Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Corporate America: Freedom's Greatest Threat!

  1. #1
    Member Habermill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Sacramento, CA
    Posts
    482

    Corporate America: Freedom's Greatest Threat!

    I bet a few liberals out there would even agree with this synopsis.

    Corporate America: Freedom's Greatest Threat
    by Chuck Baldwin
    July 27, 2007


    Most of us who believe in the free enterprise system have been taught that business interests normally work to the betterment of America's overall health, both commercially and politically. While there might have been a time when this was true, it is definitely not true today. Not only has Big Business become unfriendly to the principles of freedom, it has also become freedom's greatest threat.

    To say that Corporate America is America's greatest threat is a harsh accusation, but one that I believe is warranted. I will even be so bold as to say that freedom has much more to fear from today's Chambers of Commerce than it does from Al Qaida.

    Today's Americans need to carefully heed the sage counsel of Thomas Jefferson, who said, "Merchants have no country. The mere spot they stand on does not constitute so strong an attachment as that from which they draw their gains." The truth of that statement aptly explains the serious damage that Big Business is currently inflicting upon our liberties.

    Someone rightly observed that one can determine the focus of, and influence upon, societies by analyzing its architecture. For example, from the founding of Jamestown in 1607 through the beginning of the War for Southern Independence, the most notable buildings (in most communities) belonged to churches. From the mid-nineteenth century to the mid-twentieth century, the most prominent buildings belonged to various governments. From the mid-twentieth century to the present, the biggest, most lavish, and most notable buildings belong to Big Business. This is not accidental or coincidental. These buildings are the monuments of men to the ideas that mean the most to them. Accordingly, a vast number of today's Americans have come to worship at the shrine of Big Business.

    However, this idolatry comes at great price. Not the least of which is the way we have allowed Big Business interests to virtually control governmental policy, including our war and defense policies.

    For example, I recently obtained a copy of the U.S. Navy's "Playbook." This Playbook succinctly summarizes the Department of the Navy's policies and guidelines, and is made available to naval officers and to public affairs professionals. Under the section entitled "Vision" it states, "Americans secure at home and abroad; sea and air lanes open and free for the peaceful and productive movement of international commerce; enduring national and international naval relationships that remain strong and true; steadily deepening cooperation among the maritime forces of emerging partner nations . . ."

    Notice the emphasis of "international commerce," "international naval relations," and "emerging partner nations."

    Under the section entitled "Focus On Execution" it states, "We must continue to embrace the vital contributions that out [sic] partners make in working to secure the global community."

    Notice that part of our Navy's policy is to "secure the global community." So, who is our military charged to defend? Is it the American people? Is it the "global community," or is it Big Business? Navy brass might answer, "All of the above." However, it should seem obvious to anyone who is paying attention that in the grand scheme of things, the will and interests of the American people are being submerged under the will and interests of Big Business, which is creating the global community.

    Under the section "Maritime Strategy" it states, "This new Maritime Strategy is required to face the threats of our interdependent societies and global economy."

    Can the reader not see how that even our military and defense departments are being coerced and manipulated by the interests of Big Business? Need more evidence? Look at Iraq.

    Are you aware that America has almost as many civilian contractors in Iraq as we do military personnel? According to a recent census report, there are more than 100,000 civilian contractors currently working in Iraq. In fact, the war in Iraq has become "the most privatized war in U.S. history." (Source: Multinational Monitor, Nov/Dec 2006) The Halliburton company alone has received some $20 billion from both its oil and troop logistics contracts. Contracts, that according to MM, include "[f]orty-five dollar cases of soda; $85,000 trucks in need of minor repairs . . . tens of millions of dollars in gasoline surcharges; thousands of meals prepared but never served to the troops . . . [and] contaminated water served to the troops."

    And if one were to actually believe that America has any intention of pulling out of Iraq, consider this: experts predict that private, civilian contracts will grow into a $200 billion-a-year global business by 2010. Why do you think that our government is currently constructing the biggest U.S. embassy in the world in downtown Baghdad? In fact, when our embassy in Iraq is finished it will be larger than the Vatican!

    No, my friends, our government has no intentions of pulling out of Iraq. Not next year. Not ever! Why? It is the desire of Big Business that we be there.

    Consider, too, the way that the Chambers of Commerce around America attempt to facilitate the flow of illegal aliens into our country. In fact, the national Chamber of Commerce is one of the biggest proponents of amnesty for illegal aliens. Many within Corporate America also support "sanctuary cities" for illegal aliens. They lobby our congressmen in Washington, D.C., and in state capitols to NOT enforce our nation's laws against companies that hire illegals and against illegals themselves.

    Anyone with even a modicum of common sense understands that nothing compromises America's safety and security as does the current invasion of our country by illegal aliens. How anyone can believe that President Bush is serious about fighting a "war on terror" when he has done absolutely nothing for nearly six years to secure our borders and ports is the height of naïveté.

    As we can easily observe by reading the aforementioned U.S. Navy's own Playbook, this administration is basing its foreign and domestic policies more on the desires of Big Business than the interests of the American people. And lest Democrats think that, should they capture the White House in 2008, things will change, guess again. The same Big Business interests that control the Republican Party control the Democratic Party, which means there will be no significant change to our government's policy regarding Iraq if Democrats are in charge. Count on it!

    Look, too, at how Big Business tries to manipulate laws regarding the right to keep and bear arms. One of the chief proponents of denying people the right to transport firearms in their vehicles to and from work is Corporate America. All over the country, companies threaten their employees with dismissal should they have firearms in their cars. In fact, it is the diabolical duo of Big Business and Big Government that are the biggest proponents of denying the American people their right to personal self-defense.

    Speaking of personal self-defense, if you own a firearm and intend to have ammunition to put in that firearm, you might want to buy it while you can afford it. By the first of next year, the price of ammunition will be at least double what it is today, that is providing one can find it at all. The reason? Corporate America is selling the raw ingredients necessary for the construction of ammunition (at top dollar, I might add) to Red China. As with everything else, Corporate America would rather sell to Communist China than to the American people.

    Another sign of Corporate America's treachery: just last Tuesday (July 24, 2007), Westinghouse Electric Company signed a deal to build four nuclear power plants in China and to transfer technology for its newest reactor to a Chinese partner. According to Westinghouse president, Steve Tritch, the Chinese nuclear plant deal is worth "multibillion-dollar contracts." But the Chinese buyers asked the company not to disclose details. (Source: the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette) Just like we will never be told why China is buying up all the raw materials that go into making ammunition.

    Of course, the marriage of Corporate America with the communist elite in China is now well established. USA Today recently reported that "U.S. corporate profits in China passed $2 billion the first six months of 2006." Companies currently doing business in China include Caterpillar, Starbucks, Greif (a Delaware, Ohio-based maker of industrial packaging), General Motors, Google, UPS, Microsoft, Nike, AT&T, and of course, Wal-Mart. In addition, the Chrysler Corporation recently announced that it will begin importing cars made in China.

    In fact, the American Chamber of Commerce in Shanghai represents over 1,300 corporations, including 150 Fortune 500 companies, and the U.S.-China Business Council represents 250 companies doing business all across China. (Source: Multinational Monitor)

    Plus, we should realize that it is Corporate America that is behind the push to outsource America's jobs and industries. It is also Corporate America that is behind the push to create a NAFTA superhighway and North American Community. In short, it is Corporate America that is behind the push to sacrifice America's national sovereignty and independence.

    It is also Corporate America that opposes Country Of Origin Labeling (COOL) laws that would require companies to tell consumers where their food comes from. In fact, such a law was passed back in 2002 and signed by President Bush, but Corporate America's lobbyists successfully blocked the implementation of that law. Therefore, you and I still have no idea where the food we purchase comes from.

    The list just goes on and on.

    As one can easily see, Corporate America has morphed into an international juggernaut that threatens our safety and security, as well as our liberty and independence in a way that foreign terrorists could only dream about. The American people need to start seeing these giant corporations for what they really are: freedom's greatest threat.

    © Chuck Baldwin

  2. #2
    qu1nn
    Guest
    Good Article,


    Who is really to blame?
    We are.... for allowing it.

    A small percentage of the population is making decisions for the majority. Of that small percentage making decisions most of them can be classified as psychopaths. Do some research on it and you can find the root cause.



  3. #3
    Member Habermill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Sacramento, CA
    Posts
    482
    Here is a list of large corporations that are also members of the CFR:

    Corporate Membership
    (as of July 28, 2007)


    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    President's Circle
    ALCOA, Inc.
    American Express Company
    American International Group, Inc.
    Amgen Inc.
    Archetype Discoveries Worldwide
    Balyasny Asset Management, LP
    Bennett Jones LLP
    BP p.l.c.
    Bridgewater Associates, Inc.
    CA
    Chevron Corporation
    Citi
    Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation
    ConocoPhillips Company
    Drake Management LLC
    Exxon Mobil Corporation
    Federal Express Corporation
    Fortress Investment Group LLC
    GlaxoSmithKline
    Guardsmark LLC
    H.J. Heinz Company
    Hess Corporation
    Investcorp International, Inc.
    Kingdon Capital
    Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co.
    KPMG LLP
    Landor Associates
    Lehman Brothers
    Lockheed Martin Corporation
    McKinsey & Company, Inc.
    Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.
    Moody's Investors Service
    Morgan Stanley
    Nike, Inc.
    Pfizer, Inc.
    Reliance Industries Limited
    The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
    The McGraw-Hill Companies
    The Rohatyn Group
    Toyota Motor North America, Inc.
    U.S. Chamber of Commerce
    Veritas Capital

    Premium
    ABC News
    ACE Limited
    AEA Investors Inc.
    Airbus North America
    Alcatel-Lucent
    Alleghany Corporation
    Apax Partners, Inc.
    Apollo Management, LP
    ARAMARK Corporation
    Aramco Services Company
    Archer Daniels Midland Company
    Arnhold and S. Bleichroeder Holdings, Inc.
    Avaya Inc.
    Baker, Nye Advisers, Inc.
    Banco Mercantil
    Bank of America
    Barclays Capital
    BASF Corporation
    Bloomberg
    BNP Paribas
    Booz Allen Hamilton Inc.
    Boston Properties, Inc.
    Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
    Bunge Limited
    CALYON Corporate and Investment Bank
    Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
    Cantillon Capital Management LLC
    Caxton Associates
    CEMEX
    CH2M HILL Companies, LTD
    Cisneros Group of Companies
    CIT Group Inc.
    Continental Properties
    Corsair Capital
    Credit Suisse
    DaimlerChrylser Corporation
    De Beers
    Deere & Company
    Deloitte.
    Deutsche Bank AG
    Devon Energy Corporation
    DTAP/Duquesne Capital
    Duke Energy Corpoation
    DVS Group
    DynCorp International
    Electronic Data Systems Corporation
    Eli Lilly and Company
    Eni S.p.A.
    Equinox Partners, L.P.
    Estee Lauder Companies Inc.
    Ford Motor Company
    Freddie Mac
    Future Pipe Industries, Inc.
    Galt Industries Inc.
    General Atlantic LLC
    General Electric Company
    Google, Inc.
    Granite Associates LP
    Greenberg Traurig, LLP
    Grey Global Group Inc.
    Hasbro, Inc.
    Hitachi, Ltd.
    Houlihan Lokey Howard & Zukin
    IBM Corporation
    Indus Capital Partners, LLC
    InsCap Management, LLC
    Interpipe Inc.
    J.E. Robert Companies
    Jacobs Asset Management, LLC
    Jones Day
    JPMorgan Chase & Co
    KBR
    Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers
    Kometal GMBH Austria
    Kuwait Petroleum Corporation
    Lazard LLC
    Lukoil Americas
    Mannheim LLC
    Marathon Oil Company
    Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.
    Marubeni America Corporation
    MasterCard Advisors
    Masthead Management Partners
    Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw LLP
    MBIA Insurance Corporation
    MeadWestvaco Corporation
    Merck & Co., Inc.
    Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP
    Mitsubishi International Corporation
    Moore Capital Management LLC
    Motorola, Inc.
    Natixis North America, Inc.
    New York Life International, Inc.
    Newlight Associates
    NYSE Euronext
    Occidental Petroleum Corporation
    Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker
    Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
    Pepsico, Inc.
    Phelps Dodge Corporation
    Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation
    Pitney Bowes Inc.
    PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
    Prudential Financial, Inc.
    Rho Capital Partners
    Rothschild North America, Inc.
    Sandalwood Securities, Inc.
    Shell Oil Company
    Sidley Austin LLP
    Sony Corporation of America
    Soros Fund Management
    Standard & Poor's
    Standard Chartered Bank
    Starwood Capital Group
    Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
    The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation
    The Blackstone Group
    The Boeing Company
    The CNA Corporation
    The Coca-Cola Company
    The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc.
    The News Corporation
    The Olayan Group
    The Tata Group
    Time Warner Inc.
    Tishman Speyer Properties, Inc.
    TOTAL S.A.
    Tribeca Enterprises
    U.S. Trust Corporation
    UBS
    United Technologies Corporation
    Verizon Communications Inc.
    Veronis Suhler Stevenson
    Vinson & Elkins LLP
    Visa International
    Volkswagen of America, Inc.
    Vornado Realty Trust
    Wyeth
    Wyoming Investment Corporation
    Wyper Capital
    Xerox Corporation
    Ziff Brothers Investments LLC

    Basic
    AARP
    Access Industries, Inc.
    American Red Cross
    Apple Core Hotels Inc.
    Areva US
    Arnold & Porter LLP
    Baker & Hostetler LLP
    Baker Capital Corp.
    Banca d'Italia
    Banca di Roma
    Barbour Griffith and Rogers
    Bramwell Capital Management, Inc.
    Brown Brothers Harriman & Co.
    C & O Resources, Inc.
    Claremont Capital Corporation
    Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP
    Control Risks Group
    Covington & Burling
    Craig Drill Capital Corporation
    Debevoise & Plimpton LLP
    Ehrenkranz & Ehrenkranz LLP
    Eisner LLP
    Energy Intelligence Group, Inc.
    First Atlantic Capital, Ltd.
    French-American Chamber of Commerce
    Hemispheric Partners
    IC & A Inc.
    Idemitus Apollo Corporation
    Intellispace, Inc.
    Interaudi Bank
    Intesa Sanpaolo
    Invus Group, LLC
    Japan Bank for International Cooperation
    JETRO New York
    Joukowsky Family Foundation
    KS Management Corporation
    Linklaters
    Mark Partners
    Marvin & Palmer Associates, Inc.
    McKinsey & Company, Inc.
    Medley Global Advisors
    Mine Safety Appliances Company
    Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
    Munich Re America Corporation
    Mutual of America
    Nationwide Electrical Supply, Inc.
    Oxford Analytica Inc.
    Peter Kimmelman Asset Management LLC
    Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
    Rolls-Royce North America, Inc.
    Saber Partners, LLC
    Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
    The Baldwin-Gottschalk Group
    The Consulate General of Japan
    Tiedemann Investment Group
    Turkish Industrialists' and Businessmen's Association
    Warburg Pincus LLC
    Weber Shandwick Worldwide
    Wilpon Investors LLC
    Zephyr Management, L.P.

  4. #4
    qu1nn
    Guest
    The use of Non-Government Organizations such as the CFR as well as several other "think-tanks" are creating a path for the implementation of New World Order.


    Laws should be created to disband NGOs influence on governments.
    qu1nn

  5. #5
    Member Habermill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Sacramento, CA
    Posts
    482
    The CFR is the most dangerous organization in the Western Hemisphere. If you look at the list of current government elected officials past and present, it is absolutely staggering. Yes, both Democrats and Republicans are members. It makes you wonder about our two party system in the USA and who is really influencing and even controlling our government.

    For those that never heard about the CFR or Trilateral Commission, please read the following"

    The Council on Foreign Relations
    and the Trilateral Commission


    Most Americans have never heard of these two organizations. But knowing something about them is essential to understanding what has been going on in America for several decades. So, let us examine, first, the Council on Foreign Relations and then...the Trilateral Commission.

    The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR)
    The Council on Foreign Relations (7) was incorporated in 1921. It is a private group which is headquartered at the corner of Park Avenue and 68th Street in New York City, in a building given to the organization in 1929.

    The CFR's founder, Edward Mandell House, had been the chief adviser of President Woodrow Wilson. House was not only Wilson's most prominent aide, he actually dominated the President. Woodrow Wilson referred to House as "my alter ego" (my other self), and it is totally accurate to say that House, not Wilson, was the most powerful individual in our nation during the Wilson Administration, from 1913 until 1921.

    Unfortunately for America, it is also true that Edward Mandell House was a Marxist whose goal was to socialize the United States. In 1912 House wrote the book, Philip Dru: Administrator; In it, he said he was working for "Socialism as dreamed of by Karl Marx." The original edition of the book did not name House as its author, but he made it clear in numerous ways that he indeed was its creator.

    In Philip Dru: Administrator, Edward Mandell House laid out a fictionalized plan for the conquest of America. He told of a "conspiracy" (the word is his) which would gain control of both the Democratic and Republican parties, and use them as instruments in the creation of a socialistic world government.

    The book called for passage of a graduated income tax and for the establishment of a state-controlled central bank as steps toward the ultimate goal. Both of these proposals are planks in The Communist Manifesto. And both became law in 1913, during the very first year of the House-dominated Wilson Administration.

    The House plan called for the United States to give up its sovereignty to the League of Nations at the close of World War I. But when the U.S. Senate refused to ratify America's entry into the League, Edward Mandell House's drive toward world government was slowed down. Disappointed, but not beaten, House and his friends then formed the Council on Foreign Relations, whose purpose right from its inception was to destroy the freedom and independence of the United States and lead our nation into a world government-if not through the League of Nations, then through another world organization that would be started after another world war. The control of that world government, of course, was to be in the hands of House and like-minded individuals.

    From its beginning in 1921, the CFR began to attract men of power and influence. In the late 1920s, important financing for the CFR came from the Rockefeller Foundation and the Carnegie Foundation. In 1940, at the invitation of President Roosevelt, members of the CFR gained domination over the State Department, and they have maintained that domination ever since.

    By 1944, Edward Mandell House was deceased but his plan for taking control of our nation's major political parties began to be realized. In 1944 and in 1948, the Republican candidate for President, Thomas Dewey, was a CFR member. In later years, the CFR could boast that Republicans Eisenhower and Nixon were members, as were Democrats Stevenson, Kennedy, Humphrey, and McGovern. The American people were told they had a choice when they voted for President. But with precious few exceptions, Presidential candidates for decades have been CFR members.

    But the CFR's influence had also spread to other vital areas of American life. Its members have run, or are running, NBC and CBS, the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Des Moines Register, and many other important newspapers. The leaders of Time, Life, Newsweek, Fortune, Business Week, and numerous other publications are CFR members. The organization's members also dominate the academic world, top corporations, the huge tax-exempt foundations, labor unions, the military, and just about every segment of American life.

    Let's look at the Council's Annual Report published in 1978. The organization's membership list names 1,878 members, and the list reads like a Who's Who in America. Eleven CFR members are U.S. senators; even more congressmen belong to the organization. Sitting on top of this immensely powerful pyramid, as Chairman of the Board, is David Rockefeller.

    As can be seen in that CFR Annual Report, 284 of its members are U.S. government officials. Any organization which can boast that 284 of its members are U.S. government officials should be well-known. Yet most Americans have never even heard of the Council on Foreign Relations.

    One reason why this is so is that 171 journalists, correspondents and communications executives are also CFR members, and they don't write about the organization. In fact, CFR members rarely talk about the organization inasmuch as it is an express condition of membership that any disclosure of what goes on at CFR meetings shall be regarded as grounds for termination of membership.

    ...The CFR publishes a very informative quarterly journal called Foreign Affairs. More often than not, important new shifts in U.S. policy or highly indicative attitudes of political figures have been telegraphed in its pages. When he was preparing to run for the Presidency in 1967, for instance Richard Nixon made himself acceptable to the Insiders of the Establishment with an article in the October 1967 issue of Foreign Affairs. (l4) In it, he called for a new policy of openness toward Red China, a policy which he himself later initiated in 1972.

    The April 1974 issue of Foreign Affairs carried a very explicit recommendation for carrying out the world-government scheme of CFR founder Edward Mandell House. Authored by State Department veteran and Columbia University Professor Richard N. Gardner (himself a CFR member), "The Hard Road to World Order" admits that a single leap into world government via an organization like the United Nations is unrealistic. (15)

    Instead, Gardner urged the continued piecemeal delivery of our nation's sovereignty to a variety of international organizations He called for an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece." That means an end to our nation's sovereignty.

    And he named as organizations to accomplish his goal the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank, the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, the Law of the Sea Conference, the World Food Conference, the World Population Conference, disarmament programs, and a United Nations military force. This approach, Gardner said, "can produce some remarkable concessions of sovereignty that could not be achieved on an across-the-board basis."

    Richard Gardner's preference for destroying the freedom and independence of the United States in favor of the CFR's goal of world government thoroughly dominates top circles in our nation today. The men who would scrap our nation's Constitution are praised as "progressives" and "far-sighted thinkers." The only question that remains among these powerful Insiders is which method to use to carry out their treasonous plan.

    The Trilateral Commission
    Unfortunately, the Council on Foreign Relations is not the only group proposing an end to the sovereignty of the United States. In 1973, another organization which now thoroughly dominates the Carter Administration first saw the light of day. Also based in New York City, this one is called the Trilateral Commission.

    The Trilateral Commission's roots stem from the book Between Two Ages (16) written by Zbigniew Brzezinski in 1970. The following quotations from that book show how closely Brzezinski's thinking parallels that of CFR founder Edward Mandell House.

    On page 72, Brzezinski writes: "Marxism is simultaneously a victory of the external, active man over the inner, passive man and a victory of reason over belief."

    On page 83, he states: "Marxism, disseminated on the popular level in the form of Communism, represented a major advance in man's ability to conceptualize his relationship to his world."

    And on page 123, we find: "Marxism supplied the best available insight into contemporary reality."

    Nowhere does Mr. Brzezinski tell his readers that the Marxism "in the form of Communism," which he praises, has been responsible for the murder of approximately 100 million human beings in the Twentieth Century, has brought about the enslavement of over a billion more, and has caused want, privation and despair for all but the few criminals who run the communist-dominated nations.

    On page 198, after discussing America's shortcomings, Brzezinski writes: "America is undergoing a new revolution" which "unmasks its obsolescence." We disagree; America is not becoming obsolete.

    On page 260, he proposes "Deliberate management of the American future...with the...planner as the key social legislator and manipulator." The central planning he wants for our country is a cardinal underpinning of communism and the opposite of the way things are done in a free country.

    On page 296, Mr. Brzezinski suggests piecemeal "Movement toward a larger community of the developed nations...through a variety of indirect ties and already developing limitations on national sovereignty." Here, we have the same proposal that has been offered by Richard Gardner in the CFR publication Foreign Affairs.

    Brzezinski then calls for the forging of community links among the United States, Western Europe, and Japan; and the extension of these links to more advanced communist countries. Finally, on page 308 of his 309-page hook, he lets us know that what he really wants is "the goal of world government".

    A Meeting of Minds

    Zbigniew Brzezinski's Between Two Ages was published in 1970 while he was a professor in New York City. What happened, quite simply, is that David Rockefeller read the book. And, in 1973, Mr. Rockefeller launched the new Trilateral Commission whose purposes include linking North America, Western Europe, and Japan "in their economic relations, their political and defense relations, their relations with developing countries, and their relations with communist countries." (l7)

    The original literature of the Trilateral Commission also states, exactly as Brzezinski's book had proposed, that the more advanced communist states could become partners in the alliance leading to world government. In short, David Rockefeller implemented Brzezinski's proposal. The only change was the addition of Canada, so that the Trilateral Commission presently includes members from North America, Western Europe, and Japan, not just the United States, Western Europe, and Japan.

    Then, David Rockefeller hired Zbigniew Brzezinski away from Columbia University and appointed him to be the Director of the Trilateral Commission.

    ...As with the CFR, we do not believe that every member of the Trilateral Commission is fully committed to the destruction of the United States. Some of these men actually believe that the world would be a better place if the United States would give up its independence in the interests of world government. Others go along for the ride, a ride which means a ticket to fame, comfortable living, and constant flattery. Some, of course, really do run things and really do want to scrap our nation's independence.

    What It All Means
    ...The Council on Foreign Relations was conceived by a Marxist, Edward Mandell House, for the purpose of creating a one-world government by destroying the freedom and independence of all nations, especially including our own. Its Chairman of the Board is David Rockefeller. And its members have immense control over our government and much of American life.

    The Trilateral Commission was conceived by Zbigniew Brzezinski, who praises Marxism, who thinks the United States is becoming obsolete, and who also wants to create a one-world government. Its founder and driving force is also David Rockefeller. And it, too, exercises extraordinary control over the government of the United States.

    The effect of the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission on the affairs of our nation is easy to see. Our own government no longer acts in its own interest; we no longer win any wars we fight; and we constantly tie ourselves to international agreements, pacts and conventions.

  6. #6
    Member Habermill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Sacramento, CA
    Posts
    482
    Quote Originally Posted by qu1nn
    The use of Non-Government Organizations such as the CFR as well as several other "think-tanks" are creating a path for the implementation of New World Order.


    Laws should be created to disband NGOs influence on governments.
    qu1nn
    I definitely agree but why aren't Liberals outraged at this. Aren't Democrats Pro Union, Pro Worker etc?

  7. #7
    Member Sylvan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    beyond the sun
    Posts
    4,755
    Quote Originally Posted by Habermill
    I definitely agree but why aren't Liberals outraged at this. Aren't Democrats Pro Union, Pro Worker etc?
    Because most liberals just wear that label so they fit in with their friends. They dont like things that sound like a conspiracy. They live in a similar box as the one religion was created for. Ignorance is bliss.

    The Bilderberg Group is real - http://www.prisonplanet.com/archive_bilderberg.html - and so are the secret societies.

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Amherst
    Posts
    6,426
    This thread is like something out of the X-Files. Remember FEMA, the shadow government secretly invested with powers of worldwide totalitarian rule so it could pave the way for aliens from outer space?

    A one-world government -- the whole nine yards.

    I love conspiracy buffs.

    P.S. What particularly cracked me up about using FEMA as the cover for a coming world-wide (alien ruled) government was that the agency is so totally inept. It couldn't even handle Katrina, let alone a world-wide government.

  9. #9
    Unregistered
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    2,646

    to quinn, that was very moving video! Thanks for sharing!

    to quinn, that was very moving video! Thanks for sharing!

    I find all this talk of conspiracy rather well rather retarded...yes retarded nor stupid...

    Because one need not be a genious to see the world markets are evolving into currency groups. Most of Europe uses the Euro and most of Central America uses the dollar.....and asia is in play as Japan used to be the dominant currency.

    One need not be a genious to see that the world markets are evolving into trading blocks too!

    One need not be a genious to see that multi-national corporations are not loyal or patriotic to any nation....they are patriotic and loyal to the bottom line....as long as they get their money....they can pick where they want to live.

    One need only look at the airport hub and spoke system to see that the world economics are very similar with capitals on top on regional centers on top of smaller metro areas down to rural areas. It matters not whether it is the US or the entire world....thats just the way its organized.

    and people who go to work everyday know this in business and in politics all the decency and respect is gone.....if someone can accuse you of anything to get your job they will and that pretty much means that only the psychopaths survive and succeed the brutal emotional boxing matches of politics. People like Colin Powell who still have intellect and compassion and courage....they can fight a war...but fighting a political battle surrounded by psycophants and psychopaths is enough to keep all but Jesus Christ from the office of the Presidency.....well except if you have a personal shield against attacks like if your a woman, african american, asian, handicapped, etc.

    But conspiracy....well...ok aliens would be a conspiracy because there is evidence of them thought god created the universe and right now only he knows if where is paint brush took him BUT to label the obvious which is in the news and media everyday as conspiracy its retarded...as if your living your life in a drug filled haze incapable of acknowledging fact as fact but just a passive acceptance to everything until reality head buts you (that is)

  10. #10
    Member Habermill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Sacramento, CA
    Posts
    482
    Quote Originally Posted by sylvan_fettle
    Because most liberals just wear that label so they fit in with their friends. They dont like things that sound like a conspiracy. They live in a similar box as the one religion was created for. Ignorance is bliss.

    The Bilderberg Group is real - http://www.prisonplanet.com/archive_bilderberg.html - and so are the secret societies.
    I agree and so is the CFR and the Trilateral Commission that has both Democrats and Republicans as members in positions of power in the Federal Government.

  11. #11
    Member Sylvan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    beyond the sun
    Posts
    4,755
    Quote Originally Posted by Habermill
    I agree and so is the CFR and the Trilateral Commission that has both Democrats and Republicans as members in positions of power in the Federal Government.
    The 2 party scam is a very old political trick used on populations. And it all starts with a religious brainwashing and then they dumb down where possible. Just look at Timmy for example, not necessarily successfully dumbed down, but definately brainwashed.

    check this out - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DDyDtYy2I0M&NR

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. The nine nations of north america by Garreau
    By Timmy in forum Morning Breakfast - Breaking News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: July 13th, 2007, 07:00 AM
  2. Corporate welfare is public eneny No. 1
    By Jim Ostrowski in forum Morning Breakfast - Breaking News
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: June 23rd, 2007, 06:03 PM
  3. Hysterical right-winger smears first Muslim elected to Congress
    By DansDarkSide in forum USA Politics and Our Economy - President Joe Biden
    Replies: 100
    Last Post: December 17th, 2006, 09:19 PM
  4. Selling Of America
    By Riven37 in forum Morning Breakfast - Breaking News
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: November 29th, 2006, 09:49 PM
  5. Forget About Civil War In Iraq--One Is Coming to America
    By Pauldo in forum USA Politics and Our Economy - President Joe Biden
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: April 11th, 2006, 05:42 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •