No Conservative Party In WNY?

[TheRightView]

I am going to assume you mean statewide or nationally, because there are probably more dems locally that run with conserv backing.

And if it is statewide or nationally, it is probably because the repubs closer align with the conservative philosophies.

As far as running their own candidiates, with the enrollment differences, it usually doesn't make sense. Like all minor party lines!.. Please don't use the independents and Golisano, that is their 1 to the conservs 1 London.

P.s. Don't the Working Families ALWAYS go with the Dem, like the Liberals used to??


Don't take this as disagreement, as I would love to see more people run on the minor lines, but the numbers make it impractical.

Not always(fot the WF line..see below)...however it seems like a select few on this MB want to have only the IP party under scrutiny; they say they have their reasons about corruption but they remain strangely silent on the comings and goings of the Conservative line.

No offense taken, but to respond to the WF...it's pretty much the same as the RTL line that almost always align with the Rep. and as for the numbers game, well only time will tell as to what happens with all the lines and the candidates they run...
On a different note it goes back to the select few who are taking aim only at the IP party and to a lesser degree the Dems....almost none toward the Republican nor Conservative lines. It just seems to be an ulterior motive going on.

[LAsurvivor]

Part of that may be the constant fighting you hear about in the Independence party, going back to their formation locally with supreme court cases, etc. That makes them a topic of conversation.

As far as the Dems, it seems that their plurality locally puts them squarely in the bullseye for blame etc.

Did you cite specific instances of "corruption" yet?

[TheRightView]

Part of that may be the constant fighting you hear about in the Independence party, going back to their formation locally with supreme court cases, etc. That makes them a topic of conversation.

As far as the Dems, it seems that their plurality locally puts them squarely in the bullseye for blame etc.

Did you cite specific instances of "corruption" yet?

When you have a lot of different ideas, sometimes dicussions get heated. However going back to what you said that locally more dems were backed by conservatives than the republicans but there is no outcry just when the IP does it becomes something to rage against because that person cannot be possibly qualified to get the backing...it's all corrupted....just because somethings start off maybe not so smoothly doesn't mean it should be constantly bombarded...just look at the early life of the Christian faith...those lions ate well.

As for citing specific instances, no one else here is stating as such...they're just aiming and using scattershot to prove any type of wrongdoing(and by the way hitting very little) because they are still sour over not getting the backing they think they deserved(when they were running) when they were not the most qualified to do so.

[LAsurvivor]

Never mind

[TheRightView]

Once again, posts proven to have merit because no can say there isn't any corruption in the Conservative party.

[LAsurvivor]

there isn't any corruption in the Conservative party

[TheRightView]

If you say so, but by that remark you have to include that there is no corruption in any party because no real proof has been posted as such here.