Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst ... 567
Results 91 to 101 of 101

Thread: FISA Memo -All Legal/Gov Documents

  1. #91
    Member buffy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    14,965

    Impeachment Trial Memo U.S. House of Representatives AND Trump’s Answer



    The House Trial Memorandum is 111 pages long and be read in its entirety here...

    The President’s Answer is 7 pages long - here are the first few pages with link of Full Answer linked here







    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	37363A65-B56C-4EBE-ADC2-2CA5104BAA7B.jpg 
Views:	134 
Size:	34.3 KB 
ID:	14285   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	EB9C5948-E7F9-46A3-9FD0-74BCFA835F1F.jpg 
Views:	131 
Size:	27.9 KB 
ID:	14286   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	57E69DD8-8D65-4D8B-962A-4C321B6461BC.jpg 
Views:	128 
Size:	74.2 KB 
ID:	14287   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	E239C356-0455-498C-9B7E-3B8E0427411C.jpg 
Views:	126 
Size:	67.8 KB 
ID:	14288   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	4450CF0C-AA6F-42CF-BD9E-C0B581791BB0.jpg 
Views:	118 
Size:	75.3 KB 
ID:	14289  


  2. #92
    Member buffy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    14,965

    Trial Memorandum of Donald J Trump

    The Full 111 page TRIAL MEMORANDUM OF DONALD J TRUMP is here









    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	9C4A36AB-B3A5-468B-B5EF-FB5663E434CC.jpg 
Views:	132 
Size:	34.4 KB 
ID:	14290   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	311FEF43-5B6B-41B4-9E54-34DF7EF9F1F2.jpg 
Views:	114 
Size:	76.3 KB 
ID:	14291   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	755F9CF7-7E3E-4986-86CC-925A2856ED16.jpg 
Views:	130 
Size:	77.8 KB 
ID:	14292   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	E4F0F231-3DEF-47EE-BFFF-5565C5182270.jpg 
Views:	132 
Size:	78.8 KB 
ID:	14293   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	AB19DC6E-A0F3-471A-920E-5BC3FF1A79E6.jpg 
Views:	128 
Size:	77.8 KB 
ID:	14294  


  3. #93
    Member buffy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    14,965

    Lindsey Graham Releases FISA Applications for Carter Page Plus More...

    Q: FISA = TIES MSM HEADS (TV/BEHIND/CORP) TO D PARTY OTHER FOREIGN HEADS OF STATE IN CO-OP STRATEGY.

    We’ve heard bits and pieces from John Solomon & Sara Carter on Hannity over the months and years, but, it’s good to see the actual FISA apps. There’s many pages blacked out, but, ridiculous given what we now know, how they used circular logic to deceive the court. They leaked to the press, then used the “reporting” to fire up Congress, who initiated the FBI, who used the media reports and congressional concern to apply to FISA. Then, used the counter-intelligence spy operation to lend credence to continued leaks to the press while gaining favors from foreign 5Eyes partners to circumvent U.S. privacy protections.






    Transcript - George Papadopoulos’ conversation with a spy; besides GP adamantly stating that he and the Trump Team aren’t interested in anything illegal (he said it would be treasonous), in the first transcript, they seem to be gossiping about Seth Rich and the Clinton body count!



    Here, George P (“CT”) unequivocally rejects what the spy offers...





    LINKS are here...
    https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/fisa-investigation
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	08DC2EE7-57BE-4DFD-AB12-3975295ADE6A.jpg 
Views:	117 
Size:	48.0 KB 
ID:	15351   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	6ABE2BBD-6A0E-410C-AF23-06BC6ED03C71.jpg 
Views:	116 
Size:	56.2 KB 
ID:	15352   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	88AF15A0-31A9-4C3D-8854-730E3E2E2166.jpg 
Views:	120 
Size:	58.3 KB 
ID:	15353   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	9FC6F451-0A74-467A-ABCA-397BAEE0D8A5.jpg 
Views:	113 
Size:	46.8 KB 
ID:	15356   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	67E15633-A94F-40D5-9924-B805C22AC4DC.jpg 
Views:	111 
Size:	38.0 KB 
ID:	15357  

    Last edited by buffy; April 17th, 2020 at 12:32 PM.

  4. #94
    Member buffy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    14,965

    Lies The FBI Told Us - Lies The NY Times Told Us - Declassified For You To See

    Proof:. The FBI had nothing related to collusion w/Russia or Russian contacts and lied to everyone about it for years using the Dems and our media to help perpetuate the lies.



    “The dossier was a critical document to justify a FISA warrant against Mr. Page and this DOJ memo clearly indicates that the reliability of the dossier was completely destroyed after the interview with the primary sub-source in January 2017. Those who knew or should have known of this development and continued to pursue a FISA warrant against Mr. Page anyway are in deep legal jeopardy in my view.

    “Secondly, the comments of Peter Strzok regarding the February 14 New York Times article are devastating in that they are an admission that there was no reliable evidence that anyone from the Trump Campaign was working with Russian Intelligence Agencies in any form.

    “The statements by Mr. Strzok question the entire premise of the FBI’s investigation of the Trump Campaign and make it even more outrageous that the Mueller team continued this investigation for almost two and a half years. Moreover, the statements by Strzok raise troubling questions as to whether the FBI was impermissibly unmasking and analyzing intelligence gathered on U.S. persons.

    “These documents, which I have long sought, tell a damning story for anyone who’s interested in trying to find the truth behind the corrupt nature of the FBI’s investigation into the Trump campaign in 2016 and beyond.”

    The first document is a 57-page summary of a three-day interview the FBI conducted with Christopher Steele’s so-called “Primary Sub-source” in January of 2017. [Document 1] (* 'no contact with Russian Intel, security service or government workers' - on page 11; 3rd hand Russian heresy on page 18 )

    This document not only demonstrates how unsubstantiated and unreliable the Steele dossier was, it shows that the FBI was on notice of the dossier’s credibility problems and sought two more FISA application renewals after gaining this awareness.

    The document reveals that the primary “source” of Steele’s election reporting was not some well-connected current or former Russian official, but a non-Russian based contract employee of Christopher Steele’s firm. Moreover, it demonstrates that the information that Steele’s primary source provided him was second and third-hand information and rumor at best.

    Critically, the document shows that Steele’s “Primary Sub-source” disagreed with and was surprised by how information he gave Steele was then conveyed by Steele in the Steele dossier.

    For instance, the “Primary Sub-source”: did not recall or did not know where some of the information attributed to him or his sources came from; was never told about or never mentioned to Steele certain information attributed to him or his sources; he said that Steele re-characterized some of the information to make it more substantiated and less attenuated than it really was; that he would have described his sources differently; and, that Steele implied direct access to information where the access to information was indirect.

    In total, this document demonstrates that information from the Steele dossier, which “played a central and essential role” in the FISA warrants on Carter Page, should never have been presented to the FISA court.

    The second document contains Peter Strzok’s type-written comments disagreeing with assertions made in a New York Times article about alleged Russian intelligence ties to the Trump campaign. [Document 2]

    The document demonstrates that Peter Strzok and others in FBI leadership positions must have been aware of the issues with the Steele dossier that the FBI’s interview with Steele’s “Primary Sub-source” revealed, because Strzok commented that “[r]ecent interviews and investigation, however, reveal Steele may not be in a position to judge the reliability of his sub-source network.”

    The document further shows that the FBI’s assertion to the FISA court that “the FBI believes that Russia’s efforts to influence U.S. policy were likely being coordinated between the RIS [Russian Intelligence Services] and Page, and possibly others” appears to be a misrepresentation. This is because, in his comments on the Times article, Strzok asserts that “[w]e have not seen evidence of any individuals affiliated with the Trump team in contact with IOs [Intelligence Officials]. . . . We are unaware of ANY Trump advisors engaging in conversations with Russian intelligence officials.”

    The document also indicates that the FBI may have been using foreign intelligence gathering techniques to impermissibly unmask and analyze existing and future intelligence collection regarding U.S. persons associated with the Trump campaign: “Both the CIA and NSA are aware of our subjects and throughout the summer we provided them names and selectors for queries of their holdings as well as prospective collection.” The quote does not provide enough information to fully understand exactly what the FBI was doing but impermissible unmasking and analysis of existing and future incidental intelligence collection of U.S. persons would be troubling.

    The document also raises questions as to whether the FBI was properly using intelligence techniques and databases “throughout the summer” considering that the earliest formal investigation of a U.S. person associated with the Trump campaign was not officially opened until July 31, 2016.

    These declassified documents and other related material may be accessed at the following link: judiciary.senate.gov/fisa-investigation.

    https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/pre...-fisa-warrants


    See Catherine's Notes...



    "Statement is misleading and inaccurate"...

    https://twitter.com/CBS_Herridge/sta...867403779?s=20
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Screen Shot 2020-07-17 at 6.23.16 PM.jpg 
Views:	85 
Size:	46.3 KB 
ID:	17646   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Screen Shot 2020-07-17 at 4.26.44 PM.jpg 
Views:	90 
Size:	43.9 KB 
ID:	17645   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Screen Shot 2020-07-17 at 4.07.49 PM.jpg 
Views:	97 
Size:	72.0 KB 
ID:	17643  
    Last edited by buffy; July 17th, 2020 at 06:27 PM.

  5. #95
    Member buffy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    14,965

    Catherine "The Pen" Herridge: Judge Sullivan Should Be Disqualified in Flynn Review


    https://twitter.com/CBS_Herridge/sta...71915863351297

    Get Focused
    28 U.S. Code § 455. Disqualification of justice, judge, or magistrate judge
    U.S. Code
    Notes
    prev | next
    (a) Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned.
    (b) He shall also disqualify himself in the following circumstances:
    (1) Where he has a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party, or personal knowledge of disputed evidentiary facts concerning the proceeding;
    (2) Where in private practice he served as lawyer in the matter in controversy, or a lawyer with whom he previously practiced law served during such association as a lawyer concerning the matter, or the judge or such lawyer has been a material witness concerning it;
    (3) Where he has served in governmental employment and in such capacity participated as counsel, adviser or material witness concerning the proceeding or expressed an opinion concerning the merits of the particular case in controversy;
    (4) He knows that he, individually or as a fiduciary, or his spouse or minor child residing in his household, has a financial interest in the subject matter in controversy or in a party to the proceeding, or any other interest that could be substantially affected by the outcome of the proceeding;
    https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/455







    Flynn case goes before the full court of judges tomorrow (Tues. 8/11) - live stream starts at 9:30 at link below - click on “Today” (tomorrow) to listen live to oral arguments, if so inclined.
    https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/intern...Oral+Arguments
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Screen Shot 2020-08-10 at 9.34.03 PM.jpg 
Views:	66 
Size:	53.4 KB 
ID:	17878   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	28 US Code 1.jpg 
Views:	78 
Size:	80.9 KB 
ID:	17879   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	28 US Code 2.jpg 
Views:	76 
Size:	80.5 KB 
ID:	17880   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	28 US Code 3.jpg 
Views:	75 
Size:	76.2 KB 
ID:	17881  
    Last edited by buffy; August 10th, 2020 at 10:07 PM.

  6. #96
    Member buffy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    14,965

    A Few Twitter Notes and Observations of Today's Flynn Hearing...



    AG Barr had "information that he was not able to share with the Court" - due to Durham's investigation; due to classified information regarding the Coup that has yet to be presented to a Grand Jury. Barr's DOJ DID show declassified documents showing that FBI agents and DOJ lawyers did not think Flynn lied. Barr DID present evidence that the FBI agent was about to close the case (nothing derogatory found) when Strzok and 'the 7th floor' decided to keep it open. Barr's DOJ did argue that it was not in the best interest of Justice at the DOJ to keep prosecuting General Flynn.

    Barr did not, could not reveal *some* of the (exculpatory) information that he had.

    One of the Judges then hypothesized "what if" Barr lied about what he had; others hypothesized about a briefcase full of $20 bills - offering/accepting bribes, or, covering up something for the government.

    Catherine's updates...










    Here is the Full - 4 hour - Hearing...

    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Screen Shot 2020-08-11 at 3.34.58 PM.jpg 
Views:	81 
Size:	27.4 KB 
ID:	17882   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Screen Shot 2020-08-11 at 3.32.39 PM.jpg 
Views:	89 
Size:	62.2 KB 
ID:	17883   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Screen Shot 2020-08-11 at 3.33.15 PM.jpg 
Views:	88 
Size:	63.8 KB 
ID:	17884   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Screen Shot 2020-08-11 at 3.33.29 PM.jpg 
Views:	87 
Size:	66.6 KB 
ID:	17885   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Screen Shot 2020-08-11 at 3.33.45 PM.jpg 
Views:	86 
Size:	67.1 KB 
ID:	17886  

    Last edited by buffy; August 11th, 2020 at 10:36 PM.

  7. #97
    Member buffy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    14,965

    Sidney Powell Appeared on Lou Dobbs Tonight to Discuss Hearing...


  8. #98
    Member buffy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    14,965

    A Historic “Pardon of Innocence” For Flynn







    https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings...chael-t-flynn/



    Flynn Had Been Under a Gag Order...this will be his first statement now that the gag order is moot...



    A Great Thread to Read...


    https://twitter.com/kelsi_lou_who/st...677236225?s=21
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	9F3464D1-EB2F-4100-B2D7-6D26055D23A4.jpg 
Views:	48 
Size:	38.5 KB 
ID:	19228   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	FD062125-8CBE-4D34-B71F-718181B8015B.jpg 
Views:	53 
Size:	79.2 KB 
ID:	19229   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	A36A123D-7845-48AE-8546-790D225A886F.jpg 
Views:	47 
Size:	33.2 KB 
ID:	19230   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Screen Shot 2020-11-26 at 1.14.48 PM.jpg 
Views:	50 
Size:	51.4 KB 
ID:	19231  
    Last edited by buffy; November 26th, 2020 at 02:17 PM.

  9. #99
    Member buffy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    14,965

    John Ratcliffe May Be Too Much of a Gentleman - He Uses Soft Words...

    Remember the DNI Election Assessment that was due on December 18th but was delayed because...


    The intelligence community assessment on foreign influence in the 2020 election has been delayed as senior intelligence officials clash over the role played by China and as Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe seeks to include more viewpoints in the final analysis.

    This comes four years after an assessment on Russian meddling in the 2016 election that is still contested by some, and the debates within the intelligence community show growing concern about Chinese Communist Party influence when compared to the Russia-focused report in the last presidential election. The backdrop of the debate is increased concern about Chinese influence against U.S. lawmakers, a massive SolarWinds hack suspected by many to have been conducted by Russia, and President Trump's refusal to concede to President-elect Joe Biden.

    “Ratcliffe has been really clear about his view that China is our top national security threat,” a senior intelligence official told the Washington Examiner. “But ultimately, he’s trying to ensure politics don’t play a role in what makes it into this report. If there are conflicting views among senior analysts about Chinese election influence, he wants both views to get a fair shake in the report.”

    John Ratcliffe, DNI, explains why those with alternate analytical views (who held the majority view) were WRONG...

    Basically, Ratcliffe is saying that career bureaucrat wussies who are SO POLITICIZED they hid the fact that the CCP sought to interfere in the 2020 election because ORANGE MAN BAD. There are Factions within the IC that are Chinese assets.

    * Note the 2nd sentence in middle in 2nd paragraph “The Ombudsman’s report...also delves into a wider range of election security intelligence issues that I won’t focus on here”. Ratcliffe is keeping some information classified..










    From Q Post #2467, and #2140

    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	395459CA-68A5-4116-B148-BD3301CA26E1.jpg 
Views:	36 
Size:	55.7 KB 
ID:	19365   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	1D6D9307-372C-4137-8857-8BE6986DF130.jpg 
Views:	36 
Size:	76.7 KB 
ID:	19366   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	534EE474-32A3-4119-825D-EC8A5B928DFF.jpg 
Views:	36 
Size:	81.0 KB 
ID:	19367   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	318BF091-4F19-442B-BFDD-B8C740B7F52F.jpg 
Views:	37 
Size:	39.1 KB 
ID:	19368   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	98E2567D-8CFB-4FE7-9EC8-457D4166AEAB.jpg 
Views:	37 
Size:	20.7 KB 
ID:	19369  

    Last edited by buffy; January 16th, 2021 at 12:28 PM.

  10. #100
    Member buffy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    14,965

    Trump's 1st Declassified Document - Russia Hoax: Christopher Steele Interview


    The FBI report of agents’ interview with Steele in September 2017, nearly a year after he had been terminated as an informant, provided explosive information about his motives in working simultaneously for the FBI and the opposition research firm for Clinton’s campaign. The document was obtained by Just the News and at times reads like a confessional from the now-infamous former MI6 agent and author of the anti-Trump dossier.

    Steele told agents that then-FBI Director James Comey’s decision to re-open the Clinton email investigation in fall 2016 became his tipping point for leaking the anti-Trump collusion research that his company Orbis Intelligence had gathered and given to the FBI.

    “STEELE explained that as the election season went on, they as a company were riding two horses -- their client and the FBI -- and after FBI Director James Comey's reopening of the Hillary Clinton investigation, they had to pick one horse and chose the business client relationship over the relationship with the FBI,” the interview report stated.

    “They followed what their client wanted, and they spoke to the press,” the report noted.
    You can read the FBI's Notes from Christopher Steele's Interview here -
    https://justthenews.com/sites/defaul...ele%202017.pdf

    The most explosive revelation about (Steele's now discredited) sub-source in the newly declassified documents was that former Trump National Security Council Russia expert Fiona Hill, an impeachment witness in 2019 against Trump, had introduced Steele to his sub-source in 2011, well after he FBI had opened up its probe on the source.
    https://justthenews.com/accountabili...s-confessional
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Screen Shot 2021-01-19 at 8.48.22 PM.jpg 
Views:	28 
Size:	47.9 KB 
ID:	19381  

  11. #101
    Member buffy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    14,965

    A Fitting Filing For Groundhog Day...


Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst ... 567

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •