Originally Posted by
shortstuff
Interesting, no surprise with Johanna, she has been on that board for decades-she would appear disingenuous if she said yes. The others who said yes for term limits is no surprise, and good answer on their part. I would love to have heard Ruffino answer this, Greg please ask him at the next meeting. As for Walters saying no for term limits is a surprise, he espoused that he was a proponent of term limits when he campaigned. His voting record mirrors the Supervisor's. I'm glad Dawn, Adam and possibly Ron are showing signs of individuality apart from the Supervisor. We need to have debates on the board now that there are two Democrats, one Republican, one Blank & one Conservative.
I think term limits are good, but the term must allow governance to play out as policies are enacted. That said, governing should not be a politicians career. Therefore, their pensions should reflect that.