Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 19 of 19

Thread: Billions of our tax dollars go over seas to support Frances economy -

  1. #16
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    1,195
    Quote Originally Posted by leftWNYbecauseofBS View Post
    There will never be a rail system that connects the East Coast to the West Coast. It's silly to even hope for such a thing. Not every city needs to be connected. Each state should develop their own network and then, maybe, go to the Federal level for interstate or international connections. That's an easier project to implement.

    Back to NY, if NYS ever found the will to connect it's 4 major cities without the burden of stopping in every district that votes, that would be an amazing asset to NYS. Not only for the connectivity of cities but also the TOD development that would happen. No way in hell would you get Congress to foot the bill for that.
    Agreed. Needs to be nonstop to just major cities. You lose the benefit of high speed if you can't actually get up to high speed.

  2. #17
    Member leftWNYbecauseofBS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    10,873
    Quote Originally Posted by Jeff View Post
    Agreed. Needs to be nonstop to just major cities. You lose the benefit of high speed if you can't actually get up to high speed.
    Send a memo to California. lol

  3. #18
    Member 300miles's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Buffalo
    Posts
    9,612
    Quote Originally Posted by leftWNYbecauseofBS View Post
    Each state should develop their own network and then, maybe, go to the Federal level for interstate or international connections. That's an easier project to implement.
    After all your arguing, you're basically agreeing with me that a integrated interstate system requires federal leadership. If you're just saying that's not likely to happen, I won't disagree. But even the state-level projects we see today in California and NYS only exist in the first place because they have seed investment from the Federal Govt. It may be true that a continental, federally planned rail system is unlikely to happen anytime soon, but it's also unlikely that any individual state would have a realistic rail plan of their own without federal involvement.

  4. #19
    Member leftWNYbecauseofBS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    10,873
    Quote Originally Posted by 300miles View Post
    After all your arguing, you're basically agreeing with me that a integrated interstate system requires federal leadership. If you're just saying that's not likely to happen, I won't disagree. But even the state-level projects we see today in California and NYS only exist in the first place because they have seed investment from the Federal Govt. It may be true that a continental, federally planned rail system is unlikely to happen anytime soon, but it's also unlikely that any individual state would have a realistic rail plan of their own without federal involvement.
    No. I said states should build networks that provide benefits to the state. If the federal government wants to come in after and make connections, that's up to them. But if they didn't it would not take away from what the states did. There is a difference.

    Honestly, the only way I ever see major improvements in HS rail is if it's done in the private market but that's pretty much impossible.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. THE MATH OF IMMIGRATION DETENTION = BILLIONS of tax dollars
    By 4248 in forum Morning Breakfast - Breaking News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: December 18th, 2015, 03:53 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •