Page 2 of 12 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 177

Thread: More Kavanaugh Chaos

  1. #16
    Tony Fracasso - Admin
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Buffalo, New York, United States
    Posts
    64,975
    Quote Originally Posted by leftWNYbecauseofBS View Post
    Oh
    Please..... I have language filters on for a reason.. Thank you.

  2. #17
    Member leftWNYbecauseofBS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    10,873
    Quote Originally Posted by Breezy View Post
    Gee, must be pretty easy getting under your skin, LOL

    The guy posts a pretty level headed reply, very accurate and correct, and this response ???

    I have to add that I'm pretty glad you have left Western New York, since that kind of attitude is better for all area residents far away from here.

    Sounds like a hair trigger to me.



    Face it, the nominee is scum, and all sorts of proof is coming out now.

    Oh my!
    Oh another local Dem waterboy coming to the rescue. Do you get a stipend with your townie salary? There is a reason why you stayed in WNY and it's not because you were better than it.

    On one side we have a woman who can't provide any specifics about the incident and what specifics she provides are proven to be false. She claims to be a victim of a serious crime but she does not remember the details? All she can 'remember' is it was summer - not 100% sure on which summer but it was warm out and that it was in Montgomery County. Not a specific house or person but just a general location. It's all a pile of BS.

    As I said before, there are two kinds of people who buy her story. Morons who don't have the mental wherewithal to look at this objectively or dishonest scum who know it's BS but don't care because being a progressive or liberal is more important than ruining this mans life. Maybe you're a combo of both?

    Women who are victim of actual crimes need to years of help to try and forget or not recall what happened yet this woman can't even come out with what year or city it was.

    On the other side we have a guy who kept a detailed calendar of his life down to what parties he went to, when he mowed the lawn and who he went to go see a movie with. He has specifics of where he was and who he was with.

    Face it, he's going to be on the bench for the next 30 years and you're still going to be a poor and dumb townie.

  3. #18
    Member leftWNYbecauseofBS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    10,873
    Oh this just gets better. The lawyer for porn stars is now showing off his latest toy. Her name is Julie Swetnick and she is claiming:

    Kavanaugh was drinking excessively at house parties and was physically abusive toward girls in high school and was present at a house party in 1982 where she says she was the victim of a “gang” rape. She goes further to say that Kavanaugh and others got girls inebriated at parties so they could be “gang raped” in side rooms by a “train” of numerous boys. She is claiming this all happened from 1981 to 1983 with her rape in the middle.

    So this woman not only knew about gang rape parties but was a victim of one and even after having a 'train' run on her she continued to go to such parties for another year. Oh...and she didn't feel the need to mention this to anyone for the last 37 years.

    You would think that with multiple girls being gang-raped by a train of boys....at some point there would have been some type of formal report.



    It is digusting how scummy liberals are and what levels they will go to in trying to prevent Kavanaugh from getting on the bench. I wonder how long it's going to take these feckless c**ts before they sign their book deal or cash the checks for the rights to their lifetime movie. The scumbag lawers involved getting their cut of course.

    Kinda funny how many scummy lawyers there are out there and how most lawyers are also Democrats.

  4. #19
    Member HipKat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Pekin, IL
    Posts
    8,744
    Quote Originally Posted by leftWNYbecauseofBS View Post
    Oh f*ck off. Kavanaugh has said he didn't do it. That's because he didn't do it. I DFAF what others are saying he should say or do. These are the same retards who have fallen for other lies but don't dare to admit when they were duped.

    This is a woman who made up lies about her past in therapy because her marriage was falling apart. Her marriage was falling apart because she is a feckless c*nt. The list is long of women making up sh*t for personal gain. Hell, the leader of the #metoo movement is a freaking pathological liar and pedo.

    There is no humanity in going out and ruining a mans life because you see that as a means to an end to prevent the SCOTUS from going right for the next 30 years. Seriously, f off you c uck.

    When people like you say open your mouth, I have two realizations. 1) I am glad I am on the other side of you and 2) it fully explains why people get where they are in life.
    Nice talk, smart guy. Because he said he didn't do it, he must be innocent. You just found a way to save billions of dollars in court costs yearly. The defendant said he didn't do it your honor. Case closed. Let's get to happy hour.

    Your problem is that you're one of the morons with your nose stuffed up trump's ass so far, nothing else exists outside of his pimply ass-cheeks pressed against your face. Kavanaugh, like Trump, is a liar. He's contradicted himself several times, but hey, the proven liar said he didn't do it, and the women and his college mates who testify against his lies are wrong.
    Let me articulate this for you:
    "I'm not locked in here with them. They're locked in here with me!!"
    HipKat's Blog

  5. #20
    Member HipKat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Pekin, IL
    Posts
    8,744
    Quote Originally Posted by leftWNYbecauseofBS View Post
    Oh this just gets better. The lawyer for porn stars is now showing off his latest toy. Her name is Julie Swetnick and she is claiming:

    .
    Hey smart guy.
    In a sworn declaration released Wednesday, accuser Julie Swetnick, 55, notes that she holds “active clearances” for her work with the US Department of Treasury, US Mint and Internal Revenue Service.

    She said she also previously had security clearances with the US Department of State, Department of Justice, Department of Homeland Security and Customs and Border Protection.

    An active security clearance means Swetnick has been subjected to a stringent background investigation that deemed her qualified to have access to “classified national security information … so long as the person has a need to know the information,” according to the State Department website.

    Christine Margaret Blasey Ford (born November 1966),[1] known professionally as Christine Blasey,[2] is an American professor of psychology at Palo Alto University and a research psychologist at the Stanford University School of Medicine. These aren't some bored housewives.

    I'm going to go ahead and guess that you're one of those misogynistic pricks that can't understand why a woman wouldn't come clean the moment something happens to them, That they egged it on, or deserved it.

    You make a good little Trump puppet, because, like him, you think you know everything and you're always right, as we've all seen on here for years.
    Let me articulate this for you:
    "I'm not locked in here with them. They're locked in here with me!!"
    HipKat's Blog

  6. #21
    Member Breezy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    2,280
    Quote Originally Posted by leftWNYbecauseofBS View Post
    Oh another local Dem waterboy coming to the rescue. Do you get a stipend with your townie salary? There is a reason why you stayed in WNY and it's not because you were better than it.

    On one side we have a woman who can't provide any specifics about the incident and what specifics she provides are proven to be false. She claims to be a victim of a serious crime but she does not remember the details? All she can 'remember' is it was summer - not 100% sure on which summer but it was warm out and that it was in Montgomery County. Not a specific house or person but just a general location. It's all a pile of BS.

    As I said before, there are two kinds of people who buy her story. Morons who don't have the mental wherewithal to look at this objectively or dishonest scum who know it's BS but don't care because being a progressive or liberal is more important than ruining this mans life. Maybe you're a combo of both?

    Women who are victim of actual crimes need to years of help to try and forget or not recall what happened yet this woman can't even come out with what year or city it was.

    On the other side we have a guy who kept a detailed calendar of his life down to what parties he went to, when he mowed the lawn and who he went to go see a movie with. He has specifics of where he was and who he was with.

    Face it, he's going to be on the bench for the next 30 years and you're still going to be a poor and dumb townie.
    So, let's review leftWNYbecaueofBS: You left WNY because of BS, yet you stalk this area obsessively on here, seemingly scouring this site multiple times a day, and you call me a 'dumb townie" ?????

    It simply boggles the mind the predicament you find yourself in.

    So you left WNY because of BS, but in reality you never left because you obsess on the computer over WNY.

    Is your name on here a joke? You really can't be serious.

    Not to mention the gutter mouth. Says more about you than anyone you attack.

    He left WNY because of BS, but he comes back every single day. And you think people respect your views?

    UNBELIEVABLE!

    You need to get a life, to say the least.


  7. #22
    Member Breezy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    2,280
    Shorter Breezy: leftWNYbecaueofBS was miserable in WNY and obviously he's miserable wherever he now resides.

    LOL



  8. #23
    Member leftWNYbecauseofBS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    10,873
    Quote Originally Posted by HipKat View Post
    Hey smart guy.
    In a sworn declaration released Wednesday, accuser Julie Swetnick, 55, notes that she holds “active clearances” for her work with the US Department of Treasury, US Mint and Internal Revenue Service.

    She said she also previously had security clearances with the US Department of State, Department of Justice, Department of Homeland Security and Customs and Border Protection.

    An active security clearance means Swetnick has been subjected to a stringent background investigation that deemed her qualified to have access to “classified national security information … so long as the person has a need to know the information,” according to the State Department website.

    Christine Margaret Blasey Ford (born November 1966),[1] known professionally as Christine Blasey,[2] is an American professor of psychology at Palo Alto University and a research psychologist at the Stanford University School of Medicine. These aren't some bored housewives.

    I'm going to go ahead and guess that you're one of those misogynistic pricks that can't understand why a woman wouldn't come clean the moment something happens to them, That they egged it on, or deserved it.

    You make a good little Trump puppet, because, like him, you think you know everything and you're always right, as we've all seen on here for years.
    LOL. So having security clearance now means you can't lie. Man you're dumb. A dumb c*ck. Again, this is the College Junior who was hanging out with high school boys for 3 years at gang rape parties and didn't stop going to them AFTER she had a train run on her. Ya...totally makes sense and since she has “active clearances” we must beleive her.

    Basically she’s implying that she knew of rapes occurring and still went to the parties. And then inevitably was raped. The implication is dozens of not hundreds of witnesses should be out there. Where are they? These are influential kids from wealthy families. Inevitably the wrong girl is hurt and daddy has a tantrum. That doesn’t appear to have happened. Depending on what is produced the evidence could be credible or just Avenatti prancing around fornthe cameras. I genuinely believe he doesn’t have his client’s interests at heart and is using her for a prop. Which makes me doubt his claims and her statement.

    These are women who are afraid for Roe v. Wade are examining their histories, filling in some blanks, and trying to derail the nomination. And at least one attorney who enjoys the limelight is helping pump it up. They are resising by all means possible. They are willing to do whatever it takes to keep Kavanaugh off the bench.

    At best, they will hide behind their laywers saying just enough for morons like you to buy into their story but not enough to get them in trouble. At worst, they will take a purgery charge...if it gets there....because they will be a hero to c*cks like yourself when they get out.

  9. #24
    Tony Fracasso - Admin
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Buffalo, New York, United States
    Posts
    64,975
    I know your busy and you must of missed this

    Quote Originally Posted by leftWNYbecauseofBS View Post
    Oh

    Please..... I have language filters on for a reason.. Thank you.

  10. #25
    Tony Fracasso - Admin
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Buffalo, New York, United States
    Posts
    64,975
    Hipkat,

    I don't care how many clearances one has, people lie.

    They don't give a crap who they hurt, if they cost people money, if they hurt someone's business and/or if they ruin people's relationship. People lie.

    This is just over the top in this case. In the end if Bret was involved in countless gang rapes I wouldn't be surprised because in the end even being a judge doesn't mean you won't lie.

    This just seems like too much to be believable including after 30+ years no one coming forward from one of the rape parties.

    Basically she’s implying that she knew of rapes occurring and still went to the parties. And then inevitably was raped. The implication is dozens of not hundreds of witnesses should be out there. Where are they? These are influential kids from wealthy families. Inevitably the wrong girl is hurt and daddy has a tantrum. That doesn’t appear to have happened
    Are you not surprised that not one well meaning girl who witnessed any of these rapes didn't come forward to protect other women?

  11. #26
    Tony Fracasso - Admin
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Buffalo, New York, United States
    Posts
    64,975
    HipKat
    An active security clearance means Swetnick has been subjected to a stringent background investigation that deemed her qualified to have access to “classified national security information … so long as the person has a need to know the information,” according to the State Department website.
    I thought the Judge literally went threw 6 FBI investigations being vetted for the supreme court.

  12. #27
    Member HipKat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Pekin, IL
    Posts
    8,744
    People lie, huh? Except Kavanaugh, right? Because like lefty said, he denied it. Smh.....

    Have a better question. Why are Republicans stupid? Why are you people so stupid to support this nonsense? Liars, corruption, double standards. It’s a shame you don’t realize how pathetic it makes you look.
    Let me articulate this for you:
    "I'm not locked in here with them. They're locked in here with me!!"
    HipKat's Blog

  13. #28
    Member HipKat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Pekin, IL
    Posts
    8,744
    Quote Originally Posted by WNYresident View Post
    I know your busy and you must of missed this




    Please..... I have language filters on for a reason.. Thank you.
    He didn’t miss it. None of us missed it. I remember one time, some years ago I circumvented your language filter once and got bannned for 10 days without warning. I guess the double standard applies to people that support your president
    Let me articulate this for you:
    "I'm not locked in here with them. They're locked in here with me!!"
    HipKat's Blog

  14. #29
    Member leftWNYbecauseofBS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    10,873
    Quote Originally Posted by HipKat View Post
    People lie, huh? Except Kavanaugh, right? Because like lefty said, he denied it. Smh......

    Let's see here dummy.

    On one side we have Kavanaugh who has been a model student, husband, father and judge for the last 45 years. He has gone through multiple FBI investigations and nothing has ever come up. But now, because of a couple of women, he was a serial rapist.

    I know you're this dumb but man that's sad. On the other side let's look at the women:

    Ford: She can presnet no actual evidence or corroboration outside of her personal account. Of the details she puts out there, they are contradicted by other sources like her therapy session notes. Oh...and wait for it...now there are men coming forward claiming that what Ford is describing is something they did and not Kavanaugh. As I said before, Ford is someone worked up about what Kavanaugh can do on the bench and put together a story. Now some cuck-a-doodle-doos like you might talk about her pain but she tried to convict a main in public based on a foggyy memory and personal politics. Serious...F Her.

    Debra Katz: Katz is the current lawyer for Ford. She is a Democratic operative, a member of the "Resist Movement" and was a cleaner for Bill Clinton. You rember Bill right? Do you remember Paula Jones or Juanita Broaddrick? Those are two of the many sexual assult victims of Bill Clinton and women that Katz came out against. Why? Because you can be all rapey as long as you're a democrat.

    Swetnick: She is a gem. She has known money problems and is violent towards men. Her former boyfriend had to file a restraining order against Swetnick for both himself and his new wife and child. Oh and when she filed a sexual-harassment complaint against an employer due to her money troubles...she was represented by the same firm that Debra Katz leads.

    Here is the best part. In Montgomery County, Md., where Swetnick and her scummy lawyer claim habitual gang rapes occured there is not a statue of limitations on rape. Swetnick can file a police report today and an investigation would be launched. If there was any truth to her claims, not only would Kavanaugh be blocked from the SCOTUS but he would be removed from the federal bench.

    But did she do this? No. Her lawyer simply wants to delay the confirmation process until an 'investigation' can be completed. Translated, delay the confirmation past the midterms so Democrats can run every election on the issue of abortion and Kavanaugh. It's as clear a day yet idiots like you can't see it. You're willfully ignorant.

    I love it that these stories from scummy women are the hill that so many idiots like yourself are choosing to die on. You think you're empowering and unifying women? F'n comical. The women I know...who vote...are seeing a man get railroaded without due process in this post truth society we live in. They are watching the #metoo movement fall apart with the amazingly awesome downward spiral of the pedo Asia Argento.

    They are seeing that this BS can happen to their husband and their son. As they start to dig into things, they read about the kangroo courts on college campuses. They read about the lies at the University of Virginia, Duke, and NYU. It takes just a short period of time to realize the dangers of this post truth society.

    I don't like Trump but I will gladly take him over any Democrat. That's what people like you don't get and can't grasp. I don't like Trump and I really hate many of the things he does but he, at his worst, is better than a Progressive/Liberal. That's why he beat Clinton. And thanks to morons like yourself not only is Kavanaugh going to be on the bench but we're gonna have Trump for another 4 years.

    Oh, what about Keith Ellison? That's going to make a really good mailer.

  15. #30
    Member leftWNYbecauseofBS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    10,873
    Just gets better and better.

    1,600 men say they believe Christine Blasey Ford in the full-page newspaper ad.

    They claim to believe Anita Hill and Christine Blasey Ford...well because those two women had an issue with SCOTUS nominations made by Republicans.

    I wonder if these cuck-a-doodle-doos even spoke out when Republicans wanted Juanita Broaddrick to voice her pain and have her #metoo moment back when oh Billy Clinton was going through his impeachment troubles.

    No. They didn't. That's because they don't really care. That's not what being a Progressive or cuck-a-doodle-do even means. It's about using women to cause damage to Republican men.

Page 2 of 12 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •