Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 17 of 17

Thread: Residents need to know

  1. #16
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    8,966
    Quote Originally Posted by gorja View Post
    No cost to the job seeker.
    What is Indeed?

    Indeed is a free service to job seekers, where you can upload a resume, create job alert emails, search for jobs, save them and apply to them directly. We include all the job listings from major job boards, newspapers, associations, and company career pages, and employers can even post jobs directly to Indeed that may not be available anywhere else.
    Thank you for the tutorial on Indeed and the service they provide. That caused me to go back to the August 23 town board meeting and review the resolution hiring Diana Chamberlain and the town website recording of the meeting.

    Prior to resolution vote, councilmember Leary asked Supervisor Ruffino (resolution sponsor) “to tell us how we came to the hiring of Diana Chamberlain - what was the hiring process?”

    Supervisor Ruffino responded: We listed the position through Erie County, obtained a list and contacted everybody qualified. After exhausting the list, we put it on Indeed. We interviewed numerous candidates and we came to the conclusion Diana was the best candidate.

    That said, it is still not clear to me:

    1. Why the position opening was not listed in Town Hall or on the town website – then or even now during the current search. Like Indeed, there is no cost and it allows Lancaster residents a better opportunity to become aware there is a position open in Lancaster – the way it has always been don, and should continue, IMHO!

    2. Who is the ‘we’ Supervisor Ruffino refers to that initiated the search, interviewed the candidates, and determined who was ‘best qualified’ to fill the position? It certainly wasn’t the councilmembers as Councilman Leary had to ask, ‘what was the hiring process.’

    3. No reason given by the Supervisor for the need of this hiring and/or position specific duties.


    I find it interesting that today there are Internet free services like Indeed and low cost digital services utilized by numerous municipalities and Lancaster does not avail itself to live streaming its board meetings.

    Transparency / openness/ honesty is so easy for politicos to promise. Delivering, not so much!

    The less the public knows and/or questions its public servants, the less accountable / responsible they need be.

    Why do we need to know? As taxpayers we are stakeholders in the town. We are equally responsible to act in the best interest of our community.

  2. #17
    Member mark blazejewski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    5,361
    Quote Originally Posted by Lee Chowaniec View Post
    Thank you for the tutorial on Indeed and the service they provide. That caused me to go back to the August 23 town board meeting and review the resolution hiring Diana Chamberlain and the town website recording of the meeting.

    Prior to resolution vote, councilmember Leary asked Supervisor Ruffino (resolution sponsor) “to tell us how we came to the hiring of Diana Chamberlain - what was the hiring process?”

    Supervisor Ruffino responded: We listed the position through Erie County, obtained a list and contacted everybody qualified. After exhausting the list, we put it on Indeed. We interviewed numerous candidates and we came to the conclusion Diana was the best candidate.

    That said, it is still not clear to me:

    1. Why the position opening was not listed in Town Hall or on the town website – then or even now during the current search. Like Indeed, there is no cost and it allows Lancaster residents a better opportunity to become aware there is a position open in Lancaster – the way it has always been don, and should continue, IMHO!

    2. Who is the ‘we’ Supervisor Ruffino refers to that initiated the search, interviewed the candidates, and determined who was ‘best qualified’ to fill the position? It certainly wasn’t the councilmembers as Councilman Leary had to ask, ‘what was the hiring process.’

    3. No reason given by the Supervisor for the need of this hiring and/or position specific duties.


    I find it interesting that today there are Internet free services like Indeed and low cost digital services utilized by numerous municipalities and Lancaster does not avail itself to live streaming its board meetings.

    Transparency / openness/ honesty is so easy for politicos to promise. Delivering, not so much!

    The less the public knows and/or questions its public servants, the less accountable / responsible they need be.

    Why do we need to know? As taxpayers we are stakeholders in the town. We are equally responsible to act in the best interest of our community.
    Just My Opinion:

    It may be an old, classic patronage hiring strategy that is in play here, but simply with an updated tactic, just my opinion of course.

    Based on some unique insights, I understand that, at least in the past, certain institutions or agencies may have quietly communicated an opening to a desired candidate. Then, to comply with Civil Service Law or other legally-prescribed standards, the position may have been posted in a less-than obvious place, perhaps at a suspiciously a convenient time, and usually with the required duties and skills written in such a way so as to precisely form fit the "resume" of the desired applicant; the perfect patronage position for the perfect political/party hack.

    I am not alleging that such is the case instantly, but this use of "Indeed" to the exclusion of the obvious and commonly visited town website, does make me curious to learn more.
    Last edited by mark blazejewski; September 24th, 2021 at 07:02 AM.
    LIDA Member Rinow to Member Ruda: You were a sitting Trustee on the Board. Did you help support Mr. Sweeney getting a seat on the CDC Board?"

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Let residents decide
    By 4248 in forum Village of Lancaster and Town of Lancaster Politics
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: March 30th, 2010, 09:04 PM
  2. Cheektowaga Residents
    By backorder in forum Cheektowaga, Depew and Sloan Politics
    Replies: 78
    Last Post: January 7th, 2010, 06:53 PM
  3. New Residents/over building
    By 4248 in forum Village of Lancaster and Town of Lancaster Politics
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: May 19th, 2007, 03:51 PM
  4. First Class Residents
    By 300miles in forum Positive Points of Western NY
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: December 23rd, 2006, 08:57 PM
  5. Thank you residents of District #13
    By candidate13 in forum Erie County Politics
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: October 30th, 2005, 01:11 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •