Originally Posted by
mark blazejewski
I know nothing "for sure" about this attachment.
Am I to understand that the attachment under post #368 is a cropped version of your entire attachment on post #354 which is entirely unintelligible, and perhaps it was deliberately posted that way?
Why is that entire attachment on post #354 unintelligible, yet what may be a cropped version of the attachment on post #354 under post #368 is very readable? It only shows the comments of two posters, and nothing else.
Ergo, if in fact the attachment that you present under post #368 is a cropped version of the attachment on post #354, it stands to reason that you have the ability to post a very readable version of the entire post which appears on post #354, eh?
Be transparent Breezy, and post a readable version of the entire attachment on post #354. That may give the reader an opportunity to view the date, the substance of the post and further verifying information, or is the attachments on posts #354 and #368 just another one of your cut and paste forgeries?