Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 50

Thread: Lancaster to see significant county tax increase

  1. #16
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Lancaster, NY
    Posts
    90
    Quote Originally Posted by gorja View Post
    Correct me if I'm wrong but I do believe that it's the assessor that sets the assessment not the tax department.
    Yes, you are correct. The Assessor sets assessments.
    FYI: We also notice that the 10 bay hanger and 18 Enterprise Drive (airport owned) are no longer listed on tax rolls. Why??

  2. #17
    Member gorja's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Lancaster, NY
    Posts
    13,159
    Quote Originally Posted by DebLemaster View Post
    Yes, you are correct. The Assessor sets assessments.
    FYI: We also notice that the 10 bay hanger and 18 Enterprise Drive (airport owned) are no longer listed on tax rolls. Why??
    I think that's part of SBL-95.00-4-51.
    If you look at the town's mapping system, it's now part of 4343 Walden.
    At least with my poor vision, it is.




    Georgia L Schlager

  3. #18
    Member mark blazejewski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    5,364
    I appreciate and share Mrs. L.'s concerns about the airport assessment issue.

    But, in the world of assessments, I am still perplexed by the assessments concerning Blackstone, and what I perceive to be mansions assessed as patio homes.

    Just sayin'.
    Last edited by mark blazejewski; January 14th, 2020 at 08:24 PM.
    LIDA Member Rinow to Member Ruda: You were a sitting Trustee on the Board. Did you help support Mr. Sweeney getting a seat on the CDC Board?"

  4. #19
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Lancaster, NY
    Posts
    90
    Quote Originally Posted by gorja View Post
    I think that's part of SBL-95.00-4-51.
    If you look at the town's mapping system, it's now part of 4343 Walden.
    At least with my poor vision, it is.



    Based on Erie County tax records, 95.00-4.51, 137.6 acres, land only, taxable $180,000. Paid $3,519.43
    The buildings are not listed above. Land only.

    105.00-3-1.112, Assessment $267,800., 16 bay hanger plus 3.3 acres, paid $3718.40
    105.00-3-44.212 Assessment $393,800., 24 bay hanger plus 0.63 acres, paid $943.76
    105.00-3-44.213 Assessment $270,000., bulk hanger plus 0.42 acres, paid $646.45

  5. #20
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Lancaster, NY
    Posts
    90
    Quote Originally Posted by DebLemaster View Post
    Based on Erie County tax records, 95.00-4.51, 137.6 acres, land only, taxable $180,000. Paid $3,519.43
    The buildings are not listed above. Land only.

    105.00-3-1.112, Assessment $267,800., 16 bay hanger plus 3.3 acres, paid $3718.40
    105.00-3-44.212 Assessment $393,800., 24 bay hanger plus 0.63 acres, paid $943.76
    105.00-3-44.213 Assessment $270,000., bulk hanger plus 0.42 acres, paid $646.45
    Keep in mind that they get the same breaks on school taxes....

  6. #21
    Member gorja's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Lancaster, NY
    Posts
    13,159
    Quote Originally Posted by DebLemaster View Post
    Based on Erie County tax records, 95.00-4.51, 137.6 acres, land only, taxable $180,000. Paid $3,519.43
    The buildings are not listed above. Land only.

    105.00-3-1.112, Assessment $267,800., 16 bay hanger plus 3.3 acres, paid $3718.40
    105.00-3-44.212 Assessment $393,800., 24 bay hanger plus 0.63 acres, paid $943.76
    105.00-3-44.213 Assessment $270,000., bulk hanger plus 0.42 acres, paid $646.45
    I can't find 18 Enterprise Dr anywhere except on the county tax site but with no taxes the last 5 years.
    On the town assessor site, 95.00-4.51 has a T-hanger 12,000 sq ft floor area, 9500 sq ft pole barn and a mobile home.

    Georgia L Schlager

  7. #22
    Member gorja's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Lancaster, NY
    Posts
    13,159
    Quote Originally Posted by mark blazejewski View Post
    I appreciate and share Mrs. L.'s concerns about the airport assessment issue.

    But, in the world of assessments, I am still perplexed on the assessments concerning Blackstone, and what I perceive to be mansions assessed as patio homes.

    Just sayin'.
    I know but I stopped trying to figure how that happened. Especially when you think of condos or patio homes with common or communal property, when these have acres of their own land not communal.

    Georgia L Schlager

  8. #23
    Member gorja's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Lancaster, NY
    Posts
    13,159
    When are the new assessments coming out?
    I can't recall if our assessor was doing the commercial properties or the vendor we hired was doing them.

    Georgia L Schlager

  9. #24
    Member Neubs24's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Lancaster
    Posts
    652
    Quote Originally Posted by gorja View Post
    Our town highway boys had my branches crunched up 20 minutes after I put them out this morning.
    Here, I was worried, it wouldn't get done before another snowfall.
    Same here anytime I've put stuff out. Leaves are hit and miss but they usually blow away anyway in my area.

  10. #25
    Member Neubs24's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Lancaster
    Posts
    652
    Quote Originally Posted by gorja View Post
    Neubs, Yes, I do know that much. I lived there 48 years and I didn't mention anything about a town tax. But you would think that towns that don't have their own police force would have a higher rate of COUNTY tax than those that don't, since they use the county police services.
    My guess would be that its because they don't have the same coverage a town with their own PD has. Grand Island for example only has 2 deputies on at a time. And both are supplemented by the NYSP.

  11. #26
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    1,666
    Here's mine from 2015 - 2020
    taxes2.jpg

    2020 Only:
    taxes.jpg



    The attached image looks nicer, but here's a lump of space delimited data as well.

    An overall increase of 5.7% from last year, with a 12.3% increase in the county's portion. Sickening.

    Description 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
    CONSOLIDATED WATER $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $65.96 $73.62
    CONSOLIDATED WATER $51.08 $50.47 $50.36 $62.25 $1.00
    COUNTY SERVICE TAX $1,086.22 $1,100.19 $1,134.29 $1,170.42 $1,191.11 $1,337.21
    EC 4 FOOTAGE O & M $37.80 $37.80 $44.10 $50.40 $56.70 $59.85
    EC SEWER DIST 4 $180.00 $180.00 $0.00 $0.00 $11.07 $9.72
    EC SEWER DIST 4 $0.00 $0.00 $14.84 $13.99 $70.80 $74.21
    EC SEWER DIST 4 $14.92 $15.58 $75.68 $76.52 $0.00 $0.00
    EC SEWER DIST 4 $95.95 $100.10 $190.00 $200.00 $200.00 $202.00
    GENERAL FIRE PROT $384.18 $377.51 $368.95 $367.97 $367.41 $368.39
    GENERAL LIGHT $25.14 $25.10 $23.00 $28.39 $27.78 $27.66
    GENERAL TOWN TAX $566.39 $565.14 $561.94 $574.66 $607.57 $619.77
    HIGHWAY & BRIDGE TAX $394.23 $412.11 $420.21 $427.37 $421.88 $438.67
    LIBRARY TAX $107.33 $105.87 $105.34 $104.95 $106.67 $117.04
    POLICE FUND $339.12 $339.33 $340.05 $332.20 $315.56 $315.62
    REFUSE $134.52 $134.75 $138.79 $148.15 $166.88 $170.86
    Total Taxes: $3,417.88 $3,444.95 $3,468.55 $3,558.27 $3,610.39 $3,814.62
    increase: 0.79% 0.69% 2.59% 1.46% 5.66%

  12. #27
    Tony Fracasso - Admin
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Buffalo, New York, United States
    Posts
    64,977
    It's allowed to continue by the people we have elected throughout NYS.

    What the hell already. You see the population loss and what we see on our tax bills.

    Some stuff is understandable for spending. We do need sewers to get the poop from our homes... We do need roads... etc.. But there are items we can do without and we can also get a handle on cost of services for labor. Monopolies on labor should not be allowed.

  13. #28
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    4,639
    Quote Originally Posted by gorja View Post
    No, I only applied for my Senior STAR.

    The assessor should have made the airport take her to court instead of caving in without a fight.
    64% isn't a little reduction to take lightly.

    Grump, did the airport assessment process change between the years 2018 and 2019 that they received the reduction?

    I'm wondering what their 2020 reassessment will be.
    I don’t even know what the assessment process for airports is, let alone whether it changed.... all I know is that it can’t be comparable to residential assessment because the property types are completely different. Sounds from your posts like the town got its arse handed to it the last time it fought out an assessment battle in court against the airport. Maybe the assessor thought that settling was a smarter course. Many state court judges locally are stunningly lazy and a surprisingly large number are, sad to say, simply dumb. And assessment work actually requires some thought and knowledge. Given that well over 90 % of local judges get their jobs by forking over $$$ to county chairmen rather than on merit one should not expect much from them. And as we’ve seen lately some are more than willing to sell their decision making for things like hockey tickets. It’s reaching the point in the law, between dumbing down admission standards to law school, dumbing down bar admission standards and turning the judicial selection process into a lottery going to the highest bidder, litigants might get a fairer result by resorting to trial by ordeal.

  14. #29
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    4,639
    Quote Originally Posted by WNYresident View Post
    It's allowed to continue by the people we have elected throughout NYS.

    What the hell already. You see the population loss and what we see on our tax bills.

    Some stuff is understandable for spending. We do need sewers to get the poop from our homes... We do need roads... etc.. But there are items we can do without and we can also get a handle on cost of services for labor. Monopolies on labor should not be allowed.

    WNY, in San Francisco, Seattle and a bunch of western cities they’ve solved the sewer problem by encouraging people to **** in the streets. The pathetic old woman who thinks she’s a Cherokee who is running in the Democratic Totalitarian primary supports this.

  15. #30
    Member mark blazejewski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    5,364
    Quote Originally Posted by grump View Post
    WNY, in San Francisco, Seattle and a bunch of western cities they’ve solved the sewer problem by encouraging people to **** in the streets. The pathetic old woman who thinks she’s a Cherokee who is running in the Democratic Totalitarian primary supports this.
    Attached Images Attached Images
    LIDA Member Rinow to Member Ruda: You were a sitting Trustee on the Board. Did you help support Mr. Sweeney getting a seat on the CDC Board?"

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Lancaster declares Harris Hill project void of significant impacts at SEQR
    By Lee Chowaniec in forum Village of Lancaster and Town of Lancaster Politics
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: August 7th, 2014, 11:07 AM
  2. Lancaster’s increase in state aid
    By Lee Chowaniec in forum Village of Lancaster and Town of Lancaster Politics
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: April 4th, 2013, 10:16 AM
  3. Water pressure increase in Lancaster
    By speakup in forum Village of Lancaster and Town of Lancaster Politics
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: May 10th, 2009, 09:35 PM
  4. Lancaster New York's Tax load to increase - again & again
    By 4248 in forum Village of Lancaster and Town of Lancaster Politics
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: May 10th, 2007, 01:46 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •