Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: (Jake Turcotte) Obama: You don’t endorse me? You’re off the plane!

  1. #1
    Member leftWNYbecauseofBS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    10,873

    (Jake Turcotte) Obama: You don’t endorse me? You’re off the plane!

    Obama: You don’t endorse me? You’re off the plane!

    By Jimmy Orr | 10.31.08

    A lot of talk this morning about Barack Obama’s plane and a decision to boot reporters from the New York Post, Dallas Morning News and the Washington Times from traveling on O-Force One.
    The campaign says it’s due to lack of space. But many others see something else. Something more - in the spirit of this Halloween weekend - dastardly. These news outlets all endorsed John McCain.
    Leave it to Drudge
    In typical Drudge-like form, the headline announcing the expulsion screamed controversy:
    “The Big Purge: Skeptical Reporters Tossed Off Obama Plane”
    “Despite pleas from top editors of the three newspapers that have covered the campaign for months at extraordinary cost, the Obama campaign says their reporters — and possibly others — will have to vacate their coveted seats so more power players can document the final days of Sen. Barack Obama’s historic campaign to become the first black American president,” writes Drudge.
    Option B
    To be fair, space on campaign planes can become limited. Especially when you are up in the polls.
    It’s not like the Obama campaign isn’t trying to be helpful to these newspapers. Their suggestion? Get on the campaign bus or even worse — travel with Joe Biden.
    Normally traveling with Biden could be entertaining. The guy would talk your ears off and say something wonderfully quotable.
    But since he’s been placed in the equivalent of Al Gore’s lockbox, he’s no news all-the-time.
    Reactions
    Reactions from the newspapers?
    The Dallas Morning News recognizes that polls are good and Team Obama doesn’t want to upset anything.
    “Sen. Obama is sitting on a lead and doesn’t want to risk aggressive questions by unbiased political reporters,” writes Ryan Rusak.
    He notes Obama hasn’t held a press conference in more than a month and the interviews he has done are with pretty friendly people: Jon Stewart, Rachel Maddow and Pulitzer prize winning journalist Mario Lopez.
    But they don’t necessarily think they’re being punished for checking the McCain box.
    “But we don’t have evidence that the newspaper’s endorsement of Sen. McCain had any bearing on the campaign’s decision to boot us from the plane,” writes Rusak.
    Washington Times
    As for the Washington Times, they aren’t happy with the news. In fact, they feel like they are a pre-election victim of John McCain’s main campaign theme.
    “This feels like the journalistic equivalent of redistributing the wealth, we spent hundreds of thousands of dollars covering Senator Obama’s campaign, traveling on his plane, and taking our turn in the reporter’s pool, only to have our seat given away to someone else in the last days of the campaign,” said Washington Times Executive Editor John Solomon.
    “I hope the candidate that promises to unite America isn’t using a litmus test to determine who gets to cover his campaign,” Solomon adds.
    Official word
    Not so, says the campaign.
    “Unfortunately, demand for seats on the plane during this final weekend has far exceeded supply, and because of logistical issues we made the decision not to add a second plane. This means we’ve had to make hard and unpleasant for all concerned decisions about limiting some news organizations and in some cases not being in a position to offer space to news organizations altogether,” Obama senior adviser Anita Dunn said in a written statement.
    More friendly media
    The Washington Post’s Howard Kurtz notes, however, that “room was suddenly made for two magazines that have not been traveling with the Democratic nominee, Essence and Ebony.”
    No sale
    Ed Morrissey over at Hot Air isn’t buying the official line from Obama. He wonders why they didn’t do this a month ago. After all did anyone really think the New York Post or the Washington Times was going to endorse the Democratic nominee?
    Had they acted a few weeks ago, they could have made it look like Team Obama wanted to give secondary media outlets a chance. Now it just looks like vindictiveness, and perhaps even worse. Obama and his supporters have gotten vicious with reporters who ask questions and do research that put Obama in a bad light, and this adds to the general pattern we’ve seen since the primaries.
    McCain
    The reaction from the McCain camp isn’t surprising. But it should be noted that they’ve booted people too. Maureen Dowd from the New York Times and Time magazine’s Joe Klein were booted earlier this year.
    “The least transparent and the least vetted candidate in history is now the least accessible - not surprising,” said McCain spokesman Tucker Bounds.
    Punishment
    Calling Obama a “sore winner,” the Wonkette neatly sums up the predicament these newspapers face in the last few days.
    Now they will all have to fly commercial in order to get to various events in the last stretch of the campaign. This is the journalistic equivalent of having to walk through the town square in a pom-pom hat and a thong.

  2. #2
    Member leftWNYbecauseofBS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    10,873
    Quote Originally Posted by leftWNYbecauseofBS View Post
    Obama: You don’t endorse me? You’re off the plane!

    By Jimmy Orr | 10.31.08

    A lot of talk this morning about Barack Obama’s plane and a decision to boot reporters from the New York Post, Dallas Morning News and the Washington Times from traveling on O-Force One.
    The campaign says it’s due to lack of space. But many others see something else. Something more - in the spirit of this Halloween weekend - dastardly. These news outlets all endorsed John McCain.
    Leave it to Drudge
    In typical Drudge-like form, the headline announcing the expulsion screamed controversy:
    “The Big Purge: Skeptical Reporters Tossed Off Obama Plane”
    “Despite pleas from top editors of the three newspapers that have covered the campaign for months at extraordinary cost, the Obama campaign says their reporters — and possibly others — will have to vacate their coveted seats so more power players can document the final days of Sen. Barack Obama’s historic campaign to become the first black American president,” writes Drudge.
    Option B
    To be fair, space on campaign planes can become limited. Especially when you are up in the polls.
    It’s not like the Obama campaign isn’t trying to be helpful to these newspapers. Their suggestion? Get on the campaign bus or even worse — travel with Joe Biden.
    Normally traveling with Biden could be entertaining. The guy would talk your ears off and say something wonderfully quotable.
    But since he’s been placed in the equivalent of Al Gore’s lockbox, he’s no news all-the-time.
    Reactions
    Reactions from the newspapers?
    The Dallas Morning News recognizes that polls are good and Team Obama doesn’t want to upset anything.
    “Sen. Obama is sitting on a lead and doesn’t want to risk aggressive questions by unbiased political reporters,” writes Ryan Rusak.
    He notes Obama hasn’t held a press conference in more than a month and the interviews he has done are with pretty friendly people: Jon Stewart, Rachel Maddow and Pulitzer prize winning journalist Mario Lopez.
    But they don’t necessarily think they’re being punished for checking the McCain box.
    “But we don’t have evidence that the newspaper’s endorsement of Sen. McCain had any bearing on the campaign’s decision to boot us from the plane,” writes Rusak.
    Washington Times
    As for the Washington Times, they aren’t happy with the news. In fact, they feel like they are a pre-election victim of John McCain’s main campaign theme.
    “This feels like the journalistic equivalent of redistributing the wealth, we spent hundreds of thousands of dollars covering Senator Obama’s campaign, traveling on his plane, and taking our turn in the reporter’s pool, only to have our seat given away to someone else in the last days of the campaign,” said Washington Times Executive Editor John Solomon.
    “I hope the candidate that promises to unite America isn’t using a litmus test to determine who gets to cover his campaign,” Solomon adds.
    Official word
    Not so, says the campaign.
    “Unfortunately, demand for seats on the plane during this final weekend has far exceeded supply, and because of logistical issues we made the decision not to add a second plane. This means we’ve had to make hard and unpleasant for all concerned decisions about limiting some news organizations and in some cases not being in a position to offer space to news organizations altogether,” Obama senior adviser Anita Dunn said in a written statement.
    More friendly media
    The Washington Post’s Howard Kurtz notes, however, that “room was suddenly made for two magazines that have not been traveling with the Democratic nominee, Essence and Ebony.”
    No sale
    Ed Morrissey over at Hot Air isn’t buying the official line from Obama. He wonders why they didn’t do this a month ago. After all did anyone really think the New York Post or the Washington Times was going to endorse the Democratic nominee?
    Had they acted a few weeks ago, they could have made it look like Team Obama wanted to give secondary media outlets a chance. Now it just looks like vindictiveness, and perhaps even worse. Obama and his supporters have gotten vicious with reporters who ask questions and do research that put Obama in a bad light, and this adds to the general pattern we’ve seen since the primaries.
    McCain
    The reaction from the McCain camp isn’t surprising. But it should be noted that they’ve booted people too. Maureen Dowd from the New York Times and Time magazine’s Joe Klein were booted earlier this year.
    “The least transparent and the least vetted candidate in history is now the least accessible - not surprising,” said McCain spokesman Tucker Bounds.
    Punishment
    Calling Obama a “sore winner,” the Wonkette neatly sums up the predicament these newspapers face in the last few days.
    Now they will all have to fly commercial in order to get to various events in the last stretch of the campaign. This is the journalistic equivalent of having to walk through the town square in a pom-pom hat and a thong.

    HAHA. Nobody with the nuts to respond....

    Change my ass....

  3. #3
    Member raoul duke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    soup line
    Posts
    4,292
    Yeah, so I was perusing the SpeakupWNY archives looking for your indignation when McCain kicked journalists off The Straight Talk Express™ a month or so ago* (all of whom were journalists/columnists who criticized the McCain campaign, btw). But I suppose that was different, right? That, or not your point at all. Keep grasping. It really is getting sad and desperate. But I'm enjoying it, regardless.

    Did you hear Obama might be Malcolm X's love child? No really. . .

    ---

    * I said nothing then and I care to say nothing now, aside from mockery, as I don't see a problem with controlling access in non-public situations.
    One beautiful thing about having a government of the corporations, by the corporations, and for the corporations is that every disaster is measured in terms of economic loss. It's sort of like getting your arm sheared off in a car accident and thinking, "Damn, now it'll take longer to fold the laundry" as blood spurts from your arteries. - The Rude Pundit

  4. #4
    Unregistered
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    On the edge of the SUWNY "penalty box."
    Posts
    9,372
    WOW! Raoul Duke responded without name calling or bringing-up Sarah Palin.

    Must have run out of the good smoke.

  5. #5
    Member raoul duke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    soup line
    Posts
    4,292
    Quote Originally Posted by Surfing USA View Post
    WOW! Raoul Duke responded without name calling or bringing-up Sarah Palin.

    Must have run out of the good smoke.
    WOW! Sucking USA responded without actually contributing to the topic at hand. No wonder most of this board ain't even worth reading anymore.
    One beautiful thing about having a government of the corporations, by the corporations, and for the corporations is that every disaster is measured in terms of economic loss. It's sort of like getting your arm sheared off in a car accident and thinking, "Damn, now it'll take longer to fold the laundry" as blood spurts from your arteries. - The Rude Pundit

  6. #6
    Member leftWNYbecauseofBS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    10,873
    Quote Originally Posted by raoul duke View Post
    Yeah, so I was perusing the SpeakupWNY archives looking for your indignation when McCain kicked journalists off The Straight Talk Express™ a month or so ago* (all of whom were journalists/columnists who criticized the McCain campaign, btw). But I suppose that was different, right? That, or not your point at all. Keep grasping. It really is getting sad and desperate. But I'm enjoying it, regardless.

    Did you hear Obama might be Malcolm X's love child? No really. . .

    ---

    * I said nothing then and I care to say nothing now, aside from mockery, as I don't see a problem with controlling access in non-public situations.
    I am not grasping. I have already accepted that Obama is going to win.

    My point in posting this was to show Obama as someone who is not what people want to think he is. It has nothing to do with McCain.

    This once in a generation BS is what bothers me. This, Obama is different, is what bothers me.

    Obama is just trying to get elected and he ran the perfect campaign. This does not mean he is what is needed or that he will make a great President. THAT IS MY POINT.

    In both cases, no journalist should have been kicked off the plan for what they wrote..yet in both camps it happened.

    Is this what the Obama administration is going to be like? If they did it...so can we? Is it going to come down to Bush f*cked over poor people so Obama can f*ck over rich people? Doesn't this mean that the government is still f*cking over Americans?

    All I want is for politicans to say we are going to shaft "these folks" over here to benefit " these folks" over there...because that is what it boils down to. If supporters of Obama would just admit that he is going to shaft some Americans to benefit those Americans who got him elected...I would be fine with it. To the victor goes the spoils.

    But to say that Obama is doing things for ALL AMERICANS and his policy is what is best for the greater good is what upsets me. That his actions are for the greater good...is wrong.

  7. #7
    Unregistered
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    On the edge of the SUWNY "penalty box."
    Posts
    9,372
    Quote Originally Posted by raoul duke View Post
    WOW! Sucking USA responded without actually contributing to the topic at hand. No wonder most of this board ain't even worth reading anymore.
    Actually, I can honestly say that I look forward to reading your posts.

    We all need a little "comedy" in our lives.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Obama says he wants to stop the deception in the Whitehouse?
    By mikenold in forum USA Politics and Our Economy - President Joe Biden
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: October 24th, 2008, 09:10 AM
  2. Obama vs. Palin Analogies
    By ILOVEDNY in forum USA Politics and Our Economy - President Joe Biden
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: September 4th, 2008, 09:37 AM
  3. Obama opposed a law that would protect children who survive Abortion
    By mikenold in forum USA Politics and Our Economy - President Joe Biden
    Replies: 68
    Last Post: August 16th, 2008, 01:44 PM
  4. Will Obama be first Commander in Chief to oversee a military force with foreign recru
    By qu1nn in forum USA Politics and Our Economy - President Joe Biden
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: June 25th, 2008, 04:20 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •