Results 1 to 15 of 47

Thread: The Former Amherst Attorney Versus Amtrak Locomotive

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    827

    The Former Amherst Attorney Versus Amtrak Locomotive

    Remember a few weeks ago there was a bunch of reports of a (now) judge that got smacked by an Amtrak train in Depew. There was (is?) all kinds of speculation about the circumstances, but the most predominant was that he is/was involved with some alleged ne'er-do-wells and he was trying to kill himself. There were allegations that the was "on the take." IMO, the guy seemed shady when he was in the Amherst attorney's office years ago. Gave me the creeps.

    Last I heard, he was in hospital for a busted up leg or something and the report obtained by some 'news' station was ridiculously redacted. Whatever.

    Soooooo, what's the skinny on the guy? What's the deal/dirt?

    The guys name is said to be John Michalski.

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    4,483
    Member, what business did you have with him when he was in the town attorneys office that gave you the “creeps”, if you don’t mind my asking. And do you have some reason to think that the name that has been reported for him is not really his name? Your post kinda sounds that way. Again just wondering.

  3. #3
    Member sharky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Amherst
    Posts
    2,162
    hadn't heard about it but ch4 has a long article
    https://www.wivb.com/news/exclusive-...-hit-by-train/

    using linkedin as a source for how long he's been a judge is a joke though. linkedin can say whatever a person wants. Judges are public officials, look it up in state records
    Vote for freedom, not political parties.
    Politicians need to cut spending

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    827
    Quote Originally Posted by sharky View Post
    hadn't heard about it but ch4 has a long article
    https://www.wivb.com/news/exclusive-...-hit-by-train/

    using linkedin as a source for how long he's been a judge is a joke though. linkedin can say whatever a person wants. Judges are public officials, look it up in state records
    Thanks. Yeah, I've seen that (March 22nd) report. I was interested ("nosey", one might say) about any follow-up. Has it been hushed... and if so, by whom... and on what grounds? Is the guy still a Judge? How much "leave" time do judges get?

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    3,516
    If all of this happened to an ordinary person...all the details would have been pasted all over the media!

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    4,483
    Quote Originally Posted by joe d. View Post
    If all of this happened to an ordinary person...all the details would have been pasted all over the media!
    Not if it was part of an ongoing criminal investigation.

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    827
    Quote Originally Posted by joe d. View Post
    If all of this happened to an ordinary person...all the details would have been pasted all over the media!
    Absolutely. I mean, c'mon, that redacted report was laughable. At the end of the day, anyone - and I mean anyone - that intentionally lies on a railbed knowing a train is approaching can hardly be considered "stable." I'm not even clear on what about that would need a lengthy alleged "investigation." I suppose, however, the so-called "investigation" could be merely a claim to try to give reason to secrecy(?). Not sure how/if that would work.

    I wonder if the guy was 'on the take' from the mob. Kinda seems like that is a strong possibility. Oh to be a fly on the wall.

    Sorta seems like it has the early stage makings of a movie... of which I'd like to be part of.

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    4,483
    Quote Originally Posted by Member 2358 View Post
    Thanks. Yeah, I've seen that (March 22nd) report. I was interested ("nosey", one might say) about any follow-up. Has it been hushed... and if so, by whom... and on what grounds? Is the guy still a Judge? How much "leave" time do judges get?
    If you want to know if he’s still a judge look it up. It’s public record. It seems to me that it’s a matter that is still under investigation...an investigation that seems to go well beyond your housing court problem, judging by the sound of it. I’m no legal expert, but I’m pretty sure that federal investigators are under no legal duty to disclose the contents of an ongoing investigation to a disappointed litigant in a housing case that apparently has nothing to do with the federal investigation. Gee, why don’t you play out your fantasies by trying to discern the role of Jane Woodward, an elected official who left office over 10 years ago, if memory serves.

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    827
    Quote Originally Posted by grump View Post
    Member, what business did you have with him when he was in the town attorneys office that gave you the “creeps”, if you don’t mind my asking. And do you have some reason to think that the name that has been reported for him is not really his name? Your post kinda sounds that way. Again just wondering.
    My exposure to the then-attorney's office representative (Michalski) was related to a matter that I brought before the "housing court"... a code violation. As the "plaintiff" as it were I (along with four others similar to me) met with Michalski. My feel - as well as the predominant feeling of the group - was that Michalski was trying to compel us to select our actions based on some benefit to himself. One of the group had even come right out and said (paraphrasing)... 'My God, he wants us to make it worth his while." I couldn't disagree. And, for the record, no there was never any explicit comments in that regard... it was a feeling of the 'creeps'. I got the feeling that he was less interested in the facts of the matter... and more interested in getting something out of it for himself. Further, his general demeanor was not equivalent to other attorneys (municipal, corporate, personal, IP, litigation, real estate, environmental, etc... including Jones & Nesper, for example) with which I have been involved from time to time. I took him to be a thoroughly 'political' being.... one that was revered by Jane Woodward. [BTW, when we spoke to Klein about our feeling, he did not disagree.]

    Nah, that's his name. That's the guy.

  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    4,483
    Quote Originally Posted by Member 2358 View Post
    My exposure to the then-attorney's office representative (Michalski) was related to a matter that I brought before the "housing court"... a code violation. As the "plaintiff" as it were I (along with four others similar to me) met with Michalski. My feel - as well as the predominant feeling of the group - was that Michalski was trying to compel us to select our actions based on some benefit to himself. One of the group had even come right out and said (paraphrasing)... 'My God, he wants us to make it worth his while." I couldn't disagree. And, for the record, no there was never any explicit comments in that regard... it was a feeling of the 'creeps'. I got the feeling that he was less interested in the facts of the matter... and more interested in getting something out of it for himself. Further, his general demeanor was not equivalent to other attorneys (municipal, corporate, personal, IP, litigation, real estate, environmental, etc... including Jones & Nesper, for example) with which I have been involved from time to time. I took him to be a thoroughly 'political' being.... one that was revered by Jane Woodward. [BTW, when we spoke to Klein about our feeling, he did not disagree.]

    Nah, that's his name. That's the guy.
    Well, what was he going to get out of it for himself? Money? Prestige? A raise? How did you determine he was “revered” by Jane Woodward? Did he invoke her name? Did she invoke his name? He never said anything to suggest that he wanted anything. Judge Klein “didn’t disagree” when you expressed your feelings? Apparently he didn’t “agree” either or you would’ve certainly pointed that out. Maybe Judge Klein is too much of a professional to engage in that sort of thing? Just asking. Sounds to me like he didn’t roll in your direction so you think he’s a “creep”.

  11. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    827
    Quote Originally Posted by grump View Post
    Well, what was he going to get out of it for himself? Money? Prestige? A raise? How did you determine he was “revered” by Jane Woodward? Did he invoke her name? Did she invoke his name? He never said anything to suggest that he wanted anything. Judge Klein “didn’t disagree” when you expressed your feelings? Apparently he didn’t “agree” either or you would’ve certainly pointed that out. Maybe Judge Klein is too much of a professional to engage in that sort of thing? Just asking. Sounds to me like he didn’t roll in your direction so you think he’s a “creep”.
    Let me tell you something clearly and without any room for interpretation... the code matter fell directly in "my" (our) favor. It closed in exactly the way that we wanted, hoped, and expected. Your statement involving some highly probably speculation ends up being wrong. No matter what it "sounds like" to you. You have come to a conclusion (so-to-speak) that does not correlate to the actual truth/facts. I can't even fathom why the hell you give a crap.

  12. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    4,483
    Quote Originally Posted by Member 2358 View Post
    Let me tell you something clearly and without any room for interpretation... the code matter fell directly in "my" (our) favor. It closed in exactly the way that we wanted, hoped, and expected. Your statement involving some highly probably speculation ends up being wrong. No matter what it "sounds like" to you. You have come to a conclusion (so-to-speak) that does not correlate to the actual truth/facts. I can't even fathom why the hell you give a crap.
    So let me understand. You won. You got exactly what you wanted. And you can’t fathom why I give a crap. Let’s see “Soooooo, what’s the skinny on the guy? What’s the deal/dirt?” Where have we heard that? From you, in your first post when you started this thread. Perhaps the better question is why do you give a crap? And, of course, you didn’t even bother to answer the questions I raised about the points you were trying to make...about something in it for him...about Jane Woodward. Jane Woodward? Really? Other than you dragging her name into it how does she even figure in the story about the train.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: November 19th, 2020, 11:00 AM
  2. Amherst attorney sets stage for NY court battle on opioids
    By Business News in forum News Feeds
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: February 11th, 2019, 07:30 AM
  3. U.S. Attorney: Amherst physician pleads guilty to theft
    By Business News in forum News Feeds
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: May 30th, 2018, 03:30 PM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: June 19th, 2017, 10:03 PM
  5. Amherst attorney arrested in attempted rape
    By ChaneysGotaGun in forum Amherst, Clarence and Williamsville
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: May 23rd, 2012, 04:07 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •