Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 47

Thread: Buffalo ends year with 50 homicides !!

  1. #1
    Member cheekman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    6,037

    Buffalo ends year with 50 homicides !!

    WoW What a place.. It was a bloody year for the City of Good Neighbors. What can the city do to stop this??

    Fifty people were victims of homicides last year, up nearly 40 percent from the previous year’s total of 36.

    The vast majority of the killings were related to drug deals and turf wars involving small-time, neighborhood gangs, police say.



    http://www.buffalonews.com/apps/pbcs...121239857/1010
    God must love stupid people; He made so many

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    3,075
    No money, no turf. How do you pull the money out of this? Legalize drugs. All of them, some of the harder drugs will have to have certified distribution systems (i.e. you can use the drugs at low cost but only at a "certified" facility). This will appease addicts and deter new users. Marijuana is practically legal but the money is still associated with it. Make these facilities sources of retraining / addiction education, etc. Seems like a simple solution to me. I think many in LE are also in support of this.

  3. #3
    Member sharky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Amherst
    Posts
    2,182
    and that's only because so many of the shooters can't aim and hit people in the lower arm or leg or even hands and feet
    Vote for freedom, not political parties.
    Politicians need to cut spending

  4. #4
    Tony Fracasso - Admin
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Buffalo, New York, United States
    Posts
    64,977
    Quote Originally Posted by sharky View Post
    and that's only because so many of the shooters can't aim and hit people in the lower arm or leg or even hands and feet
    It might not make a difference but I would think it would be mandatory to have gun safety/target shooting taught in school. Let kids see first hand the damage a stray bullet can cause.

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    4,639
    Quote Originally Posted by Genoobie View Post
    No money, no turf. How do you pull the money out of this? Legalize drugs. All of them, some of the harder drugs will have to have certified distribution systems (i.e. you can use the drugs at low cost but only at a "certified" facility). This will appease addicts and deter new users. Marijuana is practically legal but the money is still associated with it. Make these facilities sources of retraining / addiction education, etc. Seems like a simple solution to me. I think many in LE are also in support of this.
    Yeah, and they should be serving liquor at AA meetings too as part of retraining and addiction education. What coud go wrong with that. The number of murders is shocking but the inability of the police to solve them boggles my mind.

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    3,075
    Actually, the analogy you ought to apply would be prohibition. We all know how well that went. But continue your dismissive and derisive commentary, I can still act like an adult.

  7. #7
    Member steven's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    West Side!
    Posts
    11,541
    Before the low of 36 homicides in 2011, there were 55 homicides in 2010.
    He also added that crime in the city overall has steadily dropped.
    Based on the FBI’s Uniform Crime Report, 24/7 Wall St. identified the 10 U.S. cities with populations of 100,000 or more with the highest rates of violent crime per 1,000 residents

    1. Flint, Mich.
    > Violent crimes per 1,000: 23.4
    > Population: 102,357
    > 2011 murders: 52
    > Median income: $22,672
    > Unemployment rate: 18.9%

    2. Detroit, Mich.
    > Violent crimes per 1,000: 21.4
    > Population: 713,239
    > 2011 murders: 344
    > Median income: $25,787
    > Unemployment rate: 19.9%

    3. St. Louis, Mo.
    > Violent crimes per 1,000: 18.6
    > Population: 320,454
    > 2011 murders: 113
    > Median income: $32,688
    > Unemployment rate: 11.7%

    4. Oakland, Calif.
    > Violent crimes per 1,000: 16.8
    > Population: 395,317
    > 2011 murders: 104
    > Median income: $49,190
    > Unemployment rate: 15.6%

    5. Memphis, Tenn.
    > Violent crimes per 1,000: 15.8
    > Population: 652,725
    > 2011 murders: 117
    > Median income: $37,045
    > Unemployment rate: 11.1%

    6. Little Rock, Ark.
    > Violent crimes per 1,000: 14.9
    > Population: 194,988
    > 2011 murders: 37
    > Median income: $44,415
    > Unemployment rate: 7.2%

    7. Birmingham, Ala.
    > Violent crimes per 1,000: 14.8
    > Population: 213,258
    > 2011 murders: 54
    > Median income: $30,212
    > Unemployment rate: 10.9%

    8. Atlanta, Ga.
    > Violent crimes per 1,000: 14.3
    > Population: 425,533
    > 2011 murders: 88
    > Median income: $41,631
    > Unemployment rate:12.1%

    9. Baltimore, Md.
    > Violent crimes per 1,000: 14.2
    > Population: 626,848
    > 2011 murders: 196
    > Median income: $38,346
    > Unemployment rate: 10.5%
    http://www.nbcnews.com/business/most...america-832351
    The cities with the highest crime rates tend to have particularly high poverty rates, high unemployment and low median income. Two of the worst-off cities, Flint and Detroit, Mich., both have had well-publicized budget woes. Flint was taken over by an emergency city manager after failing to pay its bills in 2011. Detroit is facing similar budget problems and recently came to a temporary oversight agreement with the state.

    IMO legalizing drugs inst the answer, addressing poverty is
    Last edited by steven; January 2nd, 2013 at 12:37 AM.
    People who wonder if the glass is half empty or full miss the point. The glass is refillable.

  8. #8
    Member 300miles's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Buffalo
    Posts
    9,612
    WoW What a place.. It was a bloody year for the City of Good Neighbors.
    Any homicide is bad and they are right to figure out how to stop it. But this article is hype. There were 50 homicides in 2012. During the past 10 years there were ONLY TWO years where the homicide count was less than 50. One of those years was 2011 which they oddly are comparing with 2012 to paint it as a huge "spike". They only mention all this towards the end of the article:

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    3,075
    Yes, certainly poverty is a problem. However, poverty doesn't have to imply violent. You are illustrating a correlation, not causation. What drives the murders is money, guns and the associated criminal activity. Remove the black market and the profit incentive then there is no "turf" to defend, murders will drop. There are equally poor people living in the countryside and the murder rates are lower. Bring the drugs and the money, the murder rate rises.

  10. #10
    Member cheekman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    6,037
    Quote Originally Posted by steven View Post
    Before the low of 36 homicides in 2011, there were 55 homicides in 2010.




    The cities with the highest crime rates tend to have particularly high poverty rates, high unemployment and low median income. Two of the worst-off cities, Flint and Detroit, Mich., both have had well-publicized budget woes. Flint was taken over by an emergency city manager after failing to pay its bills in 2011. Detroit is facing similar budget problems and recently came to a temporary oversight agreement with the state.

    IMO legalizing drugs inst the answer, addressing poverty is
    steve.. poverty is it since we live in a welfare state rust belt cities are noted for high poverty, no jobs, high crime and murders.. more food stamps and no jobs..
    God must love stupid people; He made so many

  11. #11
    Tony Fracasso - Admin
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Buffalo, New York, United States
    Posts
    64,977
    Quote Originally Posted by Genoobie View Post
    Yes, certainly poverty is a problem. However, poverty doesn't have to imply violent. You are illustrating a correlation, not causation. What drives the murders is money, guns and the associated criminal activity. Remove the black market and the profit incentive then there is no "turf" to defend, murders will drop. There are equally poor people living in the countryside and the murder rates are lower. Bring the drugs and the money, the murder rate rises.
    How do you supposed this could be curbed? Drugs are already illegal. How does one remove a market for something that is illegal to sell to begin with?

  12. #12
    Member steven's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    West Side!
    Posts
    11,541
    Quote Originally Posted by Genoobie View Post
    Yes, certainly poverty is a problem. However, poverty doesn't have to imply violent. You are illustrating a correlation, not causation. What drives the murders is money, guns and the associated criminal activity. Remove the black market and the profit incentive then there is no "turf" to defend, murders will drop. There are equally poor people living in the countryside and the murder rates are lower. Bring the drugs and the money, the murder rate rises.
    I disagree, you used prohibition as a example earlier. Lets roll with that:

    During prohibition people where not beating, robing, and murdering, other people for a jack and coke.
    Women were not out walking the streets selling there bodies for a gin and tonic.
    People were not getting there homes invaded in the middle of the night so someone could buy a Michelob.
    Men didn't mug little old lady's for a glass of Merlot.

    Now if you are talking about thug on thug crime you have a point, but that totally ignores the fact that a lot of crime is committed to get the money to purchase drugs. Making it legal wont make it free or address the reason these people turned to drugs in the first place, it will just make it more accessible.
    People who wonder if the glass is half empty or full miss the point. The glass is refillable.

  13. #13
    Member mikenold's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    WNY
    Posts
    7,594
    Quote Originally Posted by steven View Post
    Before the low of 36 homicides in 2011, there were 55 homicides in 2010.


    The cities with the highest crime rates tend to have particularly high poverty rates, high unemployment and low median income. Two of the worst-off cities, Flint and Detroit, Mich., both have had well-publicized budget woes. Flint was taken over by an emergency city manager after failing to pay its bills in 2011. Detroit is facing similar budget problems and recently came to a temporary oversight agreement with the state.

    IMO legalizing drugs inst the answer, addressing poverty is
    Do any of these cities have a republican mayor?
    **free is a trademark of the current U.S. government.

  14. #14
    Member mikenold's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    WNY
    Posts
    7,594
    Quote Originally Posted by mikenold View Post
    Do any of these cities have a republican mayor?
    1. Flint, Mich.
    > Violent crimes per 1,000: 23.4
    > Population: 102,357
    > 2011 murders: 52
    > Median income: $22,672
    > Unemployment rate: 18.9%

    2. Detroit, Mich.
    > Violent crimes per 1,000: 21.4
    > Population: 713,239
    > 2011 murders: 344
    > Median income: $25,787
    > Unemployment rate: 19.9%

    3. St. Louis, Mo.
    > Violent crimes per 1,000: 18.6
    > Population: 320,454
    > 2011 murders: 113
    > Median income: $32,688
    > Unemployment rate: 11.7%

    4. Oakland, Calif.
    > Violent crimes per 1,000: 16.8
    > Population: 395,317
    > 2011 murders: 104
    > Median income: $49,190
    > Unemployment rate: 15.6%

    5. Memphis, Tenn.
    > Violent crimes per 1,000: 15.8
    > Population: 652,725
    > 2011 murders: 117
    > Median income: $37,045
    > Unemployment rate: 11.1%

    6. Little Rock, Ark.
    > Violent crimes per 1,000: 14.9
    > Population: 194,988
    > 2011 murders: 37
    > Median income: $44,415
    > Unemployment rate: 7.2%

    7. Birmingham, Ala.
    > Violent crimes per 1,000: 14.8
    > Population: 213,258
    > 2011 murders: 54
    > Median income: $30,212
    > Unemployment rate: 10.9%

    8. Atlanta, Ga.
    > Violent crimes per 1,000: 14.3
    > Population: 425,533
    > 2011 murders: 88
    > Median income: $41,631
    > Unemployment rate:12.1%

    9. Baltimore, Md.
    > Violent crimes per 1,000: 14.2
    > Population: 626,848
    > 2011 murders: 196
    > Median income: $38,346
    > Unemployment rate: 10.5%
    http://www.nbcnews.com/business/most...america-832351

    I checked! None of these cities have a republican mayor and in fact the majority have not had a republican for more than 40 years!
    **free is a trademark of the current U.S. government.

  15. #15
    Member leftWNYbecauseofBS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    10,873
    Quote Originally Posted by Genoobie View Post
    Yes, certainly poverty is a problem. However, poverty doesn't have to imply violent. You are illustrating a correlation, not causation. What drives the murders is money, guns and the associated criminal activity. Remove the black market and the profit incentive then there is no "turf" to defend, murders will drop. There are equally poor people living in the countryside and the murder rates are lower. Bring the drugs and the money, the murder rate rises.
    There is always going to be a black market. It's rather naive to think otherwise.

    What drives the murders is a class of people who have no options to exist besides engaging in criminal activities. Where these people live is their 'turf' and they will 'defend' it over any issue. If all drugs were legal there still would be a market for drugs sold illegally. Just like there is a black market for guns when you can buy the same gun in a store in the open.

    The murder rate is where it's at right now because those doing the killing have no regard for human life.

    The crime rate is where it is because, as a society, we have shown a higher tolerance for crime. A perfect example is Jay-Z. Here is a guy who rose from the projects, became a drug dealer in his youth and went on to own an NBA team and friends with the President. Compare that to just 50 years ago when everyone knew JFK was 'in' with the mafia but socitey would not allow him to be open with it.

    Right now, if you're a youth in the projects the only detrement to crime is being caught and in some cases going to prison is more welcome than living free.

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. third-lowest number of homicides in Buffalo in 20 years
    By steven in forum Buffalo NY Politics
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: January 4th, 2009, 09:00 PM
  2. 2012: The Year The Internet Ends
    By gonerail in forum Morning Breakfast - Breaking News
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: June 3rd, 2008, 08:42 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •