Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 27

Thread: Jack Abramoff, Who Is He Really?

  1. #1
    Member DR_GONZO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    CHKTG.
    Posts
    2,367

    Jack Abramoff, Who Is He Really?

    9/11 TERRORISTS GAMBLED ON HIS BOATS
    Less than a week before the 9.11 attack, Atta and several other hijackers were aboard one of Abramoff’s casino boats. What no one seems able to answer is this:

    What possible thrill could gambling offer men getting ready to die in less than a week? To this date, their Sept 5 visit to a gambling vessel overrun with retirees remains unexplained.

    http://www.madcowprod.com/06202005.html

  2. #2
    Member DR_GONZO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    CHKTG.
    Posts
    2,367
    GUESS WHO STOPPED INVESTIGATION IN 2002?
    ...all this Abramoff stuff was going to be investigated by a United States Attorney, but just as he began to ask questions...

    ...the WHITE HOUSE ORDERED HIM FIRED!
    http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/arc..._07.php#006251

    This is by far the most corrupt administration in American history. Every day, another report about the evil they do, yet there is so much of it, most Americans can't even grasp it all.

  3. #3
    Member DR_GONZO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    CHKTG.
    Posts
    2,367
    DID ABRAMOFF FUND SETTLER TERRORISTS?
    Will the media give this aspect of the Abramoff case little notice? No doubt!

    http://msnbc.msn.com/id/7615249/site/newsweek/

  4. #4
    Member DR_GONZO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    CHKTG.
    Posts
    2,367
    In emails now made public by the Senate Committee on Indian Affairs, who is investigating his activities, Abramoff repeatedly referred to Native Americans as "monkeys", "troglodites" and "idiots."

    Abramoff via email once asked his co-conspirator Scanlon to meet a client, saying, "I have to meet with the monkeys from the Choctaw tribal council. You need to close the deal... with the client..."

    About one tribal client (date unknown) Abramoff wrote to Scanlon, "These mofos are the stupidest idiots in the land for sure." In another email message he wrote, "we need to get some money from those monkeys!!"

  5. #5
    Member DR_GONZO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    CHKTG.
    Posts
    2,367
    Very interesting

    Abramoff

  6. #6
    Member dtwarren's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    West Seneca, New York, United States
    Posts
    4,636
    From the Wall Street Journal
    BUSINESS WORLD
    By HOLMAN W. JENKINS, JR.

    Indian Taker
    January 11, 2006; Page A15

    Jack Abramoff was sui generis -- a personality out of control, flamboyantly corrupt, engaged in bizarre antics that your average Zegna-clad Washington lobbyist would never have dreamed of. And yet one of the soggy paper bags that we journalists have a hard time punching our way out of is the notion that any scandal, when it reaches a certain prominence, must be representative. Enron wasn't the exception but the norm of corporate behavior. Jack Abramoff is just the protruding left toe under a bedsheet of K Street corruption.

    In fact, the downfall of the man known in every press account as a "Republican lobbyist" was not remotely the upshot of workaday lobbying on behalf of corporations over this or that tax or regulatory issue. The media is wowed by the numbers in such cases but the millions the government giveth or taketh away are less impressive on corporate income statements, and are usually competed away in the marketplace for a company's goods or services.

    How different when Washington can conjure vast wealth for specific individuals or small groups by granting unique privileges to exploit the public without competition, as in the peculiar case of Indian casinos.

    Mystifying, then, is why all hands insist on treating Indians as Mr. Abramoff's "victims." Louisiana's Coushatta Tribe was under no compulsion to pay him $32 million; it did so to foil another tribe's gambling project and secure its own inflated margins.

    "You're the problem, buddy, in what happened to American Indians," Sen. Ben Nighthorse Campbell lectured an Abramoff associate two years ago. Huh? Mr. Custer's, er, Mr. Abramoff's sole interesting feature, aside from his self destructiveness and his possibly larcenous attempt to get into the gaming business himself, was his chutzpah in asking for such a big piece of change to do the tribes' dirty work.

    Political anthropologists will have to excavate why Mr. Abramoff is a mega-scandal when peeps were barely raised about previous outrages in which the chief actors were public officials who presumably owed a higher standard of conduct. Say, several political appointees in the Bureau of Indian Affairs who, in the waning days of the Clinton administration, tossed aside expert advice and recognized a bunch of new "tribes" just before spinning themselves out the revolving door and into jobs as lawyers for Indian gambling interests.

    One of them, Michael Anderson, after he'd officially left his post, continued to sign and backdate documents to help one tribe. Mr. Anderson, an "enrolled member" of the Muskogee Nation, and a deputy, Loretta Tuell, a Nez Perce member, are now partners at the firm of Monteau and Peebles, connected lineally to the very foundation myth of Indian gaming.

    No, we're not referring to the prehistoric "hoop and pole game," touted on one tribe's Web site. The beginning traces to the ancestral year of 1983, when an unemployed Connecticut welder, who may or may not have been one-sixteenth Pequot, wangled recognition for his defunct tribe. With backing from a Malaysian billionaire, and over the impotent objections of most of Connecticut, he launched the Foxwoods casino.

    Foxwood's operators felt vulnerable and in need of allies, so another resurrected tribe, the Mohegans, teamed up with another billionaire, South African Sol Kerzner. Swiftly approving their Mohegan Sun casino was Harold Monteau, the Clinton-appointed head of the National Indian Gaming Commission, who ignored opposition from agency staff and from both of his
    fellow commissioners.

    Need we add that Mr. Monteau, a Chippewa-Cree, was eventually shooed from office by congressional critics (mostly Democrats)? His law firm, with the Mohegans as a major client, now serves as a landing place for other fixers
    on the wing.

    Mr. Abramoff was sui generis, all right. He wasn't an Indian and obviously lacked the discretion to keep his sleaze between even such compendious lines, allowing him to enjoy the fruits thereof undisturbed by prosecutors.

    If there's a lesson for anyone but lobbyist trainees here, it's not a very original one. Where opportunities for enormous, instant wealth are sloshing around at the discretion of bureaucrats and legislators, invariably is bad policy to be found.

    Take the minority and small business "set-asides" that produce indictments and jail sentences with such regularity that it's hardly noticed anymore. Or take the FCC auctions for wireless spectrum: A Journal front-pager recently detailed how favoritism for "disadvantaged" entrepreneurs allowed an aerobics instructor and others to pocket large fees as fronts for secret investors.

    Typical of high-profile scandals, the Abramoff affair is a spectacular bit of flotsam left behind by a tide that has already begun to recede. Dozens of defunct "tribes" still seek recognition, and dozens more have their eyes on reclaiming traditional lands that just happen to be near major population centers and freeway interchanges. But the backlash was already underway. It comes from gaming tribes that don't want their good thing spoiled, from state governments that covet gambling proceeds for themselves, from a Congress fed up with "reservation shopping" by casino promoters.
    “We in America do not have government by the majority. We have government by the majority who participate.” ― Thomas Jefferson

  7. #7
    Member DR_GONZO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    CHKTG.
    Posts
    2,367
    White House Silent on Abramoff Meetings

    Mums the word

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    761
    There is so much honor among thieves. Watch the video for a good laugh.

    Abramoff "hearts" Delay
    http://www.crooksandliars.com/2006/01/10.html

    http://movies.crooksandliars.com/cbs...ns_060109a.wmv

    Jack: "Never before has an individual who has been steadfast to our principles-risen as high as Tom Delay."

    Jack: "Tom Delay is who all of us want to be when we grow up."
    ________________________________________

    "when we grow up" ....when does that happen?

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    761
    A "perported" encounter of Scotty M. with Gregory in a "perported" press briefing.

    Get 'em Gregory!!

    Gregory Bashes Scotty over Abramoff
    (6 meg video)
    http://movies.crooksandliars.com/Pre...egory-Jack.wmv

  10. #10
    Member DelawareDistrict's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    2,799
    There was a speech given in Congress Tuesday, Jan 18, concerning the Abramoff scandal. Here are two quotes from the speech:
    The Abramoff scandal has been described as the biggest Washington scandal ever: bigger than Watergate; bigger than Abscam; bigger than Koreagate; bigger than the House banking scandal; bigger than Teapot Dome. Possibly so. It’s certainly serious and significant. . .

    Perhaps some of us in Congress are mistaken about the true problem; perhaps others deliberately distract us from exposing the truth about how miserably corrupt the budget process in Congress is. Others simply are in a state of denial. But the denial will come to an end as the Abramoff scandal reveals more and more. It eventually will expose the scandal of the ages: how and to what degree the American people have become indebted by the totally irresponsible spending habits of the U.S. Congress-- as encouraged by successive administrations, condoned by our courts, and enjoyed by the recipients of the largesse. . .
    I urge anyone reading this to take the time to read the whole speech. While you are reading it, really thing about what is being said and relate it to what you see going on around you everyday. It is a sad situation that if not corrected soon will consume us all.
    The path is clear
    Though no eyes can see
    The course laid down long before.
    And so with gods and men
    The sheep remain inside their pen,
    Though many times they've seen the way to leave.

  11. #11
    Member DR_GONZO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    CHKTG.
    Posts
    2,367
    Why is Bush afraid of pictures of him and Abramoff? How in the hell can't he remember a $100,000 pioneer campaign contributor? That was also a team member on his 2000 campaign staff? WTF!

  12. #12
    Member DR_GONZO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    CHKTG.
    Posts
    2,367
    Bush picks Abramoff prosecutor for federal judgeship

    Good Timing?

  13. #13
    Member DR_GONZO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    CHKTG.
    Posts
    2,367
    Bush Official Warned Abramoff

    This just gets better and better.


    By PETE YOST, Associated Press Writer Sun Jan 29, 9:41 PM ET

    WASHINGTON - The Bush administration's former chief procurement official tipped off lobbyist Jack Abramoff that the government was about to suspend the federal contracts of an Abramoff client, newly filed court papers say.

    David Safavian provided "sensitive and confidential information" about four subsidiaries of Tyco International to Abramoff regarding internal deliberations at the General Services Administration, say the court papers filed Friday in a criminal case against Safavian.

    Abramoff has pleaded guilty to conspiracy, tax evasion and mail fraud in a burgeoning bribery probe centered on Capitol Hill but also involving the Interior Department.

    The White House is refusing to release photographs of
    President Bush and Abramoff or to reveal what contact Abramoff had with White House aides.

    Acting on the information that Abramoff provided the company in November 2003, Tyco lawyer Timothy Flanigan, a former assistant attorney general in the Bush administration, contacted the general counsel to the GSA and asked for an opportunity to address the suspension.

    The company revealed Flanigan's role in a statement.

    In October, Flanigan withdrew his nomination to be Bush's deputy attorney general. His confirmation was delayed due to questions about his dealings with Abramoff when Abramoff was a Tyco lobbyist.

    The government had planned to suspend Tyco because of alleged criminal conduct by former Tyco executives.

    After advising Abramoff about the internal deliberations at GSA, Safavian suggested to Abramoff what arguments Tyco should make when it appealed the suspension decision, the court papers in Safavian's federal court case say.

    Once tipped off by Abramoff, Tyco hired an outside law firm and successfully petitioned the government to lift the suspension and allow Tyco to continue to perform on government contracts.

    The law firm outlined "the many steps that Tyco had taken, including to bring on a new board of directors, a new CEO and new corporate senior management," Tyco said in its statement.

    Safavian faces trial on charges that he lied and obstructed investigations into whether he aided Abramoff in efforts to acquire GSA-controlled property around the nation's capital.

    The government said in its court filing Friday that it intends to present the information regarding Tyco at Safavian's upcoming trial. Safavian has pleaded innocent and his lawyers have moved for dismissal of all charges.

    Safavian is accused of concealing from federal investigators that Abramoff was seeking to do business with the GSA when Safavian joined the lobbyist on a golf trip to Scotland in 2002. At the time, Safavian was GSA's chief of staff. He became the Bush administration's chief procurement official in November 2004.

    In its statement, Tyco said that the information from Abramoff had come in unsolicited, that the corporation did not use Abramoff's services to respond to GSA, and that the company did not contact Safavian directly.

    The company said its outside counsel, George Terwilliger, was assured by Justice Department prosecutors that neither the company nor anyone at the company, including Flanigan, is accused, is suspected or is being investigated for any wrongdoing.

    In May 2003, Abramoff, then employed by the Washington firm Greenberg Traurig, solicited Tyco for lobbying on a tax issue.

    Prosecutors say Abramoff recommended that Tyco hire both him and a public relations and campaign consulting firm called GrassRoots Interactive, but hid from Tyco that GrassRoots Interactive was his business.

    In May and June 2003, Tyco paid GrassRoots Interactive, directly and through Greenberg Traurig's bank account, about $1.8 million, of which about $1.6 million went to Abramoff and entities he controlled, prosecutors say.

    Bush stooge tips Abramoff

  14. #14
    Member DR_GONZO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    CHKTG.
    Posts
    2,367
    Abramoff says he met Bush "almost a dozen" times

    WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Jack Abramoff said in correspondence made public on Thursday that
    President Bush met him "almost a dozen" times, disputing White House claims Bush did not know the former lobbyist at the center of a corruption scandal.

    "The guy saw me in almost a dozen settings, and joked with me about a bunch of things, including details of my kids. Perhaps he has forgotten everything, who knows," Abramoff wrote in an e-mail to Kim Eisler, national editor for the Washingtonian magazine.

    Abramoff added that Bush also once invited him to his Texas ranch.

    The messages were made public by the American Progress Action Fund, a liberal activist group. Eisler confirmed their accuracy to Reuters but said he did not intend them to become public.

    "They reflect the feeling of frustration he has not just with Bush but with all these guys claiming they didn't know him," said Eisler, who knew Abramoff through a book he wrote about the Pequot Indian tribe.

    Abramoff pleaded guilty to fraud charges in early January and is cooperating with prosecutors in a corruption probe that could implicate lawmakers and officials across Washington.

    Bush has said he never had a discussion with Abramoff and does not remember having his picture taken with him.

    The White House has said Abramoff attended three Hanukkah receptions at the White House.

    Eisler said he had seen five photographs of Abramoff with Bush, none taken at Hanukkah parties.

    White House spokesman Scott McClellan said on Thursday that the revelations did not prove Bush knew him well.

    "I think as the president also indicated, he's taken at least five photos with many people in this room at the annual holiday reception. And so I think you need to put this in context," McClellan said.

    Abramoff spokesman Andrew Blum declined to comment.

    Abramoff raised more than $100,000 for Bush's 2004 re-election campaign, a feat that won him an invitation to Bush's ranch in August 2003, the National Journal reported at the time.

    "I was invited during the 2004 campaign," Abramoff told Eisler.

    Abramoff said he did not make the trip because as an Orthodox Jew he cannot travel on Saturdays.

    In the wake of Abramoff's indictment, the Bush-Cheney campaign said it would donate to charity $6,000 in contributions made by Abramoff or his clients, but not the money he helped raise.

    The White House has acknowledged he participated in a few staff-level meetings at the White House.

    Although the Abramoff scandal has mostly focused attention so far on prominent House Republicans, including former Majority Leader
    Tom DeLay of Texas, at least two Bush administration officials have been implicated.

    David Safavian, a former White House budget official, has been charged with lying and obstructing investigations into his 2002 golf outing to Scotland with Abramoff.

    Stephen Griles, the former No. 2 official at the Interior Department, has come under scrutiny after allegations he tried to block a casino at Abramoff's request.

    Abramoff says he met Bush a dozen times

  15. #15
    Member Pauldo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    1,211
    Abramoff-gate: Another Washington Soap Opera
    by Warren Mass
    January 6, 2006

    The Republican Party’s leadership has been more troubled by the recent charges of campaign-related irregularities than it has been since CREEP -- the Committee to Re-Elect the President -- instigated the bungled Watergate break-in that eventually toppled Richard Nixon.

    Those who remember the Watergate scandal may recall that the series of events that brought down the Nixon administration were more notable for their stupidity than their dishonesty, especially considering the presumed level of intelligence and experience of all the parties involved. Watergate was likely much more than a case of incredibly inept trespassers caught with their hands in the cookie jar. And the White House effort to cover up the crime was equally clumsy.

    Could the political operatives have been that stupid? A more likely explanation for Watergate is that members of the Nixon’s own administration had been secretly drafted to bring an early retirement to a president who had forgotten that he was answerable to the power brokers who had placed him in office.

    Will the revelations of Jack Abramoff and the charges against Rep. Tom Delay develop into this administration’s Watergate? (Abramoff-gate?) While at this point it is impossible to predict whether Abramoff-gate is merely a warning or something much more ominous for Republican leaders, Americans should be wary of becoming distracted from matters of serious national policy by the mass media’s preoccupation with “chicken stealing” charges. Exactly that scenario has played out during previous presidential administrations.

    Back to Richard Nixon: While the mass media fed the flames of public indignation over the Nixon White House’s involvement in the relatively minor Watergate incident — leading to Nixon’s resignation in the face of likely impeachment — they ignored his far worse crimes in office. Among these were his unconstitutional institution of wage and price controls, his sellout of Free China on Taiwan, and his subsequent opening up of “normal” relations with the murderous mainland Communist Chinese regime.

    In our more recent history, we impeached President Bill Clinton — for his relatively minor transgressions. Yes, Bill Clinton should have been impeached. In 1997, the conservative John Birch Society (JBS) launched a campaign to “Impeach Clinton Now!” on the grounds of bribery, treason, and related presidential high crimes and misdemeanors. Many of these charges were related to the “Chinagate” scandal, in which Johnny Chung, the former fund-raiser for the Democratic Party, admitted to federal investigators that Communist China’s chief of military intelligence funneled $300,000 through him to President Clinton’s 1996 re-election campaign.

    Almost predictably, however, the major media became preoccupied with a matter much less threatening to U.S. national security, the Monica Lewinsky scandal. Though the scandal did lead to Clinton’s impeachment, he was not convicted and removed from office, as he might have been if his impeachment had been based on the more critical charges raised by the JBS-led “Impeach Clinton Now!” campaign. Of equal gravity for America’s well-being, the Lewinsky scandal-driven hoopla obscured important national security lapses by the Clinton administration.

    Now the current Republican leadership is dealing with embarrassing charges. First, Rep. Tom DeLay, who faces charges involving illegal corporate campaign donations, was forced to step down from his position as House majority leader. More recently, the once-powerful lobbyist Jack Abramoff, in making a plea agreement with government prosecutors, has been implicating many key figures on Capitol Hill in receiving legally questionable campaign contributions. Abramoff raised at least $100,000 for the 2004 Bush-Cheney re-election campaign. As a result of Abramoff’s revelations, President Bush's re-election campaign has given up $6,000 in campaign contributions and House Speaker Dennis Hastert and Representative DeLay will also donate Abramoff's campaign contributions to charity.

    It is not at all unlikely that, as “Abramoff-gate” occupies more and more space in the news, the more serious failures of some of the leading Republicans (and Democrats) in the nation’s capital will become obscured. Certainly, there is lingering dissatisfaction with the pointless war in Iraq, which is reflected in the president’s low figures in popularity polls, but the gradual ratcheting-down of our involvement there will probably take the wind out of anti-war sails. The most publicized opponents to the war have missed the point, anyway — that the invasion was waged under the authority of the United Nations and without a congressional declaration of war.

    Congress, for its part, did nothing to uphold its constitutional prerogative to declare war and acquiesced to surrendered authority for the invasion of Iraq to the Executive Branch.

    Other offenses committed by President Bush move dangerously close to being grounds for impeachment, such as his unconstitutional authorization for the National Security Agency (NSA) to eavesdrop on the international communications of U.S. citizens in violation of the warrant requirement of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). And Congress is still debating about whether to extend some of the most intrusive surveillance provisions of the liberty-threatening Patriot Act.

    It would be a national shame and an abandonment of journalist integrity if our nation’s mass media follows the pattern it did during the Nixon and Clinton years and focuses almost exclusively on “chicken stealing” incidents such as improper campaign fundraising — and then remains silent as the administration and Congress trample on the Constitution.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •