Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 17 of 17

Thread: Why keep the Marine Drive Apartments?

  1. #16
    Member 300miles's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Buffalo
    Posts
    9,612
    Quote Originally Posted by NY The Vampire State View Post
    Where exactly are you going to develop at canalside. Its basically the board walk and a few hundred feet of grass to the skyway. There is no room to put buildings on.
    Go look at Google Earth. Seriously. Canalside itself, where the Aud used to be, is still a giant construction site with no buildings. The only one planned is the Children's Museum. All the other spaces are still unclaimed. All those sites around the skyway are also available for development. The site next to Harbor Center is also ready for development. Go look around Erie Basin Marina and condos. All those parking lots and unused grass areas, all potential development sites that sit unused.

  2. #17
    Member Linda_D's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    God's Own Country ... the Southern Tier
    Posts
    8,222
    Quote Originally Posted by 4248 View Post
    Thank Goodness the Vamp has lost ground on the tear down issue -

    The only people who want the Marine Drive apartments down are developers who see another possible tax dollar subsidized development.

    Its a wonderful group of rent controlled housing units - has a good mix of residents of all ages. For the most part people who live there take pride in their apartments and surrounding area.

    I have been in those buildings literaly hundreds of times - they come under attack by developers every couple years. Some outsiders wanted them turned into condo's - some wanted them torn down.

    The only thing that raises this issue is "MONEY" -

    Some say why have people paying so little (Rental Range: $305 - $576 Bedrooms: 1 - 4) - when we can collect higher rents - more taxes simply by displaced the vary same people who these buildings were built to house.
    Well said. Right now, those buildings do nothing for developers because all that's done to them is maintenance and minor upgrades, which is why the developers want to get their hands on them. I don't know how much they "cost" the taxpayers at this point, either. Definitely much less than building new subsidized housing.

    BTW, privatizing those buildings into condos or tearing them down would be a "double dip" for the developers ... whom in Buffalo probably represent fewer firms/individuals than a normal person has digits on one of his/her hands because they would NOT only get the land/buildings for development, they would also then get more develop work to build newer, more expensive subsidized housing for the displaced tenants of those 600+ units.
    Your right to buy a military weapon without hindrance, delay or training cannot trump Daniel Barden’s right to see his eighth birthday. -- Jim Himes

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Why do the marine drive apartments exists?
    By WNYresident in forum Morning Breakfast - Breaking News
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: September 14th, 2009, 04:32 PM
  2. Marine drive Apt complex
    By jbinbny in forum Morning Breakfast - Breaking News
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: April 25th, 2005, 07:57 AM
  3. Marine Drive Apartments
    By WNYresident in forum Morning Breakfast - Breaking News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: February 3rd, 2004, 04:05 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •