Originally Posted by
mark blazejewski
It is imperative that the citizen question and scrutinize.
Some citizens bravely do it as independent "gadflys." Most citizens entrust to their elected representative(s), the task of vocal, public skepticism.
Lancaster has a diverse Council consisting of two Democrats, one Conservative, one "blank," and one Republican. The entity of the Council, in theory, should be one by which the views of all philosophical sides are publicly aired.
In Lancaster, until now, such appears not to be the case. Regrettably, the entity of the Council, seems wrapped by a rather hapless belt of diversity, functioning only when secured by a rather myopic, self-serving, arbitrary, autocratic executive buckle.
The phrase "My way, or the highway" comes to mind when I think of the autocrat and those in her orbit.
IMHO, it certainly would be desirable if those on the Council, whose political philosophies are contrary to those of the ostensible autocrat, would become more vocal in representing the philosophical interests of those electing them.