Page 239 of 272 FirstFirst ... 139189229237238239240241249 ... LastLast
Results 3,571 to 3,585 of 4076

Thread: Had enough yet

  1. #3571
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    8,922
    It’s only a humanitarian crisis when Democrats say it is

    Ah, the hypocrisy! Liberal sanctuary cities aren’t feeling so tolerant and accepting anymore as the influx of migrants being bused from Texas and Arizona are bringing the border crisis to their doors.

    Is this what precipitated the filling in of border wall gaps when Biden swore in his campaign pledge to never build another foot of border wall. Of course they are claiming they are just ‘cleaning up Trump’s mess. Biden is back, eh?

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/be...96e4865f6f708f

    Washington D.C., Mayor Muriel Bowser has requested the district's National Guard to help handle the crisis. Just 4,000 migrants have caused a “humanitarian crisis” and pushed the city to its “tipping point.” It took just 2,800 migrants for New York City Mayor Eric Adams to complain that the city’s resources were being strained. While border towns in Texas and Arizona are watching millions of migrants cross the border, big liberal cities are being brought to their knees by just a few thousand.

    But isn’t this exactly what these cities and their Democratic mayors have asked for? Adams lashed out at the "callousness" of Texas and Arizona for sending migrants to the Big Apple, but Adams has proudly supported New York’s sanctuary status. He seems very upset that migrants are willingly boarding buses to go to his sanctuary city. Are they no longer welcome there?

    When I first heard of this plan to bus migrants to liberal cities, I thought it was nothing more than a silly stunt. But Texas Gov. Greg Abbott and Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey have managed to expose the shamelessness of liberal sanctuary cities in just a few months. That was not even the stated goal of the effort, as Abbott said that he wanted to “take the border to President Biden.” That effort has apparently succeeded as well, as Biden on Thursday authorized the completion of former President Donald Trump’s border wall at open gaps near Yuma, Arizona, which the Associated Press says is the third-busiest border crossing.

    If just a few months of this can cause New York and Washington to raise the alarm, how do Democrats expect smaller border towns to shoulder this burden for years? Maybe now Democrats can put aside their moral preening and agree that illegal immigration is an issue that must be addressed. If not, perhaps a few other sanctuary cities would be more welcoming. Might I recommend Los Angeles and San Francisco?

  2. #3572
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    8,922
    Inflation Reduction Act: The Manchin, Schumer, Biden con

    The negotiated Manchin – Schumer Inflation Reduction Plan replaces the $3.5tn Build Back Better flagship infrastructure and social support legislation that Manchin crushed last fall and the reduced $1.75tn version that he rejected in December, then was renegotiating, then caused to suffer a near-death experience just weeks ago when he turned away from that too.

    “I sure hope so,” Manchin told CNN’s State of the Union show on Sunday morning, when asked if the Senate would vote to approve the bill before they go on summer recess at the end of the week.

    It’s “a great opportunity. It’s not a Democrat bill, it’s not a Republican bill, it’s definitely not a ‘green’ bill, it’s a red, white and blue bill,” he told host Jake Tapper.
    Manchin appeared to walk away from the legislation earlier this month on inflation concerns, enraging supporters of climate action and his own colleagues on Capitol Hill. He has repeatedly thwarted his own party and was seen as jeopardizing world climate goals and, at home, Democratic political fortunes, while himself making millions in the coal industry.

    He refused to support more funding for climate action and came out against tax raises for wealthy Americans to pay for it.

    “There were things in there I considered could be considered inflammatory…inflation is the biggest challenge we have in our country,” he said on Sunday.
    Then, he added, “we re-engaged” in negotiations.


    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...b8c197c879034b

    Yes, they re-engaged and Manchin received quid-pro-quo in the process.

    What’s in the plan?

    https://www.theguardian.com/environm...in-whats-in-it

    The climate spending is part of a broader package, known as the Inflation Reduction Act, that totals $739bn. The majority of this bill, however, is dedicated to confronting the climate crisis, with $369bn dedicated to the crisis over the next 10 years.

    What will people be able to access directly from this bill?

    The legislation includes a tax credit worth up to $7,500 for people who want to buy a new electric car, which has until now largely been the preserve of wealthier Americans.

    There is also a $9bn scheme, focused on low-income households, to electrify home appliances and make dwellings more energy efficient. Further tax credits, spread out over the next decade, will make it easier to buy heat pumps, rooftop solar and water heaters.

    Disadvantaged communities that suffer the brunt of fossil fuel pollution have also been recognized, with $60bn dedicated to environmental justice projects across the US.


    And the bill will not cost anyone with income of $400,000 or less an increase in taxes while lowering inflation and the national debt, and provide for all the future energy required.

    An EV in every garage, solar panels on every roof, buildings and home retrofitted to make them energy efficient. Big Brother and Santa planting money trees!

  3. #3573
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    8,922
    ‘Big Guy’ bashing ‘Former Guy’

    An Associated Press report tells us ‘Biden is no longer shy in singling out Trump, the 'former guy'; Democrats say it's overdue.’

    https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wire...p-guy-87672218

    One month into his presidency, Joe Biden made clear his distaste for even naming the man he had ousted from the Oval Office, declaring, "I'm tired of talking about Trump." "The next four years, I want to make sure all the news is the American people," he said in a CNN town hall.

    But now, Biden is eagerly naming and singling out the erstwhile "former guy" in prepared remarks and on social media, elevating Donald Trump in a way that Biden and White House aides didn't do during the first 18 months of his term.

    Speaking virtually to a group of Black law enforcement executives this past week, Biden accused the former president of stoking a "medieval hell" for police officers who fended off Jan. 6 rioters, adding that "Donald Trump lacked the courage to act."

    Biden's Twitter feed repeated those words a jarring sight for a White House that has tried to expunge any references to the former president and, in particular, his name.

    And when Biden emerged from isolation after a bout with Covid-19, he pointedly noted that he could continue working from the White House residence while Trump had to be airlifted to the hospital for treatment after his own diagnosis, at a time when vaccines were not available and the then president took a cavalier approach to mitigation measures.

    For some Democrats, Biden's willingness to engage directly with Trump was overdue. White House aides believe those two topics — law and order, and management of the pandemic—are among the areas where Biden can make the strongest contrast with the previous administration. Biden himself has made no secret he is hungry to run against Trump again, telling an Israeli television station recently that he "would not be disappointed" about a potential rematch.

    "I get it. If I was being held responsible for 9.1% inflation and a wobbly economy and southern border disarray, I'd probably try and change the subject too," said Sen. John Thune of South Dakota, the No. 2 Republican in the Senate.


    Comment

    Is anyone of the opinion that there will really be a rematch of Biden and Trump in 2024? Polls clearly indicate most Americans believe the country is headed in the wrong direction and don’t want to see either one on the ballot, much less elected.

    Biden’s law enforcement remarks re January 6th are one expected of a doddering old man refusing to acknowledge his role in the national surge in crime, murders, and retail crime occurring in Blue States and under his watch.

    Biden’s comment on his ability to fend off Covid and continue to work in his office while Trump had to be airlifted to the hospital for treatment after his own diagnosis, and at a time when vaccines were not available, is appalling and moronic.

    If Biden is emboldened by his Inflation Reduction Act support coming from Manchin, he may be disappointed. More spending will do nothing to decrease inflation and the assertion that only those earning more than $400,000 will be taxed is untrue. Should inflation increase because of the spending, the poor and the low-income families will suffer the most.

    Biden shuts down a pipeline and Manchin gets a pipeline. WTF!

  4. #3574
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    8,922
    Pelosi touches down in Taiwan despite China's warnings

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world...f042feac084d48

    U.S. House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi arrived in Taiwan on Tuesday despite repeated warnings not to from mainland China, which claims the island democracy as its own territory.

    Pelosi landed in the Taiwanese capital, Taipei, at just after 10:40 p.m. local time as part of her tour of Asia. She visited Singapore on Monday and Malaysia on Tuesday. Her office previously said she would also travel to South Korea and Japan but didn't mention a stop in Taiwan.

  5. #3575
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    8,922
    Lawyers governing Washington - making social media

    Regardless of source and legitimacy the content bears reading – especially when the Biden Cabinet is taken to task for having no business experience representation.


    As an attorney, I hesitated to forward this as it can be considered to be an indictment against my profession. But I believe there is much truth to the article below. Very thought provoking. Lawyers are adversarial and are trained to try to win at all costs. May work in litigation ----- but does not work well when governing our nation in Congress. Trying to win at any costs creates the polarization and hatred that now fills our country....Leaves no room for common sense or legitimate debate.

    Every Democrat presidential nominee since 1984 went to law school (although Gore did not graduate – Biden (no surprise) was at the bottom of his class). Every Democrat vice presidential nominee since 1976, except for Lloyd Bentsen, went to law school. Barack Obama was a lawyer. Michelle Obama was a lawyer. Hillary Clinton was a lawyer. Bill Clinton was a lawyer. John Edwards is a lawyer. Elizabeth Edwards was a lawyer. Look at leaders of the Democrat Party in Congress: Senate majority leader Chuck Schumer is a lawyer. Former Senator Harry Reid was a lawyer.

    The Republican Party is different. President Trump is a businessman. President Bush 1 and 2 were businessmen. Vice President Cheney was a businessman. President Eisenhower was a 5 star General. The leaders of the Republican Revolution: Newt Gingrich was a history professor. Tom Delay was an exterminator. Dick Armey was an economist. Ex-House Minority Leader John Boehner was a plastics manufacturer. The former Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist is a heart surgeon. Who was the last Republican president who was a lawyer? Gerald Ford, who left office 31 years ago and who barely won the Republican nomination as a sitting president, running against actor Ronald Reagan in 1976. The Republican Party is made up of real people doing real work, who are often the targets of lawyers. This is very interesting. I had never thought about it this way before.

    The Democrat Party is made up of lawyers. Democrats mock and scorn men who create wealth, like Trump, Bush, and Cheney, or who heal the sick like Frist, or who immerse themselves in history like Gingrich. The Lawyers Party sees these sorts of people, who provide goods and services that people want, as the enemies of America. And, so, in the eyes of the Lawyers Party, we have seen the procession of official enemies grow. Against whom do Hillary and Obama rail? Pharmaceutical companies, oil companies, hospitals, manufacturers, fast food restaurant chains, large retail businesses, bankers, and anyone producing anything of value in our nation.

    This is the natural consequence of viewing everything through the eyes of lawyers. Lawyers solve problems by successfully representing their clients, which, in this case should be the American people. Lawyers seek to have new laws passed, they seek to win lawsuits, they press appellate courts to overturn precedent, and lawyers always parse language to favor their side. Confined to the narrow practice of law, that is fine. But it is an awful way to govern a great nation.

    When politicians, as lawyers, begin to view some Americans as clients and other Americans as opposing parties, then the role of the legal system in our life becomes all-consuming. Some Americans become adverse parties of our very government. We are not all litigants in some vast social class-action suit. We are citizens of a republic that promises us a great deal of freedom from laws, from courts, and from lawyers.

    Today, we are drowning in laws; we are contorted by judicial decisions; we are driven to distraction by omnipresent lawyers in all parts of our once private lives. America has a place for laws and lawyers, but that place is modest and reasonable, not vast and unchecked. When the most important decision for our next president is whom he will appoint to the Supreme Court, the role of lawyers and the law in America is too big. When House Democrats sue America in order to hamstring our efforts to learn what our enemies are planning to do to us, then the role of litigation in America has become crushing.

    Perhaps Americans will understand that change cannot be brought to our nation by those lawyers who already largely dictate American society and business. Perhaps Americans will see that hope does not come from the mouths of lawyers but from personal dreams nourished by hard work. Perhaps Americans will embrace the truth that more lawyers with more power will only make our problems worse.

    The United States has 5% of the world's population and 66% of the world's lawyers! Tort (Legal) reform legislation has been introduced in congress several times in the last several years to limit punitive damages in ridiculous lawsuits such as spilling hot coffee on yourself and suing the establishment that sold it to you and also to limit punitive damages in huge medical malpractice lawsuits. This legislation has continually been blocked from even being voted on by the Democrat Party.

    When you see that 97% of the political contributions from the American Trial Lawyers Association go to the Democrat Party, then you realize who is responsible for our medical and product costs being so high.

  6. #3576
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    8,922
    Manchin and Biden wouldn’t lie to us, right?

    It’s a FOX Hannity report so it must be BS, right? Or just maybe the Inflation Reduction Act will not reduce inflation and the American taxpaying consumer takes it in the shorts again.

    Sean Hannity: Democrats are once again poised to spend a massive, huge, monumental amount of your money

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...1bdc041a87e173

  7. #3577
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    8,922
    The Inflation Reduction Act: Confused? Yeah, me too!

    The White House and Joe Manchin deny that the Inflation Reduction Act $700 billion spending bill will break President Biden’s campaign promise to not raise taxes on individuals earning over $400,000.

    In a New York Times report today, Analysis by nonpartisan group deems Biden's climate, tax bill fiscally responsible, we are informed:

    https://www.nytimes.com/2022/08/02/u...bill-cost.html

    After more than a year of trying - and failing - to pack much of President Biden's domestic agenda into a single tax-and-spend bill, Democrats appear to have finally found a winning combination. They have scrapped most of the president's plans, dialed down the cost and focused on climate change, health care and a lower budget deficit.

    As soon as party leaders announced that new bill last week, Republicans began attacking it in familiar terms. They called it a giant tax increase and a foolish expansion of government spending, which they alleged would hurt an economy reeling from rapid inflation.

    But outside estimates suggest the bill would not cement a giant tax increase or result in profligate federal spending.

    An analysis by the Joint Committee on Taxation, a congressional nonpartisan scorekeeper for tax legislation, suggests that the bill would raise about $70 billion over 10 years. But the increase would be front-loaded: By 2027, the bill would actually amount to a net tax cut each year, as new credits and other incentives for low-emission energy sources outweighed a new minimum tax on some large corporations.

    That analysis, along with a broader estimate of the bill's provisions from the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, suggests that the legislation, if passed, would only modestly add to federal spending over the next 10 years. By the end of the decade, the bill would be reducing federal spending, compared with what is scheduled to happen if it does not become law.


    Other

    And then other reports claim the vast majority of Americans will pay more in taxes as a result of Democrats' inflation bill despite President Biden's pledge not to raise taxes on those making under $400,000 per year.

    https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics...-past-promises

    The Inflation Reduction Act — unveiled Wednesday by Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., and endorsed by Biden — would increase tax revenue by $16.7 billion from Americans earning less than $200,000 a year, according to a nonpartisan analysis from the Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) published Friday. Nearly every tax bracket would pay more in taxes with those making below $10,000 per year seeing the largest uptick, the analysis showed.

    "The more this bill is analyzed by impartial experts, the more we can see Democrats are trying to sell the American people a bill of goods," Senate Finance Committee ranking member Mike Crapo, R-Idaho, said in a statement Saturday. "Nonpartisan analysts are confirming this bill raises taxes on the middle class and produces no meaningful deficit reduction when gimmicks are removed and the full cost is accounted for."


    Question: Who is peeing on our leg and telling us it’s raining?

  8. #3578
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    8,922
    Senator Manchin defends Inflation Reduction Act

    Interesting video exchange between Senator Manchin and FOX news analyst Harris Faulkner. Once again, someone is lying and hopefully the truth comes out before the bill goes to vote.

    https://www.foxnews.com/politics/man...est-virginians

  9. #3579
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    8,922
    Liberal progressiveness at its worst

    While Trump is feared and targeted by the Democrats and media as the existential threat to America’s democracy and freedom, more Americans express the country is headed in the wrong direction, express dissatisfaction with Biden and his administration and are changing their voting registration to ‘independent.’

    Americans are hurting and scared from a declining economy, rampant inflation, lawlessness and soft-on-crime democratic states, failed foreign policies, reckless government spending impacting the lives of 56% of families professing to living paycheck-to-paycheck, and the radical left, progressives and ‘woke’ crowd continue to keeping the hole they’re in.

    The following is another report on to what lengths ‘progressives will go to provoke and divide this country in the education system. And to think that objecting parents voicing their concerns were labeled terrorists by our own government!

    Portland Schools Pushing Radical Gender Ideologies on Kindergartners

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/po...760ffbb06cf969

    Portland is a progressive city known to follow controversial ideologies. From segregating college students by race to putting tampons in the boy's room Portland schools are known for over-the-top policies. It has recently been discovered that taxpayer-funded Portland Public Schools are actively teaching students gender theory instead of scientific biology.

    Chris Rufio leaked documents last week that may explain why 20% of elementary school students have left Portland schools, and 7,000 teachers have abandoned Oregon's teaching profession. These public schools are no longer merely teaching tolerance of individuals who are different, they are actively working to misinform students about biology, history, and the nature of human interactions. From as young as Kindergarten, these schools are teaching sexuality and working to impress the false idea that "white colonizers" created the gender binary.

    Who cares that for thousands of years men and women joined in unions to have children and raise families? Apparently, even though this is a key element of ancient cultures - from Ancient Egyptians to Aboriginals to Native Americans - Portland Public Schools wish to teach children that while Europeans made this idea up and that biology has no bearing on human lifestyles. Apparently, Children are taught that privileged white heterosexuals specifically created a two-sex gender system so they can oppress LGBTQIA2S+ individuals (even though this acronym didn't exist for most of human history and genderqueer individuals have always been a small minority of the population).

    Kindergartners in Portland schools are no longer taught to protect their "private parts" from strangers, or teachers like those in Portland who have been arrested for sex crimes against minors. Now, they are taught to focus on their "middle parts" and that any part of the body can be private. Diagrams of both the male and female reproductive "parts" are displayed but children are taught that "any gender and kid can have any type of body."

  10. #3580
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    8,922
    Ah, the hypocrisy

    Department of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas continues a deliberate disinformation campaign by stating that the "border is closed, the border is secure.

    After Mayorkas recently stated the border was secure, where the Biden administration has been transferring illegals throughout the country in the dead of night, the Democrats and media left are now trying to blame Trump and the Republicans for the border crisis. Democratic Mayors in Blue States while professing to being a Sanctuary City and never complaining about the crisis at the border before are now complaining because they are seeing firsthand what is taking place at the border and are ‘overwhelmed.’

    You can’t fix stupid, nor defend the defenseless. The Democrats have yet to learn that, and the country is tiring of the claptrap.

    Border crisis hits home in D.C, so Mayor Bowser finally cares

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/bo...2791d093443ccc

    For the past 18 months, our nation has experienced a historic crisis at the southern border fueled by the Biden administration’s immigration policies allowing millions of illegal aliens into the country. Texas and Arizona are ground zero for this border crisis and, over the past 17 months, have been pleading with the federal government to address the record number of illegal aliens and amounts of deadly fentanyl flooding into their communities.

    The federal government’s response has been derelict. President Joe Biden and his supposed border czar Vice President Kamala Harris have refused to visit the border. Department of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas continues a deliberate disinformation campaign by stating that the "border is closed, the border is secure." Apparently, Washington, D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser didn’t get the party line memo, as even she recently begged the Department of Defense to deploy the National Guard to address the "humanitarian crisis" in her city and her insistence that D.C. taxpayers do not foot the bill.

    But it raises a larger question — where has the mayor of the nation’s capital and other big city mayors been on this issue the last year and a half?

    Mayor Bowser recently noted that D.C’s homeless shelters are overrun with illegal aliens and that D.C. is unable to provide for homeless Americans in Washington due to the approximately 6,000 illegal aliens bussed to the nation’s capital in the last three months. For the mayor, this counts as being "overwhelmed and underfunded?"

    Imagine how small towns in Texas are doing with 7,000 illegal aliens coming through per day this summer. D.C. seems to have a head-in-the-sand approach to illegal immigration — pretend it doesn’t exist, or don’t care it exists until it becomes a problem that politically inconveniences the mayor. If Bowser were serious, why stop at just D.C. and not call for the deployment of the National Guard directly to the southern border?

  11. #3581
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    8,922
    Farmers fight against ‘carbon capture’ pipeline

    Summit Carbon Solutions wants to build a 2,000-mile pipeline carrying liquified carbon sending it to be buried a mile underground in North Dakota. The pipeline would collect the product from ethanol farms in the Dakotas, Nebraska, Iowa, and Minnesota.

    3,000 farmers are fighting against the pipeline express citing losing land through eminent domain, the explosive nature of the unstable liquified material and risk from pipeline leak, project failure and farmer cleanup liability. Summit claims there is no risk and declares renewal energy today fails to make a dent in climate change and ‘carbon capture is the best way now to keep greenhouse gases in check.

    The Biden Administration has invested $3.5 billion in the project, Microsoft and Facebook have each pledged another billion into the project.

    Farmers fight against proposed 'Midwest carbon express' pipeline

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/techn...ategory=foryou

    Comment

    There are studies and media reports galore on the feasibility and extent of using renewals to supply the energy needs of the U.S. – and unrealistic timetable forecasts and affordability.

    Besides ridding the planet of greenhouse gases, who profits from the success of this project? The ethanol suppliers and Summit will. Will any realized profits be passed on to the consumer? You know the guys who ultimately provides the $5.5 billion in ‘investment’ funding.

    Call them grants, tax breaks, investments, etc. some pig farmer in Maine is going to be paying more in taxes to invest in a project he has no say.

    Apparently, the tax and spend Democrats have not heard the adage: Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result is the sign of insanity. The Inflation Reduction Act is proof of that. Tax the hell out of the corporations, businesses, rich, celebrities, etc. and you can bet it will eventually come out of the consumers’ pocketbooks.

    Is there a carbon footprint tax on the horizon? Can’t let those cows fart all day. Fire up a combustible engine to cut the lawn, drive, cook on a gas stove.

    56% of Americans live paycheck-to-paycheck, 49% don’t pay federal income taxes. Come on guys, chop-chop. 2030 is not that far away. Got your house in order for the big transition? After all, Biden says his policies are working and you never had it so good.

  12. #3582
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    8,922
    Children of war

    While our country is embroiled in matters of children’s’ education regarding Critical Race, gender identity, loathing American history, and transforming America into a socialist state, the Ukraine’s are fighting to prevent their country from being overrun by a socialist country – and the children are suffering in the process.

    In Ukraine, young lives are shaped, or ended, by the ravages of war

    https://www.moneycontrol.com/news/wo...r-8971701.html

    In Ukraine, time is dwindling to prevent another “lost generation” — the oft-used expression not only for young lives taken but for the children who sacrifice their education, passions, and friendships to shifting front lines, or suffer psychological scars too deep to be healed.

    The online ticker at the top of a Ukrainian government page, “Children of War” flickers with a grim and steadily rising tally: Dead: 361. Wounded: 702. Disappeared: 206. Found: 4,214. Deported: 6,159. Returned: 50.

    “Every one of Ukraine’s 5.7 million children have trauma,’’ said Murat Sahin, who represents the United Nations children’s agency, UNICEF, in Ukraine. “I wouldn’t say that 10 percent or 50 percent of them are OK — everyone is experiencing it, and it takes years to heal.”

    According to humanitarian agencies, more than one-third of Ukrainian children — 2.2 million — have been forced to flee their homes, with many of them displaced two or three times, as territory is lost. More than half of Ukraine’s children — 3.6 million — may not have a school to go back to come September.

    Even so, there is the cost of unhealed psychological trauma. And the effects are not only mental but physical. Children exposed to war are at risk of “toxic stress,” a condition triggered by extreme periods of adversity, said Sonia Khush, director of Save the Children in Ukraine. The effects are so powerful that they can alter brain structures and organ systems, lasting long into children’s adult lives.

    More than 2,000 of Ukraine’s approximately 17,000 schools have been damaged by war, while 221 have been destroyed, according to UN statistics. Another 3,500 have been used to shelter or assist the 7 million Ukrainians who have fled to safer parts of the country. No one knows how many will open when the academic year starts a month from now.

  13. #3583
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    8,922
    Trey Gowdy on guilt of Alex Jones

    Bravo, Mr. Gowdy! Speaking truth to power!

    Despicable, Mr. Jones!

    Trey Gowdy: The truth won

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/tr...ategory=foryou

  14. #3584
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    8,922
    Commit, Ms. Hailey – NOW!

    Former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley declared on FOX News Sunday that “We should not take our eyes off 2022. If we don’t win in 2022, there won’t be a 2024. So, we need to stay humble, disciplined, and win that.”

    Hailey, like too many other Republicans have stated they would not run should Trump decide to do so. Nonsense, as more and more Republicans express Trump should not run.

    Commit, Ms. Hailey, for the sake of your party and the country. Anyone but Trump or Biden!

    Haley on 2024 run: ‘If we don’t win in 2022, there won’t be a 2024’

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...d223c98444cf4a

    Haley is among a number of prominent GOP figures rumored to be considering a bid for the White House, especially if Trump decides against a third run.

    Haley said last year that she wouldn’t put herself in the ring for the Republican party’s nomination if Trump were to run again.

    During Sunday’s appearance on Fox News, the former ambassador knocked “woke culture” in schools, sports and the military and said the U.S. needs “to snap out of it” and “bring sanity back to our domestic policy.”

  15. #3585
    Member buffy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    15,329
    Quote Originally Posted by Lee Chowaniec View Post
    Commit, Ms. Hailey – NOW!

    Former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley declared on FOX News Sunday that “We should not take our eyes off 2022. If we don’t win in 2022, there won’t be a 2024. So, we need to stay humble, disciplined, and win that.”

    Hailey, like too many other Republicans have stated they would not run should Trump decide to do so. Nonsense, as more and more Republicans express Trump should not run.

    Commit, Ms. Hailey, for the sake of your party and the country. Anyone but Trump or Biden!

    Haley on 2024 run: ‘If we don’t win in 2022, there won’t be a 2024’
    Lee, who do you think is rallying Americans (not just republicans) to take back our country from the disastrous plans of Joe Biden and the Democrats? Trump!

    Who is largely responsible, through his endorsements, for the many new, exciting, and energized 'America 1st' candidates winning primaries across the country? Trump!

    Through his efforts, Americans are waking up to the fact that the 2022 election is pivotal to Save America by pulling it off the wrong track before we fall off the precipice into socialism/communism,the great re-set.

    Whether you like it or not, Trump is the leader of the Republican Party; Trump endorsed candidates will take over the House & Senate and get to work restoring our Republic and exposing the lies that falsely accused Trump during his presidency. Trump WILL BE VINDICATED and will be the next POTUS. He will, once again, work tirelessly to restore our energy independence, our economy, and our leadership role in restoring peace in the world.

    You are in the minority - many more people than you apparently realize, are very grateful that Trump is still in the game, regardless of the injustices he has endured and the false accusations that continue. We, the majority, stand with him in his fight for truth and are thankful for his dedication towards restoring our Republic.

    I thank God for Donald Trump and may God protect him from the evil, lying ruling class that works overtime to devise ways in which to stop him from exposing their corruption and planned tyranny.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 162 users browsing this thread. (1 members and 161 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •