Lancaster Blowhard Nosbisch

[mark blazejewski]

Please don't stop posting. Your opinion is valuable on town politics, town and village situations and life in general.
If there are posters you don't desire to read their comments, just put them on your ignore list.

My Opinion.

If I do post anything, it will be in reaction to an unforseen, highly important circumstance.

As for political involvement, I have said a number of times, absent a special candidacy, I'll never publicly advocate for a candidate again. Not after my experiences with Leary and his supporters. Is the term "supporters" acceptable, or is that now on the list of subversive terms?

As far as the supervisor, I have nothing more to say. I don't care what his policies are perceived to be, I do not think his governing style and temperament are "in the best interests of the community", so how many times and in how many different ways can I say that?

No resident is "irrelevant". I even cherish the contributions and memories of the deceased.

I'm out of here.

[mark blazejewski]

To GroundControl, Lee Chowaniec wrote:

BTW – As you so often mention my name and often lecture me, would it be too much to ask the name of my critic so that I can determine your standing and credibility?

My Opinion:



Curious, if not downright hypocrisy in play.

Even assuming that that commenter does not know Mr. Steel's identity, why is it that he never posed that exact same question to him, especially since he spoke, unrebutted, for Lee on Chowaniec's own thread.

Finally, in response to Mr. Lee Chowaniec's post. Mr. Chowaniec, Mr. Nosbisch, Residents and Town Employee's within the Town Hall and Departments. Know this individual(s) and have realized and known. This individual(s), unfortunately is known as a Chernobyl human being! With a radioactive toxic cynicism and narcissist personality!In our society within our boundaries of Lancaster. This individual(s) has been called a hermetic and antisocial individual(s)! Sitting before their computer waiting for the moment to spout their hatred! To this individual(s) victims only to become just another upon another a casualty!

Did Lee ever test the credibility of that screenname before he adopted its characterizations aimed at me and my wife, which if you accept its comments at face value, allege that GC is my wife?

Did not Chowaniec call me a "recluse" and further supported some of Mr. Steel's other outrageous claims about me?

Why didn't Chowaniec hold Mr. Steel the same standards that he now holds for GroundControl?

Ah, perhaps the esteemed Chowaniec actually knew all along who Mr. Steel is, but actually cowers before the great social media terrorist?

Reader, has it ever occured to you that Lee understands that Mr. Steel may be "a loose cannon" and is simply happy that Steel is not attacking him or his cause?

I do know of another person who feels that such an actor can be "dangerous if we cross him."

Kind of like the mad scientist who is afraid of its own creation?

Bearing in mind that the Leary bunch will do "whatever it takes" to preserve their interests, I can imagine that they may have recruited into their ranks, the likes of "Mr. Steel", the bellowing Speak Up desperado.

Kind of a high price to advance their ball, I would say.

[mark blazejewski]

Lee...It was your staunch position of the "hands off the supervisor" that I found concerning and your silent agreement on Mr. Steel's violent posts that brought nothing but hate speech to these pages.

My Opinion:

You have baited ne forever to take your side with your feud with Mr. Nosbisch. I do not know when the feud began or the reason for it. I will tell you that I know of Mr. Nosbisch for at least 15 years from his attendance at Lancaster town board meetings. Unlike you he is an activist, participates in addressing the town board on town matters, and does impeccable research. He has problems getting his point across in the 5-minute time allotment, but undeserving of your constant outrageous irrelevant attacks.

Is Chowaniec clueless or is he in fact just trolling?

Nosbisch an "activist", seriously?

I think that only he seeks-out those whom he perceives to be the "powerful", and his subsequent activism takes place when those perceived "powerholders" recruit him to throw-out their public forum stink bombs. That he will do, just to enhance his favor with them, just my opinion.

Nosbisch is a participant at town board meetings of course, and participates in the manner I just described, that is only my opinion of course.

Chowaniec criticizes me for not mirroring Nosbisch's roles, but to what end?

Who in their right mind would want to participate in such activities as a mature, level-headed, well-educated adult, when the likes of Nosbisch pre-emptively post on social media inhibiting, abusive admonishments such as this?



I don't know of many people who want to engage such obvious threats and abuse.

Lee criticzed Ruffino and others for their lack of transparency, but these tactics are okay with him?

Maybe Chowaniec really needs to encourage Nosbisch to adjust his approach to the public?

If not Chowaniec, how about Leary himself, who seems to grant Nosbisch what many consider to be special priviledges, as he did at a February, 2025 meeting, let alone to his reaction to others when Nosbisch seemed to interrupt other commenters, as is evidenced during this April 19, 2025 town board meeting?

Reference, 01:09:00 on this link:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EuBQEFrEi6A&t=7136s

Gorja put it so very well...

Nosbisch again gets a break pn his time.

Then speaks to the audience when he's done which is not to be done. The members of the audience are the ones that get spoken to. WTF

Doesn't the average taxpayer have any recourse to this type of approach to the public participation sessions?

I wonder how the NYS Committee On Open Government feels about such seeming disenfranchisement, and perhaps we should request that it investigate on our concerns?

SMH, I can understand why people, who have lives beyond the town hall, do not want to be bothered with such stacked-deck intimidating circuses?

[mark blazejewski]

If not Chowaniec, how about Leary himself, who seems to grant Nosbisch what many consider to be special priviledges, as he did at a February, 2025 meeting, let alone to his reaction to others when Nosbisch seemed to interrupt other commenters, as is evidenced during this April 19, 2025 *town board meeting?

Reference, 01:09:00 on this link:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EuBQEFrEi6A&t=7136s

Correction, that was the April 21, 2025 town board meeting.

[mark blazejewski]

I will tell you that I know of Mr. Nosbisch for at least 15 years from his attendance at Lancaster town board meetings. Unlike you he is an activist, participates in addressing the town board on town matters, and does impeccable research. He has problems getting his point across in the 5-minute time allotment, but undeserving of your constant outrageous irrelevant attacks.

My Opinion:

Yea. he also has problems telling the full truth, but to your twisted comment, it is your version of me, apparently written, in support of your new-found "everlasting" buddy.

More objective sources may characterize me as one "known for his active civic engagement and advocacy on local government and public safety issues."

Possibly, they would cite my participation in " Lancaster Town Board meetings," which has included "providing comments and raising concerns,"and specifically note the February 6, 2023 and October 2, 2023 sessions. Such sources could further hold that my participation reflected my "ongoing involvement in municipal affairs."

Furthermore, they just may refer to my September, 2023 concerns, expressed directly to the town board, relating to " a May 2022 incident at the Buffalo Lancaster Regional Airport," regarding "the denial of access to first responders at the accident site and sought clarification on the Town's response and investigation into the matter ." (That is an entire story in and of itself.)

That same objective source may also note my interaction with the VOL Board of Trustees, during which I raised in detail "concerns about the Lancaster Community Development Corporation." They perhaps would specifically refer to my concerns regarding the "CDC's governance, financial transparency, and potential conflicts of interest," recognizing my requests for "information about board appointments, bylaws, and compliance with state filing requirements," as well as my inquiries into "issues such as trustee resignations and the CDC's relationship with the Village Board ."

That source may also note my commentary on local developments and community affairs, by singling-out my "concerns about the impact of certain policies on elderly and challenged residents of local housing."

So, that may be someone else's version of my participation in local government and affairs.

[mark blazejewski]

The residents of Lancaster are free from ridicule and disparagement tonight, Markie is busy trying to make himself relevant and Gorga is confused.

Free from trash talk; well, almost.

"Markie," really?

Kind of childish, wouldn't you say?

But, given the smears and lies you write about me, perhaps your conscience is kicking in, and the name "Mark" is beginning to haunt you?

I do not write under a screen name. I use the name my parents gave me, so could you please respect the deceased and their memory, and please refer to me by that given name?

[mark blazejewski]

Your wrote this on May 8, five days ago:

This is my last post on this as you have become unhinged and insufferable. I will not roll in the mud with you!

But Today is May 13, and you wrote this:

The residents of Lancaster are free from ridicule and disparagement tonight, Markie is busy trying to make himself relevant and Gorga is confused.

Free from trash talk; well, almost.

Two comments regarding your "relevant" talking point.

(1) Regarding participation in government, I have actually done so many times. The difference between your zany bunch and myself is that I have substantively participated, while your research assistant seems to perform.

Of your prodigy, you recently wrote...

I will tell you that I know of Mr. Nosbisch for at least 15 years from his attendance at Lancaster town board meetings... He has problems getting his point across in the 5-minute time allotment.

Maybe he would not need extra time if he did not depart from the public participation procedures?

You know, small yet troubling things, such as self-determining the starting point of the time limitation clock, directly addressing the audience, both live streaming and in-house, interrupting and challenging other commenters, and generally creating a circus-like, if not intimidating, atmosphere at those meetings?

For Heaven's sake, if he wants to be a showman, perhaps he should get a podcast gig?

Maybe you can co-host the podcast with him: Lancaster's answer to Huntley and Brinkley, eh?

Good luck to him finding a sponsor.

(2) As far as your constant assertion that I desire some sort of relevance, you are the one that, in your own words, is "making an ass out of yourself."

I don't know what you truly mean by "relevant", but if you are referring to my status as a taxpayer and resident, yea, like you and everyone else, I am relevant.

If you were referring to the political world, you're clueless. I never was, am not now, nor do I wish to be, such a political actor, insider, or sycophant. I simply have no desire for such distinctions.

For your information, in the unlikely event that you do not know, you are now fully advised that it was I who stopped my very humble efforts supportive of Leary. That message was unambiguously given to him through your Conservative leadership pal on November 17- long before I became more vocally critical of the supervisor. I conveyed my decision to those parties out of a sense of forewarned fairness.

I can post such written documentation here on Speak Up, but I truly prefer not to. It is my opinion that the best thing you can do is to stop this nonsensical "relevant" part of your narrative.

I anticipate your full cooperation on that narrow point.