Activist and thier signs
I thought this was interesting.
Now here is how the sign making works:
You will need a garage or warehoused space with plenty of area to dry your signs. Some good dry summer days, and some enthusiasm.
Now draft the layout of your sign. Although this may seem easy, you can make big mistakes trying to put too much message on the sign. Keep it simple with enough open space to make it confortable to read from a moving vehicle. (We've make all those mistakes already so you won't have to wait until next season to fix them.) We did one color (blue) last season. We are going to two colors on white background this year. We used a number of different graphics last season. One of the mistakes is to use graphics that are too detailed. This makes it difficult to print because the ink does not hold seperation well because of some capillary attraction created when the silk stretches as you squeegee the ink. The Libertarian lady liberty masthead is ideal and well suited for silk screens. You can get the .tif file from national for a few bucks. Well worth it.
Why a graphic? We've experimented with many things in the past. The LP logo is very powerful, much more so than the stupid pachyderm and ass you usually see. It says much.
Perception of numbers. One of the comments from last season from the Republican and Democratic judicial candidates and others, was what an aggressive race I ran specifically noting that my signs were everywhere. They weren't. It just seemed that way. We all used similar statute of liberty logos identifying the libertarian party. I put out 600, Steve May put out about 75O, and others did similarly. Between all our candidates we put out about 3000. It realy isn't much for an area like Dallas County which has about twenty cities and a population of about three million.
What happens is this. Most R's & D's will not put the party logo or identification on their signs. In Dallas only the Libertarians did this. Some of the Republicans caught on to this last season and a few started doing the same. People identify you with the logo. When driving around the city they will see other libertarian signs. It takes at least three to four passes for someone to remember your name on a political sign. People will remember the logo. They will recognize the logo where ever they see it in the city or county. When candidates all use the same or similar mastheads all candidates will be preceived to be supported through out a vast area. Its called synergy.
Your graphics should not be busy or crowded. Signs are to provide recognition and the perception of substantial support of the populace. You can't put the party platform on it! That's what the logo does. (Please look at the various candidates that I have signs mounted on our web site. e.g. John Davis, Steven May, Michael Needleman, Randal Morgan, mine isn't ready yet.) If you're going to use two colors then try to use one common backdrop like ours, then you will only need one mask and silk screen. We added a border of stars at the top and bottom. This centers the viewer's focus to the center of the sign where the message is and gives the sign balance. Remember, the viewer is moving and you have to focus his eyes immediately on the message.
Now for the nuts and bolts. Lay out your graphics on a good graphics engine. I suggest Corel, Adobe, or somthing similar. You should try and use a vector type graphic format or a bitmap with high resolution which will convert to a vector format without too much distortion. You can save about half the negative cost if you can give the negative producer the graphic in the format he uses on his computer. If your supplier uses camera ready art you will have to provide him a positive and he will shoot it twice to get another positive.
I'll e-mail a sample of one of ours. We'll give you our background format if you like. If you use one color you will only need one screen which will print two images head to head. This will allow you to print both sides of the sign at one time. You should keep designs proportanate to the size of one half of the paper size. (14x 22") The paper is available in sheets 28x 22" when folded it makes the standard 14"x 22" sign.
Here's the materials list:
22"x28" negative w/head to head image (leave space for fold and stake to pass through a hole at the top of sign); $48 shoot positive for a negative film, or $24 for a negative produced from .eps (encapulated post script) file in negative format
22"x28" silk screen w/frame coated & processed (aprox 30"x34") $23-$40
Coated paper 22"x28" ($0.52/sheet for 1-100, $0.45/sheet for up to 250, etc.)
Ink - NAZ - DAR/Kc $27.35/qt. (1qt/candidate about 6-700 signs), $97.30 /gal
Screen wash (clean screens & spreader) $19/gal (1gal/candiate)
Retarder $10.98/qt (1/2 qt/candidate) $31.60/gal
Dehazing fluid $25.75/gal (1qt/candidate)
Squeeges are about $0.50/in. I'd get two per station. One 4" and one 12".
Call your local screen supplier for the materials. This is the most current pricing in Dallas. Get a NAZ-DAR/KC color chart from your Naz-Dar/KC dealer. Nos 20(red) & 40(blue) work well but you can vary some.
Once you've located a place to do your signs, you'll need a table that is not too wide. It should be about as wide as the screen frame, about 28". An old door on saw horses is just perfect. Make a couple. Affix two door hindges to the table and a silk screen frame with the screen mounted flush on two sides.
Look at all the bill boards and signs on your way to work and back, and when you go out at night. You will quickly see what works and doesn't.
Debating
Debating
Last updated 9/14/95 by Tom Isenberg
Here are some tips from a professional political debater:
It's crucial to remember that "people want to know how much you care, before they care how much you know." You need to establish common ground (show that you both value the same ends) before you can explain why you think your means are just and work best.
Over the last 10 years of campaigning, giving interviews, and being a talk radio host, I've developed a 4-part formula for responding to most questions, criticisms, and concerns in a way that builds bridges (as opposed to burning them.)
State your credentials.
Share his goals.
Show how government has screwed things up and who benefits from these unjust policies.
Show the libertarian solution.
Here's an example.
HIM: You libertarians don't care about the poor.
YOU:
As the grandson of poor immigrants,
I care about poor folks and want to see them prosper the way our family did.
The problem is that many government policies trap people in poverty. For example, why should it be illegal for a single mother to start her own hair-braiding business in her apartment? Why should government keep the poor down just so established businesses won't have to face her competition?
So a good first step would be to legalize self-employment. Our immigrant grandparents were able to pull themselves out of poverty in an age of very few regulations on start-up businesses. Of course, there's a lot of other changes we need to make too.
Here are some tips specifically for debating online...
Don't use all-caps. It makes you look rabid and kooky. It makes it look like you don't have confidence in the power of your ideas and you have to make up for it with SCREAMING. Ever seen ultra-right-wing propaganda? It's full of random all-caps.
Don't use extreme punctuation, either. As with all-caps, it makes you look like you've lost self-control !!!!!!!!!!!!! If you use standard punctuation, good grammar & spelling, and are polite and restrained, you are much more likely to win respect (and perhaps reconsideration) from your "opponent" and you will impress other readers. Especially on the gun issue, where opponents already assume that you're a rabid nut.
Make sure your grammar is perfect. You should make it a point to check all your email before you send it. Nothing screams "I'm uneducated and don't care" more than mis-spellings and sloppy grammar.
Consider saving "boilerplate" arguments you've made on email so that you can recycle them easily without having to re-type. For example, I have an email folder called "debate ammo" where I keep messages arranged by topic, e.g., "gun control." And in that message, I store sound-bite answers from past messages (mine and others') that I want to recycle. For example:
Q. Guns are dangerous and should be outlawed.
A. This is a dangerous line of thinking. If we start outlawing "dangerous" objects, where will it end? We have already heard calls for violent video games to be restricted and for pornography and certain ads to be outlawed. So-called liberals are often leading the charge. I'm not a fan of these products, but the erosion of your rights means the erosion of my rights. I can well imagine that things I hold near and dear will be next.
That way, whenever someone uses that argument with me (and you know it comes up a lot) you already have a snappy answer that is exactly what you want. Then you can cut and paste it in, edit as needed, and it saves lots of time.
OT OH, I will have to make a point to spell check and grammer check myself from now on.Make sure your grammar is perfect. You should make it a point to check all your email before you send it. Nothing screams "I'm uneducated and don't care" more than mis-spellings and sloppy grammar.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)