Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Durham probe has accelerated

  1. #1
    Tony Fracasso - Admin
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Buffalo, New York, United States
    Posts
    64,577

    Durham probe has accelerated

    Durham probe has 'accelerated,' with more people 'cooperating,' coming before grand jury



    FIRST ON FOX: Special Counsel John Durham’s investigation has "accelerated," and more people are "cooperating" and coming before the federal grand jury than has previously been reported, a source familiar with the probe told Fox News.

    The source told Fox News Monday that Durham has run his investigation "very professionally," and, unlike Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation, his activities, and witness information and cooperation status are rarely, if ever, leaked.


    https://www.foxnews.com/politics/dur...ore-grand-jury

  2. #2
    Member Breezy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    2,270
    Quote Originally Posted by WNYresident View Post
    Durham probe has 'accelerated,' with more people 'cooperating,' coming before grand jury
    HaHaHa!

    Reading the New today, and found this gem...

    Trump claim of ‘Crime of Century’ fizzles in 3-year probe

    WASHINGTON (AP) — Former President Donald Trump once predicted that a special prosecutor appointed during his administration would uncover “the crime of the century” — a conspiracy to sink his 2016 campaign.

    Yet here are the results of the three-year probe by prosecutor John Durham: two trial acquittals — the latest on Tuesday — and a former FBI attorney sentenced to probation.

    That has fallen far short of Trump supporters’ expectations that Durham would reveal a “deep state” plot behind the U.S. government’s investigation into ties between Russia and Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign.

    The outcome has led to scrutiny over the purpose of Durham’s appointment by former Attorney General William Barr, who tasked him with sussing out misconduct in the Trump-Russia probe. It also has raised questions about whether or when the current attorney general, Merrick Garland, might move to rein in Durham’s work or hasten its completion.

    “You really measure the success of an investigation by what it uncovers in terms of pernicious activity, and he’s uncovered nothing,” said Stephen Saltzburg, a George Washington University law professor and former senior Justice Department official.

    There are no signs Durham plans to charge anyone else in his investigation. He is expected to produce a report at some point, but it’s unclear whether he will identify any significant misconduct or errors beyond those already reported by the Justice Department’s watchdog.

    Barr gave Durham a broad mandate in 2019 to hunt for wrongdoing by the FBI or other agencies in the early days of their investigation into potential coordination between the Trump campaign and Russia. At the time, Durham was the U.S. attorney in Connecticut with decades of Justice Department experience, including investigating CIA interrogations of terror suspects.

    Trump supporters cheered the appointment, and not just because of Durham's bona fides.

    The appointment was made shortly after the conclusion of an investigation by special counsel Robert Mueller, which found substantial contacts between Russians and Trump associates but did not allege a criminal conspiracy between them. In December 2019, a Justice Department inspector general report concluded that the Russia investigation was opened for a legitimate reason but identified numerous errors in how it was conducted — giving Trump and his supporters an avenue of attack and optimism over Durham.

    But by the end of 2020, there were signs Durham's investigation was losing momentum.

    One of his top prosecutors resigned without explanation from the Justice Department. Months later, Barr told The Wall Street Journal that he did not believe there had been improper activity during the Russia investigation by the CIA, even though suspicions about the intelligence community had helped prompt Durham's appointment in the first place.

    The year ended with just one criminal case — a guilty plea by an FBI lawyer who admitted doctoring an internal email related to the surveillance of a former Trump campaign adviser. Kevin Clinesmith was sentenced to probation, rather than prison. Notably, the case involved conduct uncovered in an earlier investigation by the inspector general, rather than by Durham's team.

    Two other criminal cases, also narrow in nature, faltered. After deliberating for just a few hours, a jury in May acquitted Michael Sussmann, a lawyer for Hillary Clinton's 2016 presidential campaign. He had been accused of lying to the FBI during a meeting in which he presented the bureau's top lawyer with information about Trump he thought should be investigated.

    On Tuesday, a jury acquitted Igor Danchenko, a Russian analyst at a U.S. think tank who'd been accused of lying to the FBI about his role in the creation of a largely discredited dossier — a compendium of unproven assertions that sought to tie Trump to Russia and whose creation was funded by Democrats. During the trial, he attacked the credibility of FBI agents who were his own witnesses.

    Despite the lack of convictions, Durham has still managed to cast an unflattering light on aspects of the Russia investigation. The Danchenko trial, for instance, centered on the origins of the dossier, which helped form the basis of secret surveillance applications the FBI filed to monitor the communications of ex-Trump campaign aide Carter Page.

    Even so, Page was one of numerous threads investigated by the FBI, and the dossier did not initiate the Russia probe. The allegations from Durham's probe have also not erased the core finding of the Mueller probe — that Russia wanted Trump elected and that Trump's team welcomed the help — nor have they swayed jurors.

    “While Durham essentially tried to put the FBI itself on trial through these prosecutions by pointing to missteps and errors in the early Trump-Russia probe, the cases painted the FBI as more victim than perpetrator and evidence of any orchestrated scheme by FBI agents to steer the investigation for political purposes never materialized,” Robert Mintz, a New Jersey lawyer and former federal prosecutor, wrote in an email.

    The Justice Department declined to comment about Durham's future, including how much longer his team might continue or when he might produce a report. Weeks before he resigned, Barr designated Durham as a special counsel to ensure his investigation would continue in the Biden administration.

    A spokesman for Durham declined to comment on criticism of the work.

    Garland and senior Justice Department leaders, perhaps careful to avoid the perception of meddling in such a politically charged investigation, have taken a hands-off approach to Durham's work.

    Before Sussmann was indicted, his attorneys appealed to senior department officials in hopes of preventing a charge, according to a person familiar with the matter who insisted on anonymity to discuss private conversations. But the Justice Department rebuffed the protest, allowing the case to proceed.

    Now, though, there is rising pressure not only on Durham to wrap up but on Garland, as attorney general, to urge him along.

    “I think he was very wise to let this run its course," Saltzburg said of Garland. “I believe the course has been run. It’s over. I believe what Merrick Garland should say to Durham is, it’s time to submit your report and go home.”

    https://buffalonews.com/news/nationa...1b719f56b.html


  3. #3
    Member buffy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    15,301

    Over?

    Saltzburg said “I believe the course has been run. It’s over. I believe what Merrick Garland should say to Durham is, it’s time to submit your report and go home.”


    A spokesman for Durham declined to comment on criticism of the work.

    Durham doesn't leak...no one knows what he'll do next.

    In Other News...

    Merrick Garland Accused of Blocking Durham from Charging Russia Hoax Conspirators
    Democrat President Joe Biden’s Attorney General Merrick Garland is accused of blocking efforts by Special Counsel John Durham to charge conspirators in the Russia Hoax.

    On Friday, former House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes weighed in on the Russiagate case during an appearance on Fox News’s “Hannity.”

    “Something else going on with Durham,” Nunes told host Sean Hannity.
    “He has put systematically the corrupt FBI on trial here.

    “He has showed us that there were so many people that were not just working for the Clinton campaign and the DNC.

    “They also happen to be working for the corrupt FBI or later after the fact.

    “They start to work for the corrupt FBI when they know that they’re actually liars… and they’re not credible.”

    “So, I think what’s happening here, that Durham is being blocked, and I don’t say this lightly,” he added.

    “He is being blocked by somebody within the Department of Justice, or he cannot bring the charges that should be brought right now.

    “And those are charges of conspiracy, of lying to Congress, misleading Congress, defrauding the government…”

    “He has probable cause, how…” Nunes said.

    “Could he possibly be blocked?” Hannity asked.

    “I just don’t see how he hasn’t been able to bring very basic charges,” Nunes said.


    Merrick Garland May Hide Durham Report From Public
    When questioned by GOP senators, President Biden’s nominee for attorney general Merrick Garland said he wouldn’t commit to releasing the Durham report.
    https://thefederalist.com/2021/02/22...t-from-public/

    I wouldn't be so confident that Durham is over; if Merrick Garland is blocking him, we may have to wait a while longer for the adjudication of the Russia Hoax, but it will be adjudicated.

    In the meantime, this is no laughing matter.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Durham probe cost $3.8M over past year
    By politico in forum News Feeds
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: December 22nd, 2021, 03:29 PM
  2. Steele dossier source arrested in Durham probe
    By politico in forum News Feeds
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: November 4th, 2021, 11:51 AM
  3. Durham aide quits amid pressure on Russiagate probe
    By politico in forum News Feeds
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: September 11th, 2020, 05:50 PM
  4. Former FBI attorney pleads guilty in Durham probe
    By politico in forum News Feeds
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: August 19th, 2020, 03:07 PM
  5. Flynn bombshell puts renewed attention on Durham probe
    By WNYresident in forum Mueller - No Russian Collusion - Bill Barr Digs in
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: May 7th, 2020, 03:24 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •