Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Flying a Plane Into the World Trade Center? Why Not Fly Out of LaGuardia?

  1. #1
    Unregistered Bringthetruth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,668

    Flying a Plane Into the World Trade Center? Why Not Fly Out of LaGuardia?

    http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=396

    Flying a Plane Into the World Trade Center? Why Not Fly Out of LaGuardia?
    Here is a new, and so far unasked question about the hugely debunked official explanation of the events of September 11th 2001.

    If you spend years planning a spectacular attack on the World Trade Center in New York City, and you are a less than adequate pilot, and you wanted to ensure the attack would be completed without giving the U.S. air defense apparatus the chance to follow their normal procedures and intercept your plane, why would you choose to fly out of Boston? Why would you choose to risk getting lost or stopped as you try to fly 190 miles to your target when you can hijack a plane from one of three airports within sight of the target?

    There are three airports that would enable a pilot or a hijacker to have visual contact with the World Trade Center within a minute or two of takeoff. With all the planning these so called hijackers must have made, how stupid would they have to have been to travel to Boston in order to attack NY? We have been told that the so-called hijackers were barely able to pilot even simple two seater aircraft, but we are supposed to believe that they felt confident enough to navigate to NY from Boston without the help of ground control. Are we to believe that i they would not have flown out an airport from which they had constant visual contact with their target? Also keep in mind that planes taking off from these NY area airports would have more fuel remaining in their tanks when they made contact. They would not have to burn off 45 minutes worth of destructive explosive fuel.

    Here is why they had to fly out of Boston: it is because the real planes had to be switched with the remote controlled modified 737s that actually impacted the towers. Yes, planes did hit the towers and the Pentagon, but not the planes that we have been told. I am convinced based on the current body of evidence, that the planes that hit the towers were 737s flown by remote control and that a Skywarrior hit the Pentagon.

    Where are the other planes? Skeptics would disqualify this commentary by saying something stupid like “well, where are the real planes then?” I’ll tell you where the real planes are, they are destroyed and the people on board were murdered. They were sacrificed for the good of the nation. At least that is the reason for their sacrifice we would hear from a Machiavellian leader who follows such illogic. I will ask that you look into that particular philosophy so that you understand what I mean. We already know that the hawks in the Bush administration are Machiavellian in their thinking; we hear that on a regular basis from Chris Matthews on MSNBC.

    The only problem is that Matthews never explains what that means. In a nutshell that means that the hawks in the White House will lie, cheat, deceive and even kill for the overall good of their mission. These are the same people that lose no sleep about the almost 3000 Americans that they sent to be killed in Iraq as part of this same mission. These people have no problem sacrificing others in order to achieve their mission. They did it with Iraq and they did it on 9/11. Stop telling me that they would never do that because they already did!

    When I teach people how to watch or interpret news I tell them to ask themselves three very important questions when they being told something by the lying bastards in the media:

    #1Does this information make sense to you?
    #2Does this information make sense to you?
    #3Does this information make sense to you?

    Once again, I ask you: would hijackers planning on attacking New York City, a city with 3 airports within direct eyesight of the intended target, choose to launch their attack from 190 miles away when they could have launched their attack from a distance of less than 15 miles? We are told that these hijackers were such geniuses that they could deceive the most sophisticated air defense system in history. After spending all that time and resources to plan an attack of that scale why would minimally trained pilots with no airliner experience make such a senseless choice Think about it!

  2. #2
    Member Daisy H's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    2,059
    What the hell are we talking about here??

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    17,449
    There are three airports that would enable a pilot or a hijacker to have visual contact with the World Trade Center within a minute or two of takeoff.
    60 seconds isn't really much time to kill the flight attendants, bust into the cockpit, overpower the pilots, and make a quick U-turn, now, is it?

    BTT - why you keep posting stupid ****?

  4. #4
    Member kma516's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    472
    Just how far does one have to go before Res puts a stop to the BS, crazy, hate-mongering posts some put forth .... like this one which is SO out there, it's beyond the ozone!!

    The Big Bang Theory: God Spoke and BANG! it happened.

  5. #5
    Member sharky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Amherst
    Posts
    2,063
    Quote Originally Posted by therising
    60 seconds isn't really much time to kill the flight attendants, bust into the cockpit, overpower the pilots, and make a quick U-turn, now, is it?

    BTT - why you keep posting stupid ****?
    plus it's easier to line up on the target from farther out
    Vote for freedom, not political parties.
    Politicians need to cut spending

  6. #6
    Member Eat My Gun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    The Socialist States of Amerika
    Posts
    1,643
    Quote Originally Posted by therising
    60 seconds isn't really much time to kill the flight attendants, bust into the cockpit, overpower the pilots, and make a quick U-turn, now, is it?

    BTT - why you keep posting stupid ****?
    'Nuff said....


    "I won't live by rules that make no sense to me." - Evan Tanner 1971-2008

    Transfixus sed non Mortuus

  7. #7
    Member Eat My Gun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    The Socialist States of Amerika
    Posts
    1,643
    Quote Originally Posted by sharky
    plus it's easier to line up on the target from farther out
    No comments on the topic, but cool avatar....


    "I won't live by rules that make no sense to me." - Evan Tanner 1971-2008

    Transfixus sed non Mortuus

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    2,184
    Quote Originally Posted by kma516
    Just how far does one have to go before Res puts a stop to the BS, crazy, hate-mongering posts some put forth .... like this one which is SO out there, it's beyond the ozone!!
    I'm not agreeing or disagreeing with the thread starting post. That said, my question is: just how far does another poster have to go before it dawns on you that you don't like their posts and you do the sensible thing and begin to ignore them?
    The difference between taxes and robbery is the mode of coercion.

  9. #9
    Member sharky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Amherst
    Posts
    2,063
    Quote Originally Posted by Eat My Gun
    No comments on the topic, but cool avatar....
    snagged it from a spitzer photoshop thread at another site
    Vote for freedom, not political parties.
    Politicians need to cut spending

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. The New World Order Always Knew We Would Resist.
    By gonerail in forum Morning Breakfast - Breaking News
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: February 29th, 2008, 03:55 PM
  2. Dear Mr. Roosevelt. . .
    By raoul duke in forum Morning Breakfast - Breaking News
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: February 1st, 2008, 06:55 PM
  3. World Trade Center
    By speaker in forum Morning Breakfast - Breaking News
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: September 10th, 2006, 03:05 AM
  4. Budget To Include $75m State Investment For New Albany Convention Center And Hotel Co
    By woodstock in forum Morning Breakfast - Breaking News
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: January 18th, 2006, 12:48 AM
  5. Another Silver Bullet Misses The Target?
    By LaNdReW in forum Morning Breakfast - Breaking News
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: November 21st, 2005, 10:09 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •