Linda: the openings aren't "deceiving"; they are what they are.Originally Posted by Linda_D
Job openings can be very deceiving since there are always many more openings at the bottom of the pile than higher up the wage scale.Originally Posted by Achbek1
Mom's Crafty Gift shop, Fashion Bug, and Wilson Farms all together have fewer than 50 cashiers all working part time for $.50 over the minimum wage and no benies. Cashiers are always leaving for something "better", so there might be 50-70 "openings" at those retail stores over the course of the year.
Manufacturers like Chevy Tonawanda, Dunlop Tire or Otokampuu American Brass each employ hundreds of workers, almost all full time with good pay and benefits. Few employees leave unless they get laid off, fired for cause, retire or die, so there might be fewer than 30 openings among all three over the course of a year.
Your right to buy a military weapon without hindrance, delay or training cannot trump Daniel Barden’s right to see his eighth birthday. -- Jim Himes
Linda: the openings aren't "deceiving"; they are what they are.Originally Posted by Linda_D
Truth springs from argument among friends.
I think Linda made an excellent post.
Raw data can become misinformation without the right context, and she put it into context.
I disagree.
There was no trend analysis in her comments, no explicit linkage between the two groups she profiled and no conclusion.
It seemed like an intake of breath, preparatory to a longer exposition.
Truth springs from argument among friends.
My point is that a high rate of turn-over among some kinds of jobs and a low rate among other kinds can make it look like there may be more of one type of job than another if you only look at job "openings" rather than at the actual number of jobs themselves. It was a response to Achbek's post that implied that manufacturing jobs in WNY had virtually disappeared since 2002 when manufacturing still employed the largest number of workers.Originally Posted by biker
Your right to buy a military weapon without hindrance, delay or training cannot trump Daniel Barden’s right to see his eighth birthday. -- Jim Himes
Now that's getting back to your normal clarity (when dealing with non-partisan topics), Linda.Originally Posted by Linda_D
I took Achebeks original post to mean the absolute number of jobs, not the number of openings.
In my field, it's like discussions of the money supply. The discussion could be about volume (absolute amount) or velocity (its passage through the economy).
I also think that the day when mfg is not the most numerous in WNY came a lot sooner than 2002, but she knows the stats apparently.
I understand (and did so posts earlier) that cashiers jobs experience a lot of turnover as people use those entry-level jobs as a perch from which to find something better.
But the fact is that there will be more job openings for cashiers than for pattern-makers at Chevy Tonawanda. And the point of her informational post was, which occupations will have the most openings over the next X years.
Truth springs from argument among friends.
Originally Posted by biker
... and just what was being manufactured in those factories run by the German's during the war? I don't think it was sewing machines, coffee pots and candy.
"God's grace and mercy have brought you through. Quit acting as if you made it on your own." ~ T. D. Jakes
"Political Correctness is a doctrine fostered by a dilusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end." ~ Unknown
The way to get started is to quit talking and begin doing. ~ Walt Disney
12/21/2012
Of course not, Crisco.Originally Posted by Crisco Kid
But before the war they were.
Unless you just feel like arm-wrestling, you do see the point, right? There were no factories of any type left anywhere in Europe or Asia by the end of WWII.
The world bought American for the first few post WWII years. Which was great for Buffalo, Toledo, Pittsburgh, Detroit.....
Truth springs from argument among friends.
Ooosh... Sorry to cause so much controversy
The Economic Census is done every five years but it takes a LONG TIME for the data to be released. We can examine it to see if there have been changes between 1997 and 2002.
Here are the links to the Economic Census data so that you can examine it for yourselves:
1997: http://www.census.gov/epcd/ec97/ny/NY029.HTM
2002: http://www.census.gov/econ/census02/data/ny/NY029.HTM
1997: 63,234 paid employees in manufacturing
2002: 57,645 paid employees in manufacturing
That evens out to a loss of 5589 paid employees in manufacturing which, depending on the circumstances, could or could not equal the actual number of losses in manufacturing jobs.
I'm just here to make people laugh. And to confuse people. Oh, and to irritate people.
Look at what the numbers don't tell us... industries like IT, Construction, and Finance are not even reported.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)