Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: County GIS Map shows Mohawk Place and flood plain

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    10,872

    County GIS Map shows Mohawk Place and flood plain

    Please all instructional steps before you click link # 1


    First you have to go here (Internet Mapping System)

    In the lower right corner you will see an area marked
    "ZOOM TO MUNICIPALITY:
    ZOOM TO MUNICIPALITY:

    in the box below it will be,
    Erie County - click on the down arrow - select ; Lancaster - click go

    When you do this you will see a plain looking map. Now on the right side is an are marked LAYERS. Check the items you wish to add: Roads,streams,wetlands - just play around for a while.

    Now refresh map. Then at the top of the page is all your tools - until you magnify to a scale of (11001) you wont see actual landscape.

    You will once you get good at it - you can see and "Identify" who owns each parcel or building lot. Theres already a bunch marked in the Mohawk Place area.

    If anyone is good at this stuff try to download a picture - I cant - every time I do it comes out blank. I will figure it out.

    The mapping clearly shows flood plain and stream area if box is checked.
    #Dems play musical chairs + patronage and nepotism = entitlement !

  2. #2
    Member gorja's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Lancaster, NY
    Posts
    13,159
    I printed and scanned. If I zoom in to the point where all the parcel numbers are indicated, it won't fit on the print screen.




    The yellow area is Mohawk Pl. The red area is parcel 93.20-4-30 (50' x 1735'). How could anyone fathom a development on a strip of land no wider than a road?

    Georgia L Schlager

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    6,675

    You can't and

    if the town and the developers think otherwise, then this is a case of legalities.

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    17,449
    Quote Originally Posted by gorja View Post

    The yellow area is Mohawk Pl. The red area is parcel 93.20-4-30 (50' x 1735'). How could anyone fathom a development on a strip of land no wider than a road?
    Good job with the map.

    Who owns all the yellow portions? Because if you look at the width of the yellow portion (assuming the red was also included), it's just about as wide as the neighboring streets.

  5. #5
    Member gorja's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Lancaster, NY
    Posts
    13,159
    I think their server is down but from a previous post-
    LinkOwner NameProperty Loc.City/TownS-B-L
    DetailsMORRISON SHIRLEY MOHAWK PLLancaster104.08-3-24.2
    DetailsTOWN OF LANCASTER MOHAWK PLLancaster104.08-4-25
    DetailsRICHARDS AURELIA L MOHAWK PLLancaster104.08-3-23
    DetailsPETRONSKY SEAN MOHAWK PLLancaster93.20-4-30
    DetailsSMITH THOMAS K & W ANNE 103 MOHAWK PLLancaster104.08-4-22
    DetailsSMITH THOMAS K & W ANNE 107 MOHAWK PLLancaster104.08-4-21
    DetailsSMITH THOMAS K & W ANNE 111 MOHAWK PLLancaster104.08-4-20
    DetailsABADON REVOCABLE TRUST 177 MOHAWK PLLancaster104.08-4-1.1
    DetailsABADON REVOCABLE TRUST 178 MOHAWK PLLancaster104.08-3-1.1
    DetailsABADON REVOCABLE TRUST 191 MOHAWK PLLancaster93.20-4-28.1
    DetailsIGNASIAK CONRAD W & W 195 MOHAWK PLLancaster93.20-4-27
    DetailsABADON REVOCABLE TRUST 248 MOHAWK PLLancaster93.20-3-15.1
    DetailsNIGHTINGALE STEVEN & W SANDRA 256 MOHAWK PLLancaster93.20-3-14
    DetailsABADON REVOCABLE TRUST 270 MOHAWK PLLancaster93.20-3-11.1
    DetailsGRASSL CARL JR & W LYNETTE 274 MOHAWK PLLancaster93.20-3-10
    DetailsGRASSL CARL JR & W LYNETTE 276 MOHAWK PLLancaster93.20-3-9
    DetailsGRASSL CARL JR & W LYNETTE 280 MOHAWK PLLancaster93.20-3-8
    DetailsKRUSZEWSKI WOJCIECH & W LIND 282 MOHAWK PLLancaster93.20-3-7
    DetailsSWEETMAN CHARLES A & W 306 MOHAWK PLLancaster93.20-3-5
    DetailsWILK MARY A 312 MOHAWK PLLancaster93.20-3-4
    DetailsBUJANOWSKI EDWARD T&W T L 322 MOHAWK PLLancaster93.20-3-3
    DetailsABADON REVOCABLE TRUST 335 MOHAWK PLLancaster93.20-4-2.1
    DetailsPETERS BARBARA 340 MOHAWK PLLancaster93.20-3-2
    DetailsTOWN OF LANCASTER 355 MOHAWK PLLancaster93.20-4-1
    DetailsTOWN OF LANCASTER 358 MOHAWK PLLancaster93.20-3-1
    DetailsSMITH THOMAS K & W ANNE 99 MOHAWK PLLancaster104.08-4-23


    Abadon Revocable Trust owns a few parcels as follows:
    # 335 Mohawk occupies most of the east side of the red road (from map) from where Trentwood Trail ends and northward.

    #177 on the east & #178 on the west which are on each side of the red road south of the creek near Walden and are both in the FEMA floodplain.

    #191 on the east side and in the north end of the FEMA floodplain

    #248 & #270 on the west side, north of the creek. #256 is owned by the people who own #257 Seneca Pl.

    Other owners-

    #256 is owned by the people who own 257 Seneca Pl.

    #274, #276, & #280 Mohawk Pl. are owned by the owner of 287 Seneca Pl

    #282 is owned by the owner of 291 Seneca Pl




    The owner of Mohawk Place development. Didn't I read that there was no development approved?


    glenn lista

    Owner, Mohawk Place Devl.
    Buffalo/Niagara, New York Area




    Current

    • Owner at Mohawk Place Devl.
    Industry
    Construction




    http://www.linkedin.com/pub/glenn-lista/9/838/aab


    Georgia L Schlager

  6. #6
    Member gorja's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Lancaster, NY
    Posts
    13,159
    Abadon Revocable Trust has the same PO box #309 in Clarence as Glenn Lista has.

    Georgia L Schlager

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    17,449
    I wonder how "surplus property" is defined by a municipality. Anyone know?

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    10,872

    Some we know

    Quote Originally Posted by therising View Post
    I wonder how "surplus property" is defined by a municipality. Anyone know?
    Surplus property can be anything deemed unusable by Town Hall. This Town has sat on property since the Courier Express gave lots to employees in the 40's and 50's.(Bet you didn't know that little bit of history)

    Many lots were given away to employees - but most like the Penora Woods and the land behind Basil Chevrolet were deemed unusable wetlands. The Town ended up foreclosing on them for back taxes.

    What usually happens is when some slick developer needs some marginal pieces - he gets the Town to deem then "Surplus." Why, because the developer has bought the adjoining land and needs more. Until recently this was another little quiet secret in Lancaster.

    Like the Mohawk Pl deal - for years and years locals have tried to buy that land. Town Hall told them - its Town property and unbuildable.

    The end of Seitz is actually a mans drive way. He has been fighting to buy it for years. Giza has refused to allow him to buy it. One of our recently promoted Town Council Members told the man he would help him. When the Council Member was informed that it was a "Potential Marrano Development" , he backed out on his promise.

    Its a fact that when a "Insider" wants these properties, they all of a sudden become surplus. But when a taxpayer or ordinary home owner wants them - they get stone walled.

    But, this is Lancaster and the Town Board must be correct - they keep appointing new "Incumbents"
    #Dems play musical chairs + patronage and nepotism = entitlement !

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    76
    If I follow correctly, parcel 93.20-4-30 is owned by Sean Petronsky and is the paper street in the north section of Mohawk place. So if Abadon Revocable Trust does not get possession of parcel 93.20-4-30, they can't develop anything???

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •