Yes, get them out they are a cancer on our society. They will never assimilate
No let them stay....
I would support it only if it as a nuclear or dirty bomb that killed over a 100,000
Deporting them is better than declaring another foreign war to fight them
Let them stay...its only a small percentage and we can police them (I hope)
In another terrorist attack, would you support repatriating all muslims out of the US
No, there are no absolutes, not all Muslims are terrorists and not all terrorists are Muslim.Originally Posted by Timmy
However, all terrorists should be dealt with to the fullest extent of the law.
This should have been nipped in the bud years/decades ago.
First Amendment rights are like muscles, if you don't exercise them they will atrophy.
Does that mean that if there is another terrorist attack that the Muslims will be behind it? or do we get rid of everyone from Pendleton instead? For crying out loud........
"The horror........The horror..........."
If there is another terrorist attack all Federal Officials, from the President on down, responsible for perpetuating interventionist foreign policy should be tried for treason.
The path is clear
Though no eyes can see
The course laid down long before.
And so with gods and men
The sheep remain inside their pen,
Though many times they've seen the way to leave.
The government of this country has become a stage 4 metastasized tumor.
The difference between taxes and robbery is the mode of coercion.
if there is another attack...like a nuclear bomb then I would not want to be a muslim or a liberal in this country
I agree with this. But, keep the Muslims here. I'll move to Iceland instead.
(I would choose Denmark, but now I read that they are rounding up Alqaida cells in Noerrebro (A Copenhagen district).
This whole poll is making the assumptions:
1. that the terrorist attack was carried out by Muslims?
2. that muslims are not born and raised Americans? (and have a country to be repatriated to)
3. that "letting them stay" is some sort of favor, when in fact it's their constitutional right.
4. that "muslims" are all "arabs"? which they are not. Muslim is their religious group, not an ethnic group ... they can be European, African, Asian, or MiddleEastern.
doesnt matter, if a dirty bomb or nuclear bomb hits the US one of three things will happen
1) repatriation of muslims
2) japanese style internment camps (ie guantanamo removed from all civilian courts and civil rights)
3) vigilante slaughter
It can be argued who started it
It can be argued why
but terrorism is the birth pangs of WWIII.
but this nation hasnt really seen the virulent nationalism of the WWII. Ask a german or a japanese american alive during WWII or a german american during WWI or a jewish american during the McCarthy Communist scare.
You havent seen how this nation can turn on a perceived infection within the body of its population.
This is definitely the name of my next band.
We'll do a mix of Simon and Garfunkle, Cat Stevens and Phil Ochs.
Prejudiced Hatred is hitting a new high in this thread.
That's a good one too! I see this name as a more sitar influenced (Ravi Shankar) style, though.
No. When we start "prohibiting the free exercise thereof" then we've lost the soul of what America is anyway. Literally, it ends America, which is exactly what any terrorist wants.
~WnyresidentBut your being a dick
Freedom has already been prohibited. Its simple, just as the myth of santa clause and the toothfairy condition young minds to have faith in the lies about gods, religion conditions the human brain to have faith in politics. And faith in politics is exactly the problem. No one is willing to fight.
The only thing that could possibly save america for what it was originally intended would be to start over, and this time make religion illegal.
We have lost America brain child.If they hit us again.May Allaha have mercy on there souls becuase we wont.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote