NYTimes Censors Ron Paul

[gonerail]

This is the third piece I have written today about the blatent and disgusting censorship of Ron Paul aftebeat John McCain today and finished second in all voting in Nevada’s primary.

Ron Paul finished second today beating McCain, Thompson, Giuliani and Huckabee in Nevada.

yet the rag newspaper New York Times found a way to continue to ignore Ron Paul.

The “official results page” on the New York Times website does not even list Ron Paul as a candidate.

Ron Paul has led Rudy Giuliani and Fred Thompson in almost every state so far and has finished second today which is higher than either of them have finished anywhere.

But the New York times thinks this isn’t worth their ink to print.
Ron Paul out performed Senator Edwards today 3 to 1 in percentage points but still they dont even print his name.

The New York Times apparently received the phone call informing them not to give any publicity to Ron Paul, and like a good little corporate tool, they listened.

Explain this image, explain why the 4rth highest ranking candidate is not listed amongst the 6 candidates on the “official results” page?

Welcome to the corruption party New York Times, I will spool your paper and keep it next to my toilet.

http://www.charlotteconservative.com...sors-ron-paul/

[Linda_D]

Well, let's see ...

Romney has 72 delegates ...
McCain has 38 ...
Huckabee has 29 ...
Thompson has 8 ...

and ... drumroll ... Ron Paul has 6 -- yes, count 'em, 6 delegates ...

that puts him ahead of Giuliani with 2 and Hunter with 1!!! Impressive!

[WNYresident]

Either way he is beating

"that puts him ahead of Giuliani with 2 and Hunter with 1!!! Impressive!"