Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst ... 34567 LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 101

Thread: FISA Memo -All Legal/Gov Documents

  1. #61
    Member buffy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005

    Devin Nunes: Our Report is Better Than Mueller Report

    This is the Report from which Nunes made several criminal referrals to AG Barr...

    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	28762C8A-4E3B-4A35-B707-1B9669BE2808.png 
Views:	171 
Size:	40.9 KB 
ID:	11622   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	EC949DF8-5E1A-4BEC-B09E-BB6C19C7F9B7.jpg 
Views:	225 
Size:	40.8 KB 
ID:	11623  

  2. #62
    Member buffy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005

    Goodbye Mr Rosenstein - Rod Submits His 2-Weeks Notice of Resignation

    Rod’s Departure posted by Q here at Post #2557

    ▶Anonymous 04/29/19 (Mon) 23:47:25 0a1809 (1) No.6367253>>6367272 >>6367294
    Interesting references in Rosensteins' resignation letter.
    He quoted 3 people:
    1. Attorney General Robert Jackson. Jackson was a prosecutor at the Nuremberg Trials. Remember, what the Nuremburg trials settled…that "just following orders" is NOT a valid defense.
    2. Edward Levi. Levi was attorney general under Ford, and credited with re-establishing law and order following Watergate.
    3. John Ashcroft. Although Ashcroft has a mixed history, at best (promoting the Patriot Act, for example), this is notable from Wikipedia:
    "In March 2004, the Justice Department under Ashcroft ruled that the Stellar Wind domestic intelligence program was illegal. The day after the ruling, Ashcroft became critically ill with acute pancreatitis. President Bush sent his White House Counsel Alberto Gonzales and Chief of Staff Andrew Card Jr. to Ashcroft's hospital bed. They wanted him to sign a document reversing the Justice Department's ruling. The semi-conscious Ashcroft refused to sign; Acting Attorney General James Comey and Jack Goldsmith, head of the Office of Legal Counsel for DOJ, were there to back him up.[22] FBI Director Robert Mueller, who also was rushing to the hospital, spoke by phone to Ashcroft's security detail, ordering them not to allow Card or Gonzales to have Comey removed from the hospital room."
    Stellar Wind was "the code name of a warrantless surveillance program begun under the George W. Bush administration …"
    "The program's activities involved data mining of a large database of the communications of American citizens, including e-mail communications, telephone conversations, financial transactions, and internet activity. William Binney, a retired technical leader with the NSA, discussed some of the architectural and operational elements of the program at the 2012 Chaos Communication Congress.
    The intelligence community also was able to obtain from the U.S. Treasury Department suspicious activity reports, or "SARS", which are reports of activities such as large cash transactions that are submitted by financial institutions under anti-money laundering rules.
    There were internal disputes within the U.S. Justice Department about the legality of the program, because data is collected for large numbers of people, not just the subjects of Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrants. During the Bush Administration, the Stellar Wind cases were referred to by FBI agents as "pizza cases" because many seemingly suspicious cases turned out to be food takeout orders. According to then-FBI Director Robert Mueller, approximately 99% of the cases led nowhere, but "it's that other 1% that we've got to be concerned about"."
    All the above from Wiki.

    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	3E6A0F8D-B4A5-40D5-B42F-702FD01F17D7.jpeg 
Views:	168 
Size:	58.7 KB 
ID:	11723   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	C846E6AA-A55F-467A-B666-E6C400FE3F3D.jpg 
Views:	158 
Size:	77.4 KB 
ID:	11724   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	A4B63A48-D142-4C13-8944-BF2D605C2D4D.jpeg 
Views:	156 
Size:	70.0 KB 
ID:	11725  
    Last edited by buffy; April 30th, 2019 at 07:23 AM.

  3. #63
    Member buffy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005

    Nadler et al Received An Invitation To The Department of Justice for A Meeting

    Amidst threats to arrest Bill Barr, the DOJ invites Nadler to Meet for a possible (and legal) resolution...

    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	BDF15FDC-E292-4E33-81D4-9276A544817D.jpg 
Views:	179 
Size:	75.3 KB 
ID:	11761   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	6F362680-849E-4406-AA46-F80101B83313.jpg 
Views:	152 
Size:	37.1 KB 
ID:	11762   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	0C463197-E456-4057-86B0-FE1D9A5E2C16.jpg 
Views:	218 
Size:	37.0 KB 
ID:	11763  
    Last edited by buffy; May 6th, 2019 at 04:19 PM.

  4. #64
    Member buffy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005

    BOOM! Closed-Door Testimony Released

    So far, Loretta Lynch claimed she knew nothing about the Clinton “matter”...

    She had a role in FISA...

    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	5D8B5CD9-D125-4FE7-B083-A2B4BDCBB97A.jpg 
Views:	157 
Size:	72.0 KB 
ID:	11834   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	A4DC7FCC-3D87-4035-B536-8473A0872B11.jpg 
Views:	144 
Size:	74.4 KB 
ID:	11835   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	C84C0856-6A68-43E5-9372-A410518EBC14.jpg 
Views:	145 
Size:	46.4 KB 
ID:	11836   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	EE87DB81-CAC6-4525-9B51-F0D3398C55E0.jpg 
Views:	132 
Size:	18.6 KB 
ID:	11838  
    Last edited by buffy; May 21st, 2019 at 12:12 AM.

  5. #65
    Member buffy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005

    Andy? Never Heard of Him...

    I suppose the value of these transcripts is in showing they’re lying when DECLAS finally happens.

    Here’s a page from Andy McCabe’s Testimony...

    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	6DDD47A0-7028-4F44-87FE-0D61BD7E456E.jpg 
Views:	220 
Size:	78.4 KB 
ID:	11837  
    Last edited by buffy; June 11th, 2019 at 02:07 PM.

  6. #66
    Member buffy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005

    Testimony of Jonathan Moffa, Deputy Asst Dir FBI

    Rep Doug Collins indicated that Moffa’s Testimony was interesting - Qresearch highlighted several pages - here’s five ...

    Thousands of additional Clinton work-related emails found...

    Classified emails “escaped into the wild”...

    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	95E617A1-8973-456D-A049-8C482D731E0A.jpg 
Views:	151 
Size:	30.2 KB 
ID:	11839   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	B7245293-955E-4C43-8E09-A8829AA2936C.jpg 
Views:	173 
Size:	53.7 KB 
ID:	11840   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	5ACC5EB6-8E75-4C53-96B6-E4FED7A651C8.jpg 
Views:	192 
Size:	62.4 KB 
ID:	11841   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	76AFCF0D-355B-4109-8B78-BC51778E8281.jpg 
Views:	142 
Size:	60.9 KB 
ID:	11842   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	D4710B60-5924-47CF-9F54-29ABD2F801F5.jpg 
Views:	139 
Size:	61.3 KB 
ID:	11843  

  7. #67
    Member buffy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005

    Mueller Will Not Testify Before Congress - Mueller Speech 5.29.19

    Begins at 7:00 mark...

    Transcript of Mueller Speech 5.29.19

    Two years ago, the Acting Attorney General asked me to serve as Special Counsel, and he created the Special Counsel's Office.

    The appointment order directed the office to investigate Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. This included investigating any links or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the Trump campaign.

    I have not spoken publicly during our investigation. I am speaking today because our investigation is complete. The Attorney General has made the report on our investigation largely public. And we are formally closing the Special Counsel’s Office. As well, I am resigning from the Department of Justice and returning to private life.

    I’ll make a few remarks about the results of our work. But beyond these few remarks, it is important that the office’s written work speak for itself.

    Let me begin where the appointment order begins: and that is interference in the 2016 presidential election.
    As alleged by the grand jury in an indictment, Russian intelligence officers who were part of the Russian military launched a concerted attack on our political system.

    The indictment alleges that they used sophisticated cyber techniques to hack into computers and networks used by the Clinton campaign. They stole private information, and then released that information through fake online identities and through the organization WikiLeaks. The releases were designed and timed to interfere with our election and to damage a presidential candidate.

    And at the same time, as the grand jury alleged in a separate indictment, a private Russian entity engaged in a social media operation where Russian citizens posed as Americans in order to interfere in the election.
    These indictments contain allegations. And we are not commenting on the guilt or innocence of any specific defendant. Every defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty in court.

    The indictments allege, and the other activities in our report describe, efforts to interfere in our political system. They needed to be investigated and understood. That is among the reasons why the Department of Justice established our office.

    That is also a reason we investigated efforts to obstruct the investigation. The matters we investigated were of paramount importance. It was critical for us to obtain full and accurate information from every person we questioned. When a subject of an investigation obstructs that investigation or lies to investigators, it strikes at the core of the government’s effort to find the truth and hold wrongdoers accountable.

    Let me say a word about the report. The report has two parts addressing the two main issues we were asked to investigate.

    The first volume of the report details numerous efforts emanating from Russia to influence the election. This volume includes a discussion of the Trump campaign’s response to this activity, as well as our conclusion that there was insufficient evidence to charge a broader conspiracy.

    And in the second volume, the report describes the results and analysis of our obstruction of justice investigation involving the President.

    The order appointing me Special Counsel authorized us to investigate actions that could obstruct the investigation. We conducted that investigation and we kept the office of the Acting Attorney General apprised of the progress of our work.

    As set forth in our report, after that investigation, if we had confidence that the President clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said that.

    We did not, however, make a determination as to whether the President did commit a crime. The introduction to volume two of our report explains that decision.

    It explains that under long-standing Department policy, a President cannot be charged with a federal crime while he is in office. That is unconstitutional. Even if the charge is kept under seal and hidden from public view—that too is prohibited.

    The Special Counsel’s Office is part of the Department of Justice and, by regulation, it was bound by that Department policy. Charging the President with a crime was therefore not an option we could consider.
    The Department’s written opinion explaining the policy against charging a President makes several important points that further informed our handling of the obstruction investigation. Those points are summarized in our report. And I will describe two of them:

    First, the opinion explicitly permits the investigation of a sitting President because it is important to preserve evidence while memories are fresh and documents are available. Among other things, that evidence could be used if there were co-conspirators who could now be charged.

    And second, the opinion says that the Constitution requires a process other than the criminal justice system to formally accuse a sitting President of wrongdoing.

    And beyond Department policy, we were guided by principles of fairness. It would be unfair to potentially accuse somebody of a crime when there can be no court resolution of an actual charge.

    So that was the Justice Department policy and those were the principles under which we operated. From them we concluded that we would not reach a determination – one way or the other – about whether the President committed a crime. That is the office’s final position and we will not comment on any other conclusions or hypotheticals about the President.

    We conducted an independent criminal investigation and reported the results to the Attorney General—as required by Department regulations.

    The Attorney General then concluded that it was appropriate to provide our report to Congress and the American people.

    At one point in time I requested that certain portions of the report be released. The Attorney General preferred to make the entire report public all at once. We appreciate that the Attorney General made the report largely public. I do not question the Attorney General’s good faith in that decision.

    I hope and expect this to be the only time that I will speak about this matter. I am making that decision myself—no one has told me whether I can or should testify or speak further about this matter.
    There has been discussion about an appearance before Congress. Any testimony from this office would not go beyond our report. It contains our findings and analysis, and the reasons for the decisions we made. We chose those words carefully, and the work speaks for itself.

    The report is my testimony. I would not provide information beyond that which is already public in any appearance before Congress.

    In addition, access to our underlying work product is being decided in a process that does not involve our office.

    So beyond what I have said here today and what is contained in our written work, I do not believe it is appropriate for me to speak further about the investigation or to comment on the actions of the Justice Department or Congress.

    It is for that reason that I will not take questions here today.

    Before I step away, I want to thank the attorneys, the FBI agents, the analysts, and the professional staff who helped us conduct this investigation in a fair and independent manner. These individuals, who spent nearly two years with the Special Counsel’s Office, were of the highest integrity.

    I will close by reiterating the central allegation of our indictments—that there were multiple, systematic efforts to interfere in our election.

    That allegation deserves the attention of every American.
    Thank you.

  8. #68
    Member buffy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005

    Nadler Demands To Know Scope of Durham’s Review - He Got His Answer Today...

    “The Review is broad in scope and multifaceted, and is intended to illuminate open questions regarding the activities of U.S. and foreign intelligence services as well as non-governmental organizations and individuals,”

    Rep. Ratcliffe: DOJ Letter Says US Attorney Durham is Investigating False Statements, FISA Abuse, Leaks – Also UK and Aussie Intel Under Review

    Now this from Paul Sperry: “Rep. John Ratcliffe of House Judiciary interpreting DOJ letter to mean special prosecutor Durham investigating crimes incl false statements, classified leaks, falsified FISA affidavits and illegal domestic spying by CIA. Foreign intel agencies under review incl UK and Australia.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	9EFDF727-4997-466A-A45D-74372E5AA557.jpg 
Views:	110 
Size:	18.6 KB 
ID:	11941   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	66748C6B-D7FF-4148-97B1-682002C2B34A.jpg 
Views:	123 
Size:	77.5 KB 
ID:	11942   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	59328DC1-D3DB-4CA9-86BF-DD0BFD3A6D72.jpg 
Views:	190 
Size:	72.7 KB 
ID:	11943   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	8CBB343B-4F01-499E-BCC1-A281DAE64A59.jpg 
Views:	124 
Size:	43.9 KB 
ID:	11946   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	C716C5A0-D9A3-48AF-A397-C5477BE60852.jpg 
Views:	115 
Size:	33.6 KB 
ID:	11945  

    Last edited by buffy; June 11th, 2019 at 06:30 PM.

  9. #69
    Member buffy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005

    Bill Barr’s Internet Task Force - Crimes Against Children - Arrests 1,700 in 2-Months

  10. #70
    Member buffy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005

    Nunes: Media Is A Mouthpiece For A Cabal of Intelligence Leakers Disinformation

  11. #71
    Member buffy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005

    Roger Stone Strikes Out With far...

    The Judge has yet to rule on DOJ claim it cannot provide what Stone With unredacted documents...

    The DOJ recently informed the court in a filing in response to Roger Stone’s motion to compel unredacted Crowdstrike reports that it doesn’t even posses the unredacted reports on the so-called ‘hack’ of the DNC servers.

    The DNC’s lawyer provided the Crowdstrike reports to the US government with redactions and claimed the redacted parts were not relevant to the investigation.

    And surprise, surprise — the FBI never looked into it.

    “By May 2016, the DNC and the DCCC became aware that their computer systems had been compromised by intrusions, and they hired the cybersecurity company CrowdStrike to identify the extent of the intrusions and mitigate the threat,” the filing stated.

    Right, because going to the FBI wasn’t an option for Hillary and her camp — they hired a Deep State friendly cybersecurity firm to crank out reports for them and magically it was ‘confirmed’ that the Russians hacked the servers and were given code names “Cozy Bear” and “Fancy Bear.”

    Former FBI Director James Comey testified that the FBI asked the DNC for the compromised servers several times and they refused to hand them over to the bureau. So, instead of raiding them, the FBI, simply accepted what they told them!

    Instead of taking the servers, Comey and the DNC agreed that CrowdStrike would investigate the so-called ‘hack’ and they ultimately churned out three “draft reports.”

    According to the court filing, “Copies of these reports were subsequently produced voluntarily to the government by counsel for the DNC and DCCC. At the time of the voluntary production, counsel for the DNC told the government that the redacted material concerned steps taken to remediate the attack and to harden the DNC and DCCC systems against future attack.”

    And did the FBI further look into the redactions? NOPE! The FBI just trusted the DNC’s lawyer that there was nothing relevant behind the redactions.

    “According to counsel, no redacted information concerned the attribution of the attack to Russian actors,” the filing stated.

    So there you have it. CrowdStrike gave the US government three “draft reports” on the so-called hack which was full of redactions and the FBI just took their word for it that the Russians hacked the DNC servers.

    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	4EF1B371-3DCB-4B28-9A0E-822A5FBE1306.jpg 
Views:	111 
Size:	45.1 KB 
ID:	11956   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DD3E7CD1-2EFA-4031-B22B-55914150BE5C.jpg 
Views:	111 
Size:	67.9 KB 
ID:	11957   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	3BC1CCB6-EF46-4CBB-ADD6-7804428C7063.jpg 
Views:	186 
Size:	71.9 KB 
ID:	11958   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	6DC78B15-BD10-4BF4-A8CA-56A2A208A1D8.jpg 
Views:	119 
Size:	55.9 KB 
ID:	11959   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	C8CC3003-F3F8-49C2-9EA2-2558D5610AC0.jpg 
Views:	125 
Size:	36.0 KB 
ID:	11960  

  12. #72
    Member buffy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005

    Nadler SPINS FACTS - Calls DOJ “Arrogant” For Replying To Mueller’s Specific Request

    Mueller Writes Letter To DOJ Asking for GUIDANCE on Subpoena From Nadler

    DOJ writes back providing the requested GUIDANCE

    Nadler goes on CNN and says DOJ is “arrogant” and “Mueller doesn’t have to comply”

    Here’s The DOJ letter - note-
    “I write in response to your July 10, 2019 letter concerning the testimonial subpoenas you received from the House Judiciary Committee (HJ C) and House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI). Your letter requests that the Department provide you with guidance concerning privilege or other legal bars applicable to potential testimony in connection with those subpoenas."

    Video is in the cnn link...
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	6CD8A01C-F827-41A8-8CE5-090322E471D8.jpg 
Views:	100 
Size:	82.5 KB 
ID:	12448   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	57083575-58EA-4844-95E6-AC3BEC2ECE67.jpg 
Views:	97 
Size:	62.8 KB 
ID:	12449   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	75A53210-5BFA-49AD-8FF9-8CA1F317519B.jpg 
Views:	103 
Size:	48.6 KB 
ID:	12450  

  13. #73
    Member buffy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005

    Here is the link to IG Report On James Comey


    Comey’s actions violated Department or FBI policy, or the terms of Comey’s FBI Employment Agreement. As described in this report, we conclude that Comey’s retention, handling, and dissemination of certain Memos violated Department and FBI policies, and his FBI Employment Agreement


    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	8B5857D6-38EC-4657-81C2-19EFF49B1645.jpg 
Views:	102 
Size:	75.6 KB 
ID:	12835   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	E80537F1-A298-4CE4-AD69-53F0453A317D.jpg 
Views:	87 
Size:	72.0 KB 
ID:	12834   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	FEE19740-7E74-46F1-97FE-C7C7200FC7BA.jpg 
Views:	94 
Size:	75.0 KB 
ID:	12836   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	93D5573E-288F-46A0-9005-A6EAAD86F24B.jpg 
Views:	90 
Size:	72.4 KB 
ID:	12837   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	5DA1F60D-622B-4A6A-9488-E47B2950B200.jpg 
Views:	207 
Size:	75.5 KB 
ID:	12838  

  14. #74
    Member buffy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005

    Let’s See How Fast This Happens ...

    Lindsey Graham is asking AG Barr for a long list of Russia investigation files to be declassified -- including transcripts of Papadopoulos conversations with informants and the FISA applications for warrants on Trump campaign officials.

    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	F56791F7-97A5-496D-A99A-EE7BDA8E181E.jpg 
Views:	102 
Size:	50.2 KB 
ID:	12872   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	53E4D4A5-55CD-4C7B-9B5B-859A6A3F98A2.jpg 
Views:	104 
Size:	70.0 KB 
ID:	12873  

  15. #75
    Member buffy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005

    8Chan Answered Questions Committee Homeland Sec - No C-Span Coverage

    Christchurch Created: [03/15/19 00:28:41 +0000] Deleted: [03/15/19 03:17:30 +0000]
    IP: [Redacted] (one OP, no other posts) Time Until Deletion: 2 hours and 49 minutes
    Congressional Primer on 8chan September 4, 2019
    o Poway
    Created: [04/27/2019 17:58:01 +0000]
    Deleted: [04/27/2019 18:10:15 +0000]
    IP: [Redacted] (one OP + several thread creation attempts + three replies to two different threads)
    Time Until Deletion: 12 minutes
    o El Paso
    Created: [08/03/19 16:15:20 +0000]
    Deleted: [08:03:19 17:00:00 +0000]
    IP: [Redacted] (two posts, one OP + one reply to same thread) Time Until Deletion: 45 minutes

    7. What is the Current Status of 8chan?
    At this time, 8chan is offline voluntarily. The site may come back online, but only when 8chan is able to develop additional tools to counter illegal content under United States law.

    8. What is 8chan’s Interaction with Other Technology Companies?
    8chan has had limited contact with Silicon Valley technology companies or their staff. NT Technology has contracts with Arin, Tucows, and Epik. There has been no sharing of information or networking or any joint effort with any other Silicon Valley technology companies. Furthermore, 8chan has had no contact with any companies or staff in charge of alternative social-media websites.

    9. What Are 8chan’s Future Plans?
    If 8chan comes back online, it will be done when 8chan develops additional tools to counter illegal content under United States law. If 8chan returns, staff would implement a way to restrict certain parts of the website during a state of emergency, in which case any board in question would be put in a read-only mode until it would be deemed safe enough to enable posting again. It also looks forward to working with the federal government to improve the law, making reporting and engagement with law enforcement agencies easier. Toward this end, 8chan includes its list of suggested legislative reforms as Exhibit B.

    10. Conclusion
    8chan has strived to be the only imageboard fully compatible with the First Amendment. At the same time, it has worked responsibly with law enforcement agencies when unprotected speech is discovered on its platform. No single platform can sensibly prevent all hateful, illegal, or threatening speech—it can only act in due time to remove it. 8chan’s record demonstrates that it is a responsible platform, carefully protecting free speech and assisting law enforcement agencies in appropriate times of need.
    James Watkins Owner, 8chan
    Benjamin Barr Counsel
    (202) 719-1717
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	713E4A19-CD5B-4BD0-AA7C-C81CC158A663.jpg 
Views:	82 
Size:	47.9 KB 
ID:	12882   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	BECD791E-EB6E-4AF6-B86E-371F7BDD3582.jpg 
Views:	96 
Size:	87.9 KB 
ID:	12878   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	64E540FB-F51E-4DCB-A754-5A5C617F773B.jpg 
Views:	103 
Size:	80.2 KB 
ID:	12879   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	949689D8-9B02-4CFE-A03C-856E77D61CAF.jpg 
Views:	80 
Size:	92.5 KB 
ID:	12880   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	4B07D597-F17A-405D-992C-88C30CAEA330.jpg 
Views:	90 
Size:	76.1 KB 
ID:	12881  

Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst ... 34567 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts