Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst ... 678
Results 106 to 107 of 107

Thread: To all the Lancaster Airport “You should have known better” naysayers

  1. #106
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Lancaster, NY
    Posts
    1,713
    Quote Originally Posted by 4achange View Post
    Here are the 100% true facts, period.

    Many (not all) pilots who take off from Lancaster airport fly well below the recommended altitudes for safe flight operation. They fly low altitude, high speed turns and level off anywhere between 300 -600 ft flying DIRECTLY OVER residential housing on Nichter and Westwood, Schwartz rds.

    If one of these aircraft has any, and i mean any critical flight system malfunction, they will not be able be able to land at the airport because they have no altitude to help them. They will in all probability crash either into a house (since they choose to fly directly over mine and many others) or in the near vicinity to a house.

    With increased expansion, there will come a much greater risk of this happening. I dont give a rats ass about anyones statistics, this is an accident waiting to happen, period!


    It seems, beside the residents, the only ones who will care will be the NTSB investigating the scene of the crash. And then, what will the Lancaster airport, the town, and the rest of the clowns have to say?

    OOPS?
    Exactly correct!! The NTSB admitted they only get involved when it is too late. I still hold firm that the FAA needs to report to the NTSB.

  2. #107
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    11
    To those of you complaining about the NOISE from KBQR, you have a valid point, to those of you complaining about the SAFETY of aircraft "buzzing" your house at 2-300 feet, you do not have a valid complaint. The simple FACT is, no aircraft is passing over anyone's house at that low of an altitude. Those claiming that they see this happening are either exaggerating or are a poor judge of distance. even the lowest and slowest aircraft that flies in and out of KBQR from runway 26 is at an altitude of 250-350 feet BEFORE IT REACHES THE END OF THE RUNWAY. Every single pilot that is licensed in this country performs takeofs in the same way, they get as much altitude as quickly as possible. It is for the safety of the pilot and those on the ground. When the turn along Pavement road is made every single plane is at least 700 feet above the ground, passing over Nichter they should be at or close to pattern altitude. The MUST be at that altitude or they will not make it back to the runway in time if their engine fails. Now, in the extremely rare case that that happens, the pilot will immediately be looking for a place to land, the LAST place they will be looking to land is the ONLY concentration of houses near the airport, do you people understand that? You house will not be crashed into!

    So please stop using the safety excuse, nobody is overflying your house at anything less than 700 or so feet AGL (that is above the ground, not above sea level) Anyone claiming otherwise is either lying, or more likely just mistaken.

    As for the noise issue, I understand your frustration, but the airport has been there a lot longer than you have, and what about the freight trains every 15 minutes? Are you asking for those to be removed to? You bought houses next to an AIRPORT, a very busy RAILROAD and a couple miles from a RACETRACK. I know the traffic pattern was changed in 2006, I have nothing against following the old pattern if it's restored, concentrate your efforts on THAT and not the other ridiculous claims.

    Now I am one of the pilots (student at this point) I'm a 36 year old auto mechanic that lives in South Buffalo, right next to Mercy Hospital. I have ambulances going down my street every hour, and helicopters who really do fly directly over my house at less than 200 feet, am I afraid they are going to crash into my house and constantly whine for them to stop? NO!

    But guess what, I won't fly over your houses, I will request flight following from KBUF and turn past the development when I can. At well OVER 300 feet. And before you ask, no pilot in his right mind would "buzz" anyone's house. It's not only dangerous and annoying but illegal. We could lose our license and get fined. The reason those of you have complained to the FAA and haven't gotten a response? Those you complained about were at pattern altitude, NOT below it.

    As for the "pollution" excuse? Give me a break. These planes have a lot less power than your SUV's, are a lot better maintained, and use less fuel too.

Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst ... 678

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Airport safety issue affects all Lancaster residents
    By ichingtheory in forum Village of Lancaster and Town of Lancaster Politics
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: July 6th, 2010, 12:55 PM
  2. Lancaster Police - Options Exist
    By WNYRealist in forum Village of Lancaster and Town of Lancaster Politics
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: April 10th, 2010, 08:39 AM
  3. Lancaster Residents fight Air Strip rezone and exspansion. Funded by FAA
    By 4248 in forum Village of Lancaster and Town of Lancaster Politics
    Replies: 62
    Last Post: March 31st, 2010, 07:03 AM
  4. Mr. Marrano please provide Lancaster airport assessment/tax clarification
    By Lancaster Resident in forum Village of Lancaster and Town of Lancaster Politics
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: March 1st, 2010, 08:56 AM
  5. Lancaster Town Zoning Board asked to determine legality of Lancaster-Buffalo Airport
    By shortstuff in forum Village of Lancaster and Town of Lancaster Politics
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: February 20th, 2010, 09:21 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •