Speakupwny.com
Buffalo News, Forums and Opinions
Live Forums and Blogs | Onlinebuffalo.com | Erie County | City of Buffalo 

Last Updated: Oct 28th, 2018 - 14:30:43 

Speakupwny.com 
Development
Editorials
Education
WNY News
Government Waste
Labor & Management
Letters to the Editor
Local Opinions
Local WNY Websites
New Government Structure
Politics
Preservation
Press Releases
Taxes and Fees
WNY Health
WNY Business
Reviews
Buffalo Sports
Insiders Corner



Politics

Vote YES to 4 Councilmen in West Seneca
By Daniel T. Warren
Oct 28, 2018, 14:25
Email this article
 Printer friendly page
It is time to end the failed experiment called "downsizing" by going to the back of the ballot and voting YES to 4 Councilmen on November 6th. Some are saying that the goals of downsizing were:

1) Lowering Taxes - By reducing the size of the town board and eliminating long term health and pension benefits
2) Increase citizen involvement
3) Establish open government, a forum for open debate and ideas
4) A grass roots movement, not a top down government

However these goals were not fulfilled after 9 years.

1) We did not see any lowering of taxes. Taxes have gone up faster than the rate of inflation ($8.7 million and 27.3% over 9 years). We have hired a lot more than 2 positions at higher rates of pay than those downsizing abolished together with long term health and pension benefits.

2) We have not seen increase in citizen involvement. In fact what we have seen is efforts to decrease citizen participation. (e.g. 3:00 p.m. meetings have increased, an attempt to eliminate citizens speaking at board meetings, etc.)

3) There has been at least 1 lawsuit over the Town's failure to adhere to the Open Meetings Law and we do not have a forum for open debate and ideas that are a result of the downsizing in 2009.

4) The effort to restore our Town Board to 5 is a grass roots movement. Hamburg has already went back to a 5 member Town Board because downsizing did not deliver on its goals.

Some also say that if we elect the same people, we will have the same problem whether the numbers are 3 or 5.

First, we have not elected the same people. Since going to a 3 member Town Board there has been 3 different Town Boards with different membership composition.

Second, while electing quality people to hold office is important, those who make this argument to retain a 3 member Town Board overlook the structural issues with a dangerously small legislative body that James Madison warned us of in the Federalist #55.

With a 3 member board there are only 3 combination of votes to pass/defeat an item, however with a 5 member board there 10 combinations of votes to pass/defeat an item. So while it may be 1 vote that decides an issue there are much more combination of votes so that 1 vote is not necessarily the same vote.

"The first thing is human nature. After all, a board is nothing more than a group of human beings trying to work together to create the best results for the organization they are charged with directing and protecting. Human beings work best in groups of a certain size. Over the years a number of studies have been conducted on the effectiveness of group decision making. One such study by the authors of Decide and Deliver: 5 Steps to Breakthrough Performance in Your Organization determined that the optimum size for a decision-making group was seven people and that for each person added above this, the group’s decision making effectiveness was reduced by 10%. (Note 3) Another study found that the most effective number was five, but then noted that the effectiveness of the group decision making in groups between five and eight neither increases nor decreases. (Notes 7,8) Drawing from these studies, it would seem that the ideal board size as far as human decision making is somewhere between five and eight." http://dorgerconsulting.com/2011/07/20/size-matters-right-sizing-your-board-of-directors/

Vote YES on November 6 to restore our representation and begin the path to a more effective government.

http://www.restore-representation-west-seneca.org/

© Copyright 2017 - Speakupwny.com
hosted by Online Media, Inc
Buffalo Web Design and Web Hosting

Top of Page

Politics
Latest Headlines
Vote YES to 4 Councilmen in West Seneca
It is time for West Seneca to restore its representation!
West Seneca’s only hope of changing its direction is to vote out the incumbents
Lancaster public hearings of July 1, 2013 - Part IV: Special Use Permit
Lancaster public hearing on code text change - Part III
Lancaster public hearings on code text change - Part II
Lancaster public hearing on code text change - Part I
Lancaster appoints police officer: Part II: Resident and board comments
Lancaster appoints police officer based on Police Chief's recommendation
Lancaster Town Board, a new beginning or status quo
What Fudoli’s victory means to the “regulars”
Lancaster election, time to consider the issues
Fudoli/Giza debate, Part: II
Fudoli/Giza debate, Part I
Lancaster acted irresponsibly on police building project asserts resident, Part II: Contingency



Buffalo Web hosting and Buffalo Web Design By OnLineMedia, Inc
www.olm1.com

Part of
www.onlinebuffalo.com