Jim O posting in 3,2,1...
Haiti: 7.0 magnitude earthquake
Chile: 8.2 magnitude earthquake
(Chile earthquake actually released 500 times more energy)
Haiti death toll: ~300,000
Chile death toll: less than 500
Haiti building codes: none
Chile building codes: going back to 1920's, and heavily revamped in 1960's, strict codes regarding building and renovating to protect against such disasters.
Haiti international aid: over $1bn when you figure in cash and material aid, including military/security
Chile international aid: not even requested for 1 week, afterward no troops, and requests of up to $50mm from Red Cross and other agencies. No troops or logistic/police presence requested
But government intervention and regulation is baaaaaaad. It costs too much for everyone.
The Devil says: pay me now, or pay me later.
~WnyresidentBut your being a dick
Jim O posting in 3,2,1...
Raptor Jesus: He went extinct for your sins.
I doubt you'll find many, if any, sensible people who don't agree with building codes, especially in earth quake areas. However, to expect a building in the plains area to be built the same as a building in LA or San Fran isn't realistic.
"I know you guys enjoy reading my stuff because it all makes sense. "
Dumbest post ever! Thanks for the laugh PO!
Nope, it's not. Perhaps I don't give you enough credit, Doogs, but you ARE one of the more reasonable partisans around here. You recognize the value of at least some sort of intervention.
As NBuff pointed out though, there are plenty of people around who do nothing but bitch about any kind of regulation. There's Jimmuh, his lapdog Tronix (who admittedly hasn't been around), I think Nickelcity usually blows snotrockets when talking about gov't regulation of real estate development, &etc.
~WnyresidentBut your being a dick
But we can count on big corps to be honest and do the right thing. Since when do they sell out safety.. Never! (sarcasm)
“Two percent of the people think; three percent of the people think they think; and ninety-five percent of the people would rather die than think.”
Don't deliberately try to miss the point. Government regulation is not just good, but totally necessary, for a well ordered society.
~WnyresidentBut your being a dick
I disagree.
Safety is always the argument used to justify building codes. But for most of us, that argument is stretched to justify what are essentially home improvement taxes under the guise of building codes.
Putting up a fence, building a deck, laying a uni-lock patio, or installing a pool all require permits and inspection where I reside. I can't really see how any of those projects are legitimate public safety issues.
I'm not opposed to government regulation pertaining to the structural integrity of buildings, but it seems that regulations are always expanded to the point where they stray from their original intent, ie: public safety.
"I won't live by rules that make no sense to me." - Evan Tanner 1971-2008
Transfixus sed non Mortuus
You do realize that the Queen City of the Great Lakes is built on a fault line as well, don't you? And, according to a program that I watched recently on the Science Channel about the Great Lakes, Lakes Superior and Ontario were formed when a Rift Valley opened up in their location about twenty to twenty-five thousand years ago (an eyeblink in geologic time).
The worst earthquake is the next one that happens directly under you.
Think you can trust the government?
Ask an Indian!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)