Buffalo News, Forums and Opinions
Live Forums and Blogs | Onlinebuffalo.com | Erie County | City of Buffalo 

Last Updated: Jan 14th, 2024 - 09:26:32 

WNY News
Government Waste
Labor & Management
Letters to the Editor
Local Opinions
Local WNY Websites
New Government Structure
Press Releases
Taxes and Fees
WNY Health
WNY Business
Insiders Corner

Taxes and Fees

Lancaster Final 2011 Budget Proposal
By Lee Chowaniec
Nov 12, 2010, 18:36
Email this article
 Printer friendly page
This Monday evening the Lancaster Town Board will vote on the revised preliminary town budget and the Special Districts budget. The Special Districts budget is the same as was proposed in the tentative budget. The town budget appropriations (expenditures) were cut from $23.23 million to $22.68 million - $556,777 or 2.37%.

Considering two line items in the Recreation Filing Fee Fund budget were slashed by $130,000 and the Appropriated Fund Balance (Reserves) was now considered not needed, it was also removed from the budget, and the budget was actually reduced by $426,777. It also means that the amount of Appropriated Fund Balance (Reserves) used to offset the difference between appropriations (expenditures) and revenues drops from $1.11 million to $978,735 and leaves near $3 million in reserves for next year’s budget; and will again wind up being well over $4 million next year when there will be three Town Board seats up for re-election and a fiscally responsible budget can be had.

Bottom Line

The bottom line is that with the budget cuts the new tax rate will be reduced from 8.28 to 8.11 (dollars per thousand dollars of assessed valuation). The property tax on a home assessed at $100,000 will lessen from $986.34 (includes refuse and water) to $969.34. Under the 2010 budget tax rate of 8.19 that homeowner would have paid $977; had his or her assessment remained the same.
An individual whose assessment went up $30,000 would now pay $243 more in taxes instead of $248 under the preliminary proposed budget.

It appears quite clear that the several individuals who spoke out against the tentative budget had some effect on getting the fiscally irresponsible budget reduced. But will this reduction satisfy those who review what was taken out of the budget, what was left in and how little of the reserves were used.

Despite slashing $426,777 from the tentative budget, the spending in the Final Budget (excluding Special Districts) still increases by $1.35 million, 6.33%. Fewer reserves ($130,000)were also spent to lower the tax levy.

Adjustments to the Budget

General Fund – Townwide ($272,000)

Ambulance - $40,000
Youth Incentives (Lancaster contractual) - $5,000
Youth Incentive (Depew contractual) - $2,000
Worker’s Comp (Volunteer Ambulance) - $60,000
Bond Anticipation Notes (Principal) - $165,000

General Fund –Town Outside of Villages ($33,600)

All from the Disaster Preparedness Fund

Police Fund ($21,530)

Overtime for patrol - $20,000 (from $200,000 to $180,000)
Employee Benefits (Social Security Tax) - $1,530

Highway Department ($99,647)

New Hire Denial - $55,203
Wage increase for added seasonal help - +$12,500
Retirement ell Backs - $35,000
Social Security Tax - $5,944
Interfund Transfer for Self Health Insurance - $16,000

Recreation Filing Fee Fund

Culture & Recreation (Equipment & Capital Outlay) - $120,000 (from $120,000 to $0)

Culture & Recreation (Contractual Expense) - $10,000 (from $10,000 to $0)

Appropriate Fund Balance – Was $168,000, now $38,500 because of cuts (-$130,000)

Summary of Adjustments



For those that believe that taxes were reduced for everyone because the 2011 tax rate of 8.11 is lower than the 8.19 tax rate of 2010, think again. After reval, and especially like the one that took place in Lancaster where total property valuation increased by $300 million, the tax rate always fall below the previous year’s.

The tentative budget tax rate increase of 8.28 was obscene and was attributable to the obscene spending increase of 8.94%. The question now becomes whether this final budget proposal is fiscally responsible. At a time of economic crisis, should a town budget that increase spending by 6.33% be considered responsible? A town budget that along with the Special Districts budget increases spending from $28.15 million in 2010 to $29.69, or by 5.47%.

Lastly, there are several questions that need asking on some of the cuts; like the principal on the Bond Anticipation Notes; $165,000.

Your comments would be appreciated.

© Copyright 2023 - Speakupwny.com
hosted by Online Media, Inc
Buffalo Web Design and Web Hosting

Top of Page

Buffalo Theatre District
Taxes and Fees
Latest Headlines

An open letter to County Executive Mark Poloncrarz
2012 proposed Lancaster budget, fiscally responsible or smoke and mirrors; Part III: Government Waste
2012 proposed Lancaster budget, fiscally responsible or smoke and mirrors; Part II
2012 proposed Lancaster budget, fiscally responsible or smoke and mirrors; Part I
Tentative 2012 Lancaster budget holds the line on taxes
Library funding chaos, the taxpayer still foots the bill
Lancaster financial audit found favorable; sound and solid
Lancaster approves 2011 budget, Part III: Conclusion
Lancaster approves 2011 budget, Part II: Resident input
Lancaster approves 2011 budget
Lancaster Final 2011 Budget Proposal
Lancaster 2011 budget public hearing: Part V: Debt Service, closing comments
Lancaster 2011 budget public hearing: Part IV: Police budget
Lancaster 2011 budget public hearing: Part III: Highway Department Budget
Lancaster 2011 budget public hearing: Part II: 2011 General Fund Budget

Buffalo Web hosting and Buffalo Web Design By OnLineMedia, Inc

Part of