Pictures are worth a thousand WORDS

[gorja]

I'll be voting for Judge Cervi as I always have
The Working Families line doesn't bother me like the rest of you.
I'm sure as Cervi, Amatura and Wozniak do NOT believe in defunding the police

[mark blazejewski]

The Working Families line doesn't bother me like the rest of you.
I'm sure as Cervi, Amatura and Wozniak do NOT believe in defunding the police[/FONT][/SIZE]

Judges enjoy certain electoral latitudes under law, and besides, Cervi is unopposed. Nice try, but the party that has endorsed

As for Amatura and Wozniak, the are the endorsed Working Families Party candidates.

Rudz has the support of the Working Families Party.

Birds of a feather, eh?

Too bad they didn't eliminate the one police officer position when they had the chance.

[gorja]

Judges enjoy certain electoral latitudes under law, and besides, Cervi is unopposed. Nice try, but the party that has endorsed

As for Amatura and Wozniak, the are the endorsed Working Families Party candidates.

Rudz has the support of the Working Families Party.

Birds of a feather, eh?

I still would be voting for Cervi whether the other guy was still in the race or not.
But he still went into the primary to get the Working Families line which you seem to have a problem with the others getting the Working Families line.
My question is electoral latitude or not why is it okay for a judge to seek the line bit not the others???

[mark blazejewski]

My question is electoral latitude or not why is it okay for a judge to seek the line bit not the others???

Judicial races are viewed and treated differently than candidates for other political offices when it comes to party primaries and party endorsements, and you should know that, eh?

But, in the event that you do not, try reading this. It should enlighten you....

2018 Edition
Judicial Campaign Ethics
Handbook
New York State Advisory Committee on Judicial Ethics

Reference: http://ww2.nycourts.gov/sites/defaul...thicshndbk.pdf