Why 9/11 Disaster was done from within America

[Dumbfounded]

I find it amusing that the people who believe Bush was behind this elaborate 9/11 hoax are also the people who say Bush can't tie his own shoelaces.

Of course Bush didn't plan the 9/11 attacks by himself!

Look, try and suspend your disbelief, and conspiracy-fringe group mockery to consider one simple fact:

At the VERY LEAST

The Bush Administration ALLOWED the 9/11 terrorist attacks to occur by doing absolutely nothing.

Believe it or not, between the warnings from other nations, the PDFs, FBI and CIA warnings, telling NORAD to "stand down," the airline stock short-selling done by THOUSANDS of Americans on 9/11, continuing to read "My Pet Goat" after the announcement, ZERO intervention by local military aircraft to bring the jets down-

WHY can't people, rational or otherwise accept that its POSSIBLE for our government NOT to give a SH-T about us and to use 9/11 as a "rallying cry," an excuse to invade Iraq?

WHAT other incident or arguments would have rallied our Congress/Senate and nation to support a totally baseless war, which turns out has been for war profitters, not for oil, not for freedom and not to protect the people of the United States

Our national security was not so weak or deficient;Complacent that so much destruction occured on American soil in a reliatively long period of time (by military/airforce response).

You've seen the "tip of the iceberg" of Bush & Co's total lack of conscience

I could care less WHO believes WHAT about 9/11 EXCEPT that given the overwhelming FACTS, at the very LEAST our administration ALLOWED 9/11 to occur.

Destruction, rallying the American people by inaction and/or actual involvement in the terrorist attacks

WHY is it so "impossible" for "Democracy to be destroyed from within for the sake of profit and absolute power?" What?! Some of you out there still believe that Bush is a "religious, family man?"

And who the hell wants a "civil war" to bring the supposed govt officials that perpetrated 9/11 to justice?! Yeah, let's divide the nation even more!

Keeping an open mind is NOT equated with being "nuts"

Is the harsh reality that we're governed by sociopaths so hard to accept?

Remember that most Federal politicians, big oil, the pharmaceuticals and tons of other large, SUCCESSFUL corporate players by their very nature ARE successful BECAUSE they're cold-blooded sociopaths.

You have a few thousand Ted Bundy's ("no, not the shoe salesman Bundy) running the civilized world and perhaps that thought is too difficult to comprehend, let alone accept without derisive half-witted cynical villification!

Were the Apollo missions faked? I doubt it!

Is there a Loch Ness Monster? No way!

Do the major military powers of the world work with ETs? I doubt it?

Is there an Area 51? I don't care!

Does Fisher Rd. dress up as a woman now and then? Of course he does! Duh!

Did J.F.K. get murdered in a govt coup? Yes. The facts point to it.

Is it POSSIBLE that the Bush administration ALLOWED 9/11 to occur as an excuse to rally the nation to invade Iraq & Afghanastan in an act of "Biblical Revenge" based soley on fabrications and desperately pieced-together & dubious itelligence info? Yes. The "circumstantial" facts point to it

[LHardy]

National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
Federal Building and Fire Safety Investigation of the World Trade Center Disaster
Answers to Frequently Asked Questions
http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm

9/11 Revealed?
New book repeats false conspiracy theories
http://usinfo.state.gov/media/Archiv...16-241966.html

Debunking the 9/11 Myths: Special Report
Popular Mechanics examines the evidence and consults the experts to refute the most persistent conspiracy theories of September 11.
http://www.popularmechanics.com/tech...w/1227842.html

Still trying to find candidates other than Ron Paul who support the 9/11 conspiracy.
No luck yet. Wonder why that is?

[Bringthetruth]

National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
Federal Building and Fire Safety Investigation of the World Trade Center Disaster
Answers to Frequently Asked Questions
http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm

9/11 Revealed?
New book repeats false conspiracy theories
http://usinfo.state.gov/media/Archiv...16-241966.html

Debunking the 9/11 Myths: Special Report
Popular Mechanics examines the evidence and consults the experts to refute the most persistent conspiracy theories of September 11.
http://www.popularmechanics.com/tech...w/1227842.html

Still trying to find candidates other than Ron Paul who support the 9/11 conspiracy.
No luck yet. Wonder why that is?

Gravel is the only other guy who would speak up.

Any other of the remaining candidates who speaks up dies mysteriously:see JFK

[Bringthetruth]

my research:

Why did Dick Cheney say that "it seems we were not able to scramble fighter jets in time to protect the Pentagon,"? There was plenty of time. Plus there are a battery of anti-aircraft missles surrounding the White House and the Pentagon. The military behavior completely contradicted standard procedures, which call for jets to be scrambled as soon as a suspected hijacking is reported. They stood down. Why?

Why was there no criminal investigation of the crimes of 9/11? Why were there no military reprimands for incompetence? This administration has been caught in lie after lie. Anyone with any inkling of common sense can see that there was a "stand down" order, and not a "break down" in our defense.

Why did Rumsfield say, "It is a truth that a terrorist can attack any time, any place, using any technique and it's physically impossible to defend at every time and every place against every conceivable technique. Here we're talking about plastic knives and using an American Airlines flight filled with our citizens, and the MISSILE to damage this building (added for emphasis) and similar (inaudible, explosives) that damaged the World Trade Center. The only way to deal with this problem is by taking the battle to the terrorists, wherever they are, and dealing with them." And there is the motive; take the battle to the terrorists. Preemptive military invasions on anyone we deem terrorists. Even the American people. (Read, Confessions of an Economic Hitman, by John Perkins)

Anyone can look back in their 8th grade science book and learn about gravity and "free fall" speeds. Carbon based fires don't collapse steel framed buildings, as evidenced by the Windsor building in Madrid that burned for 17+ hours, and did not collapse. The tallest building in China burned for hours and didn't collapse last week. Explosives bring down steel framed skyscrapers in controlled demolitions at free fall (and near ff) speed. Explosions scattered thousands of pieces of human beings hundreds of feet to land even on the roof tops of other buildings. They found 200 pieces of human remains, scattered in a 500 foot radius; all of them were from the same man.

Carbon fires CANNOT melt steel and leave it in molten pools that burn for 2 months. Only a chemical reaction like thermate, or even depleted uranium can continue burning for that long.

The plane in Brazil exploded after hitting a gas pump, bringing temperatures in excess of 1,800º F. The pictures show a tail section, passenger section, luggage, wings, engines, and 150 + body’s in body bags. Pictures of firemen carrying body bags. I saw none of this at the Pentagon. Why not? They said that the plane “vaporized”. How is that possible? At Hiroshima and Nagasaki, temperatures reached 9,000º F. when the bombs were dropped, turning the innocent civilians into ash. How is it that the plane was vaporized, by kerosene (jet fuel) that burns at a max of 650º F, but not the 185 civilians in that section of the pentagon? 185 people at the pentagon were auditors auditing the missing 2.4 trillion dollars Rumsfeld admitted on September 10th, 2001. Why isn’t this examined. Here is a motive. It’s called greed.

Let me ask you a question: Would a prosecutor in a murder trial be interested in an insurance policy taken out on the victim 6 weeks before their demise? Would the person that obtained said insurance policy be considered suspect? What about a friend of the suspect that not only contaminated the murder site, but cleaned it and got rid of all the evidence? Would the prosecutor be interested in them too? The answers to these questions are undeniably, yes! So why isn’t the media concerned with Larry Silverstein, and Rudy Giuliani? Why was the biggest crime scene in America contaminated and quickly cleaned? Oh, and one more, would witnesses and people that knew the truth but lied and covered for the criminals and murderers be now accomplices? Yes, they would. And that is the corporate owned media.

These are irrefutable facts present in the “public domain”.

Anyone that denies these facts is not only defending a lie, they are complicit in the cover up on one of the most horrific crimes in the history of the United States. They who disregard the facts, and the physics involved, are likened unto the fact deniers of the holocaust.

[Dumbfounded]

National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
Federal Building and Fire Safety Investigation of the World Trade Center Disaster
Answers to Frequently Asked Questions
http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm

9/11 Revealed?
New book repeats false conspiracy theories
http://usinfo.state.gov/media/Archiv...16-241966.html

Debunking the 9/11 Myths: Special Report
Popular Mechanics examines the evidence and consults the experts to refute the most persistent conspiracy theories of September 11.
http://www.popularmechanics.com/tech...w/1227842.html

Still trying to find candidates other than Ron Paul who support the 9/11 conspiracy.
No luck yet. Wonder why that is?

Of course there's "no luck" accusing the Bush adminstration of complicity in 9/11

I read the scientific research and believe that its VERY POSSIBLE that the "pancake effect" may have been due to the literal hinges each floor was secured by.

Of course, all these reports are the products of what most rational people accept as a government-controlled media;"Fox News" is just the most OBVIOUS government media lackey

The federal government has PAID SCIENTISTS to counter Global Warming with "exaustive research" and to find a "positive spin" on global warming.

One of Bush's Surgeon Generals was ORDERED NOT to tell the American public medical FACTS to improve the quality of life-health and safety,.

The federal government can have "experts" say whatever they want them to say BECAUSE they're so damned powerful

ASSUMING that all of the government-supervised scientific research on the materials science of 9/11 is ALL ACCURATE,

There is NO question that Bush, Cheney, Rove and the rest of this sh-t LET 9/11 happen-ALLOWED the United States to be attacked by terrorists.

The Northeast/Eastern corridor of airspace is the most HEAVILY PATROLLED in the United States, kinda due to D.C.'s importance.

NORAD was either "distracted" by counter orders
OR
Told to "stand down" by Cheney or Bush chanelling Cheney.

I remember seeing an ad in "TIME" or "Newsweek" a few years ago, AFTER Rush Lindbaugh's drug charges & admission to addiction which read:

"Rush Lindbaugh: Someone you can trust."
It was a side-profile photo of a smiling, cross-armed Rush, basically the leader and icon of the conservative media (and their Sheepeople audience) in the U.S.

And ANY CRAP "researched" and "published" by the 9/11 Commission is questionable, kinda like the CONSPIRACY-RIDDEN Warren Report

The 9/11 surviving Family members BEGGED the federal government for an investigation into 9/11, an forensic/political investigation which SHOULD have been "AUTOMATIC," 9/11 being a crime or terrorism and all.

A 9/11 widow asked the FIRST leader of the 9/11 Commission, Henry Kissinger if he had done any consulting work for the Bin Laden family and a VERY embarassed Kissinger quickly and quietly withdrew as head of the 9/11 commission.

WHY do you find it IMPOSSIBLE for our "leaders" (some) to betray their own nation for profit and absolute power?!

Are these "high" and "mighty," "holy" politicians EXEMPT from the corruption that corporate executives & other white collar criminals engage in?!

Since WHEN are our W.A.S.P. (mainly) leaders beyond THEFT & MURDER?

When I state that I BELIEVE that the U.S. government is DIRECTLY RESPONSIBLE for the events of 9/11, I do NOT believe that they controlled every ASPECT and person of authority involved in this tragedy

The mainstream media basically ignored the recent deathbed confession of a J.F.K. assasanation insider who confirmed many "conspiracy theory suspicions" regarding the J.F.K. coup.

We could type back and forth until our fingers were bloody and raw.

I will state what I've stated before: I put NOTHING past this adminsitration.

There are NO crimes beyond their warped, twisted
set of values. Values which exist for a microcosm of the human race.

Yes. "Compassionate Conservatism."

JEB BUSH for President!!!
Bill O' Reilly for Vice President!!!
Sean Hannity as Chief Of Staff
Bruce Willis as Secretary Of Defense (He's a proud Conservative!)
Alan Colmes as Press Secretary
Dennis (sellout) Miller as Secretary Of State
Dick Cheney as the secretive well-paid "advisor" to the President
FisherRd as Secretary Of The Navy! Oooh! Those uniforms! Sooooooo tacky!!!
Timmy as Ambassador to Israel
Ann Coulter or Laura Ingrahmin charge of Transexuals of America)
Rush Lindbaugh as the director of the DEA
Karl Rove as special advisor to everyone in power and the bureau of the media

And George Bush as the Beaver!

[Bringthetruth]

To much common sense in these post^

[Surfing USA]

[Bringthetruth]

There should be a national and ongoing debate among participants of both sides of the aisle bringing key facts, figures, and witnesses to bear to bring into the open a true discussion. After all, if the government has nothing to hide, why is there no debate on one of the most important issues of our time, in which wars are being justified, liberties trashed, literally trillions of dollars spent, laws and agencies erected which are classically un-American or unconstitutional, and society re-engineered?

Obviously we are no longer truly free, if this debate is stifled in any way.



Maybe we should first ask: Do you believe the official 9-11 story as told by our government and mainstream media from beginning to end?

We then come to the unavoidable question: Do you really want to know the truth about 9-11?

Most people will instinctively answer “yes of course” to this question, but reality differs from their answers much like it would if you were to ask someone if they recently lied or cheated.

WHY I BELIEVE
If you do not believe it in full, then where do you draw the line between lies and deception, a cover-up and truth? If someone lies to you partly, how do you decide what isn’t a lie and what is?