Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: New York State Educators Hit Pay Dirt with Pensions

  1. #1
    Unregistered Enough's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    4,544

    New York State Educators Hit Pay Dirt with Pensions

    New York State educators hit pay dirt with pensions

    By Mary B. Pasciak NEWS STAFF REPORTER - First of two parts
    Updated: 08/10/08 9:49 AM


    In retirement, John H. George does a little painting, spends a lot of time with his grandchildren and devotes himself to the North Tonawanda Botanical Gardens. He’s spending his golden years much like countless other Western New Yorkers. Except for one thing. His public pension — $205,809 a year — exceeds his former salary.

    It’s the biggest state pension of any retired public employee in Western New York and the ninth largest statewide. It also was years in the making.

    When George was ready to retire from the North Tonawanda schools at age 64, he cashed in hundreds of days of unused vacation and sick time he had racked up during 17 years as superintendent.

    As a result, during his final 12 months on the job, George received more than $500,000. When the state calculated his pension, that extra money was counted.

    “I wouldn’t apologize for it,” he said. “It was some unusual circumstances I happened to be in that resulted in that. I certainly paid my dues.”

    Thousands of other retired educators in Western New York and throughout the state enjoy the fruits of similar end-of-career payouts that fatten their pensions, too.

    Like the former Lewiston-Porter school superintendent who also engineered a pension — $143,802 — that was bigger than his salary.

    Or the retired Buffalo high school principal with a six-figure pension.

    And the Depew math teacher with a pension of more than $90,000 a year — about equal to his pay while working.

    “It is this elephant in the room that’s been growing more obese this decade that everyone refuses to recognize,” said Edmund J. McMahon, director of the Empire Center for New York State Policy, a conservative think tank. “The issue is, somebody’s paying. All this stuff has a cost.”

    System invites abuse

    Pension costs to New York taxpayers have increased fivefold since 2000.

    The Buffalo Public Schools, for example, paid $3.6 million into the state retirement fund in 2000-2001 but kicked in $18.9 million in 2007-08.

    State pension funds are invested in the stock market to help pay pension benefits, but when the stock market tanks, as it did recently, taxpayers end up footing a bigger share of the pension bill.

    At the same time, critics say, the state pension system is designed to invite abuse.

    Stories abound of police racking up overtime in their final years of employment to punch up their pensions. So do reports of double dippers — those who collect a public pension while continuing to work on another public payroll.

    For example, there are sex offenders and other criminals who have been forced out of their jobs but who continue to collect their public pensions.

    And some retired elected officials draw paychecks as well as pensions in two different public arenas.

    At the forefront of the statewide debate on pensions are the public schools, where contract language and state laws permit high-level administrators and teachers to retire relatively young — 55 — with pensions that are, in some cases, bigger than their salaries.

    State officials are aware of the outrage such lucrative pensions create but say the kind of inflated pension that George received is a thing of the past. Lump sum payments for unused sick and vacation time are not included in pension calculations for employees hired after 1971, they said.

    But some 10,000 educators remain in the state’s Tier 1 pension classification, meaning they were hired before 1973, including an unknown number of people hired before 1971.

    That group includes Niagara Falls Superintendent Carmen Granto, 65, who has worked for the district for 42 years.

    Granto’s contract allows him to cash in his unused days.

    At one point, he had accrued 45 vacation days and 747 sick days, worth about $220,000 when cashed in.

    Granto plans to retire in 2009. But rather than taking a lump sum upon retirement, as George did, Granto is cashing in over three years, boosting his annual paycheck, normally around $130,000, to just over $200,000.

    That’s likely to add $33,000 to his pension, making it higher than his base salary, a pension scenario similar to George’s, according to Buffalo News calculations.

    The buybacks he, George and others in Tier 1 received originated at a time when teaching and administrative salaries were low, Granto said.

    “When I started teaching, I was making $5,000 a year. It took me 15 years to pay off my student loans,” he said.

    Exempt from state tax

    During a 44-year career that began in September 1964, George worked as an art teacher in Genesee County and then in the Williamsville school system before becoming an administrator. After working his way up through the ranks, he was named North Tonawanda superintendent in 1989.

    George was viewed as a good superintendent who enjoyed his work. He rarely used his vacation time. He rarely called in sick.

    His reluctance to use his benefit time ultimately paid him huge dividends.

    George received up to five weeks’ vacation a year under his contract, which also stated that the district would pay him the full value of his unused vacation time upon retirement. He also could cash in his unused sick time at one-half its value.

    That’s exactly what he did. By the time George retired in September 2006, at age 64, he had accrued nearly three years of unused time.

    He cashed in 195 vacation days for $149,026.

    He cashed in 426.5 sick days for $165,649.

    And he collected his base salary for $183,417.

    All told, George received $533,749 during his final year in North Tonawanda, according to documents provided by the school district and the New York State Teachers’ Retirement System.

    When it came time for the state to calculate his retirement benefits, his unused sick days and vacation time added an extra $52,865 a year onto his pension, according to a News analysis.

    Not only is the resulting $205,809 pension bigger than George’s base salary had been, but, like all state pensions in New York, it is exempt from state income tax and Social Security tax.

    George said it’s not surprising that his pension is the highest among local superintendents because for many years he was the highest paid among his peers.

    “My compensation was also high in comparison to others, and that got factored in,” he said.

    He added that he accumulated so many sick and vacation days because he stayed in one district for so long.

    “I didn’t take much time off,” he said. “Vacation time was always in the summer. And I was fortunate to have good health all those years.”

    In announcing his retirement, George had said he would devote more time to painting. He’s done some of that but said most of his time has been devoted to his grandchildren, including one who died in 2005. George runs a foundation in his grandson’s memory and spends many days tending to a garden in the child’s honor at the North Tonawanda Botanical Gardens.

    No tweaking needed

    Six-figure pensions are not unheard of among educators.

    Statewide, 696 former teachers and administrators have pensions of more than $100,000, according to the New York State Teachers’ Retirement System. The largest annual pension, $316,245, goes to James H. Hunderfund, a former Long Island superintendent.

    Locally, 15 retirees in Erie and Niagara counties, including George, draw six-figure pensions, records show.

    The 15, all retired administrators, include Marion Canedo, the Buffalo superintendent who retired four years ago with a $121,137 pension, and longtime Orchard Park Superintendent Charles L. Stoddart, whose pension is $109,266.

    Canedo and Stoddart, like most retired school administrators in the region, did not see much of a golden parachute on their way to retirement. Canedo did not receive any lump sums in her final year, according to Buffalo payrolls.

    Stoddart, after serving more than two decades as superintendent in his district, collected $15,732 for unused vacation time.

    Their pensions reached six figures under the basic state pension formula. Educators such as Canedo and Stoddart, who began teaching prior to 1976, collect up to 79 percent of average earnings in their final three to five years. Those hired after 1976 get up to 60 percent; they cannot count unused vacation or sick time toward their pensions.

    Others, though, like John George and Walter S. Polka, capitalized on huge buybacks of unused time.

    Polka retired from Lewiston-Porter in 2003, after running the district for 13 years. In the four years leading up to his retirement, Polka cashed in more than $172,000 in sick time.

    The year he left, he collected another $119,106 for unused sick days and vacation time. Those buybacks helped boost his pension to $143,802 — well over his annual salary of about $109,000.

    Polka did not respond to a request to comment.

    “Although not in any way a typical practice [among superintendents], I am nevertheless embarrassed when these reports surface,” said Donald A. Ogilvie, superintendent of the Erie 1 Board of Cooperative Educational Services. “The public pension system is already

    a substantial benefit that shouldn’t require additional tweaking to squeeze out a few more dollars.”

    Sweetening the pot

    In some districts teachers get pension- inflating buybacks, too.

    In Niagara Falls, for example, teachers can cash in up to 300 unused sick days, the equivalent of more than $40,000 for a veteran educator.

    More than a dozen teachers who launched their careers before 1971 and who retired in the past few years saw their pensions increase because of the extra money they received by cashing in their sick days.

    Other districts, including Buffalo, further sweeten pensions by offering lump sum retirement incentives in addition to sick and vacation day buybacks.

    Buffalo teachers and administrators can cash in 220 unused sick days. Administrators can cash in five weeks of unused vacation days as well. The district also offers “early retirement incentives” to many veteran teachers and administrators — up to about $26,000 for teachers and $50,000 for administrators.

    In just two recent years, the combined payout was $14.5 million to 522 people.

    Aside from retired superintendents, the Buffalo retiree with the biggest pension is former Grover Cleveland High School Principal Benjamin L. Randle Jr., who received $51,662 for unused sick, vacation and personal time in his final year, boosting his pension to $101,032.

    At least eight other principals who retired from Buffalo get pensions of more than $90,000.

    Some smaller school districts in Erie County, including Depew, offer similar incentives.

    For many years, until 2005, teachers in Depew got a $35,000 retirement incentive when they left the district. Teachers also can trade in their unused sick days for health insurance coverage or for cash.

    Many teachers took the cash. In four recent years, the district gave out $2.6 million in incentives to 32 retiring teachers.

    At least 10 teachers each received golden parachutes of more than $100,000. One, a math teacher, got $111,000, according to payroll records. He ended up with a pension of $91,362, the same amount he made while working.

    It all makes for a comfortable retirement for many former school employees — but, some argue, at too high a high cost to those footing the bill.

    “The pension fund is essentially the taxpayers of New York State,” McMahon said.

    mpasciak@buffnews.com
    Thank Goodness for Rumor! After all, "It's for the children"!

  2. #2
    Member 300miles's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Buffalo
    Posts
    9,612



    “I wouldn’t apologize for it. … I certainly paid my dues.” –John George, retired school superintendent with a public pension of $205,809

  3. #3
    Member Bannister's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    North Buffalo
    Posts
    1,229
    Quote Originally Posted by Enough
    Thank Goodness for Rumor! After all, "It's for the children"!
    What does Phil Rumore have to do with this article? All of the examples in the article of people making big money were suburban teachers or Buffalo administrators or superintendents, not Buffalo teachers.

    Or are you just throwing his name out there b/c he embodies the spirit of everything wrong with public education? Those blasted Depew teacher pensions...must be Rumore's fault. Rising gas prices making it more expensive to drive the school buses...blame Phil Rumore.

    Sure, there are some Buffalo teachers still around who are on Tier 1, but the vast majority of them have retired since Williams and the control board took over. There has been a mass exodus of veteren teachers in the past few years.

    Most of the retirees from my building this year were Tier 2's and Tier 3's.

    The state and local districts have been making changes to the retirement system for a long time. It's probably time to make a Tier 5 to allow for even further cutbacks.

    For the news to write an expose about a select few retirees who don't represent the vast majority of teachers in the field today leads me to believe they are just trying to stir up controversy.
    1 Corinthians 13:1 "If I speak in the languages of men and of angels, but have not love, I am only a resounding gong or a clanging cymbal."

  4. #4
    Unregistered Enough's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    4,544
    Quote Originally Posted by Bannister
    What does Phil Rumore have to do with this article?
    Because Phil Rumore is the poster-child for the continued increases in school tax increases. He is the face, advocate, leader. I looked up "school tax increases" in the dictionary and their was a picture of Rumore!

    I don't blame the guy. His job isn't to balance budgets or be concerned with taxes. His job is to get the best deal for the people he represents. But don't get on TV and pretend you are concerned about the "children" while you bend the taxpayers over!

    In fact, I have a certain level of respect for Rumore, he's done quite a bit for the teachers in Buffalo. If I had to negotiate a contract I'd want him on my side! Then again, look at the idiots he's negotiating against.

  5. #5
    Member run4it's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Buffalo
    Posts
    5,689
    Rumore is not for the children, he's for the teachers. He's not SUPPOSED to be for the children. You can, by extension, say that the teachers are for the children, and Rumore is for the teachers, ergo yadda yadda, but he was hired to secure the best teaching atmosphere, period. You can also say that the happier the teachers, the better job they will do FOR the children

    And by the way, how does getting a large pension (and I'm not saying the rules there couldn't stand to be changed) affect one bit the quality of education the students are getting? And I believe (feel free to prove me wrong...it's quite possible) that Rumore represents that Buffalo Teachers Federation. This teacher is from NT. They have nothing to do with each other.
    But your being a dick
    ~Wnyresident

  6. #6
    Member leftWNYbecauseofBS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    10,876
    The good news is, most if not all, of the cases for Teachers/Police/Fire that will be posted in the news are Tier 1. New hires are at tier 4 or 5 and do not get the same perks.

    The bad news is there are a LOT of folks on Tier 1 and 2 who were able to retire at a relatively young age. These folks will be collecting 75k to 200k tax free for 10-40 years. Sadly until these people die, the burden will still be there to the taxpayer.


    In terms of how this effects the kids....

    For every penny spent on pensions a penny is lost on the kids. Now I am not saying that if these pensions were taken away the money would go to the kids. In fact what would happen is the money would simply get wasted somewhere else in the system.


    I recently looked at a home in the Amherst for under 190k. The only reason I looked at it is from inside information that the home was worth MUCH MUCH more based on improvements. The family is simply looking to sell because the owner passed away.

    With a zero down 30 year fixed at 6% the amount in taxes was around 50% of the mortgage payment. Most of those taxes go to the schools and most of the school funds go to the teachers. THAT IS THE PROBLEM.

    In Buffalo, the problems are compounded because there is simply not enough real estate paying taxes or real estate value to support the public school system. Since the product of the public schools is so poor, the situation is only getting worse.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. State commission says mergers are key to any tax relief
    By bornandraised in forum Company Watch, Master planning, Development and Policy Discussion
    Replies: 42
    Last Post: July 22nd, 2008, 05:03 PM
  2. "Democrat" New York State Govenor Spitzer
    By WNYresident in forum Albany NY State budget Capital and Governor Kathy Hochul
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: March 14th, 2008, 11:34 PM
  3. Cutting Red Tape Will Ease Doing Business with State and Local Governments
    By Night Owl in forum Albany NY State budget Capital and Governor Kathy Hochul
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: April 18th, 2005, 12:13 PM
  4. New York State Comptroller Announces Second Quarter 2005 Bond Sale Schedule
    By Night Owl in forum Albany NY State budget Capital and Governor Kathy Hochul
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: April 16th, 2005, 10:58 PM
  5. The Taylor Law and how it kills taxpayers....
    By takethepowerback in forum Morning Breakfast - Breaking News
    Replies: 118
    Last Post: April 10th, 2005, 06:27 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •