DNC helped fund research - Why is this considered bad?

[WNYresident]

Clinton campaign, DNC helped fund research that led to salacious Trump dossier

The controversial dossier containing salacious allegations about President Donald Trump and his possible connections to Russia, including coordination between the Trump campaign and the Kremlin, resulted from funding by Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee to the firm Fusion GPS, a source familiar with the situation confirmed to Fox News.
Fusion GPS was retained by Marc E. Elias, an attorney representing the DNC and the Clinton campaign, The Washington Post first reported Tuesday. Fusion GPS then reportedly hired former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele to write the now-infamous dossier.
Steele had ties both to the U.S. intelligence community and the FBI.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017...port-says.html



Why is it important who paid for the research?

[sharky]

Because it shows that the real collusion with Russia was being done by democrats. Wasn't the pee thing proven false eventually?

[WNYresident]

I haven't looked it up but was it true or false? There was a story that Clinton made a comment that if Trump is elected we are all going to hang. I wonder if they were so sure they were going to win the election they didn't care what they were doing. They assumed they would sweep it all under the rug and walk away with millions.

What a horrible judge of character some of the local political parties have looking back all of this.

[WNYresident]

UNDER THE BUS: NY Times Says Clinton Campaign 'LIED' for Over a Year

The left-leaning New York Times is distancing itself from the Clinton campaign following a bombshell report that the DNC was behind the debunked Trump Dossier; saying Hillary’s lawyer “pushed back” when the newspaper “tried to report” the story.

Two prominent journalists from the Times publicly lashed-out at the Clinton camp on social media, saying DNC lawyers “pushed back” on the story when the newspaper began probing the debunked Trump Dossier months ago.

“When I tried to report this story, Clinton campaign lawyer @marceelias pushed back vigorously, saying "You (or your sources) are wrong,” posted reporter Kenneth Vogel.

“Folks involved in funding this lied about it, and with sanctimony, for a year,” wrote Maggie Haberman, the White House correspondent for the NY Times.

https://www.hannity.com/content/2017...r-over-a-year/

[BorderBob]

A GOP challenger opened the account. Clinton/DNC/Dems picked it up when he dropped out. It was widely reported and has zero to do with the dossiers veracity. This is Nunes, trying to deflect something, probably coming out of Muellers shop. Soon.




b.b.

[4248]

Haven't we learned yet - facts don't matter when it comes to the Clintons. There's so many others involved in so many cover ups - they can't now start telling the truth. Loyals will dismiss anything and everything that comes to light.
Nothing will come of any of this - the only thing the Dems/media will ever agree on is Trump should not be President.

[BorderBob]

He shouldn't.



b.b.