I'm sure that the Democrats worked hand in hand during Bush years.
Printable View
I'm sure that the Democrats worked hand in hand during Bush years.
I have nothing against peaceful protests, nor do I recall people that didn't vote for Obama crying and causing mayhem because they didn't get their way. You see Miles here's the difference. Conservatives want the country to be fixed and know it will be arduous and demanding. Lefties would prefer the government give them something and keep on our ruinous path, or they threaten to move, cause violence, etc etc. Even suicide hotlines are overwhelmed.. Seriously? Romney was 100% correct. Tough times ahead with 20 trillion in debt , so I would suggest millenials, the left, and liberals toughen up a bit.
Hopefully the snowflakes assume their customary fetal position as opposed to the violence which will only beget violence from groups that could make that a serious proposition.
Oh really?
http://i.imgur.com/J1hSHPi.jpg
Like I said before... people on SUWNY have the memory of a goldfish.
So you think a few pictures from a twisted subset of people are an equivalent magnitude of what's going on now? Sounds like the protesters are calling for you.
He's got a great memory I am sure he'll find you an example.
Why would they be calling for me? I voted for Trump.
I thought this thread was to post memes about the election.
Here's one for you:
https://tse3.mm.bing.net/th?id=OIP.M...00do0&pid=15.1
Now that the "Wicked Witch From The East" has decided to join the recount the vote folly.
President elect Trump should reconsider and bring criminal charges against our former First Lady.
Have to remember the people pushing for the recount are doing what is legal to do. The reasoning behind doing the recount is weak seeing the process is only being done in states where Trump won. If it was about the integrity the recounts would be with states where either candidate won.
So, lets play this out. Trump decides to prosecute Clinton (he doesn't have the authority, but I will play along). He gets an indictment. Probable cause, more likely than not. Now we go to trial. Less than half the country voted for him, but he needs 12 of 12 to convict. Beyond a reasonable doubt. Much higher standard. What are the odds that ONE PERSON, and he only needs one, votes to acquit. Or Jury nullification.
No conviction.
The chargeable section has never been tested. The "Gross negligence" standard may be overly broad and wouldn't survive appeal
No conviction.
AUSA's like slam dunks. This was never a slam dunk.
Oh, and we don't persecute political opponents.
b.b.