She named names (Post #630) and now her sex trafficking charges were reduced to racketeering, racketeering conspiracy, extortion and forced labor.
Allison Mack is the latest to cop a plea (Posts #233 & #236)I must take full responsibility for my conduct. I am very sorry for my role in this case. I am very sorry to my family and to the good people I hurt through my misguided adherence to [Nxivm leader] Keith Raniere’s teachings,” Mack continued after composing herself.
Sporting a beige sweater, black pants, leopard-print shoes and a brown straw piercing her bun, the 36-year-old confessed to being part of secret master-slave group within Nxivm called DOS.
Mack had been facing sex trafficking charges — prosecutors allege women in DOS were branded with Raniere’s initials and groomed to have sex with him — but they were not among the counts she pleaded to Monday.
However, she still admitted to keeping a slave and that she instructed women in the group “to perform services for me.”
The prosecutors are after the big fish - Raniere and Bronfman - and still undisclosed partners and clients.
Last edited by buffy; April 15th, 2019 at 10:18 AM.
“This May not be all of them, but, this week I will be sending”...
8 Criminal Referrals To AG Wm Barr
And filed...
2 Civil lawsuits against Twitter and McClatchy
Major criminal referrals containing many names each are explained here...
More details on the civil lawsuits are in the video found in the link below...
If you’re out there and you lied and you defamed, we are going to come after you,” he told the Fox News host
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/nun...-russia-probes
Last edited by buffy; April 9th, 2019 at 10:04 AM.
I heard he will have an extradition hearing/or be extradited May 2nd; remember, Q and Trump both had coordinated with Assange (here at Posts #2 & 3) . JA will be facing serious charges for publishing classified Leaks, however, as a publisher, he also has a strong defense in freedom of the press. Most importantly, JA can provide information on the murder of Seth Rich and the DNC & Podesta Email uploads. (Yes, I said “uploads, not “hacks” - Seth Rich uploaded onto thump drives and gave to JA). There is a very important JA interview/video Here at #626 where you will hear JA strongly imply that Seth Rich was the source for the DNC docs and was murdered for it. Dems used MS13 for the hit and then killed them - ReRead Posts #13 & 14 hereand, Post #1000- Q reveals that MS13 phones were unlocked and info captured!
Seth Rich Posts including Q calling him a “Patriot” - #877 & #878
This is a very good theory...
▶Anonymous* 04/12/19 (Fri) 01:16:06 ef8721 (7) *
Irregardless of possession being 9/10ths of the law Julian Assange (JA) will be brought to US soil ASAP. With Merkel and Germany DeepState (DS) breathing down a weak May's neck and Brexit being post poned, leaving the UK very vulnerable to DS ops, getting JA out of their reach would be paramount to ensuring his safety - US soil and/or under US Marine guard, it would be. UK isn't able to fend off the DS at the moment, politically nor militarily.
Given the way he was carried out as noted by other anons…….low, in a sling, completely surrounded by officers, cuffed in the front and being allowed to carry a book I agree that he was sending us a message and that he was being protected from assassination.
I also noted that his extradition court appearance is via video which likely means that he is being held in a high security location and moving him to and from court is too risky considering how many DS scumbags want him dead.
I also agree with the anon who posted that POTUS made the UK do the heavy lifting in getting him out of the embassy and ready for extradition in return for the possibility that POTUS might not drop the hammer on the UK for their dirty dealings in Five Eyes (FVEY) Russia Collusion Hoax. Since DECLAS is the next big event we are expecting, getting JA out of the embassy and prepped for extradition might have been the final hold up to DECLAS. IIRC, DECLAS will likely expose FVEY misdeeds so perhaps JA, among other things are/were part of the deal to avoid full public exposure.
Therefore it's my guess that JA is being held by American forces probably at a US military base like Ramstein/Landstuhl. Ramstein Air Base is a United States Air Force base in Rhineland-Palatinate, a state in southwestern Germany. It serves as headquarters for the United States Air Forces in Europe – Air Forces Africa and also for NATO Allied Air Command.Short hop out of UK, high security, best medical care.
Unlike the anon who posted that JA's extradition is likely to be long and involved, I seriously doubt this if POTUS is indeed strong arming the Brits into getting him ready for extradition in return for not publicly dropping them as a USA ally. Besides POTUS eliminated the threat of arrest or deportation for him.
I suspect JA will be given a couple of months to relax, get his health in order and begin being brought up to speed regarding The Plan before he is brought to the USA. I actually expect it to happen in weeks instead of months. I doubt he'll be making a big public arrival. He'll likely come in at night to a non-de script airfield and be moved to safety
Assange is being brought to the US to testify about where he got the Podesta emails, in public, under oath. When that happens, you will finally have the basis you want for the arrests you want. Trump is staying neutral/silent on the matter because going either way would taint the testimony. Justice is not clean, quick, or pretty. It's time-consuming, expensive, and rare. Years have been spent prepping for this moment.
Last edited by buffy; April 13th, 2019 at 08:41 AM.
Is this why they got a pass in NY?
The prosecutors state:“I was there, and I knew that the contributions were made by more than a dozen NXIVM members to Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign,” former NXIVM employee Frank Parlato tells Big League Politics, confirming that the court documents refer to Clinton’s campaign.”
“Campaign Contribution Evidence i. Facts At trial, the government intends to introduce witness testimony and documents demonstrating that in 2007, the defendants and their co-conspirators were involved in an illegal scheme to exceed contribution limits to a presidential primary campaign.
Witness testimony, corroborated by documentary evidence, will demonstrate that at least 14 members of the Nxivm community, including at least five defendants and co-conspirators, made the maximum campaign donation to a primary campaign with the understanding that they would be reimbursed by Bronfman or Nancy Salzman.
At the suggestion of a political operative, who has since pleaded guilty to an unrelated New York state bribery charge also involving campaign contributions, the contributions were “bundled” and presented to the candidate at a fundraising event attended by conspirators, including Nancy Salzman.
https://bigleaguepolitics.com/court-...nton-campaign/
In March 2018, federal authorities arrested Keith Raniere on a variety of charges related to DOS, including sex trafficking, sex trafficking conspiracy, and conspiracy to commit forced labor. He has also been charged with two counts of sexual exploitation of a child and one count of possession for child pornography. Raniere has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/seagra...ticles&via=rss
Focuses on Volume Two of the Mueller Report - Yelling for us all...
Last edited by buffy; April 19th, 2019 at 09:16 PM.
Borne from a FOIA request filed in November 2017 by attorney Ty Clevenger, who requested any information regarding Seth Rich and Julian Assange. The NSA informed Clevenger in a letter dated 4 October 2018 that:
Your request has been processed under the provisions of the FOIA. Fifteen documents (32 pages) responsive to your request have been reviewed by this Agency as required by the FOIA and have found to be currently and properly classified in accordance with Executive Order 13526. These documents meet the criteria for classification as set forth in Subparagraph © of Section 1.4 and remains classified TOP SECRET and SECRET.
Fortunately, Bill Binney, one of the founding fathers of the NSA, and universally acknowledged to be one of the most brilliant people who ever worked for the U.S. government, has offered clarification on this issue in a brief interview with Ed Butowsky he gave two days ago.If NSA had come back and said, “No, we do not have anything pertaining to Seth Rich,” that would have been news. It would have been especially unwelcome news for those who believe that Seth was the source on the DNC emails. But now the opposite is true. The NSA says that it has documents that are classified TS and S. What do those documents say or prove? That remains to be seen.”
Here’s what Binney says:
“Ty Clevenger has FOIAed information from NSA asking for any data that involved both Seth Rich and also Julian Assange.
And they responded by saying we’ve got 15 files, 32 pages, but they’re all classified in accordance with executive order 13526 covering classification, and therefore you can’t have them.
That says that NSA has records of communications between Seth Rich and Julian Assange. I mean, that’s the only business that NSA is in — copying communications between people and devices.”
Hear Bill Binney in his own words...@6:55...
https://vimeo.com/331034117
If Binney is interpreting this correctly — and bear in mind that, not only is he extraordinarily bright, but he is sometimes referred to as “the father of the NSA” — this provides strong support for the hypothesis that Seth was indeed Wikileaks’ source for the DNC emails it published. Assange has strongly hinted at this, Sy Hersh claims to have a trusted informant inside the FBI who states that he has seen FBI documents verifying this, and Binney himself says that he has two sources inside the intel community vouching for this.
https://medium.com/@markfmccarty/bil...n-54a2df5a0e5b
Last edited by buffy; April 20th, 2019 at 07:42 PM.
Here are five key points about CrowdStrike that the mainstream media is ignoring:
1. Obama Appoints CrowdStrike Officer To Admin Post Two Months Before June 2016 Report On Russia Hacking DNC
2. The FBI Never Looked At The DNC’s Servers — Only CrowdStrike Did
3. Comey Contradicted The DNC’s Story On The FBI Asking To See The Server
5. CrowdStrike Is Funded By Clinton-Loving Google $$
Finally, it’s worth pointing out that CrowdStrike received $100 million in investments led by Google Capital (since re-branded as CapitalG) in 2015.
You can read details here - https://dailycaller.com/2017/06/24/c...sia-dnc-story/
CROWDSTRIKE is a VERY BIG part of the Coup and Hillary’s Pay-to-Play Schemes
A few of Q’s earliest posts in 2017 were cryptic mentions of CrowdStrike (Before this QForum began in 1/14/18) here is one...seemed like a “warm up” post to get us thinking...
Q
!UW.yye1fxo
22 Dec 2017 - 5:37:09 PM
In February, 2018, Q was more forthcoming on CrowdStrike’s role - here at Post #262
Way Before the DNC “Hack,” Hillary Used Crowdstrike To Set Up “Subscription-style” access to her private server based on payments to the Clinton Foundation - Q began explaining Crowdstrike thoroughly here #1369, #1371, #1372 (including the “Avalanche” language Hannity and Sara Carter are currently using), bombshell at #1374, #1375, and, culminating with CROWDSTRIKE in #1376.
Last edited by buffy; April 26th, 2019 at 07:16 PM.
By now you may have heard that Peter and Lisa discussed finding & grooming White House personnel to spy, leak, and help in their Coup efforts. As interesting as this revelation is, a more intriguing fact is that the texts disclosing this information CAME FROM SARA CARTER’s “SOURCE” (Q!)
Dec 6, 2017
Why are Sara & John getting all the ‘real' scoops?
Expand your thinking.
Why are they now under protection?
Q
From the article below...
The texts had been obtained by SaraACarter.com Tuesday and information regarding the possible attempt to recruit White House sources had been divulged by several sources to this news site (saraacarter.com) last week.
https://saraacarter.com/breaking-fbi...py-for-bureau/
Q told us here at Post #998 that the Strzok/Page Texts are just scratching the surface. Q then asks...
Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 388aee No.1916147 ��
Jun 26 2018 20:19:12 (EST)
Where are the Comey and McCabe text messages? The “private” Gmail messages? The Burner phone messages? The Call pulls?
Coming soon to a theater near you.
PS/LP texts are only scratching the surface.
Threats of assassination?
They are preparing for this by activating progressive activists.
- Q goes on to say that once the public learns of the set up/scam, the jig is up, but, the MSM will attempt to deflect it away from the former Administration and Dem Candidate - Hillary. That won’t work. The truth is coming out. It’s a sloooow rollout, to be sure, but, after years of lies and propaganda, I suppose certain people need to have it spoon fed to them, one swallow at a time.
One thing is for sure - Sara Carter was given the texts, by her source - the Q team - and she published them in this article. Count on (trusted) Sara Carter and John Solomon to be the recipients of more previously withheld/hidden/deleted texts and emails that the public should know about to more clearly understand what happened and IS happening.
Q tells us that there were discussions that threatened assassination - shouldn’t be too surprising given the Clinton body count. These people have a lot to lose and are desperate. Stay tuned to Sara Carter and .John Solomon for the best “real scoops”!
The texts...
A few weeks after the presidential election, Mr. Strzok and Ms. Page discussed the logistics for the briefing. Mr. Strzok and Ms. Page said the following:
Strzok: Talking with Bill. Do we want Joe to go with Evanina instead of Charli for a variety of reasons?
(Strzok is referring to former FBI Assistant Director of Counterintelligence division Bill Priestap. ‘Joe is referencing FBI Special Agent Joe Pientka, who interviewed former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn in January, 2017. And Evanina is in reference to William Evanina, National Counterintelligence and Security Center.)
Page: Hmm. Not sure. Would it be unusual to have [sic] show up again? Maybe another agent from the team?
Strzok: Or, he’s “the CI guy.” Same.might [sic] make sense. He can assess if there [sic] are any news [sic] Qs, or different demeanor. If Katie’s husband is there, he can see if there are people we can develop for potential relationships
Page: Should I ask Andy about it? Or Bill (Priestap) want to reach out for Andy (McCabe)?
Strzok: I told him I’m sure we could ask you to make the swap if we thought it.
Last edited by buffy; April 28th, 2019 at 07:15 AM.
Whistleblower Tapes: Trump Wiretapped “A Zillion Times” By ‘The Hammer,’ Brennan’s and Clapper’s Secret Computer System
March 17, 2017
By Mary Fanning and Alan Jones
President Obama’s Director of National Intelligence (DNI) James Clapper and his Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) director John Brennan oversaw a secret supercomputer system known as “THE HAMMER,” according to former NSA/CIA contractor-turned whistleblower Dennis Montgomery.
Clapper and Brennan were using the supercomputer system to conduct illegal and unconstitutional government data harvesting and wiretapping. THE HAMMER was installed on federal property in Fort Washington, Maryland at a complex which some speculate is a secret CIA and NSA operation operating at a US Naval facility.
This video (below) from the article is a bit misleading - the NSA was not spying on Trump - the NSA collects phone calls, emails on EVERYONE. Q (and Admiral Mike Rogers) told us that (in Post #2559 & #2561) they noticed that 4 contractors gained unusual access to their metadata...
Joe DiGenova’s video was posted by Q (YouTube took it down) here it is preserved on mp4...Joe tells us that 4 contractors had access to NSA data ...
Shortened mp4 - https://media.8ch.net/file_store/eec...d6651625f0.mp4
John Brennan “We wouldn’t do that”...
http://theamericanreport.org/2017/03...mputer-system/
Last edited by buffy; April 28th, 2019 at 07:18 AM.
ICYMI - George Papadopoulos revealed more information about how he met the “CIA spy” Joseph Mifsud this morning with Maria Bartiroma. She ties it all together with Devin Nunes and Jim Jordan - effectively setting the stage for the “start of the offence” Q posted about here at Post #2573
So, what do you think the Democrats response is? Desperation! Talking points jumped quickly from “subpoena” to “arrest”! Arrest Barr is the new talking point. This is what desperation looks like - they must get rid of the man who wants to investigate spying!
I sometimes listen to this guy who goes by the name of “Black Conservative Patriot” ...
I titled this meme “Eating the Dems Lunch”
Last edited by buffy; May 5th, 2019 at 10:27 PM.
James Comey is in trouble and he knows it
BY KEVIN R. BROCK, OPINION CONTRIBUTOR — 05/07/19 09:30 AM EDT
Kevin Brock is a former FBI Assistant Director for the Office of Intelligence
James Comey’s planet is getting noticeably warmer. Attorney General William Barr’s emissions are the suspected cause.
Barr has made plain that he intends to examine carefully how and why Comey, as FBI director, decided that the bureau should investigate two presidential campaigns and if, in so doing, any rules or laws were broken.
In light of this, the fired former FBI director apparently has decided that photos of him on Twitter standing amid tall trees and in the middle of empty country roads, acting all metaphysical, is no longer a sufficient strategy.
No, Comey has realized, probably too late, that he has to try to counter, more directly, the narrative being set by the unsparing attorney general whose words in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee last week landed in the Trump-opposition world like holy water on Linda Blair. Shrieking heads haven’t stopped spinning since.
And so we’ve seen Comey get real busy lately. First he penned a curious op-ed in The New York Times. Then a Times reporter, with whom Comey has cooperated in the past, wrote a news article exposing an early, controversial investigative technique against the Trump campaign in an attempt to get out front and excuse it. Next, Comey is scheduled to be encouraged on a friendly cable news “town hall.”
In the op-ed, Comey trotted out his now-familiar St. James schtick, freely pronouncing on the morality of others. He sees himself as a kind of Pontiff-of-the-Potomac working his beads, but comes across more like an unraveling Captain Queeg working his ball bearings.
Comey adjudged the president as “amoral.” He declared the attorney general to be “formidable” but “lacking inner strength” unlike — the inference is clear — Comey himself. A strategy of insulting the executioner right before he swings his ax is an odd one but, then, Comey has a long record of odd decisions and questionable judgment.
“Amoral leaders [referring to the president] have a way of revealing the character of those around them,” wrote Comey without a hint of irony or self-awareness. Those whom the former FBI director assembled around him probably rue the day they ever met the man. Most are now fired or disgraced for appalling behaviors that Comey found easy to manipulate to advance his decisions.
Then, just to make sure his op-ed was odd-salted to the max, Comey mused that the president “eats your soul in small bites.” OK, let’s step back for a moment: James Comey appears to be in trouble. His strange, desperate statements and behaviors betray his nervousness and apprehension. In a way, it’s hard to watch.
Comey will claim that everything he did in the FBI was by the book. But after the investigations by Department of Justice Inspector General Michael Horowitz and U.S. Attorney John Huber, along with Barr’s promised examination, are completed, Comey’s mishandling of the FBI and legal processes likely will be fully exposed.
Ideally, Barr’s examination will aggregate information that addresses three primary streams.
The first will be whether the investigations into both presidential nominees and the Trump campaign were adequately, in Barr’s words, “predicated.” This means he will examine whether there was sufficient justification under existing guidelines for the FBI to have started an investigation in the first place.
The Mueller report’s conclusions make this a fair question for the counterintelligence investigation of the Trump campaign. Comey’s own pronouncement, that the Clinton email case was unprosecutable, makes it a fair question for that investigation.
The second will be whether Comey’s team obeyed long-established investigative guidelines while conducting the investigations and, specifically, if there was sufficient, truthful justification to lawfully conduct electronic surveillance of an American citizen.
The third will be an examination of whether Comey was unduly influenced by political agendas emanating from the previous White House and its director of national intelligence, CIA director and attorney general. This, above all, is what’s causing the 360-degree head spins.
There are early indicators that troubling behaviors may have occurred in all three scenarios. Barr will want to zero in on a particular area of concern: the use by the FBI of confidential human sources, whether its own or those offered up by the then-CIA director.
Without diving into the weeds, it’s important to understand that FBI counterintelligence investigations generally proceed sequentially from what is called a preliminary investigation or inquiry (PI) to a full investigation (FI). To move from a PI to an FI requires substantial information — predication — indicating investigative targets acted as agents of a foreign power.
This is problematic for Comey in light of Mueller’s findings. There are strict guidelines governing when the FBI can task a confidential source or a government undercover operative to collect against a U.S. citizen. Normally this is restricted to a full investigation, and normally restricted to the United States, not overseas.
There is a sense that Comey’s team was not checking the boxes, did not have adequate predication, and may have tasked sources before an investigation was even officially opened. Barr should pull case files and dig in on this.
In addition, the cast of characters leveraged by the FBI against the Trump campaign all appear to have their genesis as CIA sources (“assets,” in agency vernacular) shared at times with the FBI. From Stefan Halper and possibly Joseph Mifsud, to Christopher Steele, to Carter Page himself, and now a mysterious “government investigator” posing as Halper’s assistant and cited in The New York Times article, legitimate questions arise as to whether Comey was manipulated into furthering a CIA political operation more than an FBI counterintelligence case.
Some in the media have suggested that the Times article was an attempt by the FBI to justify its early confidential source actions. But current FBI Director Christopher Wray has shown that he would like to excise the cancerous tumor that grew during Comey’s time and not just keep smoking. It’s hard to imagine current FBI executives trying to justify past malfeasance.
James Comey is right to be apprehensive. He himself ate away at the soul of the FBI, not in small bites but in dangerously large ones. It was a dinner for one, though: His actions are not indicative of the real FBI. The attorney general’s comprehensive examination is welcome and, if done honestly and dispassionately, it will protect future presidential candidates of both parties and redeem the valuable soul of the FBI.
Kevin R. Brock, former assistant director of intelligence for the FBI, was an FBI special agent for 24 years and principal deputy director of the National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC). He is a founder and principal of NewStreet Global Solutions, which consults with private companies and public-safety agencies on strategic mission technologies.
https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciar...nd-he-knows-it
NXIVM had satellite centers all over the world. The CBC reports that one of the largest satellite centers was located in Vancouver, BC @3:30
What the CBC does not mention is that there is a deeper Canadian connection to NXIVM. Stephan Bronfman, the chief fundraiser and senior adviser to the Canadian prime minister, Justin Trudeau, is the first cousin of NXIVM founders and financiers Sara and Clare Bronfman’s father, Edgar. The larger Bronfman family is both Canadian and American.
Bronfman and Trudeau have their own entwined scandals including moving large sums of money to the Cayman Islands, bribes to Libya for SNC- Lavalin contracts that included prostitutes (sex slaves?) for Gaddafi’s son, and illegal donations to Trudeau’s Liberal Party.
And, from the NYPost on today’s trial...
https://nypost.com/2019/05/09/nxivm-...ed-on-witness/
There are currently 16 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 16 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote