Casino proponents around here aren't that interested in the factual evidence regarding the damage a casino will do to the surrounding area. They're just sick of having to drive more than 15 minutes to any one of the 5 gaming facilities (not counting Ft. Erie or the Racino at the Fairgrounds) already operating in the area. Ya know, bring blight surrounding the Seneca Niagara Casino closer to home, I guess.
One beautiful thing about having a government of the corporations, by the corporations, and for the corporations is that every disaster is measured in terms of economic loss. It's sort of like getting your arm sheared off in a car accident and thinking, "Damn, now it'll take longer to fold the laundry" as blood spurts from your arteries. - The Rude Pundit
Isn't this what the people want?
First Amendment rights are like muscles, if you don't exercise them they will atrophy.
we already have the blight. why fight every new build in the city. if its not tax payers money let them build it. and that goes for anyone who wants to spend their own money in the city
One good thing about growing old is your secrets are safe with your friends they can't remember them either
Except since the casino will not technically be in the city, the money spent there will not be money spent in the city. However the peripheral costs associated with the casino, will be borne by the taxpayers.Originally Posted by granpabob
One beautiful thing about having a government of the corporations, by the corporations, and for the corporations is that every disaster is measured in terms of economic loss. It's sort of like getting your arm sheared off in a car accident and thinking, "Damn, now it'll take longer to fold the laundry" as blood spurts from your arteries. - The Rude Pundit
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Fools gold ...
Reply With Quote