Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Erie County exploring idea of municipal broadband

  1. #1
    Tony Fracasso - Admin
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Buffalo, New York, United States
    Posts
    64,974

    Erie County exploring idea of municipal broadband

    Erie County exploring idea of municipal broadband

    A cheaper alternative may be on the way to the broadband internet services currently available in Erie County. The Legislature is going to explore the possibility of starting its own county-wide network.
    Lawmakers recently gave the go-ahead to the Legislature's Economic Development Committee to take steps towards setting up a municipal broadband system.
    Legislator Patrick Burke sponsored the resolution and says customers of the big name providers are paying a premium price for a low-end product.
    http://news.wbfo.org/post/erie-count...R2F3o.facebook

  2. #2
    Tony Fracasso - Admin
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Buffalo, New York, United States
    Posts
    64,974
    So the County wants to compete with the private sector providing cable service? Don't you think that is crossing the line?

  3. #3
    Member FMD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    5,739
    Well the cost for broadband is expensive, it is only natural for the Govt to want to get in on all those juicy profits.
    Willful ignorance is the downfall of every major empire in history.

    "Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun." - Mao, 1938

  4. #4
    Member NY The Vampire State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Not in a Cuomo Tax Free Zone
    Posts
    1,803
    When has Government Inc. ever made anything cheaper?
    Democrats & Republicans Suck Alike.

  5. #5
    Tony Fracasso - Admin
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Buffalo, New York, United States
    Posts
    64,974
    Comments from wbfo

    Susan • 2 hours ago

    This is long overdue. Online communication and information seeking is a public good that should be provided at cost by our elected officials. This would address the problem of people who cannot afford cable or satelite, and who get their information through costly cell phone charges.

    I live in Chautauqua County and will be forwarding this article to my county officials.
    When does it ever stop? Nothing is "provided" by any elected official. Elected officials force others to pay through taxes. Currently Time Warner is down to $15 for cable plus 5 I think to rent a cable modem. Let's say with taxes 25 a month.


    BBND-MTRS • an hour ago

    To wnyresident - Because the market has failed. It's not responding to the needs of the consumers. Also because access to broadband is as essential now as electricity and water to your family's future health & welfare.
    And government hasn't failed? I don't consider broadband an essential compared to electricity or water. You can say a "car" is essential to a family's future health and welfare. Without a car you can not drive to work, the doctor or drop your kids off at school. I wonder if they believe we should provide cars, insurance and gas money.

    The problem isn't helping people, the problem is what is the limit of what is spent.

    Instead of providing it for free how about removing all taxes associated with broadband access? I don't have a cable bill in front of me. Does anyone know what fees/taxes are charged on a basic internet package provided by Timewarner or Verizon?

  6. #6
    Member sharky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Amherst
    Posts
    2,182
    gov't run ISP. It'll make the NSA's spying program even easier to implement
    Vote for freedom, not political parties.
    Politicians need to cut spending

  7. #7
    Member FMD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    5,739
    Yes.

    The fees and surcharges outside the modem rental fee is like $3. thats for both Verizon and TW.

    The biggest problem here is the monopoly of services. Bother Verizon, and TW got together and set their prices to coincide with each other. So both companies are charging about the same.

    Lack of competition has created higher prices. Its like the ComCast/TW merger deal (havent been following - did that actually go through?)

    The other big issue are these companies are also not making the market very favorable to any sort of competition. Take for instance my business land line, the telephone line is own by Verzon, yet my phone service is provided by Qtell.

    Now, Qtell charges me $30 a month for the business line, that same service under Verizon would be much more expensive... Plus as an added bonus, when you call Qtell you talk to a human with in 3 minutes - literally... Verizon, its usually 10 minutes just to get through the phone system...

    but heres the thing... I had residential DSL, through verzion. Mind you verizon owns the phone lines.... Yet because my business phone service was thruogh Qtell, they charged me and extra $5 a month.

    Go figure.
    Willful ignorance is the downfall of every major empire in history.

    "Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun." - Mao, 1938

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: November 20th, 2007, 03:32 PM
  2. The latest BAD idea to come out of the Erie County Legislature
    By NEDem08 in forum Morning Breakfast - Breaking News
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: June 15th, 2006, 06:29 PM
  3. Senecas will not obey Federal, State, County or Municipal Laws
    By Unregistered in forum Issues concerning Indian Sovereignty, Land Claims and Casinos
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: June 18th, 2003, 01:53 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •