Originally Posted by
shortstuff
I will simply put this out there:
1. The house was positioned differently, Lee-we will take some photo's and send it to you personally to get a view of the house.
2. Matt did come out to see the house and the sink hole/drainage ditch, his response is classic-get an engineer ($$) {what he should have done was to help the homeowners to address the elevation differential-he did not} instead of helping the homeowners with a reasonable solution.
3. These homeowners own a business, she is a dentist in the village of Lancaster-her request to discuss the matter should have had the courtesy of a meeting upon her request. Matt has no right to say no considering taxpayers pay his salary. She is not unreasonable in making that request.
4. New build should not be higher than their neighboring lots, Matt should have been more attentive considering the complaint from the neighbor whose lot is flooded by the new build.
5. It is my understanding that lawsuits are being considered against the Code Enforcement Officer and the Builder...
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote