Q_anon QPosts - Q Anonymous - (No Reply Thread)

[buffy]

Q
!!Hs1Jq13jV6
12 May 2020 - 7:59:58 PM


https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexled.../#56428ce2180f
Q
———————
First question I have is, WHY IS THIS IN THE TRAVEL SECTION of Forbes?

When is this nightmare going to end? Here’s a same day hit piece...

[buffy]

Q
!!Hs1Jq13jV6
13 May 2020 - 10:54:50 AM


DmHRTaGVsAAtI9I.jpg


https://twitter.com/QBlueSkyQ/status...66918223114240
Excellent find, Anon(s).
But, you must go back before you can go forward.


https://www.reuters.com/article/us-u...-idUSKBN1E202V
Why did U.S. District Court Judge Rudolph Contreras recuse?
https://www.fisc.uscourts.gov/current-membership
Judge Rudolph Contreras current member of FISC?
WHO SIGNED THE FLYNN FISA?
THE SWAMP RUNS DEEP.
Q
—————-
The FISC link shows Judge Contreras went back to the FISA COURT after recusing himself from the Flynn case. His FISC term runs from 2016 - 2023 and the judges rotate ‘on-call’ duties.

Original Q post from 8/31/18 is here at #1422, preceding that post are a few relevant posts regarding Supreme Court Justice, John Roberts, who appoints FISC judges and is supposed to be overseeing the FISC.

From the Reuters article...

Court spokeswoman Lisa Klem did not say why Contreras was recused, and added that the case was randomly reassigned.

Reuters could not immediately learn the reason for the recusal, or reach Contreras.

We know from the Strzok/Page emails that Strzok knew Judge Contreras and planned to talk to him about FISA warrants. .

Who signed the Flynn FISA? We know who signed the 4 Carter Page FISA’s.
We know that Peter Strzok reached out to the 7th floor to keep Flynn’s case open. However, the following exerpt From IG FISA Report indicates that the FBI/Crossfire Hurricane team DID NOT seek FISA’s on Manafort or Flynn.


https://www.justice.gov/storage/120919-examination.pdf

Who signed the Flynn FISA? Q said “the swamp runs deep” - some speculate that there was no warrant, therefore NO ONE SIGNED and the swamp is covering that up by claiming Flynn was picked up as incidental collection from routine monitoring of the Russian Ambassador. Others wonder if Obama’s Direct Order to the FISC (presented as a threat to National Security) was signed by Contreras. Remember, Obama made a big show of sanctioning Russia and expelling Russian Diplomats on December 29, 2016. Contreras could have signed it; FISC judge Rosemary Collier signed one for Crossfire Hurricane.

Q posted this on 8/28/28 (#1338)...
Who must sign off on FISA warrants?
Who directs the signers?
Given magnitude of spy campaign (U.S. Presidential Election Republican Party Nominee Candidate + President Elect + President of the United States) would HUSSEIN be required to DIRECT ORDER?

The Year 2020 is BIZARRE...

[buffy]

Q
!!Hs1Jq13jV6
13 May 2020 - 11:23:26 AM


EW4co5dWAAYy_Ft.jpg


https://www.breitbart.com/national-s...llary-clinton/
[Russia] narrative ALL FAKE?
Q
—————
There’s some good Qresearch attached to the original here at #3198

From Ed Henry’s Report...

Former National Security Council chief of staff Fred Fleitz made a similar claim in an article on FoxNews.com April 22:

House Intelligence Committee staff told me that after an exhaustive investigation reviewing intelligence and interviewing intelligence officers, they found that Brennan suppressed high-quality intelligence suggesting that Putin actually wanted the more predictable and malleable Clinton to win the 2016 election.

Instead, the Brennan team included low-quality intelligence that failed to meet intelligence community standards to support the political claim that Russian officials wanted Trump to win, House Intelligence Committee staff revealed. They said that CIA analysts also objected to including that flawed, substandard information in the assessment.

[buffy]

Q
!!Hs1Jq13jV6
13 May 2020 - 3:15:10 PM


EX01YkwXgAE1uIu.jpg


https://twitter.com/CBS_Herridge/sta...65533;�
Board under heavy attack.
Q
—————-
Anon made a request to Q+/Trump, which he answered concealed in a tweet. It was during this post at #3351

Needless to say, all hell broke loose after DNI, Rick Grenell released the names of those who requested unmaskings from Mike FLynn surveillance - one casualty was Q’s Qresearch board on 8kun - at Post #457)









Reminder...

[buffy]

Q
!!Hs1Jq13jV6
13 May 2020 - 3:38:27 PM

Anonymous
13 May 2020 - 3:28:56 PM


ClipboardImage.png
D5 date on the ODNI release…

>>9156649
Excellent find, Anon.
[They] thought it meant Dec [5] _State Funeral.
NSA
A lot more coming [soon].
Q
—————
Q doesn’t like to tip- off the enemy. “They” monitor the Qresearch boards for clues on what Q is revealing to the public. Q has been inserting ‘D5’ cryptically in posts; Anons figured out it referred to an avalanche danger scale with D5 being the largest and most deadly.




Anons also speculated that it was code for December 5th. During that time, Congress wanted to know what John Huber was up to and called him to testify - on Dec 5th. Here at Post #1876. The implication was that Huber would start the avalanche with his testimony. Q said G HW Bush’s State Funeral would serve to distract from Huber’s testimony. And, at Post #1891, Q asks if it’s a coincidence that Bush Sr’s funeral was held on D5 and all Congressional business was cancelled Then, on December 5th, Q explains the double meaning of D5 and how aware “they” were of its potential impact - here at #1903

We now see that the day “they” feared has arrived, not on Dec 5th, but with Nakasone’s stamped D5 notification that the release of classified information has been approved for release to Grenell. Q also says “think mirror” and uses the alphabet numerically, so, if you look at the 4th day as the letter D, and May as the fifth month of the year, you get D5. Double meanings.

[buffy]

Q
!!Hs1Jq13jV6
13 May 2020 - 4:28:56 PM

Anonymous
13 May 2020 - 4:01:54 PM


drip_drip.jpg

>>9157228

PAIN


EPS87P2XsAAuLgC.jpg

>>9157248
This is only the start.
Q
—————

[buffy]

Q
!!Hs1Jq13jV6
13 May 2020 - 5:03:21 PM


EX7IdRSWkAc8Axq.jpg
Dates are important.
FISA unmask request(s) [PRIOR TO] Amb. Kislyak phone call?
WHO ASKED AMB. KISLYAK TO CALL FLYNN [SET UP _FBI entrap + FISA [late] justify]?
Q
——————
UPDATE: Who Asked Kislyak to call? Looking at "important dates" Kislyak called Flynn on Dec. 28th - James Clapper unmasked Flynn on Dec. 28th!


It was someone advising Obama about foreign spies ...



We know that Clapper unmasked Flynn on the day of the phone call. It's logical that, perhaps, Susan Rice asked Kislyak to call Flynn, then, Clapper listened in. As Obama’s National Security Advisor, Rice was in a position to tell Kislyak that the incoming NSA, Flynn, is the one to express concerns going forward... Both Rice and Clapper are good guesses, but, given that Q said dates are important, Clapper fits the timeline.



Q is implying somewhat of a parallel construct was formed to entrap Flynn. Q said ‘dates are important’ so, it can’t be coincidental that Obama decided to sanction Russia over the ‘meddling’ and eject Russian diplomats on the same day that Flynn called Sergey Kislyak - December 29, 2016.

Michael Flynn’s Russia Timeline

The incoming Trump administration opposed the U.N. resolution, and Flynn was directed by a “very senior member of the Presidential Transition Team” to contact foreign governments, including Russia … to influence those governments to delay the vote or defeat the resolution,” according to the (Flynn) plea agreement. The “very senior member” of the transition team was not identified.

Here’s where the parallel construction comes in. The article reports a ‘very senior member’ - Trump’s Executive Committee member list is long, but a few names pop out including Steve Bannon, Reince Priebus (both asked to resign), Jared and Ivanka Kushner, and Don Jr. Since it’s inconceivable that any of the Trump kids could be the traitor, it’s possible that Jared may have been advised to pass advice along to Flynn.

[buffy]

Q
!!Hs1Jq13jV6
13 May 2020 - 5:14:55 PM

Anonymous
13 May 2020 - 5:07:27 PM


Housley_re_Flynn_DECLAS_5_13_20.png
>>9158421
>Dates are important.

THIS IS EXACTLY THE POINT!! Thank You.
https://twitter.com/adamhousley/stat...65533;�

'''How do they explain so many of the requests being PRIOR to the Kislyak call that SUPPOSEDLY was the predicate for the

investigation?'''
And Sgt Schultz? He must have forgotten he was on the list, considering what he told to George Stephanopoulos on Sunday
https://twitter.com/treehuggingsis/s...65533;�

>>9158507
Go back further.


https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/pol...donald-n995866
The 'Hook'.
Nov 30 'unmask' needed justification?
WHO SET UP THE MEETING?
WHO WAS DIRECTING AMB. KISLYAK TO MAKE CONTACT [MEETING + PHONE]?
Q
————-
‘Go back further’ - they were listening in much earlier. This posts builds on the theory that the Obama Administration DIRECTED Kislyak, and Jared Kushner was set up to advise Flynn. In hindsight, we also know that Don Jr. was set up with the Russian lawyer at Trump Tower meeting. Q told us in Post #2338 that Mueller’s team planned to indict the Trump kids.

From the article...



Remember, Brennan hinted that Trump family members would be indicted; he states it in a video here at Post #2362. Q told us Bill Barr put an end to Weissman’s plan to indict Ivanka, Jared and Don.

It’s the same tactic they used on Flynn!

The linked article mentions numerous suspects to chose from surrounding the Trump kids, but, especially Jared and the people who were contacting him. It’s an interesting read and full of intrigue - give it a read!

[buffy]

Q
!!Hs1Jq13jV6
13 May 2020 - 5:52:24 PM
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/n...-team📁
Q
——————-

[buffy]

Q
!!Hs1Jq13jV6
13 May 2020 - 6:31:54 PM

https://www.military.com/video/aircr...65533;�
Q
——————-
The next batch of DECLAS from Grenell will expose those who advised Kislyak and set up the Trump kids for a tie-in involvement with Russians.

[buffy]

Q
!!Hs1Jq13jV6
13 May 2020 - 8:18:52 PM
The point to understand.
They [knowingly] unmasked [attached names to] AFTER POTUS won the election of 2016.
They thought they could prevent the exposure of this information and remain protected.
Why did they believe this?
What 'insurance' did they have?
Infiltration of US GOV?
This fact alone should scare every American.
SHADOW PRESIDENCY.
SHADOW GOVERNMENT.
It took this long for a reason.
Q
—————
Senior Executive Services are DeepState permanent federal employees who are like-minded, self-serving deeply, and deeply embedded in the US GOV.









This is why Trump signed an Executive Order making it easier to fire a federal employee

[buffy]

Q
!!Hs1Jq13jV6
13 May 2020 - 8:50:43 PM


bbdb9a04fa8c19daaf579a962320823069d063f18ea850ab21 625a5565df06b5.jpg


https://twitter.com/antlive73_am/sta...37696📁
Panic?
Q
——————-
F*CKERBERG: "WE CAN'T STOP THE Q MEMES! WE CAN'T STOP THE Q MEMES! SOMEONE! ANYONE! WE NEED TO STOP THE Q MEMES! WE'LL GIVE ANYONE $100K IF THEY CAN OUTCODE THOSE DIGITAL SOLDIERS!

The dataset contains "multimodal content" — pieces of content where its meaning is derived from multiple different elements, which can be difficult for AI to understand.

https://www.businessinsider.com/face...archers-2020-5

Here’s an example of memes they would probably deem ‘hateful’...

[buffy]

Q
!!Hs1Jq13jV6
14 May 2020 - 11:08:27 AM




https://twitter.com/Stardust_1416/st...65533;�
Q
———————-
The next question should have been - organized by whom? Who is Q?

She knows Q’s laser is over the Target focused on her. Hillary paid for the dossier and orchestrated it’s path to the FISC. She conspired with Obama and his Administration to spy, falsely accuse, prosecute and continually try to overthrow the POTUS six ways from Sunday.

Sad to say, but, she will deny, deflect and project for eternity.




That’s not the worst of it...



Reference, look at Post #497, and, if your not familiar with Epstein’s Island, this page is astonishing.


PRODUCERS OF CHILD PORNOGRAPHY


https://vault.fbi.gov/fbi-communicat...-01-of-01/view

[buffy]

Q
!!Hs1Jq13jV6
14 May 2020 - 11:15:17 AM
[Example A]
Who [former WH staff][one or more] introduced [pushed] DAN COATS as DNI DIR to POTUS?
Who [former WH staff][one or more] insisted he could be trusted?
Knowingly or unknowingly?
Q
——————
What a mine field POTUS has/had to navigate through without detonating!

A couple Answers From Qresearch... keyword From Q is ‘former’ White House Staff

Unless ‘future proves past’ Mike Pence doesn’t fit the Post - that didn’t stop Anons from throwing Pence’s name out there - with references...



Pence recommended Coats, according to Coats in his testimony. He also said he was on a personal level with Comey from, Little League.

Mike Pence talked Dan Coats out of quitting the Trump administration. .

Aides to Mr. Trump seized upon that to suggest Mr. Coats was disloyal and should be fired. But he was shielded by Mr. Pence, a longtime protégé and former governor of Indiana.

So, not Pence, but his Chief of Staff was a spy for Strzok...


https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...investigation/
https://www.chicagotribune.com/natio...102-story.html

"Josh regularly communicates with Senator Coats and his staff on issues affecting Indiana and how to best advance Hoosier priorities," Coats spokesman Matt Lahr said in an emailed statement.

There’s Reince Priebus...

Reince became Chief of Staff as an olive branch extended to the RNC never-trumpers - the voice of the traditional GOP in the White House. But Trump never trusted him, and he never had the authority of a true chief of staff.

It has been a long, strange trip for Priebus, who came to Washington as GOP chairman in 2011 on a promise to reform a party in disarray. His story, in a way, is the story of the Republican Party itself: His initial wariness of Trump gave way to capitulation and then enabling. He swallowed his private qualms for the sake of the team, until his turn to be the victim of Trump’s pageant of dominance finally came—publicly disgraced, dismissed in a tweet.

It has been a long, strange trip for Priebus, who came to Washington as GOP chairman in 2011 on a promise to reform a party in disarray. His story, in a way, is the story of the Republican Party itself: His initial wariness of Trump gave way to capitulation and then enabling. He swallowed his private qualms for the sake of the team, until his turn to be the victim of Trump’s pageant of dominance finally came—publicly disgraced, dismissed in a tweet.

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics...riebus/535368/

Knowingly or Unknowingly?
In an example of being used unknowingly, Priebus was on Hannity (5/11/20) recently telling a story about being duped by McCabe about a ‘false’ NYTimes ‘Russia’ article that led Priebus to ask why the FBI doesn’t call them out on it. Next thing he knows, the narrative shifts to being that of PRIEBUS PRESSURING the FBI to rebuke NYTimes. Priebus was clearly saying McCabe set him up.


https://www.wlrn.org/post/white-hous...tacts#stream/0

[buffy]

Q
!!Hs1Jq13jV6
14 May 2020 - 11:44:58 AM


https://twitter.com/tomselliott/stat...65888📁
Is this about the virus OR ABOUT PROTECTING THEMSELVES?
>Mail-in-Ballot push [Election]
>[D] State bailout(s) push
>Refusal to testify re: fear of COVID-19
WHO BENEFITS THE MOST?
Q
———————










Watch -
https://media.8kun.top/file_dl/930e1...PHf1zS0y0d.mp4