility that a well-orchestrated exploitative domestic reaction to the Chinese-generated Covid-19 virus, perhaps in pursuit of a much darker political agenda, may currently be in play.

    In short, the United States may be reacting to a joint foreign and domestic challenge, collectively applied in the interests of imposing a sinister "Fundamental Transformation" of America, both as a world power and as a Constitutional Republic.

    Regarding the "Ground Zero" area for Covid-19 origination, I am entirely perplexed by the data reporting of both China and the World Health Organization.

    https://www.nationalreview.com/2020/...to-wuhan-labs/

    https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...urate-us-inte/

    I am particularly troubled by the comments of World Health Organization (WHO) Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, who asserted that the Trump administration was "politicizing" the Covid-19 crisis, and seemed to threaten America when he warned that further "politicization" would result in increased "body bags."

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/world-h...on-11586122093

    The relationship between the WHO's Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus and China is very suspicious, particularly when considered within this context:

    "Most critically, Beijing succeeded from the start in steering the World Health Organization (WHO), which both receives funding from China and is dependent on the regime of the Communist Party on many levels. Its international experts didn’t get access to the country until Director-General Tedros Adhanom visited President Xi Jinping at the end of January. Before then, WHO was uncritically repeating information from the Chinese authorities, ignoring warnings from Taiwanese doctors—unrepresented in WHO, which is a United Nations body—and reluctant to declare a “public health emergency of international concern,” denying after a meeting Jan. 22 that there was any need to do so."

    https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/04/02...th-soft-power/
    The information described above, if taken within the contents of "Unrestricted Warfare," led me to muse about, but not entirely embrace or assert, a hypothetical scenario which I outline on post #1661 of the "Had Enough Thread"...

    https://www.speakupwny.com/forums/sh...gh-yet/page111

    That hypothetical situation by the hour, seems less and less speculative, and to some, appears to smack of some strong echos of reality.

    Whether by collusive commission, or by presented opportunity, many may perceive that the Globalist, Deep State, Neo Con, Socialist Democrat and fanatical Left in America just may be exploiting the China-born Covid-19 virus pandemic, to achieve their own political ends.

    Remember when Nancy Pelosi herself said that the Impeachment of President Trump said was a matter of "national urgency?"

    Is it not reasonable for one to ask, why did the Speaker fervently hold those expressed beliefs, and loudly deliver them at a time concurrent with the early hours which presented the first significant whispers of the pandemic which was about to descend?


    Perhaps the answer resides in a rather perplexing timeline beginning in 2016?

    With that said, no explanation or definition has ever been offered which satisfies many minds, as to what Peter Strozk's reference to an "insurance policy"truly meant. One can only speculate that the reference was to an unspecified tactic to guarantee a Clinton election, and to advance her rather cryptic promise of a "Stronger Together" America.

    If the "Stronger Together" theme was in fact a code for a concerted effort to advance the kindred policies of an axis consisting of the Globalist, Deep State, Neo Con, the Socialist Democrats in Washington and on the state and local levels, and fanatical Left, and that those efforts were to be jointly applied to favor the imposition of a "New World Order," is it not reasonable for the confused or the cynic to theorize that the entire post-2016 election sequence of events, may not be entirely happenstance?

    To wit:

    (1) Is it truly reasonable to consider that out of the ashes of the unexpected Clinton's defeat, came fanciful and now discredited Russia Collusion narrative?

    (2) After Russia Collusion disintegrated, was Ukraine and Impeachment truly resultant of a statistically-supported game of chance?

    (3) Then within mere days, from the extinguished embers of the failed Impeachment, does a once-in-a century opportunity arrive by a perchance roll of the dice; a convenient circumstance which favors a further discrediting of the Trump Presidency, while simultaneously establishing a tested template for authoritarian rule?


    More recently, this past week, Holy Week, it became obvious to many that there is now existent a new synthetic American form of the Covid-19 virus; a contagious germ, born in a petrie dish of fear and matured by the concerted efforts of American chemists of the Statist discipline.

    Presently, and for some weeks, its toxicity has been transmitted through the unfiltered informational droplets of those exact same actors and their sycophantic media allies.

    Last week, it became obvious that the resultant infection is now weakening the immune systems of the Constitutionally strong and religiously devote, with the classic symptom of an advanced-stage affliction being an unquestioned obedience to the commands of the carriers.

    Now, the very same Statist actors who developed the fear virus, are offering a toxic anecdote: An authoritarian Dakin's Solution, which while reducing current fears, may, if left unattended, may quickly compromise, and then consume, the freedom-loving heart, and the spiritual soul.

    Just consider the impact of this vicious plague on entire our economic and Constitutional system:

    (1) Regarding the economy, in addition to previous relief measures, Congress authorized a two trillion dollar relief measure, replete with Leftist-driven "pork" inclusions.

    https://www.cnbc.com/2020/03/27/hous...-to-trump.html

    https://www.federalreserve.gov/newse...y20200409a.htm


    It is said that it would take months to physically print that amount of cash, just sayin'.

    Even more troubling, it appeared to be with glee that ACA guru-turned-financial wizard Zeke Emanuel, touted the necessity for an 18-month economic shutdown.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/10/m...my-debate.html

    https://www.realclearpolitics.com/vi...a_vaccine.html

    https://www.foxnews.com/politics/bid...last-18-months

    In my opinion, there will be no American economy to recover if the industrial/economic shutdown continues past this June, just sayin'.

    (2) In the area of our civil liberties and Constitutional guarantees, consider that our religious freedoms are under now under "acceptable" challenge...

    https://www.theintelligencer.com/new...p-15195650.php

    https://www.foxnews.com/us/mississip...ervices-easter

    https://www.clarionledger.com/story/...le/5129189002/

    ...along with our rights to freely associate and travel...


    https://thehill.com/homenews/state-w...s-takes-effect..

    ...and perhaps are not without consequences, possibly kindred to these applied in Philadelphia, for purported failures to display what some perceive to be the 21st Century American equivalent of the horrible Nazi-imposed "Star of David," which are evident in these news stories...


    https://abcnews.go.com/US/philadelph...ry?id=70104383

    https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article...ragged-off-bus

    Can it not be reasonably argued, that a very troubling component to this new authoritarian normal, ostensibly created for our own safety, is resident in the creation of an American, post-Stalinist Stasi in the communities of America...

    https://www.foxnews.com/politics/la-...-at-home-order

    Along with a seemingly suppliant acceptance of heretofore unimaginable intrusions on privacy...

    https://www.politico.com/news/2020/0...racking-162715

    https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...fvpKS9CR-Dsi6g

    ...some will suggest that a sinister template has been created for a future speedy imposition of authoritarian rule in America, in support of the Globalist wet dream of a one world government; a not-so-well-disguised fantasy land articulated most recently by Dr. Henry Kissinger...

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-cor...s0ScBL4ZGYdqhI

    Perhaps this is another "insurance policy" for 2020..

    https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2020...b_TnKSisbr6j3c

    ...offered as a rider to the 2016 policy?...

    "...for that there’s no way he gets elected—but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk. It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you’re 40 …"
    Whatever the future holds, many complicated concerns were reduced to simple understanding with Secretary Bennett's words...

    "As bad as the coronavirus is, and it is bad, unless we arrest the frenzy and panic mongering, we should be prepared for things worse than the virus."
    Indeed Mr. Secretary.

    The American people many suggest, need to step back, and consider what may be some insidious reasons for this rapid change in its nation and its society. In my opinion, they need to consult the fine print of their Constitutional insurance policy, and hopefully, they will reject the illogical temptations presented by synthetic "Fear Virus."

    I trust that the American people will not forego the human liberty dividends attached thereto, and not surrender the policy for its up-to-date cash value.

    Yep, April, 2020: "That Was The Revealing Month That Was!"
    Last edited by mark blazejewski; April 13th, 2020 at 11:34 PM.
    LIDA Member Rinow to Member Ruda: You were a sitting Trustee on the Board. Did you help support Mr. Sweeney getting a seat on the CDC Board?"

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 9 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 9 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •