Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Continuing, quiet, "backroom" deals signal the onset of even greater future power by

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    761

    Continuing, quiet, "backroom" deals signal the onset of even greater future power by

    Governor Pataki is expected to act soon on a bill that quietly passed both houses of the Legislature in the final hours of the session, authorizing tax breaks for New York City building owners who increase wages for unionized security guards they employ.

    Opponents of the little-known bill called it a straight political barter that puts security standards - and the tax code - at the service of political support from union members. Supporters said it will ultimately lead to increased wages for all guards. Mr. Pataki has 10 days to act on the measure once it reaches his desk, which is likely to happen within days.


    The bill, which passed the Assembly and Senate over the final two days of the 2005 legislative session last month, has angered an outspoken security consultant who was appointed by Mr. Pataki several years ago to review security policy in the state.

    The consultant, Richard "Bo" Dietl, said the bill bears all the marks of
    a backroom deal between Republicans and the powerful Service Employees International Union, which represents unionized guards.


    If approved, the pay raise would be just the most recent instance lawmakers in Albany have quietly brokered a deal with the politically powerful service workers union. The most notable example was a deal Mr. Pataki and the legislative leaders struck with the president of SEIU/1199, Dennis Rivera, in 2002. Mr. Rivera endorsed Mr. Pataki after the governor quietly agreed to increase salaries for hospital and nursing-home workers by $1.8 billion over three years.
    Mr. Spano's seat in the Republican led Senate is viewed as the party's most vulnerable. He was re-elected by just 18 votes last fall, and the Republicans maintain a tenuous 35-27 hold in the Senate.

    A budget analyst with the Manhattan Institute's Empire Center for New York State Policy, E.J. McMahon, said the bill's passage would
    signal the onset of even greater future power by unions over lawmakers in Albany because it would make it seem normal to manipulate the tax code in the service of unions.

    Mr. McMahon first called attention to the bill in a recent article about another tax credit, for comedians, proposed by Mr. Espaillat.
    "This is a horrid piece of legislation," Mr. McMahon said.
    "This is using a tax credit to fully subsidize a pay increase for members of a politically wired union by using building owners as the middlemen.

    The unions ... are now using the tax code and ultimately the taxpayers to finance their collective bargaining. I would predict you have not seen the end of this. This is just the beginning of this stuff."

    __________________________________

    What else did Albany get done this year?
    Not much, the New York Post argues in this editorial.

    Sure, there were rhetorical high-fives when the legislative session ended last month — among lawmakers, that is.

    But what really got done?
    Not much. Expectations are basement-level indeed.

    Take, for example, Albany's biggest bragging point:
    that it finally passed a state budget before the fiscal year began. (Actually, it was about a week later — but close enough for Albany work.)

    That budget calls for spending of some $107 billion — a jump over last year of $4.4 billion, or 4.3 percent,

    that far outpaces the 2.5 percent inflation rate.

    Ouch — taxpayers are going to be smarting for a while over that one.

  2. #2
    Tony Fracasso - Admin
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Buffalo, New York, United States
    Posts
    64,975
    It's almost who's side are the politicans on.

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    761
    There seems to be no signs of any reasonible "fear" of opposing the wants of the taxpayers in NYS and possibly jepordizing their careers in this state "whatsoever".

    And their called "representatives" !


  4. #4
    Tony Fracasso - Admin
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Buffalo, New York, United States
    Posts
    64,975
    You noticed that too huh...

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    761

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    5,398
    I am not surprised at all. I had read months ago about the SEIU deal prior to the election. Right in the open. SEIU is brazen about their political tie with PTAC. They really aren't quite about any of their negs and deals. The news of SEIU negs are printed in the SEIU website and letters.

    There are also good union curroption update sites on the net.

    IE - http://www.nlpc.org/artindx.asp

    Patacki is Republican in name tag only.
    The good old boys club of NY.
    Sweatheart deals for the unions. Always paid for by the taxpayers. In the old days they would call it "Protection Money".
    Now they call it "Election money"!

    I suppose the bigger question would be - How do you fight such a large money machine with all that power.
    My suggestion - Start a grass root movement that can generate the same dollars to compete with the machine.
    Now how do you get those dollars? When the people who are most pissed don't have that kind of spare change.
    Answer- Everyone has to pitch in
    Change the leadership by changing the party representatives. Starting at the council seats and up. Takes years and money.
    Or you just don't. You move!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •