Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 34

Thread: Shake up at the shoe shine rag.

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    4,639

    Shake up at the shoe shine rag.

    Jerry Sullivan, Bucky Gleason & John Vogl out in sports dept. Wonder if it’ll hit other depts? How long before it’s reduced to weekly? They were always quick to spend Pegula money for players, coaches, facilities etc. Apparently the Pegulas’ fellow billionaire, Warren (I think taxes should be higher because my money is hidden in charitable trusts) Buffett doesn’t feel that way.

  2. #2
    Tony Fracasso - Admin
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Buffalo, New York, United States
    Posts
    64,977
    Most of what is going on in my opinion is solely based on where advertising dollars are going. This isn't because the paper is one sided or not.

  3. #3
    Member HipKat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Pekin, IL
    Posts
    8,744
    Whoa! That's major! Sad to see Sully go. I know he's not real well liked but I appreciate him calling it like it is with the Bills and Sabres
    Let me articulate this for you:
    "I'm not locked in here with them. They're locked in here with me!!"
    HipKat's Blog

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    4,639
    Quote Originally Posted by HipKat View Post
    Whoa! That's major! Sad to see Sully go. I know he's not real well liked but I appreciate him calling it like it is with the Bills and Sabres
    Hip, I’m sorry to see Bucky Gleason go because he’s a local yokel who seemed to genuinely care about Buffalo sports. I respect your opinion on Sullivan but he always struck me as one of those “smartest guy in the room” types who ended up frustrated and embittered because he was never able to break out of a dying market into the career he thought he deserved. That said, it guts the sports department and I wonder if other departments will follow.

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    4,639
    Quote Originally Posted by WNYresident View Post
    Most of what is going on in my opinion is solely based on where advertising dollars are going. This isn't because the paper is one sided or not.
    Agree. But there’s some type of poetic justice in watching that rag squirm after they convinced their workers to vote to put the Courier Express out of business 30 years ago.

  6. #6
    Member HipKat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Pekin, IL
    Posts
    8,744
    Quote Originally Posted by grump View Post
    Hip, I’m sorry to see Bucky Gleason go because he’s a local yokel who seemed to genuinely care about Buffalo sports. I respect your opinion on Sullivan but he always struck me as one of those “smartest guy in the room” types who ended up frustrated and embittered because he was never able to break out of a dying market into the career he thought he deserved. That said, it guts the sports department and I wonder if other departments will follow.
    I agree with you on Gleason. I love how there's nothing in the News about it.... typical
    Let me articulate this for you:
    "I'm not locked in here with them. They're locked in here with me!!"
    HipKat's Blog

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    4,639
    Quote Originally Posted by HipKat View Post
    I agree with you on Gleason. I love how there's nothing in the News about it.... typical
    I hadn’t thought to look but I’m not surprised.

  8. #8
    Member leftWNYbecauseofBS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    10,873
    The BN is in a lot of trouble but it's a bed that they made. For the last 20 years or so they have been telling their readers how much smarter they are (Donn Esmonde) than paying subscribers and how little the understand sports (Sullivan, Harrington, Graham and Gleason) to fans. If that wasn't enough they mixed in calling readers racist (Watson) for good measure. Mix this in with an utterly incompetent digital and development team who couldn't build a website to save their lives and you arrive at where they are today.

    It's not like the region hasn't given the BN material to cover. All you need to do is spend 5 minutes reading a comments section or spend the afternoon at a BBQ with someone 3 arms away from the corruption to realize it exists and goes deep. But for all of the political and 'investigative' reporters they have on staff....they just decided not to cover these stories. Maybe they thought too little of their readers or they just never got the last call on the 'old boys club' that hasn't existed since JFK was in office. Who knows.

    I do find it funny that one of the top stories on their website Tuesday morning is a recap of the stories they ran over the long weekend. Then a listicle and a gallery of some concert.

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    4,639
    Leftie, the reason they choose not to cover the open and obvious corruption is fealty to the Democratic Party, wellspring of 99.99% of the corruption in Buffalo, Erie County and NYS. You’re right on about Esmonde, Watson and the sports crew. And, little as I know about website development and so on, even I know a platter of **** when I see it. As for writing stories about their previously published stories this is just in keeping with a media pattern I’ve noticed for years, media members intruding themselves into a story to make it about them. Lyin’ Brian Williams is only the most comically idiotic example.

  10. #10
    Member sharky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Amherst
    Posts
    2,182
    I think there are a few reasons why that paper is failing.
    Papers in general aren't doing as well anymore.
    More opinions in their articles than facts. Lack of details in the few cases where the article wasn't an opinion piece disguised as news.
    Getting rid of the Disqus comment system. I stopped using their site after that and others likely did too, less page views means less ad revenue. Ch4 did the same and I don't go on their site any more either. In both cases the comments often had more details than the articles.
    Vote for freedom, not political parties.
    Politicians need to cut spending

  11. #11
    Tony Fracasso - Admin
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Buffalo, New York, United States
    Posts
    64,977
    Quote Originally Posted by leftWNYbecauseofBS View Post
    The BN is in a lot of trouble but it's a bed that they made. For the last 20 years or so they have been telling their readers how much smarter they are (Donn Esmonde) than paying subscribers and how little the understand sports (Sullivan, Harrington, Graham and Gleason) to fans. If that wasn't enough they mixed in calling readers racist (Watson) for good measure. Mix this in with an utterly incompetent digital and development team who couldn't build a website to save their lives and you arrive at where they are today.

    It's not like the region hasn't given the BN material to cover. All you need to do is spend 5 minutes reading a comments section or spend the afternoon at a BBQ with someone 3 arms away from the corruption to realize it exists and goes deep. But for all of the political and 'investigative' reporters they have on staff....they just decided not to cover these stories. Maybe they thought too little of their readers or they just never got the last call on the 'old boys club' that hasn't existed since JFK was in office. Who knows.

    I do find it funny that one of the top stories on their website Tuesday morning is a recap of the stories they ran over the long weekend. Then a listicle and a gallery of some concert.


    That is how I see it.

    Why would a news paper tell people who they should vote with endorsements. A news paper should lay out the facts and let people decide for their own. The moment you endorse someone that a reader doesn't like you might lose that reader/subscriber. Why would you even risk that in the first place.

    I used to by the Sunday paper all the time. Then it dawned on me why do I want to support a group that supports people who in my opinion hurt the area.

    Instead of seeing the "paper" endorse candidates I would rather see 1 full page of reader endorsements. Do a 50/50 split. Last example would have been Hillary vs Trump. Let 200 people send in their endorsements, 100 for each candidate and the reason why they endorse that candidate. Just a short paragraph why each reader is voting for that candidate. Something like that.

  12. #12
    Tony Fracasso - Admin
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Buffalo, New York, United States
    Posts
    64,977
    Quote Originally Posted by grump View Post
    Leftie, the reason they choose not to cover the open and obvious corruption is fealty to the Democratic Party, wellspring of 99.99% of the corruption in Buffalo, Erie County and NYS. You’re right on about Esmonde, Watson and the sports crew. And, little as I know about website development and so on, even I know a platter of **** when I see it. As for writing stories about their previously published stories this is just in keeping with a media pattern I’ve noticed for years, media members intruding themselves into a story to make it about them. Lyin’ Brian Williams is only the most comically idiotic example.

    All joking aside you really think they are a shill for the local Democratic Party?

  13. #13
    Tony Fracasso - Admin
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Buffalo, New York, United States
    Posts
    64,977
    Quote Originally Posted by sharky View Post
    I think there are a few reasons why that paper is failing.
    Papers in general aren't doing as well anymore.
    More opinions in their articles than facts. Lack of details in the few cases where the article wasn't an opinion piece disguised as news.
    Getting rid of the Disqus comment system. I stopped using their site after that and others likely did too, less page views means less ad revenue. Ch4 did the same and I don't go on their site any more either. In both cases the comments often had more details than the articles.

    Why did you like Disqus versus facebook comments?

  14. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    1,556
    They should just cut it down to 1 section, real estate transactions and death notices, that’s about all it seems good for, relaying public records in an easy to view format.

  15. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    4,639
    Quote Originally Posted by WNYresident View Post
    All joking aside you really think they are a shill for the local Democratic Party?
    Absolutely! All joking aside. In another thread, I posted about the Syracuse Post Standard which I got in the habit of looking at some years back. It is so stridently Democratic that it ran a recent article suggesting that the condo assessment laws were put in place to give Trump a tax write off for a condo that bears his name in Westchester County. As blatant a lie as that is, the Post Standard has done a much better job than the shoe shine rag of covering the bidding scandals involving Cuomo’s staff and donors. The shoe shine rag quickly swept under the rug the latest sex games involving the legislative lollipop, Hoyt, the sex games involving Assemblyman Grabberass from Cheek and the former state senator who fired his chief of staff, allegedly over who was “partnering” with whom in the office. I could go on and on.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. What if the shoe were on the other foot?
    By mikenold in forum USA Politics and Our Economy - President Joe Biden
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: April 20th, 2009, 09:37 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •