Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: "No Deal," Seriously?

  1. #1
    Member mark blazejewski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    5,352

    "No Deal," Seriously?

    "No deal, seriously?"



    "McCracken said he and his Republican counterpart, Gregg Smith, in January began discussing whether to endorse the same candidates for office 'in an effort to turn down the heat, relative to politics.' The two committees agreed on a slate that left out a sitting Town Board member and town justice."

    Note the reference to January, the month before the February 13, 2021 Republican Reorganization meeting.


    In January, 2021, McCracken's GOP counterpart was Greg Sojka, not Gregg Smith.


    Why was McCracken speaking with one lone Republican Committeeman in January, apparently with a confident presumption that the Committeeman would soon be Republican Chairman, unless there were clandestine efforts underway to depose Sojka, and that those efforts were previously made known McCracken?


    Ergo, if there was "no, quote-unquote, deal," as Gregg Smith states, why was the Town Democrat Chairman discussing the possibility of cross-endorsements with a Republican Committeeman instead of with Chairman Sojka?


    The Republican and Democratic parties in Lancaster took an unusual step ahead of Tuesday's primaries:


    They cross-endorsed a full slate of candidates for two Town Board seats, highway superintendent and town justice.


    Party leaders say they wanted to lower the temperature in the town, long a Democratic stronghold where the closely divided Town Board of recent years has seen infighting and a legislative stalemate.


    "I think we found candidates with a mutual interest to get things done," said Terrence D. McCracken, the Lancaster Democratic chairman.


    But the political détente has spurred a former Lancaster GOP chairman to launch an effort opposing the cross-endorsed Republicans, a campaign joined by the town Conservative Party.


    A photo on a Facebook page used by "Real Republicans" shows someone in front of Town Hall holding a sign that blasts RINOs, or Republicans in Name Only, while dressed in a rhinoceros costume.


    "We just want what's best for the Lancaster residents, regardless of party," said Gregory Sojka, the former town Republican chair.


    The rogue Republican group said it wants to put an end to at least 25 years of Democratic control of the Town Board.


    There was a time, when Democrats held all five seats on the board and unanimous outcomes were the norm, that a dissenting vote was rare enough to make news.


    Today, Democrats have a fragile 3-2 majority on the board, McCracken said, but board members have splintered on various issues, making it difficult at times to do the business of the town.


    "Things in town have become so divisive," McCracken said.


    McCracken said he and his Republican counterpart, Gregg Smith, in January began discussing whether to endorse the same candidates for office "in an effort to turn down the heat, relative to politics." The two committees agreed on a slate that left out a sitting Town Board member and town justice.


    For Town Board, the Republicans and Democrats endorsed Councilman Michael J. Wozniak Jr., a Conservative who aligns with Democrats, and Lancaster Village Trustee Paul H. Rudz, a registered Republican. They passed over Republican Councilman Adam L. Dickman.


    McCracken said Dickman has contributed little to the Town Board since winning office and, instead, is an obstacle to productive governance. Sojka disagrees.


    "I think Adam Dickman has been very effective," he said.


    This sets up two primaries for Town Board: Rudz, Dickman, Wozniak and Mark R. Burkard are running in the GOP primary, with the top two vote-getters gaining the Republican lines on the November ballot. Burkard, Dickman, Wozniak and a fourth candidate, Gregory C. White, are running in the Conservative primary.


    For highway superintendent, the Democrats and Republicans cross-endorsed the incumbent, Daniel J. Amatura, who first won election to the position in 2009 and was a Town Board member before that.


    Smith, the town GOP chairman, said the members of his committee made their decision, via secret ballot, in a transparent process free of pressure from top party officials.


    "There's no, quote-unquote, deal," Smith said.


    However, Deborah Lemaster, the chair of the influential Lancaster Conservative Party, said she received several calls that a bipartisan agreement was in the works, a prospect that concerned her.


    "I didn't like that," Lemaster said. "The voters need a choice."


    Town Conservatives opted to endorse their own candidates, she said, a group embraced by Sojka, who attacked the town Republican committee and Ralph Mohr, the Republican Erie County election commissioner and a Lancaster resident, for their roles in the deal.


    The rogue slate includes Dickman and Burkard for Town Board and John R. Pilato, the town's forestry supervisor and the owner of a lawn care company, for highway superintendent.


    The Conservatives and Sojka's "Real Republican" group say the cross endorsement is a corrupt bargain that will preserve Democratic rule in the town, with all of the patronage hiring that comes with it.


    For example, several Wozniak relatives, including his wife and at least one nephew, are Lancaster town employees, although McCracken said most had to score well on a civil service exam for their job.


    "No deals-no patronage-no BS," Sojka, who also is trying to link the cross-endorsed "RINOs" to progressive proposals such as defunding the police, wrote on Facebook.


    And Sojka accuses Amatura of letting well-connected contractors drop off trees and brush at town collection sites, shifting the cost of disposing of this debris from the companies onto Lancaster taxpayers. McCracken said it was a long-standing, informal practice recently ended by Amatura, though the Town Board must decide on an official policy.


    Amatura and Pilato are running in the Republican and Conservative primaries.


    Smith, Mohr and McCracken said the decision to back the same group of candidates shows local parties can find common ground even as national Republicans and Democrats have bitter policy and electoral disputes.


    "It seems to be very disingenuous what he's trying to do," Mohr said of Sojka's "Real Republican" push. "He's trying to split the party apart."


    The cross-endorsement deal also leaves out Town Justice Anthony J. Cervi, who won election with Republican backing in 2013 and was re-elected in 2017. Democrats and Republicans instead are supporting attorney Anthony G. Marecki, a registered Republican who formerly worked in the Erie County Attorney's Office.


    Cervi, backed by the Conservatives and the splinter Republicans, and Marecki are competing for the Democratic, Republican, Conservative and Working Families ballot lines.
    Reference: https://buffalonews.com/news/local/lancaster-democrat-gop-cross-endorsement-spurs-backlash/article_436c6bbe-ce06-11eb-983b-037cc1cee783.html?utm_campaign=snd-autopilot&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook_&fbclid=IwAR1KrcMlwzIiFh7c1086-nawZ5J_cy6UjE6pEqpmBLwZTgHzrVc7koYZDnY
    Last edited by mark blazejewski; June 18th, 2021 at 01:27 PM.
    LIDA Member Rinow to Member Ruda: You were a sitting Trustee on the Board. Did you help support Mr. Sweeney getting a seat on the CDC Board?"

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    8,957
    Welcome to Lancaster politics

    In a Buffalo News opinion piece titled: “It’s Hamburg, after all,” the News reported today that political sniping in this town elections is depressing but seems predictable. Hamburg is a political junky’s dream and looks like the kindergarten of local politics - petty politics at work on matters that don’t matter.

    Sounds like Lancaster sniping and a kindergarten type political atmosphere? Not exactly. The Hamburg report dealt only with the Highway Superintendent campaign. In Lancaster, this primary election has become toxic and contentious resulting from town and county political party bosses intervening, colluding, deceiving, and obfuscating attempting to control the narrative and a power grab to undermine the democratic political process outcome.

    Smith, Mohr, and McCracken said the decision to back the same group of candidates shows local parties can find common ground even as national Republicans and Democrats have bitter policy and electoral disputes.
    Mohr, and McCracken decide to lower the town political temperature by endorsing the same group of candidates prior to candidate interviews and vetting, and this is not ‘making a deal’? Especially when Sojka was still the Republican Party Chair, not Smith. Why was McCracken dealing with Mohr? Because Mohr still has great influence over the Lancaster Republican Party and had Sojka ousted at the party reorganization meeting that soon followed.

    Not satisfied with cross endorsing candidates, the Republican and Democratic endorsed candidates are also primarying candidates to overthrow the endorsed Conservative Party candidates. If successful, the voters in the Town of Lancaster will be denied any voice in the November election. Why bother voting.

    The Conservative Party endorsed its candidates first. Republican Incumbents Judge Cervi and Councilmember Dickman were endorsed along with conservatives John Pilato (Highway Superintendent), and Mike Burkard for council. The Republican Party did not endorse Republican incumbents Cervi or Dickman. Mohr and his patronage committee cronies being vindictive towards Sojka and Conservative Party Chair Lemaster for not playing along.

    Without a major party ballot line there is little hope of November election victory. All endorsed conservatives are challenging the endorsed Republican candidates for that line..

    One reading the campaign mailers posted on Speakup must be confused as who the good guys are – candidates possessing same voter values / political ideology, holding community best interests rather than their own agendas and political careers. Republican mailers, ‘real’ Republican mailers; Conservative mailers, Conservative Team Leader mailers; Democrat mailers in support of Republican candidates and endorsed Working Family candidates. Obfuscation to the max.

    Bottom Line: If the Republican / Democrat / Working Family party bosses are successful in getting a cross endorsed slate of Marecki (Justice), Amatura (Highway Superintendent), Wozniak (Council), and Rudz (Council) elected, they have deprived the Lancaster electorate of voter choice – especially the over 8,000 town independents and blanks.

    A dangerous precedent, IMHO. What kind of town board government can we expect from individuals who profess left, far left, conservative values and ideologies?

    Incumbent councilmember Mike Wozniak now presents himself as a conservative declaring the Democrats have gone too far left to satisfy his pallet. Yet he has voted consistently with the Democratic Party board majority – after promising to be independent when running for the council seat last year. What can we expect from him now when endorsed by the far-left Marxist Working Family Party?

    Republican Paul Rudz accepting the Democratic Party endorsement and Working Family Party support, advocating replacing the Lancaster Police Department for the Sheriff’s patrol to save money.

    Politics is ugly! It just got uglier. Three political bosses colluded and told the Lancaster electorate to piss off. “We know what’s best for you.”

    When Ralph Mohr is involved you can be assured deal-making is also involved.

  3. #3
    Member mark blazejewski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    5,352
    All-in-all, a pretty straightforward, even-handed article by Mr. Watson.

    Quote Originally Posted by Lee Chowaniec View Post
    Mohr, and McCracken decide to lower the town political temperature by endorsing the same group of candidates prior to candidate interviews and vetting, and this is not ‘making a deal’? Especially when Sojka was still the Republican Party Chair, not Smith.
    When assessed against this seemingly unlabeled example of dealing making, aka collusion,..

    McCracken said he and his Republican counterpart, Gregg Smith, in January began discussing whether to endorse the same candidates for office "in an effort to turn down the heat, relative to politics."
    Reference: https://buffalonews.com/news/local/l...gHzrVc7koYZDnY

    ...is it not fair for the reader to conclude that those comments suggest a very thin cover story for what may have been the "real" reasons for the cross-endorsements?



    Quote Originally Posted by Lee Chowaniec View Post
    If successful, the voters in the Town of Lancaster will be denied any voice in the November election. Why bother voting.
    Would not the inclusion of an analytical observation highlighting the potential lack of voter choice in November, have more vividly conveyed to the readers the potential perils of the perceived collusive efforts?


    The rogue Republican group said it wants to put an end to at least 25 years of Democratic control of the Town Board.
    Reference: https://buffalonews.com/news/local/l...gHzrVc7koYZDnY

    The rogue slate includes Dickman and Burkard for Town Board and John R. Pilato, the town's forestry supervisor and the owner of a lawn care company, for highway superintendent.
    Reference: https://buffalonews.com/news/local/l...gHzrVc7koYZDnY

    When referencing the current GOP group/slate opposing the endorsed Republican and Democrat candidates, "rogue" may be an accurate post-reorganizational meeting label.

    However, I feel that the article would have been more fairly balanced had the article attached the "rogue" label to Smith regarding his January, 2021 conversation(s) with McCracken. At that time, was not Smith an authorized spokesman for the Lancaster GOP leadership?

    For example, several Wozniak relatives, including his wife and at least one nephew, are Lancaster town employees, although McCracken said most had to score well on a civil service exam for their job.
    Thank you for your objective reporting Mr. Watson.

    Once again, a pretty well-balanced article.

    Kudos to Mr. Watson!
    Last edited by mark blazejewski; June 18th, 2021 at 06:27 PM.
    LIDA Member Rinow to Member Ruda: You were a sitting Trustee on the Board. Did you help support Mr. Sweeney getting a seat on the CDC Board?"

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    8,957
    The rogue Republican group said it wants to put an end to at least 25 years of Democratic control of the Town Board.
    25 years back to the only Republican Party administration to control the town board majority – and the only time in the past 70 years. And in the past 20 years that I know of Mr. Mohr’s influence in the Republican Party has met with little success in getting endorsed candidates elected to office. A handful of candidates in the past 18 years.

    The unassigned mailer that I started a thread on titled ‘This campaign mailer serves no credible purpose’ came from Mohr’s residence and contained falsehoods and fiction.

    I wish Mr. Mohr continued failure. To his loyal, patronage, lapdog committee members, I must ask, “What the hell were you thinking that made you buy into his ****?”

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    8,957
    After rereading today's Watson's Lancaster report, I must comment again:

    The Republican and Democratic parties in Lancaster took an unusual step ahead of Tuesday's primaries:

    They cross-endorsed a full slate of candidates for two Town Board seats, highway superintendent and town justice.

    Party leaders say they wanted to lower the temperature in the town, long a Democratic stronghold where the closely divided Town Board of recent years has seen infighting and a legislative stalemate.

    "I think we found candidates with a mutual interest to get things done," said Terrence D. McCracken, the Lancaster Democratic chairman.
    The temperature will be lowered because the two parties forged a deal to silence the two Republicans on the current town board who were challenging the democratic controlled board, Leary and Dickman. Get rid of Dickman and keep the democratic yes man Wozniak. Mohr sold his party out and cut a deal to get rid of Sojka and the endorsed party candidates he had lined up.

    McCracken said Dickman has contributed little to the Town Board since winning office and, instead, is an obstacle to productive governance.
    That may have had some truth before a second Republican got on the town board. Dickman alone was outnumbered 4-1 and was fighting a useless battle. Since Leary came on, Dickman has done a 180 and has become a thorn in the democrats side. Solution: Get rid of Dickman.

    Mohr and his committee cohorts should be shamed of themselves and the BS they are trying to peddle.

    Hopefully, the voters will see through this colluded attempt to grab power at the expense of the community's best interest.

    Mohr and McCracken will stoop to any level to gain control. As for the candidates and committee members of both major parties, what the hell were you thinking? Integrity and values mean nothing to you?

  6. #6
    Member mark blazejewski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    5,352
    Quote Originally Posted by lee chowaniec View Post

    mohr and his committee cohorts should be shamed of themselves and the bs they are trying to peddle.

    Hopefully, the voters will see through this colluded attempt to grab power at the expense of the community's best interest.

    Mohr and mccracken will stoop to any level to gain control. As for the candidates and committee members of both major parties, what the hell were you thinking? Integrity and values mean nothing to you?
    spot on!!!
    LIDA Member Rinow to Member Ruda: You were a sitting Trustee on the Board. Did you help support Mr. Sweeney getting a seat on the CDC Board?"

  7. #7
    Member Frank Lee Blunt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2021
    Posts
    592
    Lee, as usual, you are focused on the big picture. Ralph's taste for revenge is insatiable when it comes to vanquishing an enemy. He is full of hate and rage for Mr. Sojka. It is because it was Mr. Sojka who was instrumental in Adam Dickman's turnaround. To the great chagrin of the Fatman. Both must be dispatched in Ralph's ugly dark world. He is caught up in his own web. I said weeks and weeks ago Mr. Mohr is in the fight of his Lancaster political life. I'm afraid the Fatman doesn't have any idea who's calling the shots for his undoing locally. Keep looking at Mr. Sojka you dopey RINO's.
    When your"machine" has operated by push and shove for so many years you tend to forget who you REALLY hurt or left behind that was once close and trusted, you will eventually pay the heavy price of such acts.

    I think the Conservative party is working hard and I feel as though the message has spread. The TOL board meeting should be very very interesting.

    Will the Stupervisor touch the elephant in the room? You know, the Formal Investigation of the candidate for Highway Superintendent Dan Amatura. Should the voters be made aware of that from the "most" transparent leader Lancaster has ever seen?
    As I said, this one may be a dusey. STAY TUNED......I walk among you everyday.........
    Frank Lee Speaking....

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    8,957
    In my mind the big picture is twofold.

    To lower the temperature in town politics is McCracken code for getting rid of Republican Dickman who together with Leary were the necessary checks and balances who questioned, opposed, and brought some reasonable compromise and resolve to the board that favored the best interests of the community.

    They supported residents who brought concerns before the board, addressing resolutions, and bringing resolve that supported the best interest of the community, rather than that of developers / project sponsors and resolution sponsorships that favored the Democratic controlled town board.

    If Wozniak and Rudz win, Supervisor Ruffino has his three votes, and then some. The democrats will again control the town board as they have in the past 66 of 70 years. A town board where in the past year the Supervisor and his hired budget officer presented the least transparent budget ever; incomplete, filled with errors, and exceeding the state mandated tax cap until the Republicans on the board acted to resolve the chaos.

    The Supervisor petitioned to get the long-gone Budget Officer stipend of $5,000. It was undeserved as his Director of Administration & Finance prepares the budget and his oversight was non-existent.

    Then there is the continuing new dog control facility construction debacle under the oversight of councilmember Wozniak and Town Engineer Schiller. DCO Karn is not deserving of any assigned blame for any project cost override from the initial project construction estimate. She never partook in the building design or estimated project cost at its inception, or thereafter. Yet, they tried to assign blame that she made added design changes and/or modifications.

    The solar farm project which was good-to-go under Supervisor Ruffino and his two minions was another fiasco. Leary and Dickman supported the residents in getting their concerns addressed and conditions were added to the resolution proposal protecting the community’s best interests. Supervisor Ruffino has yet to provide an example of that promised 10% savings of the entire energy bill he touted for the energy company.

    Then there’s the patronage hiring that didn’t take place because of Leary and Dickman. So Dickman 'the obstructionist' must go. Wozniak is a RINO and Rudz sold his soul to the Democrats, Working Family Party, and the unholy REPDEM Alliance. Leary’s voice will be silenced, as well as voters challenging board policies and procedures.

    Once again the Lancaster voters are being snookered. Not by a political party this time, but a tag team of seasoned political BS operatives who want to destroy all opposition. Control the narrative, cancel the obstruction, control the town under the guise of lowering the political temperature.

  9. #9
    Member mark blazejewski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    5,352
    Quote Originally Posted by Lee Chowaniec View Post
    If Wozniak and Rudz win, Supervisor Ruffino has his three votes, and then some. The democrats will again control the town board as they have in the past 66 of 70 years.
    Your entire comment is replete with sage insight Lee. It reminds me of the scene from the movie "Gettysburg" when Buford confides to his subordinate just how the battlefield will look if his Federal Calvary does not hold the high ground.

    Just My Opinion:

    With that said, I am specifically responding to the illustrated quote and wish to point out one thing: The new leadership of the Republican Party has set the stage for the complete destruction of whatever is left of the Lancaster Republican Party.

    The activity on social media, in my opinion is a strong indicator as to what is going on. The Democrats, with the essential help of colluding Republicans, managed to stage a Republican leadership coup in February, and now have planted their Fifth Columnist stooges into positions of leadership. Whatever social media fighting that has taken has been between the RINOs, the deposed Republicans, the Conservatives, and some concerned residents who like you, see what the future holds.

    The Democrats for the most part were gleefully silent, as they witnessed the metaphorical bloodletting of the RINOs and those who otherwise would have been their natural allies.

    And why should the Democrats have engaged?

    More lessons from history: The Napoleonic axiom "Never disturb your enemy when he is making a mistake," comes to mind eh?

    Kudos to the McCracken bunch. So far, in their march to gain long-term, if not permanent control, the Democrats managed to exploit the petty ego of the long-time Republican honcho, who in turn managed to move his clueless, compliant, and self-serving pawns over his self-destructive chess board.

    My last point:

    Should Rudz win this thing, the only way possible way he remains of permanent value to the McCracken/Giza/Mohr bunch is for the RINO to become a DIVO (Democrat In Voting Only), lest in four years, he go the way of the pretty good Councilman, Matt Walter.

    Finis.
    Last edited by mark blazejewski; June 21st, 2021 at 07:34 AM.

  10. #10
    Member Frank Lee Blunt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2021
    Posts
    592
    Ah Mark, you give them too much leeway. I have said many times before, they are ALL the same. There is not one ounce of difference between any of them. All have lost their way. All have traded in their moral fiber to gain power. None of their SCHEMES would work out in the open where the voters could see. None get a pass from me. I know them all too well. And they know me also. They just keep looking right past me when I am near them.
    Lee has the entire history correct. When he posts, I pay attention, as with your posts Mark.
    It's always a long haul to victory over an entrenched opponent. Keep up the good work of informing the citizens. Modern Town Criers. The best way to get the truth out is hand to hand, mouth to mouth, one to another. The way a community stays healthy is by being informed and connected to each other.
    Stay tuned
    Frank Lee Speaking....

  11. #11
    Member mark blazejewski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    5,352
    Quote Originally Posted by Frank Lee Blunt View Post
    Ah Mark, you give them too much leeway. I have said many times before, they are ALL the same. There is not one ounce of difference between any of them. All have lost their way. All have traded in their moral fiber to gain power. None of their SCHEMES would work out in the open where the voters could see. None get a pass from me. I know them all too well. And they know me also. They just keep looking right past me when I am near them.
    Lee has the entire history correct. When he posts, I pay attention, as with your posts Mark.
    It's always a long haul to victory over an entrenched opponent. Keep up the good work of informing the citizens. Modern Town Criers. The best way to get the truth out is hand to hand, mouth to mouth, one to another. The way a community stays healthy is by being informed and connected to each other.
    Stay tuned
    Ah Blunt, I don't surrender that easy.

    My perceived melancholy should not be misconstrued. It only reflects a comment regarding the success of McCracken thus far, and how successfully gullible or complicit that many on the Republican side have been.

    I hope that my words will serve to incentivize the good voters to limit the forward movement described above, and will send the clear message that our town government is not a private club for the REPDEM elite.
    LIDA Member Rinow to Member Ruda: You were a sitting Trustee on the Board. Did you help support Mr. Sweeney getting a seat on the CDC Board?"

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Mr. "Servant of the People", start "showing me" you work for "US"
    By avet in forum Albany NY State budget Capital and Governor Kathy Hochul
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: March 28th, 2005, 01:03 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •