probably sore that voters did not buy the socialist load of crapOriginally Posted by Save Us
Mike Lindell presentation on voter fraud and suppression
I have a difficult time believing anything I hear or read in the media anymore. However, if any of this compelling voter fraud presentation has credibility, we are even more screwed than I fear!
https://michaeljlindell.com
Oh they did! That's why he is in office. You don't get elected unless you promise things as you know, and nobody doles out the candy like Democrats. Why do you suppose there is a pension time bomb in Dem states, it's rather obvious to most of us.
Productive people would just like to be left alone.
Lee,
Lindell's presentation is devastating to the revolutionaries, and the surge in death threats directed toward him seems to support my observation.
Those increases in death threats is so profound that Lindell now resides at a "secure location." That precaution was made known to a radio host directly by Lindell.
Moreover, I understand that in linking his presentation directly to YouTube, Lindell seemingly erred because Google picked-up on that link, which caused what appears to be the broad censorship of his presentation. That censorship occurred within two hours of its link to YouTube
To my take on the presentation, Lindell does present some statistics which can not be entirely or completely confirmed. For example, Lindell in once instance used as a supporting fact a notation that there was an upsurge of "CONFINED VOTERS" in one state. That curiosity would seem to be of little adjudicative value, in that any investigation could be subject to the subjective challenge. (The "Confined" voters could simply cite Covid concerns.)
But on the specific issues which unquestionably would have changed the results in Arizona, Nevada, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Georgia, such as illegal immigrant voters, underage voters, unregistered voters, voters who voted twice, non-registered voters, ballots accepted beyond the legislatively-prescribed deadline, ballots impacted by postal error, dead voters, and other such provable irregularities, I found Lindell's presentation to be compelling and past performances notwithstanding, the controversies should now be pursued. (You will recall that many of those controversies were not fully addressed by the proper state(s) authorities, the DOJ, and in the case of the proceeding brought by Texas AG Paxton, the SCOTUS.)
Furthermore, I believe that this was an election that may have impacted by nefarious Deep State actors, and the apparent disinterest of Barr to pursue these issues, speaks directly to my concern for the election's integrity. IMHO, for Barr, given the preponderance of such evidence, to wantonly dismiss these concerns, does not suggest a mere lack of curiosity, but rather a predisposed prejudiced so profound that it raises the specter of complicity.
In any event, for me, what is far more alarming than the fate of Trump, is the future integrity of the electoral process.
I am astounded by the reluctance of the political actors to call for a bi-partisan review of the controversies, which would align with historic precedent. You will recall that resultant of the 1972 Watergate break-in, the Senate Select Committee On Campaign Abuses was formed in 1973 to seek corrective action(s) to improve the national political process troubles me deeply.
A failure to apply such a high-profile review, IMHO, reflects the possibility of Deep State/ Globalist effort to institutionalize the fraud, and does so in the interests of advancing what some may term "the revolution."
Simply put, if the fraud is permitted to stand, America will never see a ****ing free election again.
Just my two cents
Last edited by mark blazejewski; February 10th, 2021 at 11:51 AM.
LIDA Member Rinow to Member Ruda: You were a sitting Trustee on the Board. Did you help support Mr. Sweeney getting a seat on the CDC Board?"
That's just ridiculous, I voted for Biden and never thought about socialism or any giveaway, my vote was for someone to Save Us from 4 more years of soap operas.
There are also pension timebombs in the private sector, another subject totally, sure there are in Dems states, not good I guess; but would have been nice to see Trump pay off the national debt "in his first term," as he said. You do recall him saying he "loved debt" - no one handled debt like Donald Trump, he added. LOL
What the heck is this: "Productive people would just like to be left alone" ???
If I only had a dime for every time...
Indeed, and you are going to hear it a lot more in the future.
You wrote in another post: “I voted for Biden and never thought about socialism or any giveaway, my vote was for someone to Save Us from 4 more years of soap operas.”
I as well had it with the drama of the past four years. Do you believe it was all Trump’s doing? That 4 years of attack by the Dems, left and liberal media minions played no role in the divisiveness? Or is this another example of your bias / naivete along with your declaration that ‘you never thought about socialism or any give-away’?
Trump is gone and if he is impeached by the Senate (unlikely) and unable to seek election again, it wouldn’t bother me one bit. He owns the firestorm he created. But as he was hammered relentlessly by the Dems / left / media for four years, never receiving credit for any accomplishment, Biden is deserving of same scrutiny and that is going to happened because of a crazed double-standard, cancel culture liberal / socialist Democratic Party whose leader promised ‘unity’ and is drifting further left by the day.
It has to bust your oranges that I am an unaffiliated registered voter and kowtows to neither major political party.
You have your head so far up the Democratic Party’s ass that you have to live and breathe and spew every bit of their BS, hateful, totalitarian ideology.
Biden in three short weeks has broken his promise of bipartisan politics now claiming getting the job done by passing 45 pieces of executive order legislation with the support of unity in this party is ludicrous. Making boastful promises on quick Covid elimination programs he is walking back his promise and saying it make take a year or longer. “I need more time, man.” His school opening plan is a joke – favoring unions over child educational and social needs.
He will get a pass from the fawning media and culture change class – and the likes of you. Double-standard, indeed! Hypocrisy to the max!
Biden is old, tired and in poor health. He has put Marxist socialists (not so-called progressives in the White House) and will not last four years in office. And you never gave socialism a thought from the primary on? We have yet to see the true makeup of this party and how it impacts the 'middle class'.
WE ARE SO SCREWED!
Biden's exploitable condition may very well have been the reason why the Leftists and Clyburn put a finger on the scale for Biden during the crucial South Carolina primary.
In my mind, that Leftist effort reminds me of Hindenburg's 1932 re-election as President of Germany. I wonder who was American equivalent of von Papen that whispered the name "Kamala Harris" in Biden's ear?
LIDA Member Rinow to Member Ruda: You were a sitting Trustee on the Board. Did you help support Mr. Sweeney getting a seat on the CDC Board?"
Well yes it is dissappointing that Trump did not do anything with the debt. As far as public pension solvency in blue states and cities.... really not much of a debate there, they are grossly underfunded, so the answer is to raise taxes to fund them ,driving more people out, again, there is no debate on the subject. It's axiomatic. Why do you think red states with low taxes and less regulation are growing? Why are Texas, Tennesse ,Florida etc etc. growing so much? Not sure why you find the matter incomprehensible. I am betting you are old enough to have seen that historically Democrats raise taxes and Republicans cut taxes. First thing Biden said is he is going to raise taxes.Traditionally one party wants more government and one wants less. More government is always expensive and doesn't produce anything. I can't believe that I have to explain this. Just read proposed legislation,, it's all there. Read the manifesto, it's there too.
Taxpayers fund and government allocates/ redistributes the fruits of what is produced which is better for non producers and worse for those that have to pay for it all. It's not a great thing when government is the largest employer. Ask any small business person how they feel about the concept of being 'left alone'.
Yes productive people would like less government because that always without exception means more spending and more taxes. I can explain this to you but I can't understand it for you.
Spot on!
Stop it Save Us, you're making too much sense and telling it like it is to one who does understand but does not want to hear it because truth offends his sensibilities. As such, you are an individual worthy of shaming, silencing, and cancelling!
My 6 year old has better situational awareness. I can only deduce he has a cognitive dissability, public service employee, or has a benefit card of some type. .
Dude, you write like an elitist full of himself anyway so blah blah blah. Just another member of the grievance crowd. God help the six year old influenced by that brain.
And I have to write that every single person I know who moved south was the weather.
Not at all he can join the other blah blah blah grievers moaning on forever on Had enough yet LOL
Go ahead and continue to embarrass yourselves.
You're starting to sound like Mark Blazejewski.
Readers, I like this choice of broadsides: "totalitarian ideology."
Say what ???
Yes the CEO's, fund managers, businesses , financial executives, intelligent taxpayers etc that fled to red states did so because of the weather. Uh...ok...sure..
I am going to guess that basic economics is not your cup of tea, and that's ok to admit.
There are currently 18 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 18 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
