Fortunately the majority of Supreme Court Judges who decided this case were not as mentally challenged as you. When you see a sign that says "Fine for Littering" do you think it means "its OK to litter here" instead of realizing that is part of a larger set of laws that prohibit littering?
Oh, and Robert's bitched slapped Scalia with Scalia's oqwn words from the earlier Obamacare opinion - in which Scalia claimed the law allowed the federal government to do exactly what he claimed they could not do now. So Scalia's "meaning of words" is like Humpty Dumpy - only in Scalia's world words mean exactly whatever he wants them to mean whenever he wants them to mean what he wants.
It is implausible that Congress meant the Act to operate in this manner. See National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, 567 U. S. ___, ___ (2012) (SCALIA, KENNEDY, THOMAS, and ALITO, JJ., dissenting) (slip op., at 60) (“Without the federal subsidies . . . the exchanges would not operate as Congress intended and may not operate at all.”). Congress made the guaranteed issue and community rating requirements applicable in every State in the Nation. But those requirements only work when combined with the coverage requirement and the tax credits. So it stands to reason that Congress meant for those provisions to apply in every State as well."