Hey "Breezy," aka "Bobby,"
The thread indicated that you were just viewing the comments, but you still did not answer this question...
Tick, tick, tick...Quote Originally Posted by Lee Chowaniec
Hey Breezy: What do you think? Is Terranova getting screwed over by her / your party? If not, why not. You have the inside track as a political operative. Educate us!
and, speaking of...
...explain your change of heart, going from...Originally Posted by Breezy
"Breezy," 2015:
...to...Breezy
Mark Blazejewski... and his attacks on Dawn G. are without any credibility whatsoever...
I think that his attacks on this fine, strong and courageous woman...
https://www.speakupwny.com/forums/sh...ewski+tap+fund
"Breezy," 2019:
Is it not about time that you started to answer some question along with spouting your interloping vomit?Quote Originally Posted by Breezy
Of course, like the political prostitutes that they have become, street walkers Sojka and Gaczewski...
Last edited by mark blazejewski; August 31st, 2019 at 11:27 AM.
LIDA Member Rinow to Member Ruda: You were a sitting Trustee on the Board. Did you help support Mr. Sweeney getting a seat on the CDC Board?"
Yeah, Conservatives and Republicans for Lancaster!!
They sure stick out in history: Fudoli and Brainard, now Gaczewski and Todaro.
Ha! Conservative Christian values for sure!!!!!
NOT!
Thank God the rank and file Conservative Party voters DID NOT listen to the so-called leaders of their party for Town Supervisor.
I sincerely supported Dawn G. in 2015, but I just don't think she is qualified for supervisor, that's all. Just my opinion. I think you need a lot more experience to lead the town.
Does the so-called Conservative candidate for supervisor, Mr. Ruffino, support your comments...
...when attached to your horrible comments about a woman, which appear to pollute those values?...
Your concerns about tenure experience are separate and apart from that disgusting, woman-abusing characterization, and I hope and believeQuote Originally Posted by Breezy
Of course, like the political prostitutes that they have become, street walkers Sojka and Gaczewski
that Mr. Ruffino does not share your disgusting opinion.
YOUR disgusting comments stand in contradiction of both Christian and Conservative values, and are an insult to both groups, IMHO.
Last edited by mark blazejewski; August 31st, 2019 at 11:56 AM.
LIDA Member Rinow to Member Ruda: You were a sitting Trustee on the Board. Did you help support Mr. Sweeney getting a seat on the CDC Board?"
Are you saying there is a disclaimer on this thread which states Lancaster registered voters only may comment or have an opinion?
As the OP, I have no problem with comments or opinions of current or past residents from East Jahunga or anywhere especially the non-residents paying town property taxes.
Georgia L Schlager
Well said, Breezy!!!Yeah, Conservatives and Republicans for Lancaster!!
They sure stick out in history: Fudoli and Brainard, now Gaczewski and Todaro.
Ha! Conservative Christian values for sure!!!!!
Thank God the rank and file Conservative Party voters DID NOT listen to the so-called leaders of their party for Town Supervisor.
Georgia L Schlager
My comment speaks for itself.
LIDA Member Rinow to Member Ruda: You were a sitting Trustee on the Board. Did you help support Mr. Sweeney getting a seat on the CDC Board?"
Yes, "Breezy" is a "silver-tongued orator" who writes of...
...with woman- abusing words such as these...
...all towards...Quote Originally Posted by Breezy
Of course, like the political prostitutes that they have become, street walkers Sojka and Gaczewski
...at the expense of a woman's reputation.
But, no worries Gorja, "Breezy," as per his so-called "Christian" values and thinking, will find that Ruffino and company have many "merit badges" to offer, and who, like Jesus, who miraculously provided plenty of fish to the hungry, will see that "Breezy"is adequately "fed" with the merit badges "Breezy" so desperately covets.
LIDA Member Rinow to Member Ruda: You were a sitting Trustee on the Board. Did you help support Mr. Sweeney getting a seat on the CDC Board?"
"Breezy," Shortstuff and Gorja: Ruffino's supportive "Troika of Trouble."
But when it comes to speaking objectively of Ruffino, are they...
...or maybe...
...or just...
...that Ruffino leads around by the nose?
Last edited by mark blazejewski; August 31st, 2019 at 04:54 PM.
LIDA Member Rinow to Member Ruda: You were a sitting Trustee on the Board. Did you help support Mr. Sweeney getting a seat on the CDC Board?"
Hey "Breezy," aka "Bobby,"
As I read Lee's comment, he asserted nothing, he asked two questions. That is indicated by the two question marks (?).
My goodness, instead of criticizing Lee, whom you yourself once called the "premier poster" on this form for merely asking questions...
...why not favor your fellow "Troika of Trouble" partner Shortstuff with some of your sage advise?...
That perhaps would be supportive, soothing, and good advise for Shortstuff?
While I do not presume to speak for Lee, just as another poster, criminees, am I to understand that you are demanding posters not to ask questions?
Aren't you the anonymous tyrant!
But, my bad, we all know that you do not like to get, or answer, questions. I say that because you still have not answered, or are avoiding, this one...
BTW, what in Hell is a "COMMENTER?"Quote Originally Posted by Lee Chowaniec
Hey Breezy: What do you think? Is Terranova getting screwed over by her / your party? If not, why not. You have the inside track as a political operative. Educate us!
Last edited by mark blazejewski; August 31st, 2019 at 11:07 PM.
LIDA Member Rinow to Member Ruda: You were a sitting Trustee on the Board. Did you help support Mr. Sweeney getting a seat on the CDC Board?"
[QUOTE=Breezy;1888611]
Never posted anything that referenced party affiliation change. My question was directed at Shortstuff to get clarification on what party she now supports as she favors Ruffino but now seems to have reservations on supporting Terranova.You come off as pretty judgmental to posters who change their party affiliation.
Nothing, and your point is?What's wrong with that? A lot of commenters on here have said they changed their party over time.
Never. Been a life-long ‘blank. You should know that as I have posted that numerous times.Have you never changed?
Nah, will continue to be a ‘blank’. I could give a rat's ass what party anyone else belongs to.Maybe this is something you should think about and perhaps mind your own business about. It's every bit their right to do at any time.
This paragraph is so pathetically lame it is not worth commenting on.People also move away, temp or perm, and still post here. Why not go after leftWNYbecauseofBS who, I believe, lives in North Carolina, yet still posts on Speakup all the time. He/She has every right to move and still chime in here, even though I can't say I like what He/She writes. I was away over the winter helping a relative and only chimed in a bit, but I remain a member of Speakup, as does shortstuff - who does have a fan base here of people wanting to hear her thoughts, which sometimes do match yours.
I am sorry to have disappointed you again. BTW: still waiting to hear from you as to whether you are supporting Dianne Terranova. I know the Lancaster Democratic Party isn’t.You are coming off as a bit pushy here.
I try Robert, but it is difficult when one has this political agenda independency; not being beholden to anyone. You know what I mean.You can do better, Lee.
My BS meter alarm is going absolutely crazy.
You supported Dawn in 2015 because she was an endorsed candidate on the Democratic Party line - period.
As a registered conservative she ran on the Democratic line because she approached the Conservative Party too late in the game for consideration and endorsement. She wanted to serve the town.
She had been endorsed in the primary by the Conservative, Republican and Independence Parties. Ruffino challenged her on the Conservative line and won thanks to some good-old-backdoor politicking.
So, Dawn needs 'a lot more experience' for the supervisor position, maybe like Ruffino's 16 years, eh? The new found 'fiscal conservative', eh? His prior 14 years of council service belies his fiscal conservatism and I am sure it will be brought to light.
I don't deny Ruffino's earlier years. On many occasions over the past few years, you have commented nad commended Ruffino for his votes for fiscal conservatism.Originally posted by Lee Chowaniec:
So, Dawn needs 'a lot more experience' for the supervisor position, maybe like Ruffino's 16 years, eh? The new found 'fiscal conservative', eh? His prior 14 years of council service belies his fiscal conservatism and I am sure it will be brought to light.
It now seems that the Democratic leadership and its personal issues with our Diane Terranova somehow erases everything you said good about Ruffino.
I am hard pressed to find where you and others have seen Gaczewski vote in line with 'Conservative values' since she has been on the board.
How will she and he vote Tuesday on Resolution #8 in making the Forestry supervisor position and the Assistant Park crew chief position part time permanent?
Do we really need a Forestry supervisor and an Assistant park crew chief through the winter? I don't know the answer just putting the question out there.
Georgia L Schlager
Mr. Bruso seems to fancy himself something of a teacher who frequently assigns "homework."
For his and your information, good teachers are required to teach to the objective, and to only assign homework which tests and benefits learning. Good teachers do not sloppily, or perhaps cynically, assign work that may tend to frustrate the student's sincere efforts and result in a confused knowledge set.
For the student to successfully complete the assignment, it is in need of clear factual resources for precise, accurate information. A student finds such information in non-fictional sources, not in the pages of a mystery "Who Dun It" novel.
In this "homework assignment," Mr. Bruso the teacher, did not send the student to the library; he seems to have sent the student on a fog-shrouded scavenger hunt.
In that regard, some observations:
The personal contribution to Plymouth Crossroads, drawn from the joint cheeking account of John and Linda Bruso, and dated January 24, 2018, appears to be an act of personal generosity and support. IMHO, the personal charities of the Brusos are their private business should be exempt from intrusive public scrutiny and wanton criticism.
My concern attends the disposition of the monies donated to Bruso by Dirschberger in 2017, which were duly reported to the NYS Board of Election.
Many, myself included, requested that Mr. Bruso return or donate to charity those monies.
As I have already noted, based upon his August 23, 2019 statement and supporting documents, I simply can not discern what is or what is not true with respect to Bruso's disposition of the Dirschberger contribution. Only Bruso knows the true intent of the "Friends of John Bruso's" February 2, 2018 contribution to Plymouth Crossroads, and no one knows what was in his heart.
Simply put, I am troubled by the ambiguity of that disposition. While a disbursement was made to Plymouth Crossroads on February 2, 2018, it seems that a clear, authoritative, and unambiguous declaration of the intended purpose was not made until August 23, 2019.
In fact, you yourself seemed to have taken note of that ambiguity in April, 2018:
I myself raised the same concern on June 30, 2018:
Certainly Frank Todaro's August 22, 2019 comment is correct:
"Survivors everywhere should know that their elected leaders have integrity."
It is curious that Mr. Bruso made his actions known to those inside Democrat circles, but seemingly chose to withhold that information from the survivor, and from the broad base of the voters to whom he pledged transparency in 2017.
IMHO, Bruso's nearly two-year lack of clarity did not well serve the interests of the survivor, the voters, and the broad public interest, nor did it do honor to his 2017 campaign commitment to transparency.
To the contrary, his perhaps unwitting lack of clarity seemingly has increased cynicism in our political process and our leaders.
However, and far more troubling, is the possibility that the lack of prolonged clarity may have been intentional. To some, it seems to have raised suspicions of deliberate political machinations and manipulations, which may have been applied strictly to achieve a desired political end. If true, such machinations and manipulations were advanced at the expense of the victim of the violence.
While I make no allegation whatsoever, I am reminded of the words of Cicero: "Cui bono?" Indeed, who seems to have benefited from Bruso's lack of clarity?
I will offer this much "Breezy:" Absent further evidence, at this point in time, I am inclined to view entire course of events as a case of off-setting penalties, and urge both candidates to double-down on efforts to combat such workplace abuse, and to move on to a discussion of other issues in the campaign.
Last edited by mark blazejewski; September 1st, 2019 at 01:12 PM.
LIDA Member Rinow to Member Ruda: You were a sitting Trustee on the Board. Did you help support Mr. Sweeney getting a seat on the CDC Board?"
I just cannot understand that legislation that was fiscally-conservative, championed by Ron Ruffino, that being his move to save taxpayers from the onerous high costs of health insurance for elected, part-time, town board members, never gets mentioned by the opposition on here. I remember this was the first initiative of any town around. You could certainly say it was forward-thinking. Especially today when the costs have skyrocketed. He deserves a lot of credit for that. Probably received a lot of scorn from those who did not like losing such a benefit - and from politicians from other towns - when the idea was adopted in other localities. I have not seen anything close to that being offered by Dawn, much less offered by Lee, nor Gallo, or Sojka.
The rest of this claptrap by Lee and Mark is just that, claptrap.
Todaro did lie and was exposed for it here.
He should retract. It was a cheap shot that backfired on Todaro. That's it.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote