https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...ave-the-proof/
The problem for the Mueller team is that they and the FBI have never reportedly actually looked at the server.
Roger Stone and his legal team are requesting the report from Crowdstrike, the firm connected with the Deep State who reportedly did inspect the DNC server after emails were released by WikiLeaks.
▶Anonymous 05/12/19 (Sun) 23:32:48 8e8880 (2) No.6485132>>6485140 >>6485188
All he has to do is name Bill Binney as an expert witness.
Bill Binney speaks so very eloquently. If only everyone listened.
My personal favorite version of Binney explaining not only that it DIDN'T happen, but that it COULDN'T have happened. It's written in clear non-tech jargon, too.
https://turcopolier.typepad.com/sic_...-russians.html
Useful to read it all (it's short) but here's the conclusion:
"A more plausible explanation is that it was discovered that emails had been downloaded from the server and copied onto a device like a thumb drive. But the culprit had not yet been identified. We know one thing for certain—CrowdStrike did not take steps to shutdown and repair the DNC network until 18 days after the last email was copied from the server.
The final curiosity is that the DNC never provided the FBI access to its servers in order for qualified FBI technicians to conduct a thorough forensic examination. If this had been a genuine internet hack, it would be very easy for the NSA to identify when the information was taken and the route it moved after being hacked from the server. The NSA had the technical collection systems in place to enable analysts to know the date and time of the messages. But that has not been done.
Taken together, these disparate data points combine to paint a picture that exonerates alleged Russian hackers and implicates persons within our law enforcement and intelligence community taking part in a campaign of misinformation, deceit and incompetence. It is not a pretty picture."