Your wrote this on May 8, five days ago:
Today is May 13 and you wrote this:
Two comments regarding your "relevant" talking point.
(1) Regarding participation in government, I have actually done so many times. The difference between your zany bunch and myself is that I have substantively participated, while your research assistant seems to perform.
Of your prodigy, you recently wrote...
Maybe he would not need extra time if he did not depart from the public participation procedures?
You know, small yet troubling things, such as self-determining the starting point of the time limitation clock, directly addressing the audience, both live streaming and in-house, interrupting and challenging other commenters, and generally creating a circus-like, if not intimidating, atmosphere at those meetings?
For Heaven's sake, if he wants to be a showman, perhaps he should get a podcast gig?
Maybe you can co-host the podcast with him: Lancaster's answer to Huntley and Brinkley, eh?
Good luck to him finding a sponsor.
(2) As far as your constant assertion that I desire some sort of relevance, you are the one that, in your own words, is "making an ass out of yourself."
I don't know what you truly mean by "relevant", but if you are referring to my status as a taxpayer and resident, yea, like you and everyone else, I am relevant.
If you were referring to the political world, you're clueless. I never was, am not now, nor do I wish to be, such a political actor, insider, or sycophant. I simply have no desire for such distinctions.
For your information, in the unlikely event that you do not know, you are now fully advised that it was I who stopped my very humble efforts supportive of Leary. That message was unambiguously given to him through your Conservative leadership pal on November 17- long before I became more vocally critical of the supervisor. I conveyed my decision to those parties out of a sense of forewarned fairness.
I can post such written documentation here on Speak Up, but I truly prefer not to. It is my opinion that the best thing you can do is to stop this nonsensical "relevant" part of your narrative.
I anticipate your full cooperation on that narrow point.
Last edited by mark blazejewski; May 13th, 2025 at 10:02 AM.
"No, Mr. B., this is not an attack against you. If or when it comes, you will certainly recognize it as such!"
Ground Control said many times regarding the Conservative Leadershp having their hands in the club's defunding.
I can see that. As the leadership has no kids and have always been against anything regarding the school district.
They complain about the lights left on at a Westwood park playing field.
They are not an "it's for the kids" type of people.
Then, you have Dawn the chameleon and Leary the bully.
Last edited by gorja; May 13th, 2025 at 03:40 PM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)