Quote:
(1) I am sorry for your uneasiness. I wish you safety in your travels.
Thanks...
Quote:
(A) "Pound sand." How intellectually thoughtful. I am sure, or at least hope, that you can do better than that.
Not really.
Quote:
(B) 8 years of unprecedented obstruction. Are you referring to the years 2001-2009?
Dems worked with Bush on lots of things. Many of which I disagreed with. No where even close to the inaction of the Obama years by the gop. This shouldn't even be argued.
Quote:
(C) "SCOTUS appointee was stolen." That sounds like another left-wing talking point, like the Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Michigan recounts, the "stolen election," the Russians, and all of the other nonsense.
I agree with Vice President Biden, who suggested during an outgoing Republican administration, that no SCOTUS appointment should be filled during a Presidential election year. Therefore, the election properly addressed the SCOTUS vacancy issue.
I don't . I voted for a President. Along with that vote was a contract that he would appoint Judges. That was taken away.
Quote:
(5) I do not know what you are talking about here. The Guiliani group is a historic fact. But, I am sure that the unbiased news media will focus like a laser beam on all potential follies of the Trump administration, and crow kudos on the Congressional Democrats.
BTW, still no attorney general. What's the hold up? I may be pounding sand, but I am curious to know what the tantrumatic Senators are pounding?
Unless I am mistaken, GOP can hold a vote anytime they want to confirm him just as they did with Devos. I don't know why they are delaying. Do they not have the votes? If not, is it because there are serious questions and concerns about Sessions record?
Quote:
If Ms. Yates's opinion was based on professional and moral grounds, why did she not resign, like Richardson and Ruckelshaus? Why did she wait to be terminated? A little political theater there?
Why would she resign? This makes no sense to me. How can she do her job if she quits?
Quote:
I guess we will have to wait to see how the Ninth Circuit dance goes. I'll bet that the "unbiased" Ninth Circuit will do the correct thing: for you.
I guess. Not for me though.